Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE SOCİOLOGY OF LEİSURE İN THE CONTEXT OF DIGİTALİSATİON OF COMMUNİCATİON PROCESSES

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 23, 287 - 311, 31.12.2023

Ahmet Elnur

https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1351469

Abstract

The increasing impact of digital technologies on social interactions within the framework of leisure activities reveals the necessity of expanding the scope of the sociology of leisure to include communication processes. Within the scope of this study, which aims to explore the effects of the digitalisation of communication processes on the field of sociology of leisure time, the studies conducted in the disciplines of communication studies, sociology and leisure studies that address the effects of the transformation in communication processes on leisure time are synthesised in the light of a comprehensive literature review. In this direction, firstly, the results of the change from traditional communication methods to digital platforms such as social media are examined, and the difficulties that arise as well as the increase in speed and access in communication processes as a result of digitalisation are revealed. In the second part, the effects of digitalisation on society and leisure time, including the evaluation of leisure time in the digital environment and various problems specific to the digital age, are examined. In the last part of the study, the transformative effects of the spread of digital communication on the field of digital leisure are analysed, and in this context, it is revealed how the field of sociology of leisure is restructured in the digital age. Technological developments in the digital age make it necessary to carry out new theoretical studies in the field of the sociology of leisure in line with the in-depth examination of the effects of virtual interactions, digital inequality, gaming experiences, digital leisure time and social media. The adoption of an interdisciplinary approach, which brings together the fields of communication, sociology, tourism and technology, emerges as a highly significant issue in order to comprehensively understand the interactional relationship between the phenomena of leisure and digitalisation and to reveal more effective strategies in the context of ensuring the sustainability of leisure.

Keywords

Digital Communication Digital Leisure Sociology of Leisure Technological Transformation

References

  • Adeyemi, A., & Ise-Oluwa Ige, I. (2022). Exploring digital media as a technology tool for leisure among Nigerian university students. International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure, 5(4), 489-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41978-022-00119-5
  • Aguilera-Carnerero, C., & Azeez, A. H. (2016). ‘Islamonausea, not Islamophobia’: The many faces of cyber hate speech. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 9(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr.9.1.21_1
  • Ahad, A. D., & Lim, S. M. A. (2014). Convenience or nuisance?: The ‘WhatsApp’dilemma. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.278
  • Albrechtslund, A. M., & Albrechtslund, A. (2014). Social media as leisure culture. First Monday, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i4.4877
  • Asimah, V. K., Hurriyati, R., Gaffar, V., & Wibowo, L. A. (2022). Virtual leisure and recreation reality and well-being during COVID-19 pandemic-the future of Ghana tourism: Does technological self-efficacy matter? African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 11(6), 1860-1877. https://doi.org/10.46222/ajhtl.19770720.329
  • Backlund, E. A., & Kuentzel, W. F. (2013). Beyond progression in specialization research: Leisure capital and participation change. Leisure Sciences, 35(3), 293-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2013.780543
  • Bai, H., & Gao, K. (2021). The study of social media alienation in the digitized world. 5th International Seminar on Education, Management and Social Sciences.
  • Bassyiouny, M., & Wilkesmann, M. (2023). Going on workation – Is tourism research ready to take off? Exploring an emerging phenomenon of hybrid tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives, 46, 101096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101096
  • Baym, N. K. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Polity.
  • Beck, U. (1998). Politics of risk society. J. Franklin (Ed.), The politics of risk society içinde (s. 9–22). Polity.
  • Blanco, A., (2016). The transformation of leisure in the digital age. B. Çoban (Ed.), Social media and social movements: The transformation of communication patterns içinde (s. 165-179). Lexington Books.
  • Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
  • Bullingham, L., & Vasconcelos, A. C. (2013). ‘The presentation of self in the online world’: Goffman and the study of online identities. Journal of Information Science, 39(1), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551512470051
  • Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. Oxford University Press.
  • Cavalcante, F. R. (2020). Aplicativos para smartphones que possibilitam o lazer em tempos de lockdown: entre a socialização, o entretenimento e as práticas corporais. LICERE-Revista Do Programa De Pós-graduação Interdisciplinar Em Estudos Do Lazer, 23(3), 369-390. https://doi.org/10.35699/2447-6218.2020.25449
  • Chen, Y., Sherren, K., Smit, M., & Lee, K. Y. (2023). Using social media images as data in social science research. New Media & Society, 25(4), 849-871. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211038761
  • Choi, N. G., & DiNitto, D. N. (2013). The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, ehealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(5), e93. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2645
  • Church, K., & de Oliveira, R. (2013). What's up with WhatsApp?: comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services.
  • Cousineau, L. S., Kumm, B. E., & Schultz, C. (2023). Surveillance, capitalism, leisure, and data: Being watched, giving, becoming. Leisure Sciences, 45(5), 451-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2023.2197455
  • Cover, R. (2023). Identity and digital communication: Concepts, theories, practices. Taylor & Francis.
  • Crawford, G. (2012). Video gamers. Routledge.
  • Cunningham, S., & Craig, D. (2019). Social media entertainment: The new intersection of Hollywood and Silicon Valley. NYU Press.
  • de Bruijn, M. (2014). Connecting in mobile communities: An African case study. Media, Culture & Society, 36(3), 319-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443714521088
  • de Vere Hunt, I., & Linos, E. (2022). Social media for public health: Framework for social media–based public health campaigns. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(12), e42179. https://doi.org/10.2196/42179
  • Denovan, A., & Macaskill, A. (2017). Building resilience to stress through leisure activities: A qualitative analysis. Annals of Leisure Research, 20(4), 446-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2016.1211943
  • Dhiman, D. B. (2023). Key issues and new challenges in new media technology in 2023: A critical review. Journal of Media & Management, 5(1), 1-4.
  • Dong, Z. S., Meng, L., Christenson, L., & Fulton, L. (2021). Social media information sharing for natural disaster response. Natural Hazards, 107, 2077-2104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04528-9
  • Dorsey, A. & Collier, R. (2018). Origins of sociological theory. ED-Tech Press.
  • Duerden, M. D., Courtright, S. H., & Widmer, M. A. (2018). Why people play at work: A theoretical examination of leisure-at-work. Leisure Sciences, 40(6), 634-648. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01490400.2017.1327829
  • Ebrahim, A. F., Behrouz, M. B., & Morteza, V. N. (2016). Legal and juridical aspects of virtual games: An overview of Islamic and Iran's Law. Social Crimonol, 4(153), 2. https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4435.1000153
  • Eisenstein, E. L. (1980). The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge University Press.
  • Erden, K. (2019). The evaluation of social media within the context of the silencing system. Uluslararası Kültürel ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(1), 308-322.
  • Fung, A. Y. (2018). Cultural policy and East Asian rivalry: The Hong Kong gaming industry. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Gallistl, V., & Nimrod, G. (2020). Media-based leisure and wellbeing: A study of older Internet users. Leisure Studies, 39(2), 251-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2019.1694568
  • Gammon, S., & Ramshaw, G. (2021). Distancing from the present: Nostalgia and leisure in lockdown. Leisure Sciences, 43(1-2), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1773993
  • Garg, P., & Pahuja, S. (2020). Social media: Concept, role, categories, trends, social media and AI, impact on youth, careers, recommendations. S. Alavi & V. Ahuja (Ed.), Managing social media practices in the digital economy içinde (s. 172–192). IGI Global.
  • Gee, E. R., & Tran, K. M. (2016). Video game making and modding. B. Guzzetti & M. Lesley (Ed.), Handbook of research on the societal impact of digital media içinde (s. 238-267). IGI Global.
  • Gellmers, J., & Yan, N. (2023). Digital leisure engagement and positive outcomes in the workplace: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021014
  • Gerges, M. (2015). Paradigms in social media studies [yüksek lisans tezi]. Uppsala University.
  • Granic, I., Lobel, A., & Engels, R. C. (2014). The benefits of playing video games. American Psychologist, 69(1), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034857
  • Gregg, M. (2013). Work's intimacy. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Haferkamp, N., Eimler, S. C., Papadakis, A. M. & Kruck, J. V. (2012). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0151
  • Heath, R. (2020). Branding in a digitally empowered world: The role of user-generated content [doktora tezi]. Auckland University of Technology.
  • Hjorth, L. (2011). Games and gaming: An introduction to new media. Berg.
  • Ho, C. H., & Cho, Y. H. (2021). Social media as a pathway to leisure: Digital leisure culture among new mothers with young children in Taiwan. Leisure Sciences, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2021. 2007823
  • Howe, L. C., Whillans, A. & Menges, J. I. (2020, 24 Ağustos). How to (actually) save time when you’re working remotely. Harvard Business Review. 20 Ağustos 2023 tarihinde https://hbr.org/2020/08/how-to-actually-save-time-when-youre-working-remotely adresinden edinilmiştir.
  • Isotalus, P. (1998). Television performance as interaction. Nordicom Review, 19(1), 175-184.
  • Jenny, S. E., Manning, R. D., Keiper, M. C., & Olrich, T. W. (2017). Virtual(ly) athletes: Where eSports fit within the definition of “Sport”. Quest, 69(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2016.1144517
  • Kapoor, K. K., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Patil, P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Nerur, S. (2018). Advances in social media research: Past, present and future. Information Systems Frontiers, 20, 531-558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9810-y
  • Kellner, D. (2021). Technology and democracy: Toward a critical theory of digital technologies, technopolitics, and technocapitalism. Springer Nature.
  • Kelly, J. P. (2017). Time, technology and narrative form in contemporary US television drama: Pause, rewind, record. Springer.
  • Lazer, D., Baum, M., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M., Nyhan, B., Pennycock, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E., Watts, D., Zittrain, J. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
  • Lopez, K. J., Muldoon, M. L., & McKeown, J. K. (2019). One day of #Feminism: Twitter as a complex digital arena for wielding, shielding, and trolling talk on feminism. Leisure Sciences, 41(3), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2018.1448022
  • López-Sintas, J., Rojas-DeFrancisco, L., & García-Álvarez, E. (2015). The nature of leisure revisited: An interpretation of digital leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 47(1), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2015.11950352
  • López-Sintas, J., Rojas-DeFrancisco, L., & García-Álvarez, E. (2017). Home-based digital leisure: Doing the same leisure activities, but digital. Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), 1309741. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1309741
  • Lupton, D. (2015). Digital sociology. Routledge.
  • Marguba, B. (2023). The impact of digital technology. Наука и Инновация, 1(17), 126-128. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8166772
  • Martzoukou, K., Kostagiolas, P., Lavranos, C., Lauterbach, T., & Fulton, C. (2022). A study of university law students’ self-perceived digital competences. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 54(4), 751-769. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211048004
  • Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new: Thinking about electric communication in the late nineteenth century. Oxford University Press.
  • Mbokota, G., & Padayachee, M. S. (2021). The impact of mandatory work from home on employee engagement [yüksek lisans projesi]. University of Pretoria.
  • Milošević, J. (2020). Digital nomads: A cultural view [lisans tezi]. University of Rijeka.
  • Milton, T., Kumar, S., Manju, Kumar, M. & Goyal, P. (2023). Analysis of social media networks as a strategic tool for business management. Korea Review of International Studies, 16(3), 54-62.
  • Misra, S., & Stokols, D. (2012). Psychological and health outcomes of perceived information overload. Environment and Behavior, 44(6), 737-759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511404408
  • Mittal, M., & Pani, A. K. (2010). An empirical investigation into the perceived usefulness of socio-technical exchange in India: Social identity, social exchange, and social vicinity. Journal of Internet Commerce, 9(3-4), 208-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2010. 526486
  • Mittal, N. (2016). Cyber-d subjects: DeLillo’s Cosmopolis and Shteyngart’s Super Sad True Love Story. Anafora-časopis za znanost o književnosti, 3(2), 267-279.
  • Mizuno, F. R. (2007). Processos educativos desvelados em prática social de trabalhadores de uma indústria de grande porte de São Carlos: Na perspectiva da convivência e do diálogo. Cadernos de Pós-graduação, 6(1), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.5585/cpg.v6n1.1873
  • Muroga, K. (2022, 12 Ağustos). No time for love? The impact of ICTs on time allocation and relationships in Japan. 20 Ağustos 2023 tarihinde https://ssrn.com/abstract=4186416 adresinden erişişmiştir.
  • Nevolina, V. V., Volkova, V. B., Shatskaya, I. I., Prokhodtsev, K. A., Zharkova, A. A., Karpenko, G. V., & Yudina, A. M. (2022). Managing students' social activity in the context of digital transformations: Socio-cultural determinants and constructive basis. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(2), 5718-5725.
  • Ngai, E. W., Tao, S. S., & Moon, K. K. (2015). Social media research: Theories, constructs, and conceptual frameworks. International Journal of Information Management, 35(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.09.004
  • O’Sullivan, P. B., & Carr, C. T. (2018). Masspersonal communication: A model bridging the mass-interpersonal divide. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1161-1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686104
  • Özmen Akalın, F. A. (2021). Modernitenin yeni evresi olan hipermodernite döneminde değişen toplumsal tutum ve davranışlar hakkında sosyolojik bir değerlendirme. H. Babacan (Ed.), İktisadi, idari ve sosyal bilimler: Teori, güncel araştırmalar ve yeni eğilimler 3 içinde (s. 110-127). IVPE.
  • Parveen, S., Ahmad, B., Iram, T., & Rasool, Y. (2022). Women empowerment in inherited land rights: End of violence in rural areas. The Journal of Adult Protection, 24(5/6), 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAP-05-2022-0009
  • Pedrozo, S. (2013). New media use in Brazil: digital inclusion or digital divide? Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 3(1), 144-162.
  • Pellegrino, A., Stasi, A., & Bhatiasevi, V. (2022). Research trends in social media addiction and problematic social media use: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 1017506. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1017506
  • Pilgrim, J., & Bledsoe, C. (2015). The role of technology in the transformation of twenty-first century literacy skills. M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology içinde (s. 4805-4813). IGI Global.
  • Pizzo, A. D. (2023). Hypercasual and hybrid-casual video gaming: A digital leisure perspective. Leisure Sciences, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2023.2211056
  • Pronovost, G. (2000). The collapse of the leisure society? New challenges for the sociology of leisure. S. R. Quah & A. Sales (Ed.), International handbook of sociology içinde (s. 355–365). Sage.
  • Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. MIT Press.
  • Rapp, A., Tirassa, M., & Ziemke, T. (2019). Editorial: Cognitive aspects of interactive technology use: From computers to smart objects and autonomous agents. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1078. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01078
  • Reed, J., Dunn, C., Beames, S., & Stonehouse, P. (2023). E ‘Ride on!’: The Zwift platform as a space for virtual leisure. Leisure Studies, 42(2), 188-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2022.2088836
  • Rojek, C. (2010). The labour of leisure: The culture of free time. Sage.
  • Schnauber-Stockmann, A., & Mangold, F. (2020). Day-to-day routines of media platform use in the digital age: A structuration perspective. Communication Monographs, 87(4), 464-483. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1758336
  • Schultz, C. S., & McKeown, J. K. (2018). Introduction to the special issue: Toward “digital leisure studies”. Leisure Sciences, 40(4), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2018.1441768
  • Schwartz, R., & Halegoua, G. R. (2015). The spatial self: Location-based identity performance on social media. New Media & Society, 17(10), 1643-1660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814531364
  • Seo, Y., & Jung, S. U. (2016). Beyond solitary play in computer games: The social practices of eSports. Journal of Consumer Culture, 16(3), 635-655. https://doi.org/10.1177 /1469540514553711
  • Shim, J. M. (2004). The evolution of leisure studies in North America and South Korea: A study of cultural consensus [doktora tezi]. The Pennsylvania State University.
  • Silk, M., Millington, B., Rich, E., & Bush, A. (2016). (Re-) thinking digital leisure. Leisure Studies, 35(6), 712-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2016.1240223
  • Singh, A. K., & Singh, P. K. (2019). Digital addiction: A conceptual overview. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 3538.
  • Smith, T. A., Butts, M. M., Courtright, S. H., Duerden, M. D., & Widmer, M. A. (2022). Work–leisure blending: An integrative conceptual review and framework to guide future research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(4), 560–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000924
  • Spracklen, K. (2013). Leisure, sports and society. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Spracklen, K. (2015). Digital leisure, the internet and popular culture: Communities and identities in a digital age. Springer.
  • Standage, T. (1999). The Victorian internet: The remarkable story of the telegraph and the nineteenth century’s online pioneers. Berkley Books.
  • Stanfors, M., Jacobs, J., 2023. Unpaid caregiving and stress among older working-age men and women in Sweden. SSM - Population Health, 23, 101458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101458
  • Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., & Schkade, L. L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision Sciences, 35(2), 259-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.00117315.2004.02524.x
  • Sunstein, C. (2018). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
  • Sweitzer, A. (2019). A phenomenological study exploring the adoption of social networking platforms to achieve digital literacy for all learners [doktora tezi]. Nova Southeastern University.
  • Tewatia, M., & Majumdar, S. (2022). Humans of Instagram: Exploring influencer identity discourses on Instagram. Journal of Digital Social Research, 4(4), 52-75. https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v4i4.120
  • Thurson, K. M. (2021). Parenting, vaccines, and COVID-19: A machine-learning approach [yüksek lisans tezi]. Clemson University.
  • Törhönen, M., Hassan, L., Sjöblom, M., & Hamari, J. (2019). Play, playbour or labour? The relationships between perception of occupational activity and outcomes among streamers and YouTubers. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  • Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
  • Tully, M., & Ekdale, B. (2014). Sites of playful engagement: Twitter hashtags as spaces of leisure and development in Kenya. Information Technologies & International Development, 10(3), 67–82.
  • Turel, O., Qahri-Saremi, H., & Vaghefi, I. (2021). Dark sides of digitalization. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 25(2), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2021.1887694
  • Van Dijk, J. (2006). The network society: Social aspects of new media. Sage.
  • Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
  • Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class. Macmillan.
  • Velez-Mandes, E. L. (2021). Enterprise social network systems implementation model for knowledge sharing among supply chain IT professionals [doktora tezi]. Nova Southeastern University.
  • Walter, A. M. (2021). The self in a time of constant connectivity. American Ethnologist, 48(4), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.13039
  • Wood, L., Hoeber, O., Snelgrove, R., & Hoeber, L. (2019). Computer science meets digital leisure: Multiple perspectives on social media and eSport collaborations. Journal of Leisure Research, 50(5), 425-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2019.1594466
  • Xue, H., Newman, J. I., & Du, J. (2019). Narratives, identity and community in esports. Leisure Studies, 38(6), 845-861. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2019.1640778

İLETİŞİM SÜREÇLERİNİN DİJİTALLEŞMESİ BAĞLAMINDA BOŞ ZAMAN SOSYOLOJİSİNİN DÖNÜŞÜMÜ

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 23, 287 - 311, 31.12.2023

Ahmet Elnur

https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1351469

Abstract

Dijital teknolojilerin boş zaman değerlendirme etkinlikleri çerçevesinde gerçekleşen sosyal etkileşimler üzerindeki etkisinin her geçen gün artması, boş zaman sosyolojisinin kapsamının iletişim süreçlerini de kapsayacak şekilde genişletilmesi gerekliliğini ortaya çıkarmaktadır. İletişim süreçlerinin dijitalleşmesinin boş zaman sosyolojisi alanı üzerindeki etkilerinin keşfedilmesinin amaçlandığı bu çalışma kapsamında; iletişim süreçlerindeki dönüşümün boş zaman üzerindeki etkilerini ele alan iletişim çalışmaları, sosyoloji ve boş zaman çalışmaları disiplinlerinde gerçekleştirilmiş olan çalışmalar kapsamlı bir alanyazın taraması ışığında sentezlenmektedir. Bu doğrultuda öncelikle geleneksel iletişim yöntemlerinden sosyal medya gibi dijital platformlara doğru yaşanan değişimin ortaya çıkardığı sonuçlar irdelenmekte, dijitalleşme sonucunda iletişim süreçlerinde yaşanan hız ve erişim artışının yanı sıra ortaya çıkan zorluklar ortaya konulmaktadır. İkinci bölümde boş zamanın dijital ortamda değerlendirilmesi ve dijital çağa özgü çeşitli sorunlar da dâhil olmak üzere dijitalleşmenin toplum ve boş zaman üzerindeki etkileri mercek altına alınmaktadır. Çalışmanın son bölümünde ise dijital iletişimin yaygınlaşmasının dijital boş zaman alanı üzerindeki dönüştürücü etkileri incelenmekte, bu bağlamda boş zaman sosyolojisi alanının dijital çağda nasıl yeniden yapılandırıldığı gözler önüne serilmektedir. Dijital çağda yaşanan teknolojik gelişmeler; boş zaman sosyolojisi alanında sanal etkileşimlerin, dijital eşitsizliğin, oyun deneyimlerinin, dijital boş zaman ve sosyal medyanın etkilerinin derinlemesine incelenmesi doğrultusunda yeni kuramsal çalışmaların gerçekleştirilmesini gerekli hale getirmektedir. Boş zaman ve dijitalleşme olguları arasındaki etkileşimsel ilişkinin kapsamlı bir şekilde anlaşılması ve boş zamanın sürdürülebilirliğinin sağlanması bağlamında daha etkili stratejilerin ortaya konulması noktasında; iletişim, sosyoloji, turizm ve teknoloji alanlarının bir araya getirildiği disiplinler arası yaklaşımın benimsenmesi oldukça mühim bir husus olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır.

Keywords

Boş Zaman Sosyolojisi Dijital İletişim Dijital Boş Zaman

References

  • Adeyemi, A., & Ise-Oluwa Ige, I. (2022). Exploring digital media as a technology tool for leisure among Nigerian university students. International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure, 5(4), 489-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41978-022-00119-5
  • Aguilera-Carnerero, C., & Azeez, A. H. (2016). ‘Islamonausea, not Islamophobia’: The many faces of cyber hate speech. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 9(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr.9.1.21_1
  • Ahad, A. D., & Lim, S. M. A. (2014). Convenience or nuisance?: The ‘WhatsApp’dilemma. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.278
  • Albrechtslund, A. M., & Albrechtslund, A. (2014). Social media as leisure culture. First Monday, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i4.4877
  • Asimah, V. K., Hurriyati, R., Gaffar, V., & Wibowo, L. A. (2022). Virtual leisure and recreation reality and well-being during COVID-19 pandemic-the future of Ghana tourism: Does technological self-efficacy matter? African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 11(6), 1860-1877. https://doi.org/10.46222/ajhtl.19770720.329
  • Backlund, E. A., & Kuentzel, W. F. (2013). Beyond progression in specialization research: Leisure capital and participation change. Leisure Sciences, 35(3), 293-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2013.780543
  • Bai, H., & Gao, K. (2021). The study of social media alienation in the digitized world. 5th International Seminar on Education, Management and Social Sciences.
  • Bassyiouny, M., & Wilkesmann, M. (2023). Going on workation – Is tourism research ready to take off? Exploring an emerging phenomenon of hybrid tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives, 46, 101096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101096
  • Baym, N. K. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Polity.
  • Beck, U. (1998). Politics of risk society. J. Franklin (Ed.), The politics of risk society içinde (s. 9–22). Polity.
  • Blanco, A., (2016). The transformation of leisure in the digital age. B. Çoban (Ed.), Social media and social movements: The transformation of communication patterns içinde (s. 165-179). Lexington Books.
  • Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
  • Bullingham, L., & Vasconcelos, A. C. (2013). ‘The presentation of self in the online world’: Goffman and the study of online identities. Journal of Information Science, 39(1), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551512470051
  • Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. Oxford University Press.
  • Cavalcante, F. R. (2020). Aplicativos para smartphones que possibilitam o lazer em tempos de lockdown: entre a socialização, o entretenimento e as práticas corporais. LICERE-Revista Do Programa De Pós-graduação Interdisciplinar Em Estudos Do Lazer, 23(3), 369-390. https://doi.org/10.35699/2447-6218.2020.25449
  • Chen, Y., Sherren, K., Smit, M., & Lee, K. Y. (2023). Using social media images as data in social science research. New Media & Society, 25(4), 849-871. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211038761
  • Choi, N. G., & DiNitto, D. N. (2013). The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, ehealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(5), e93. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2645
  • Church, K., & de Oliveira, R. (2013). What's up with WhatsApp?: comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services.
  • Cousineau, L. S., Kumm, B. E., & Schultz, C. (2023). Surveillance, capitalism, leisure, and data: Being watched, giving, becoming. Leisure Sciences, 45(5), 451-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2023.2197455
  • Cover, R. (2023). Identity and digital communication: Concepts, theories, practices. Taylor & Francis.
  • Crawford, G. (2012). Video gamers. Routledge.
  • Cunningham, S., & Craig, D. (2019). Social media entertainment: The new intersection of Hollywood and Silicon Valley. NYU Press.
  • de Bruijn, M. (2014). Connecting in mobile communities: An African case study. Media, Culture & Society, 36(3), 319-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443714521088
  • de Vere Hunt, I., & Linos, E. (2022). Social media for public health: Framework for social media–based public health campaigns. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(12), e42179. https://doi.org/10.2196/42179
  • Denovan, A., & Macaskill, A. (2017). Building resilience to stress through leisure activities: A qualitative analysis. Annals of Leisure Research, 20(4), 446-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2016.1211943
  • Dhiman, D. B. (2023). Key issues and new challenges in new media technology in 2023: A critical review. Journal of Media & Management, 5(1), 1-4.
  • Dong, Z. S., Meng, L., Christenson, L., & Fulton, L. (2021). Social media information sharing for natural disaster response. Natural Hazards, 107, 2077-2104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04528-9
  • Dorsey, A. & Collier, R. (2018). Origins of sociological theory. ED-Tech Press.
  • Duerden, M. D., Courtright, S. H., & Widmer, M. A. (2018). Why people play at work: A theoretical examination of leisure-at-work. Leisure Sciences, 40(6), 634-648. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01490400.2017.1327829
  • Ebrahim, A. F., Behrouz, M. B., & Morteza, V. N. (2016). Legal and juridical aspects of virtual games: An overview of Islamic and Iran's Law. Social Crimonol, 4(153), 2. https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4435.1000153
  • Eisenstein, E. L. (1980). The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge University Press.
  • Erden, K. (2019). The evaluation of social media within the context of the silencing system. Uluslararası Kültürel ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(1), 308-322.
  • Fung, A. Y. (2018). Cultural policy and East Asian rivalry: The Hong Kong gaming industry. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Gallistl, V., & Nimrod, G. (2020). Media-based leisure and wellbeing: A study of older Internet users. Leisure Studies, 39(2), 251-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2019.1694568
  • Gammon, S., & Ramshaw, G. (2021). Distancing from the present: Nostalgia and leisure in lockdown. Leisure Sciences, 43(1-2), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1773993
  • Garg, P., & Pahuja, S. (2020). Social media: Concept, role, categories, trends, social media and AI, impact on youth, careers, recommendations. S. Alavi & V. Ahuja (Ed.), Managing social media practices in the digital economy içinde (s. 172–192). IGI Global.
  • Gee, E. R., & Tran, K. M. (2016). Video game making and modding. B. Guzzetti & M. Lesley (Ed.), Handbook of research on the societal impact of digital media içinde (s. 238-267). IGI Global.
  • Gellmers, J., & Yan, N. (2023). Digital leisure engagement and positive outcomes in the workplace: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021014
  • Gerges, M. (2015). Paradigms in social media studies [yüksek lisans tezi]. Uppsala University.
  • Granic, I., Lobel, A., & Engels, R. C. (2014). The benefits of playing video games. American Psychologist, 69(1), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034857
  • Gregg, M. (2013). Work's intimacy. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Haferkamp, N., Eimler, S. C., Papadakis, A. M. & Kruck, J. V. (2012). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0151
  • Heath, R. (2020). Branding in a digitally empowered world: The role of user-generated content [doktora tezi]. Auckland University of Technology.
  • Hjorth, L. (2011). Games and gaming: An introduction to new media. Berg.
  • Ho, C. H., & Cho, Y. H. (2021). Social media as a pathway to leisure: Digital leisure culture among new mothers with young children in Taiwan. Leisure Sciences, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2021. 2007823
  • Howe, L. C., Whillans, A. & Menges, J. I. (2020, 24 Ağustos). How to (actually) save time when you’re working remotely. Harvard Business Review. 20 Ağustos 2023 tarihinde https://hbr.org/2020/08/how-to-actually-save-time-when-youre-working-remotely adresinden edinilmiştir.
  • Isotalus, P. (1998). Television performance as interaction. Nordicom Review, 19(1), 175-184.
  • Jenny, S. E., Manning, R. D., Keiper, M. C., & Olrich, T. W. (2017). Virtual(ly) athletes: Where eSports fit within the definition of “Sport”. Quest, 69(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2016.1144517
  • Kapoor, K. K., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Patil, P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Nerur, S. (2018). Advances in social media research: Past, present and future. Information Systems Frontiers, 20, 531-558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9810-y
  • Kellner, D. (2021). Technology and democracy: Toward a critical theory of digital technologies, technopolitics, and technocapitalism. Springer Nature.
  • Kelly, J. P. (2017). Time, technology and narrative form in contemporary US television drama: Pause, rewind, record. Springer.
  • Lazer, D., Baum, M., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M., Nyhan, B., Pennycock, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E., Watts, D., Zittrain, J. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
  • Lopez, K. J., Muldoon, M. L., & McKeown, J. K. (2019). One day of #Feminism: Twitter as a complex digital arena for wielding, shielding, and trolling talk on feminism. Leisure Sciences, 41(3), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2018.1448022
  • López-Sintas, J., Rojas-DeFrancisco, L., & García-Álvarez, E. (2015). The nature of leisure revisited: An interpretation of digital leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 47(1), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2015.11950352
  • López-Sintas, J., Rojas-DeFrancisco, L., & García-Álvarez, E. (2017). Home-based digital leisure: Doing the same leisure activities, but digital. Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), 1309741. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1309741
  • Lupton, D. (2015). Digital sociology. Routledge.
  • Marguba, B. (2023). The impact of digital technology. Наука и Инновация, 1(17), 126-128. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8166772
  • Martzoukou, K., Kostagiolas, P., Lavranos, C., Lauterbach, T., & Fulton, C. (2022). A study of university law students’ self-perceived digital competences. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 54(4), 751-769. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211048004
  • Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new: Thinking about electric communication in the late nineteenth century. Oxford University Press.
  • Mbokota, G., & Padayachee, M. S. (2021). The impact of mandatory work from home on employee engagement [yüksek lisans projesi]. University of Pretoria.
  • Milošević, J. (2020). Digital nomads: A cultural view [lisans tezi]. University of Rijeka.
  • Milton, T., Kumar, S., Manju, Kumar, M. & Goyal, P. (2023). Analysis of social media networks as a strategic tool for business management. Korea Review of International Studies, 16(3), 54-62.
  • Misra, S., & Stokols, D. (2012). Psychological and health outcomes of perceived information overload. Environment and Behavior, 44(6), 737-759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511404408
  • Mittal, M., & Pani, A. K. (2010). An empirical investigation into the perceived usefulness of socio-technical exchange in India: Social identity, social exchange, and social vicinity. Journal of Internet Commerce, 9(3-4), 208-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2010. 526486
  • Mittal, N. (2016). Cyber-d subjects: DeLillo’s Cosmopolis and Shteyngart’s Super Sad True Love Story. Anafora-časopis za znanost o književnosti, 3(2), 267-279.
  • Mizuno, F. R. (2007). Processos educativos desvelados em prática social de trabalhadores de uma indústria de grande porte de São Carlos: Na perspectiva da convivência e do diálogo. Cadernos de Pós-graduação, 6(1), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.5585/cpg.v6n1.1873
  • Muroga, K. (2022, 12 Ağustos). No time for love? The impact of ICTs on time allocation and relationships in Japan. 20 Ağustos 2023 tarihinde https://ssrn.com/abstract=4186416 adresinden erişişmiştir.
  • Nevolina, V. V., Volkova, V. B., Shatskaya, I. I., Prokhodtsev, K. A., Zharkova, A. A., Karpenko, G. V., & Yudina, A. M. (2022). Managing students' social activity in the context of digital transformations: Socio-cultural determinants and constructive basis. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(2), 5718-5725.
  • Ngai, E. W., Tao, S. S., & Moon, K. K. (2015). Social media research: Theories, constructs, and conceptual frameworks. International Journal of Information Management, 35(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.09.004
  • O’Sullivan, P. B., & Carr, C. T. (2018). Masspersonal communication: A model bridging the mass-interpersonal divide. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1161-1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686104
  • Özmen Akalın, F. A. (2021). Modernitenin yeni evresi olan hipermodernite döneminde değişen toplumsal tutum ve davranışlar hakkında sosyolojik bir değerlendirme. H. Babacan (Ed.), İktisadi, idari ve sosyal bilimler: Teori, güncel araştırmalar ve yeni eğilimler 3 içinde (s. 110-127). IVPE.
  • Parveen, S., Ahmad, B., Iram, T., & Rasool, Y. (2022). Women empowerment in inherited land rights: End of violence in rural areas. The Journal of Adult Protection, 24(5/6), 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAP-05-2022-0009
  • Pedrozo, S. (2013). New media use in Brazil: digital inclusion or digital divide? Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 3(1), 144-162.
  • Pellegrino, A., Stasi, A., & Bhatiasevi, V. (2022). Research trends in social media addiction and problematic social media use: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 1017506. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1017506
  • Pilgrim, J., & Bledsoe, C. (2015). The role of technology in the transformation of twenty-first century literacy skills. M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology içinde (s. 4805-4813). IGI Global.
  • Pizzo, A. D. (2023). Hypercasual and hybrid-casual video gaming: A digital leisure perspective. Leisure Sciences, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2023.2211056
  • Pronovost, G. (2000). The collapse of the leisure society? New challenges for the sociology of leisure. S. R. Quah & A. Sales (Ed.), International handbook of sociology içinde (s. 355–365). Sage.
  • Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. MIT Press.
  • Rapp, A., Tirassa, M., & Ziemke, T. (2019). Editorial: Cognitive aspects of interactive technology use: From computers to smart objects and autonomous agents. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1078. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01078
  • Reed, J., Dunn, C., Beames, S., & Stonehouse, P. (2023). E ‘Ride on!’: The Zwift platform as a space for virtual leisure. Leisure Studies, 42(2), 188-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2022.2088836
  • Rojek, C. (2010). The labour of leisure: The culture of free time. Sage.
  • Schnauber-Stockmann, A., & Mangold, F. (2020). Day-to-day routines of media platform use in the digital age: A structuration perspective. Communication Monographs, 87(4), 464-483. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1758336
  • Schultz, C. S., & McKeown, J. K. (2018). Introduction to the special issue: Toward “digital leisure studies”. Leisure Sciences, 40(4), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2018.1441768
  • Schwartz, R., & Halegoua, G. R. (2015). The spatial self: Location-based identity performance on social media. New Media & Society, 17(10), 1643-1660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814531364
  • Seo, Y., & Jung, S. U. (2016). Beyond solitary play in computer games: The social practices of eSports. Journal of Consumer Culture, 16(3), 635-655. https://doi.org/10.1177 /1469540514553711
  • Shim, J. M. (2004). The evolution of leisure studies in North America and South Korea: A study of cultural consensus [doktora tezi]. The Pennsylvania State University.
  • Silk, M., Millington, B., Rich, E., & Bush, A. (2016). (Re-) thinking digital leisure. Leisure Studies, 35(6), 712-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2016.1240223
  • Singh, A. K., & Singh, P. K. (2019). Digital addiction: A conceptual overview. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 3538.
  • Smith, T. A., Butts, M. M., Courtright, S. H., Duerden, M. D., & Widmer, M. A. (2022). Work–leisure blending: An integrative conceptual review and framework to guide future research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(4), 560–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000924
  • Spracklen, K. (2013). Leisure, sports and society. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Spracklen, K. (2015). Digital leisure, the internet and popular culture: Communities and identities in a digital age. Springer.
  • Standage, T. (1999). The Victorian internet: The remarkable story of the telegraph and the nineteenth century’s online pioneers. Berkley Books.
  • Stanfors, M., Jacobs, J., 2023. Unpaid caregiving and stress among older working-age men and women in Sweden. SSM - Population Health, 23, 101458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101458
  • Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., & Schkade, L. L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision Sciences, 35(2), 259-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.00117315.2004.02524.x
  • Sunstein, C. (2018). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
  • Sweitzer, A. (2019). A phenomenological study exploring the adoption of social networking platforms to achieve digital literacy for all learners [doktora tezi]. Nova Southeastern University.
  • Tewatia, M., & Majumdar, S. (2022). Humans of Instagram: Exploring influencer identity discourses on Instagram. Journal of Digital Social Research, 4(4), 52-75. https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v4i4.120
  • Thurson, K. M. (2021). Parenting, vaccines, and COVID-19: A machine-learning approach [yüksek lisans tezi]. Clemson University.
  • Törhönen, M., Hassan, L., Sjöblom, M., & Hamari, J. (2019). Play, playbour or labour? The relationships between perception of occupational activity and outcomes among streamers and YouTubers. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  • Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
  • Tully, M., & Ekdale, B. (2014). Sites of playful engagement: Twitter hashtags as spaces of leisure and development in Kenya. Information Technologies & International Development, 10(3), 67–82.
  • Turel, O., Qahri-Saremi, H., & Vaghefi, I. (2021). Dark sides of digitalization. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 25(2), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2021.1887694
  • Van Dijk, J. (2006). The network society: Social aspects of new media. Sage.
  • Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
  • Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class. Macmillan.
  • Velez-Mandes, E. L. (2021). Enterprise social network systems implementation model for knowledge sharing among supply chain IT professionals [doktora tezi]. Nova Southeastern University.
  • Walter, A. M. (2021). The self in a time of constant connectivity. American Ethnologist, 48(4), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.13039
  • Wood, L., Hoeber, O., Snelgrove, R., & Hoeber, L. (2019). Computer science meets digital leisure: Multiple perspectives on social media and eSport collaborations. Journal of Leisure Research, 50(5), 425-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2019.1594466
  • Xue, H., Newman, J. I., & Du, J. (2019). Narratives, identity and community in esports. Leisure Studies, 38(6), 845-861. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2019.1640778
There are 109 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Sociology (Other)
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ahmet Elnur 0000-0002-3287-535X

Early Pub Date December 29, 2023
Publication Date December 31, 2023
Submission Date August 28, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 10 Issue: 23

Cite

APA Elnur, A. (2023). İLETİŞİM SÜREÇLERİNİN DİJİTALLEŞMESİ BAĞLAMINDA BOŞ ZAMAN SOSYOLOJİSİNİN DÖNÜŞÜMÜ. Akademik Hassasiyetler, 10(23), 287-311. https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1351469
AMA Elnur A. İLETİŞİM SÜREÇLERİNİN DİJİTALLEŞMESİ BAĞLAMINDA BOŞ ZAMAN SOSYOLOJİSİNİN DÖNÜŞÜMÜ. Akademik Hassasiyetler. December 2023;10(23):287-311. doi:10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1351469
Chicago Elnur, Ahmet. “İLETİŞİM SÜREÇLERİNİN DİJİTALLEŞMESİ BAĞLAMINDA BOŞ ZAMAN SOSYOLOJİSİNİN DÖNÜŞÜMÜ”. Akademik Hassasiyetler 10, no. 23 (December 2023): 287-311. https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1351469.
EndNote Elnur A (December 1, 2023) İLETİŞİM SÜREÇLERİNİN DİJİTALLEŞMESİ BAĞLAMINDA BOŞ ZAMAN SOSYOLOJİSİNİN DÖNÜŞÜMÜ. Akademik Hassasiyetler 10 23 287–311.
IEEE A. Elnur, “İLETİŞİM SÜREÇLERİNİN DİJİTALLEŞMESİ BAĞLAMINDA BOŞ ZAMAN SOSYOLOJİSİNİN DÖNÜŞÜMÜ”, Akademik Hassasiyetler, vol. 10, no. 23, pp. 287–311, 2023, doi: 10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1351469.
ISNAD Elnur, Ahmet. “İLETİŞİM SÜREÇLERİNİN DİJİTALLEŞMESİ BAĞLAMINDA BOŞ ZAMAN SOSYOLOJİSİNİN DÖNÜŞÜMÜ”. Akademik Hassasiyetler 10/23 (December 2023), 287-311. https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1351469.
JAMA Elnur A. İLETİŞİM SÜREÇLERİNİN DİJİTALLEŞMESİ BAĞLAMINDA BOŞ ZAMAN SOSYOLOJİSİNİN DÖNÜŞÜMÜ. Akademik Hassasiyetler. 2023;10:287–311.
MLA Elnur, Ahmet. “İLETİŞİM SÜREÇLERİNİN DİJİTALLEŞMESİ BAĞLAMINDA BOŞ ZAMAN SOSYOLOJİSİNİN DÖNÜŞÜMÜ”. Akademik Hassasiyetler, vol. 10, no. 23, 2023, pp. 287-11, doi:10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1351469.
Vancouver Elnur A. İLETİŞİM SÜREÇLERİNİN DİJİTALLEŞMESİ BAĞLAMINDA BOŞ ZAMAN SOSYOLOJİSİNİN DÖNÜŞÜMÜ. Akademik Hassasiyetler. 2023;10(23):287-311.
 Download Cover Image

MAKALE DEĞERLENDİRME SÜRECİ

Yazar tarafından gönderilen bir makale, gönderim tarihinden itibaren 10 gün içinde dergi sekreteri tarafından makalenin, telif sözleşmesinin ve benzerlik raporunun (Turnitin programı) eksiksiz ve düzgün bir şekilde gönderilip gönderilmediği yönünden incelenir. İstenilen bu dosyalar eksiksiz ve düzgün bir şekilde gönderilmiş ise makale; ikinci aşamada derginin yayın çizgisine uygun olup olmadığı yönünden değerlendirilir. Bu süreçte makale yayın çizgisine uygun değilse yazara iade edilir. Makale yayın çizgisine uygun ise şablona uygun bir şekilde gönderilip gönderilmediği yönünden değerlendirilir. Şayet makale şablona uyarlanıp gönderilmemiş ise değerlendirme sürecine alınmaz. Bu süreçte yazarın derginin belirlediği şartlara uygun bir şekilde sisteme makale yüklemesi beklenir. Makale şablona uygun bir şekilde hazırlanıp gönderilmiş ise son aşamada makale derginin yayın ilkeleri, yazım kuralları, öz, abstract, extented abstract, kaynakça gösterimi vb. yönlerden incelenir. Bu ayrıntılarda makalede bir sorun varsa yazarın bu hususları tamamlaması istenir ve verilen süre içerisinde eksiksiz bir şekilde yeniden makaleyi göndermesi istenir.
Tüm bu aşamaları geçen makale, editör tarafından bilimsel yeterliliğinin denetlenmesi amacıyla ikinci 7 günlük süre içerisinde çalışmaya uygun iki hakeme değerlendirmeleri için gönderilir. Hakemlerin değerlendirme süreleri 15 gündür. Bu süre zarfında hakemlik görevini tamamlamayan bir hakem olursa ilgili hakeme değerlendirmeyi tamamlaması için 7 günlük ek süre verilebilir. Bu süre zarfında hakem görevini yerine getirmezse yerine yeni bir hakem ataması yapılır. En az iki hakemden gelen raporlar olumlu ise makale yayın aşamasına alınır. Hakem raporlarından birisi olumlu diğeri olumsuz ise makale üçüncü bir hakeme gönderilir. Üçüncü hakem raporu da olumsuz ise makale ret edilir. Üçüncü hakemin değerlendirmesi olumlu ise makaleyle ilgili hakem raporları dergi alan editörlerinden oluşan Editörler Kurulu tarafından incelenir. Makalenin yayınlanmasıyla ilgili nihai karar alan editörlerinden oluşan Editörler Kurulu tarafından verilir. Hakem raporlarının yetersiz ve tatmin etmekten uzak olması veya İngilizce editör tarafından abstract ve extented abstract’ın yetersiz görülmesi hallerinde de yine makaleyle ilgili son karar Editörler Kurulu tarafından verilir. Tüm bu aşamalardan geçen bir makale en yakın sayıya yayınlanmak üzere eklenir. İlgili sayıda yer kalmaması halinde makalenin yayımı bir sonraki sayıya kaydırılır. Bu durumda ve tüm değerlendirme sürecinde yazar isterse makalesini geri çekme hakkına sahiptir. Ancak bu durumu dergiye bildirmesi gerekir. Makale gönderim tarihinden makalenin yayına kabul tarihine kadar tüm bu işlemler için ortalama 3 aylık bir süre öngörülmektedir.