Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

X, Y ve Z Kuşaklarının Kentsel Alanları Kullanım Şekilleri ve Kentten Beklentileri

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 59 - 90, 30.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.33399/biibfad.1083238

Abstract

X. Y ve Z kuşaklarının kentsel alanları kullanma şekilleri, kent yöneticilerinden beklentileri, kentsel alanlarda gördüğü eksiklikler ve hayallerindeki kent tasvirleri tespit edilerek kent idarecilerinin uygulayacakları plan ve programlara nitel veriler oluşturmak çalışmanın temel amaçları arasında yer almaktadır. Bu amaçlar doğrultusunda, X, Y ve Z kuşaklarının özellikleri ve ilgi alanlarına göre hangi yıllara dâhil olduğu açıklandıktan sonra İzmir ili yerleşikleriyle yapılan yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme çalışmasının çıktılarına yer verilmiştir. Çalışma nitel araştırma yöntemleri arasında yer alan yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme tekniğine dayandırılmıştır. Çalışmada X, Y ve Z kuşaklarının ulaşım, trafik, konut ve altyapı konusunda benzer düşüncelere sahip olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. X kuşağı bireyleri dingin yaşamı, kalabalıktan uzak, el değmemiş doğal şehir alanlarını tercih ederken, Y kuşağı bireyleri yeşil alanları ve yoğun alanlara sahip kültürel alanları tercih etmektedir. Kuşakların farklılaşan ihtiyaçlarının tam olarak karşılanmamasından ötürü katılımcıların İzmir kentine aidiyet düzeylerinin düştüğü bu durumun da yaşam kalitesini azalttığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bu sebeple kent yöneticileri tarafından imar, çevre düzeni gibi stratejik planların hazırlanma süreçlerinde kuşaklar arasındaki farklılıkların dikkate alınması sorunların çözümünde önemli görülmektedir.

References

  • Adıgüzel, O., Batur, Z. E., & Ekşili, N. (2014). Kuşakların değişen yüzü ve y kuşağı ile ortaya çıkan yeni çalışma tarzı: mobil yakalılar. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (19), 165-182.
  • Aziz, A. (2020). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntem ve Teknikleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Berkup, S. B. (2014). Working with generations X and Y in generation Z period: management of different. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(19), 218-229.
  • Betz, C. L. (2019). Generations X, Y, and Z. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 44, 7-8.
  • Cohen, P. (2012). In Our Prime: The Invention of Middle Age. North Carolina: Scribner.
  • Coupland, D. (1991). Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture. New York: St. Martin's Press. Duman, Z. (2019). Kuşak Çatışması. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Düzenli, T., Alpak, E. M., & Yılmaz, S. (2019). The correlation between urban open space occupation differences among generations X, Y, and Z and occupant well-being. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(2), 3737- 3751.
  • Dworkin, S. (2012). Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1319-1320.
  • Euromonitor International (2020). How China's Urban Millennials and Gen Z Live and Spend. https://go.euromonitor.com/rs/805-KOK-719/images/wpChineseMillennialsGenZ-v0.5.pdf?mkt_tok=ODA1LUtPSy03MTkAAAGCdsWfTkbWwyxfMaXM7X33S3visIZ2O66bieezro_eJCHZ0w8YywKDZOc-eHKupXmM8INEDjr6oEjS5WkqIQEkgE1tmKRlVb1XXZXVavSZq_dNsBI. [Erişim tarihi: 03.01.2022].
  • Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2018). ‘True Gen’: Generation Z and İts İmplications For Companies. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gen-generation-z-and-its-implications-for-companies. [Erişim tarihi: 29.12.2022].
  • Galvin, R. (2015). How many interviews are enough? Do qualitative interviews in building energy consumption research produce reliable knowledge? Journal of Building Engineering, 1, 2-12.
  • Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2018). Qualitative Methods For Health Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Grix, J. (2010). The Foundations Of Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • İslamoğlu, H., & Alnıaçık, Ü. (2019). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Şehir Politikaları Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi. (2019). İstanbul’da demografik değişim: 2013-2018. http://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/FileHandler2.ashx?f=istanbul-demografi-13.04.2019_2.pdf. [Erişim tarihi: 11.09.2020].
  • J. Schenarts, P. (2020). Now arriving: surgical trainees from generation Z. Journal of Surgical Education, 77(2), 246-253.
  • Kam, A. (2022). The importance of different generational features for urban management and planning. Kwartał, 4-12.
  • Karaibrahimoğlu, S. (2021). Kuşak değişimi bağlamında kentsel kamusal mekânı yeniden düşünmek. Planlama Dergisi, 1-11.
  • Kupperschmidt, B. (2000). Multigeneration employees: strategies for effective management. The Health Care Manager, 19(1), 65-76.
  • Lancaster, L. C., & Stillman, D. (2003). When Generations Collide: Who They Are. Why They Clash. How to Solve the Generational Puzzle at Work. New York: Harper Business.
  • Larkin, C. M., Jancourt, M., & Hendrix, W. H. (2018). The generation Z world: shifts in urban design, architecture and the corporate workplace. Corporate Real Estate Journal, 7(3), 230-242.
  • Lee, H. (2020). Are millennials leaving town? Reconciling peak millennials and youthification hypotheses. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 1-19.
  • Levickaite, R. (2010). Generations X, Y, Z: how social networks form the concept of the world without borders (the case of Lithuania). Limes Cultural Regionalistics, 3(2), 170-183.
  • Markert, J. (2004). Demographics of age: generational and cohort confusion. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 24(2), 11-25.
  • Maxwell, G., & Broadbridge, A. (2014). Generation Y graduates and career transition: perspectives by gender. European Management Journal, 32(4), 547-553.
  • Merritt, S. R., & Editor, S. N. (2002). Generation Y: a perspective on America's next generation and their impact on higher education. The Serials Librarian, 42(1-2), 41-50. doi:10.1300/J123v42n01_06 Mora, P. (2006). Key factors of success in today’s wine sector. International Journal Of Wine Marketing. 18(7), 139-149.
  • Neuman, L. (2014). Toplumsal Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
  • Parlak, B., & Doğan K. C. (2020). Kamu Yönetimi Kuramlarına Giriş. Sakarya: Değişim Yayınları.
  • Patterson, C. K. (2007). Generational diversity-The impact of generational diversity in the workplace. Diversity Factor, 17-22.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. R. (2016). Empowerment Series: Research Methods for Social Work. Boston: Cengage Learning.
  • Salleh, M. S., Mahbob, N. N., & Baharudin, S. (2017). Overview of “Generation Z” behavioural characteristic and its effect towards Hostel facility. International Journal of Real Estate Studies, 11(2), 60-67.
  • Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing and Health, 18(2), 179-183.
  • Sarıoğlu, E. B. (2018). Y'leri Anla, Değiştirme Kurumsal Hayatta Milenyum Kuşağı ve İletişim. İstanbul: Humanist.
  • Star, A. (1993). The twentysomething myth. The New Republic, 22-26.
  • Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069. New York: William Morrow Company.
  • Supunya, P., & Ayuwat, D. (2019). Lifestyle of generations in the sub-urban case study: major cities in Northeastern Thailand. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 2(2), 366-374.
  • Susanti, A., & Natalia, W. (2018). Public space strategic planning based on Z generation preferences. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 407(1). doi:10.1088/1757-899X/407/1/01207
  • Tanner, R. (2021). Management is Journey. https://managementisajourney.com/15-influential-events-that-shaped-generation-y-infographic/.
  • Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World. New York: McGraw- Hill.
  • Taş, Y., & Demirdöğmez, M. (2017). Geleceğimiz olan Z kuşağının çalışma hayatına muhtemel etkileri. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(13), 1031-1048.
  • Tolbize, A. (2018). Generational Differences In The Workplace. https://rtc.umn.edu/docs/2_18_Gen_diff_workplace.pdf. [Erişim tarihi: 12 Haziran 2021].
  • USF. (2021). Generatıons In The Workplace. https://www.usf.edu/hr-training/career-development/lunch-bytes/lbgenerations.aspx. [Erişim tarihi: 12 Haziran 2021].
  • Weingarten, R. M. (2009). Four generations, one workplace: a gen X-Y staff nurse’s view of team building in the emergency department. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 35, 27-30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2008.02.017
  • West, P. (2016). Simple random sampling of individual items in the absence of a sampling frame that lists the individuals. West New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 1-7. doi:10.1186/s40490-016-0071-1
  • Yüksel, A. N. (2020). Nitel bir araştırma tekniği olarak: görüşme. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 6(56), 547-552.

Generation X, Y and Z’s Use of Urban Areas and Expectations from the City

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 59 - 90, 30.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.33399/biibfad.1083238

Abstract

The main purposes of the study are to determine the way that X, Y and Z generations use urban areas, their expectations from the city administrators, the deficiencies they see in urban areas and the descriptions of the city in their dreams, and to create qualitative data for the plans and programs to be implemented by the city administrators. For these purposes, after explaining which years the X, Y and Z generations belong to according to their characteristics and areas of interest, the outputs of the semi-structured interview study with the residents of Izmir are included. The study is based on the semi-structured interview technique, which is among the qualitative research methods. In the study, it was concluded that X, Y and Z generations have similar thoughts about transportation, traffic, housing and infrastructure. While generation X prefer calm life, untouched natural city areas away from crowds, Y generation individuals prefer green areas and cultural areas with dense areas. It was concluded that the level of belonging of the participants to the city of Izmir decreased due to the fact that the differing needs of the generations were not fully met, and this situation also reduced their quality of life. For this reason, considering the differences between generations in the preparation processes of strategic plans such as zoning and environmental order by city managers is considered important in solving problems.

References

  • Adıgüzel, O., Batur, Z. E., & Ekşili, N. (2014). Kuşakların değişen yüzü ve y kuşağı ile ortaya çıkan yeni çalışma tarzı: mobil yakalılar. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (19), 165-182.
  • Aziz, A. (2020). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntem ve Teknikleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Berkup, S. B. (2014). Working with generations X and Y in generation Z period: management of different. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(19), 218-229.
  • Betz, C. L. (2019). Generations X, Y, and Z. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 44, 7-8.
  • Cohen, P. (2012). In Our Prime: The Invention of Middle Age. North Carolina: Scribner.
  • Coupland, D. (1991). Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture. New York: St. Martin's Press. Duman, Z. (2019). Kuşak Çatışması. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Düzenli, T., Alpak, E. M., & Yılmaz, S. (2019). The correlation between urban open space occupation differences among generations X, Y, and Z and occupant well-being. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(2), 3737- 3751.
  • Dworkin, S. (2012). Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1319-1320.
  • Euromonitor International (2020). How China's Urban Millennials and Gen Z Live and Spend. https://go.euromonitor.com/rs/805-KOK-719/images/wpChineseMillennialsGenZ-v0.5.pdf?mkt_tok=ODA1LUtPSy03MTkAAAGCdsWfTkbWwyxfMaXM7X33S3visIZ2O66bieezro_eJCHZ0w8YywKDZOc-eHKupXmM8INEDjr6oEjS5WkqIQEkgE1tmKRlVb1XXZXVavSZq_dNsBI. [Erişim tarihi: 03.01.2022].
  • Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2018). ‘True Gen’: Generation Z and İts İmplications For Companies. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gen-generation-z-and-its-implications-for-companies. [Erişim tarihi: 29.12.2022].
  • Galvin, R. (2015). How many interviews are enough? Do qualitative interviews in building energy consumption research produce reliable knowledge? Journal of Building Engineering, 1, 2-12.
  • Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2018). Qualitative Methods For Health Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Grix, J. (2010). The Foundations Of Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • İslamoğlu, H., & Alnıaçık, Ü. (2019). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Şehir Politikaları Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi. (2019). İstanbul’da demografik değişim: 2013-2018. http://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/FileHandler2.ashx?f=istanbul-demografi-13.04.2019_2.pdf. [Erişim tarihi: 11.09.2020].
  • J. Schenarts, P. (2020). Now arriving: surgical trainees from generation Z. Journal of Surgical Education, 77(2), 246-253.
  • Kam, A. (2022). The importance of different generational features for urban management and planning. Kwartał, 4-12.
  • Karaibrahimoğlu, S. (2021). Kuşak değişimi bağlamında kentsel kamusal mekânı yeniden düşünmek. Planlama Dergisi, 1-11.
  • Kupperschmidt, B. (2000). Multigeneration employees: strategies for effective management. The Health Care Manager, 19(1), 65-76.
  • Lancaster, L. C., & Stillman, D. (2003). When Generations Collide: Who They Are. Why They Clash. How to Solve the Generational Puzzle at Work. New York: Harper Business.
  • Larkin, C. M., Jancourt, M., & Hendrix, W. H. (2018). The generation Z world: shifts in urban design, architecture and the corporate workplace. Corporate Real Estate Journal, 7(3), 230-242.
  • Lee, H. (2020). Are millennials leaving town? Reconciling peak millennials and youthification hypotheses. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 1-19.
  • Levickaite, R. (2010). Generations X, Y, Z: how social networks form the concept of the world without borders (the case of Lithuania). Limes Cultural Regionalistics, 3(2), 170-183.
  • Markert, J. (2004). Demographics of age: generational and cohort confusion. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 24(2), 11-25.
  • Maxwell, G., & Broadbridge, A. (2014). Generation Y graduates and career transition: perspectives by gender. European Management Journal, 32(4), 547-553.
  • Merritt, S. R., & Editor, S. N. (2002). Generation Y: a perspective on America's next generation and their impact on higher education. The Serials Librarian, 42(1-2), 41-50. doi:10.1300/J123v42n01_06 Mora, P. (2006). Key factors of success in today’s wine sector. International Journal Of Wine Marketing. 18(7), 139-149.
  • Neuman, L. (2014). Toplumsal Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
  • Parlak, B., & Doğan K. C. (2020). Kamu Yönetimi Kuramlarına Giriş. Sakarya: Değişim Yayınları.
  • Patterson, C. K. (2007). Generational diversity-The impact of generational diversity in the workplace. Diversity Factor, 17-22.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. R. (2016). Empowerment Series: Research Methods for Social Work. Boston: Cengage Learning.
  • Salleh, M. S., Mahbob, N. N., & Baharudin, S. (2017). Overview of “Generation Z” behavioural characteristic and its effect towards Hostel facility. International Journal of Real Estate Studies, 11(2), 60-67.
  • Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing and Health, 18(2), 179-183.
  • Sarıoğlu, E. B. (2018). Y'leri Anla, Değiştirme Kurumsal Hayatta Milenyum Kuşağı ve İletişim. İstanbul: Humanist.
  • Star, A. (1993). The twentysomething myth. The New Republic, 22-26.
  • Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069. New York: William Morrow Company.
  • Supunya, P., & Ayuwat, D. (2019). Lifestyle of generations in the sub-urban case study: major cities in Northeastern Thailand. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 2(2), 366-374.
  • Susanti, A., & Natalia, W. (2018). Public space strategic planning based on Z generation preferences. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 407(1). doi:10.1088/1757-899X/407/1/01207
  • Tanner, R. (2021). Management is Journey. https://managementisajourney.com/15-influential-events-that-shaped-generation-y-infographic/.
  • Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World. New York: McGraw- Hill.
  • Taş, Y., & Demirdöğmez, M. (2017). Geleceğimiz olan Z kuşağının çalışma hayatına muhtemel etkileri. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(13), 1031-1048.
  • Tolbize, A. (2018). Generational Differences In The Workplace. https://rtc.umn.edu/docs/2_18_Gen_diff_workplace.pdf. [Erişim tarihi: 12 Haziran 2021].
  • USF. (2021). Generatıons In The Workplace. https://www.usf.edu/hr-training/career-development/lunch-bytes/lbgenerations.aspx. [Erişim tarihi: 12 Haziran 2021].
  • Weingarten, R. M. (2009). Four generations, one workplace: a gen X-Y staff nurse’s view of team building in the emergency department. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 35, 27-30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2008.02.017
  • West, P. (2016). Simple random sampling of individual items in the absence of a sampling frame that lists the individuals. West New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 1-7. doi:10.1186/s40490-016-0071-1
  • Yüksel, A. N. (2020). Nitel bir araştırma tekniği olarak: görüşme. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 6(56), 547-552.
There are 45 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Public Administration
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Kıvanç Demirci 0000-0001-6598-6673

Publication Date December 30, 2022
Submission Date March 5, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 6 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Demirci, K. (2022). X, Y ve Z Kuşaklarının Kentsel Alanları Kullanım Şekilleri ve Kentten Beklentileri. Bingöl Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 59-90. https://doi.org/10.33399/biibfad.1083238


Creative Commons Lisansı