Edebiyat Dilbilim Eğitim ve Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi

Abstract

In this article, on the occasion of declaring 2023, the "50th Anniversary of His Death", as the "Year of Âşık Veysel", of Âşık Veysel, one of the recent strong pioneers of the "Tradition of Minstrel", which was recorded in the UNESCO "Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity". Turkish words and affixes, including the vocabulary composed of words borrowed from the source languages in the written discourses of Veysel Şatıroğlu, who sang improvised poetry with the instrument accompaniment in the Şarkışla dialect of Sivas province, were written locally and had humanistic values in the universal. stopped. The vocabulary in the poems of Veysel Şatıroğlu, a cultural representative of the Turkish villager, who is the master of the nation, as Atatürk said, with the lessons he gave at the People's Houses with the dialect of Sivas Region Şarkışla, which is also at the dialectical transition point during the transition period from the Ottoman Empire to the Turkish Republic, coincides with the period when the Compilation Dictionary studies started. Due to this reason, it has been carried as a corpus to today's dialect studies as a natural record. Veysel Şatıroğlu became a cultural ambassador by carrying the "Minstrelsy Tradition" from the Ottoman Empire to modern Turkey, and his power of representation gained global value. When the local words are evaluated in the Alta-Turkish language and culture with the altaistic analysis, it will be seen that there is a common language and culture from Japan to Turkey and how the Altai-Turkish cultural union is shaped in a large geography including Hungary, and in addition to the Union of Turkish States that may occur in the future, it will be seen that the Altai States The Cultural Union will rise step by step with similar studies and reach an international dimension with information feasts, and will contribute to the transport of intangible cultural heritage as well as technical developments. In the introductory part of the study, Turkish dialects and Altaic languages and the peripheral languages, mostly Arabic and Persian, were emphasized, starting from the dialect of Veysel Şatıroğlu and Sivas. Turkish words were compared with Altaic comparison. An example: aşık “oiled, dull and slightly dark colored” (< āş “repair of the container, attachment, patch”), aşu “red ocher” (Beserek Mountain), aşu < *ālçu > plaster “white ocher” ; ş < l > Jap. 色 [iro] “paint”. Then, Turkish suffixes were examined. In the conclusion part, evaluations based on numerical criteria based on word lists were made. A basic bibliography on the subject, which can be considered rich on which citations are based, and which examines the literature, has also been given. With this Altaic analysis, it has been shown that many more studies can be done about Veysel from different perspectives. New inferences can be made by evaluating Veysel's interviews and poems and the criticisms made for him in fields that examine different aspects of life, from political science to painting, from linguistics to plant science.