BibTex RIS Cite

Metabolik Holter İle Fizik Tedavi Ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Günlük Fiziksel Aktivitesinin Ölçülmesi

Year 2008, Volume: 61 Issue: 4, 196 - 201, 01.04.2008

Cem Çetin Ali Erdoğan Mustafa Yolcu Metin Lütfi Baydar

https://doi.org/10.1501/Tipfak_0000000682

Abstract

Keywords

-

References

  • Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Macera CA, Bouchard C, et al. Physical activity and public health. JAMA 1995; 273: 402-407.
  • Franklin BA, Whaley MH, Howley ET. Benefits and Risk Associated with Exercise. In: Franklin BA, Wha- ley MH, Howley ET, editors. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 6th ed. Philadelphia: 5. Eaton CB, Lapane KL, Garber CE, LWW; 2000. p.3-21.
  • McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Physical Activity, Health, and Aging. In: McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL, editors. Exercise Physiology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: LWW; 1996. p.635-668.
  • Kujala UM, Viljanen T, Taimela S, Vi- itasalo JT. Physical activity, VO2max and jumping height in an urban population. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994;26:889-895. Assaf AR, Lasate TM, Carleton RA. Physical activity, physical fitness, and coronary heart disease risk factors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27:340– 346.
  • Jackson AS, Beard EF, Wire LT, Ross RM, Stuteville JE, Blair ST. Chan- ges in aerobic power of men, ages 25–70 yr. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995;27:113–120.
  • Jackson AS, Wire LT, Ayers GW, Be- ard EF, Stuteville JE, Blair ST. Chan- ges in aerobic power of women, ages 20–64 yr. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996;28:884–891.
  • Tager IB, Hollenberg M, Satariano WA. Association between self-reported leisure-time physical activity and me- asures of cardiorespiratory fitness in an elderly population. Am J Epidemi- ol 1998;147:921–931.
  • Zhang JG, Ohta T, Ishikawa-Takata K, Tabata I, Miyashita M. Effects of daily activity recorded by pedometer on peak oxygen consumption (VO2pe- ak), ventilatory threshold and leg ex- tension power in 30- to 69-year-old Japanese without exercise habit. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003; 90:109-113.
  • Singh NP, Fraser GE, Knutsen SF, Lindsted KD, Bennett HW. Validity of a physical activity questionnaire 18. Strath SJ, Swartz AM, Bassett DR. among african-american seventh- day adventists. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33:468-475.
  • Montoye HJ, Kemper HCG, Saris WHM, Washburn RA. Measuring 19. Ravussin E, Rising R. Daily Energy Physical Activity and Energy Expen- diture. In: Montoye HJ, Kemper HCG, Saris WHM, Washburn RA, eds. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1996. p.3-59.
  • Baumgartner TA, Jackson AS Mahar, MT Rowe, DA. In: Baumgartner TA, Jackson AS Mahar, MT Rowe, DA, 20. Campbell KL, Crocker PR, Mckenzie eds. Measurement For Evaluation in Physical Education and Exercise Science. Boston: Mcgraw Hill; 2003. pp.14-79, 371-384.
  • Melby CL, Ho RC, Hill JO. Assessment Of Human Energy Expenditure. In: Bouchard C, editor. Physical Activity and Obesity. Champaign: Human Ki- netics Publishers; 2000. p.104-121.
  • Ceesay BM, Prentice AM, Day KC, 22. Welk GJ, Schaben JA, Morrow JR Jr. Murgatroyd PR, Goldberg GR, Scott W. The use of heart rate monitoring in the estimation of energy expendi- tures validation study using indirect whole-body calorimety. Br J Nutriti- on 1989;61:175-186.
  • Laporte RE, Montoye HJ, Caspersen CJ. Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research; Problems and Prospects. Public Health Report 1985;100:131-145.
  • Goran MI, Poehlman ET, Johnson RK. Energy requirements across the life span; new findings based on me- asurement of total energy expendi- ture with doubly labelled water. Nut- rition Research 1995;15:115-150.
  • King GA, Torres N, Potter C, Brooks TJ, Coleman KJ. Comparison of acti- vity monitors to estimate energy cost of treadmill exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;6:1244-51. Reliability of accel-erometry-based activity monitors; a generalizabi- lity study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1637-45.
  • Fruin ML, Rankin JW. Validity of a Multi-Sensor Armband in estima- ting rest and exercise energy ex- penditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1063-9.
  • Jakicic JM, Marcus M, Gallagher KI, Et Al. Evaluation of the sensewear pro armband to assess energy ex- penditure during exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36:897-904.
  • Westerterp KR. Energy metabolism and body composition; General prin- ciples. Eur Respir Mon 2003;24:1- 10.
  • Beaver WL, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ. A new method for detecting anaero- bic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol 1986; 60:2020–2027.
  • Bouchard C, Daw EW, Rice T, et al. Familial resemblance for VO2 max in the sedanter state: the HERITAGE family study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:252-258.
  • American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand: The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardi- orespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:975-991.
  • Blair SN, Cheng Y, Holder JS. Is physical activity or physical fitness more important in defining he- alth benefits? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:379-399.
  • Paffenbarger RS, Blair SN, Lee IM, et al. Measurement of physical activity to assess health effects free-living populations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;25:60-70.
  • St-Onge M, Mignault D, Allison DB, Rabasa-Lhoret R. Evaluation of a por- table device to measure daily energy expenditure in free-living adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85:742-9.
  • Fruin ML, Rankin JW. Validity of a multi-sensor armband in estima- ting rest and exercise energy ex- penditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36:1063-9.

Metabolik Holter İle Fizik Tedavi Ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Günlük Fiziksel Aktivitesinin Ölçülmesi

Year 2008, Volume: 61 Issue: 4, 196 - 201, 01.04.2008

Cem Çetin Ali Erdoğan Mustafa Yolcu Metin Lütfi Baydar

https://doi.org/10.1501/Tipfak_0000000682

Abstract

Amaç: Pratik uygulamaların fizik tedavi ve rehabilitasyon bölümü öğrencilerinin günlük fiziksel aktivite seviyesi üzerine etkisinin incelenmesi ve günlük fiziksel aktivite düzeyi ile aerobik dayanıklılık göstergeleri ve alt ekstremite izokinetik kuvvetleri arasındaki ilişki düzeyinin araştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırmaya 42 öğrenci katılmıştır. Günlük fiziksel aktivitenin ölçülmesinde metabolik holter kullanılmış ve deneklerin 3 gün süreyle toplam enerji tüketimi (TEE), istirahat enerji tüketimi (REE), toplam adım sayısı (STEP), aktif enerji tüketimi hesaplanmıştır (AEE). Ayrı bir zamanda egzersiz testi yapılmış, günlük fiziksel aktivite düzeyleri ile zirve oksijen tüketimi, solunumsal eşik değerleri arasındaki ilişki araştırılmıştır. Ayrıca izokinetik kuvvet ile fiziksel aktivite düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiler değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: İkinci sınıf ve dördüncü sınıf öğrencileri arasında enerji tüketim parametreleri (TEE, AEE, REE, STEP) ile egzersiz testleri değerleri (VO2peak, VT) ve izokinetik test değerlerinde (PT Ex, PT Flex) anlamlı farklılık saptanmamıştır. Tüm deneklerin TEE ile izokinetik kuvvet değerleri arasında yüksek korelasyon (r=0,61; 0,64), REE ile izokinetik kuvvet değerleri arasında çok yüksek korelasyon (r=0,80; 0,79), yağsız vücut kitlesi (FFM) ile aerobik dayanıklılık arasında düşük korelasyon (r=0,43; 0,34), izokinetik kuvvet değerleri arasında çok yüksek korelasyon (r=0,81; 0,81) saptanmıştır.Sonuç: Hasta başı uygulamaların, öğrencilerin günlük fiziksel aktivite seviyelerinde artış oluşturmadığı, günlük fiziksel aktivite düzeyi ile fiziksel uygunluk parametreleri, aerobik dayanıklılık göstergeleri ve alt ekstremite izokinetik kuvvetleri arasında anlamlı ilişkiler olduğu gösterilmiştir.

Keywords

Enerji tüketimi Solunumsal eşik Zirve VO2 izokinetik kuvvet

References

  • Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Macera CA, Bouchard C, et al. Physical activity and public health. JAMA 1995; 273: 402-407.
  • Franklin BA, Whaley MH, Howley ET. Benefits and Risk Associated with Exercise. In: Franklin BA, Wha- ley MH, Howley ET, editors. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 6th ed. Philadelphia: 5. Eaton CB, Lapane KL, Garber CE, LWW; 2000. p.3-21.
  • McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Physical Activity, Health, and Aging. In: McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL, editors. Exercise Physiology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: LWW; 1996. p.635-668.
  • Kujala UM, Viljanen T, Taimela S, Vi- itasalo JT. Physical activity, VO2max and jumping height in an urban population. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994;26:889-895. Assaf AR, Lasate TM, Carleton RA. Physical activity, physical fitness, and coronary heart disease risk factors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27:340– 346.
  • Jackson AS, Beard EF, Wire LT, Ross RM, Stuteville JE, Blair ST. Chan- ges in aerobic power of men, ages 25–70 yr. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995;27:113–120.
  • Jackson AS, Wire LT, Ayers GW, Be- ard EF, Stuteville JE, Blair ST. Chan- ges in aerobic power of women, ages 20–64 yr. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996;28:884–891.
  • Tager IB, Hollenberg M, Satariano WA. Association between self-reported leisure-time physical activity and me- asures of cardiorespiratory fitness in an elderly population. Am J Epidemi- ol 1998;147:921–931.
  • Zhang JG, Ohta T, Ishikawa-Takata K, Tabata I, Miyashita M. Effects of daily activity recorded by pedometer on peak oxygen consumption (VO2pe- ak), ventilatory threshold and leg ex- tension power in 30- to 69-year-old Japanese without exercise habit. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003; 90:109-113.
  • Singh NP, Fraser GE, Knutsen SF, Lindsted KD, Bennett HW. Validity of a physical activity questionnaire 18. Strath SJ, Swartz AM, Bassett DR. among african-american seventh- day adventists. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33:468-475.
  • Montoye HJ, Kemper HCG, Saris WHM, Washburn RA. Measuring 19. Ravussin E, Rising R. Daily Energy Physical Activity and Energy Expen- diture. In: Montoye HJ, Kemper HCG, Saris WHM, Washburn RA, eds. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1996. p.3-59.
  • Baumgartner TA, Jackson AS Mahar, MT Rowe, DA. In: Baumgartner TA, Jackson AS Mahar, MT Rowe, DA, 20. Campbell KL, Crocker PR, Mckenzie eds. Measurement For Evaluation in Physical Education and Exercise Science. Boston: Mcgraw Hill; 2003. pp.14-79, 371-384.
  • Melby CL, Ho RC, Hill JO. Assessment Of Human Energy Expenditure. In: Bouchard C, editor. Physical Activity and Obesity. Champaign: Human Ki- netics Publishers; 2000. p.104-121.
  • Ceesay BM, Prentice AM, Day KC, 22. Welk GJ, Schaben JA, Morrow JR Jr. Murgatroyd PR, Goldberg GR, Scott W. The use of heart rate monitoring in the estimation of energy expendi- tures validation study using indirect whole-body calorimety. Br J Nutriti- on 1989;61:175-186.
  • Laporte RE, Montoye HJ, Caspersen CJ. Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research; Problems and Prospects. Public Health Report 1985;100:131-145.
  • Goran MI, Poehlman ET, Johnson RK. Energy requirements across the life span; new findings based on me- asurement of total energy expendi- ture with doubly labelled water. Nut- rition Research 1995;15:115-150.
  • King GA, Torres N, Potter C, Brooks TJ, Coleman KJ. Comparison of acti- vity monitors to estimate energy cost of treadmill exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;6:1244-51. Reliability of accel-erometry-based activity monitors; a generalizabi- lity study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1637-45.
  • Fruin ML, Rankin JW. Validity of a Multi-Sensor Armband in estima- ting rest and exercise energy ex- penditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1063-9.
  • Jakicic JM, Marcus M, Gallagher KI, Et Al. Evaluation of the sensewear pro armband to assess energy ex- penditure during exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36:897-904.
  • Westerterp KR. Energy metabolism and body composition; General prin- ciples. Eur Respir Mon 2003;24:1- 10.
  • Beaver WL, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ. A new method for detecting anaero- bic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol 1986; 60:2020–2027.
  • Bouchard C, Daw EW, Rice T, et al. Familial resemblance for VO2 max in the sedanter state: the HERITAGE family study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:252-258.
  • American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand: The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardi- orespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:975-991.
  • Blair SN, Cheng Y, Holder JS. Is physical activity or physical fitness more important in defining he- alth benefits? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:379-399.
  • Paffenbarger RS, Blair SN, Lee IM, et al. Measurement of physical activity to assess health effects free-living populations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;25:60-70.
  • St-Onge M, Mignault D, Allison DB, Rabasa-Lhoret R. Evaluation of a por- table device to measure daily energy expenditure in free-living adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85:742-9.
  • Fruin ML, Rankin JW. Validity of a multi-sensor armband in estima- ting rest and exercise energy ex- penditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36:1063-9.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Cem Çetin

Ali Erdoğan This is me

Mustafa Yolcu This is me

Metin Lütfi Baydar This is me

Publication Date April 1, 2008
Published in Issue Year 2008 Volume: 61 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Çetin, C., Erdoğan, A., Yolcu, M., Baydar, M. L. (2008). Metabolik Holter İle Fizik Tedavi Ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Günlük Fiziksel Aktivitesinin Ölçülmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, 61(4), 196-201. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tipfak_0000000682
AMA Çetin C, Erdoğan A, Yolcu M, Baydar ML. Metabolik Holter İle Fizik Tedavi Ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Günlük Fiziksel Aktivitesinin Ölçülmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. April 2008;61(4):196-201. doi:10.1501/Tipfak_0000000682
Chicago Çetin, Cem, Ali Erdoğan, Mustafa Yolcu, and Metin Lütfi Baydar. “Metabolik Holter İle Fizik Tedavi Ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Günlük Fiziksel Aktivitesinin Ölçülmesi”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 61, no. 4 (April 2008): 196-201. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tipfak_0000000682.
EndNote Çetin C, Erdoğan A, Yolcu M, Baydar ML (April 1, 2008) Metabolik Holter İle Fizik Tedavi Ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Günlük Fiziksel Aktivitesinin Ölçülmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 61 4 196–201.
IEEE C. Çetin, A. Erdoğan, M. Yolcu, and M. L. Baydar, “Metabolik Holter İle Fizik Tedavi Ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Günlük Fiziksel Aktivitesinin Ölçülmesi”, Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 196–201, 2008, doi: 10.1501/Tipfak_0000000682.
ISNAD Çetin, Cem et al. “Metabolik Holter İle Fizik Tedavi Ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Günlük Fiziksel Aktivitesinin Ölçülmesi”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 61/4 (April 2008), 196-201. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tipfak_0000000682.
JAMA Çetin C, Erdoğan A, Yolcu M, Baydar ML. Metabolik Holter İle Fizik Tedavi Ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Günlük Fiziksel Aktivitesinin Ölçülmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2008;61:196–201.
MLA Çetin, Cem et al. “Metabolik Holter İle Fizik Tedavi Ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Günlük Fiziksel Aktivitesinin Ölçülmesi”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 61, no. 4, 2008, pp. 196-01, doi:10.1501/Tipfak_0000000682.
Vancouver Çetin C, Erdoğan A, Yolcu M, Baydar ML. Metabolik Holter İle Fizik Tedavi Ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Günlük Fiziksel Aktivitesinin Ölçülmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2008;61(4):196-201.