Abstract
What is the relation between digital technologies and public spaces? Are they capable of making each other successful, or is one driving the decline of the other? The path towards the digitalization of social interaction that came along with the digital revolution at the end of the 20th century does not necessarily have a beneficial consequence for urban public space, as social interaction no longer needs the support of, or to support (physical) public spaces. In other words, the digitalization of social interaction is driving the detachment of contemporary society from the use of their traditional urban public spaces. Consequently, new tools and technologies are being implemented in a number of public spaces in several cities, in order to align contemporary (digital) resources to the needs and wants of contemporary societies. This contribution offers a review of several developments that were implemented in a number of public spaces during the “digital age”. This review is performed by presenting a comprehensive framework of public space in the digital age, with a specific focus on key features that have been affected by digitalization: social interaction, political participation, and social activities.
Keywords
References
- Albeera, H. A. (2019). The future of public space: how to measure active public space in the digital era. Nottingham Trent University (United Kingdom).
- Albrecht, A. J. (2015), Digital Media Façades for Lively Public Spaces: Promoting Dialogue, Participation and Social Innovation in Urban Environments. Conference: Making Cities Liveable Conference
- Albrechtslund, A., and P. Lauritsen. (2013). Spaces of Everyday Surveillance: Unfolding an Analytical Concept of Participation. Geoforum, 49: 310–316.
- Ampanavos, S. P. Y. R. I. D. O. N., & Markaki, M. E. T. A. X. I. A. (2014, April). Digital cities: towards a new identity of public place. In The Mediated City Conference.
- Aurigi, A., & De Cindio, F. (Eds.). (2008). Augmented urban spaces: articulating the physical and electronic city. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
- Bagdikian, Ben. (1992). The Endless Chain, The media Monopoly Chapter 1, Boston 4th Ed.
- Deore, P. & Lathia, S., (2014). Contribution of Street Vendor in making Streets “Public.”
- Drucker, S. J., & Gumpert, G. (2012). The impact of digitalization on social interaction and public space. Open House International.
- Foucault, M. (1986). Of other spaces. Diacritics, 16(1), 22– 27.
- Garrard, J. (2009). Active Transport: Children and Young People: An Overview of Recent Evidence. Melbourne: Victorian Health Promotion Foundation. Giddings, S. 2014. Gameworlds: Virtual Media and Children’s Everyday Play. New York: Bloomsbury.
- Habermas, J., & Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT press.
- Hillman, M., J. Adams, and J. Whitelegg. (1990). One False Move, a Study of Children’s Independent Mobility. London: Policy Studies Institute.
- Houghton, K. (2010). Augmenting public urban spaces: The impact of the digital future on the design of public urban spaces. In Utopia 2010 PIA Queensland State Planning Conference (pp. 19-23).
- Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.
- Leaver, T. (2017). Intimate Surveillance: Normalizing Parental Monitoring and Mediation of Infants Online. Social Media + Society 3 (2). https://doi. org/10.1177/2056305117707192
- López Baeza, J. (2021). Unveiling urban dynamics: An exploration of tools and methods using crowd-sourced data for the study of urban space [dissertation]. University of Alicante.
- Madanipour, A. Cars, G. and Allen, J. (1998), eds, Social Exclusion in European Cities, Jessica Kingsley and Regional Studies Association, The Stationery Office, London.
- Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city. Routledge.
- Mitchell, W. J. (1996). City of bits: space, place, and the infobahn. MIT press.
- Mitra, A., & Schwartz, R. L. (2001). From cyber space to cybernetic space: Rethinking the relationship between real and virtual spaces. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(1), JCMC713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00134.x
- Nyaigoti, N. W., Moirongo, O. B., & Njuguna, M. B. (2013). Impact of Digital Technology on Urban Spaces. In Scientific Conference Proceedings.
- OECD. (2018). Going digital in a multilateral world: An interim report to ministers.
- Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
- Riether, G. (2016). A Public Space for the Digital Age. In SIGraDi 2016, 20th Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics, 260–265. Argentina: Buenos Aires.
- Sennett, R. (1992). The fall of public man. WW Norton & Company.
- Southerton, C., M.S. Damkjaer, A.R. Bøge, and A. Albrechtslund. (2019). Navigating Smartphone Anxieties Within the Family: Affordances, Surveillance and Intimacy. In The 69th Annual International Communication Association Conference. Washington: ICA.
- Tham, J. (2018). Critical factors for creating a successful digital public administration. Available at SSRN 3296207.
- Valentine, G. (1997). ‘Oh Yes I Can’ ‘Oh No You Can’t’: Children and Parents’ Understandings of Kids’ Competence to Negotiate Public Space Safely. Antipode 29 (1): 65–89
- Velibeyoglu, K. (1999). Public Realm in the Information Age. Diss. For Ph. D Cadidate at: Izmir Institute of Technology.
Abstract
Dijital teknolojiler ve kamusal alanlar arasındaki ilişki nedir? Birbirlerini desteklemekte midir, yoksa biri diğerinin önemsizleşmesine mi neden olmaktadır? 20. yüzyılın sonundaki dijital devrimle birlikte gelen sosyal etkileşimin dijitalleşmesine giden yol, sosyal etkileşimin kamusal alanların desteğine veya fiziksel olarak desteklenmesine artık ihtiyaç duymamasından dolayı, kentsel kamusal alan açısından yararlı bir sonuç oluşturmamaktadır. Başka bir deyişle, sosyal etkileşimin dijitalleşmesi, çağdaş toplumun geleneksel kentsel kamusal alanların kullanımından kopmasına neden olmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, çağdaş (dijital) kaynakları çağdaş toplumların ihtiyaç ve istekleriyle uyumlu hale getirmek için birçok şehirde çeşitli kamusal alanlarda yeni araçlar ve teknolojiler uygulanmaktadır. Bu çalışma, “dijital çağ” döneminde birçok kamusal alanda uygulanan çeşitli gelişmelerin bir incelemesini sunmaktadır. Bu inceleme, dijitalleşmeden etkilenen sosyal etkileşim, siyasi katılım ve sosyal faaliyetler gibi temel özelliklere özellikle odaklanarak, dijital çağda kapsamlı bir kamusal alan çerçevesi sunmaktadır.
Keywords
References
- Albeera, H. A. (2019). The future of public space: how to measure active public space in the digital era. Nottingham Trent University (United Kingdom).
- Albrecht, A. J. (2015), Digital Media Façades for Lively Public Spaces: Promoting Dialogue, Participation and Social Innovation in Urban Environments. Conference: Making Cities Liveable Conference
- Albrechtslund, A., and P. Lauritsen. (2013). Spaces of Everyday Surveillance: Unfolding an Analytical Concept of Participation. Geoforum, 49: 310–316.
- Ampanavos, S. P. Y. R. I. D. O. N., & Markaki, M. E. T. A. X. I. A. (2014, April). Digital cities: towards a new identity of public place. In The Mediated City Conference.
- Aurigi, A., & De Cindio, F. (Eds.). (2008). Augmented urban spaces: articulating the physical and electronic city. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
- Bagdikian, Ben. (1992). The Endless Chain, The media Monopoly Chapter 1, Boston 4th Ed.
- Deore, P. & Lathia, S., (2014). Contribution of Street Vendor in making Streets “Public.”
- Drucker, S. J., & Gumpert, G. (2012). The impact of digitalization on social interaction and public space. Open House International.
- Foucault, M. (1986). Of other spaces. Diacritics, 16(1), 22– 27.
- Garrard, J. (2009). Active Transport: Children and Young People: An Overview of Recent Evidence. Melbourne: Victorian Health Promotion Foundation. Giddings, S. 2014. Gameworlds: Virtual Media and Children’s Everyday Play. New York: Bloomsbury.
- Habermas, J., & Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT press.
- Hillman, M., J. Adams, and J. Whitelegg. (1990). One False Move, a Study of Children’s Independent Mobility. London: Policy Studies Institute.
- Houghton, K. (2010). Augmenting public urban spaces: The impact of the digital future on the design of public urban spaces. In Utopia 2010 PIA Queensland State Planning Conference (pp. 19-23).
- Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.
- Leaver, T. (2017). Intimate Surveillance: Normalizing Parental Monitoring and Mediation of Infants Online. Social Media + Society 3 (2). https://doi. org/10.1177/2056305117707192
- López Baeza, J. (2021). Unveiling urban dynamics: An exploration of tools and methods using crowd-sourced data for the study of urban space [dissertation]. University of Alicante.
- Madanipour, A. Cars, G. and Allen, J. (1998), eds, Social Exclusion in European Cities, Jessica Kingsley and Regional Studies Association, The Stationery Office, London.
- Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city. Routledge.
- Mitchell, W. J. (1996). City of bits: space, place, and the infobahn. MIT press.
- Mitra, A., & Schwartz, R. L. (2001). From cyber space to cybernetic space: Rethinking the relationship between real and virtual spaces. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(1), JCMC713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00134.x
- Nyaigoti, N. W., Moirongo, O. B., & Njuguna, M. B. (2013). Impact of Digital Technology on Urban Spaces. In Scientific Conference Proceedings.
- OECD. (2018). Going digital in a multilateral world: An interim report to ministers.
- Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
- Riether, G. (2016). A Public Space for the Digital Age. In SIGraDi 2016, 20th Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics, 260–265. Argentina: Buenos Aires.
- Sennett, R. (1992). The fall of public man. WW Norton & Company.
- Southerton, C., M.S. Damkjaer, A.R. Bøge, and A. Albrechtslund. (2019). Navigating Smartphone Anxieties Within the Family: Affordances, Surveillance and Intimacy. In The 69th Annual International Communication Association Conference. Washington: ICA.
- Tham, J. (2018). Critical factors for creating a successful digital public administration. Available at SSRN 3296207.
- Valentine, G. (1997). ‘Oh Yes I Can’ ‘Oh No You Can’t’: Children and Parents’ Understandings of Kids’ Competence to Negotiate Public Space Safely. Antipode 29 (1): 65–89
- Velibeyoglu, K. (1999). Public Realm in the Information Age. Diss. For Ph. D Cadidate at: Izmir Institute of Technology.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Architectural Design |
| Journal Section | Reviews |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 31, 2021 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2021 Volume: 3 Issue: 2 |