Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2023, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 107 - 120, 15.10.2023

Abstract

References

  • [1] Baker, N. (2018). Leader-member exchange and follower trust in leader: The moderating effect of leader emotional expressivity. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 4(4), 741-749.
  • [2] Baker, N. (2019a). The combined effect of leader-member exchange and leader optimism on follower job outcomes. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(5), 2525-2555.
  • [3] Baker, N. (2019b). The moderating effect of leader anger on the relationship between leader-member exchange and follower job outcomes. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(2), 781-794.
  • [4] Baker, N. (2019c). Lider-üye etkileşimi ve takipçi iş performansı: Lider duygu dışavurumunun modere edici etkisi. In Tuğsal, T. (Ed.), Liderlik ve Kurumsal Yönetim: Teori ve Güncel Araştırmalar (pp. 65-75). Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
  • [5] Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89-136.
  • [6] Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278-321.
  • [7] Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
  • [8] Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42–51.
  • [9] Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844.
  • [10] Graen, G., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30(1), 109-131.
  • [11] Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
  • [12] Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta‐analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281-342.
  • [13] Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
  • [14] Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698.

40 YEARS OF LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE RESEARCH: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS BETWEEN 1982 AND 2022

Year 2023, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 107 - 120, 15.10.2023

Abstract

This qualitative study analyzes the past 40 years of research on leader-member exchange through conducting bibliometric analysis. Using R and R Studio, articles on leader-member exchange that are published in the Web of Science have been analyzed. The findings of the bibliometric analysis reveal that a total of 4316 articles have been published on leader-member exchange, and the first article on the subject appeared in 1982. Further analysis uncovered that the highest number of articles on leader-member exchange has been published in 2022. Most of the body of literature on leader-member exchange are found in the Journal of Applied Psychology, Frontiers in Psychology, and Journal of Organizational Behavior. Y. Brunetto, R. C. Liden, and Y. Liu are the top three researchers that contributed most to the body of knowledge on leader-member exchange, and the top three affiliations are University of Illinois, Renmin University of China, and Michigan State University. The most productive countries are USA, China, and Australia; and the most frequently used words are “leader-member exchange”, “performance”, and “work”.

References

  • [1] Baker, N. (2018). Leader-member exchange and follower trust in leader: The moderating effect of leader emotional expressivity. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 4(4), 741-749.
  • [2] Baker, N. (2019a). The combined effect of leader-member exchange and leader optimism on follower job outcomes. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(5), 2525-2555.
  • [3] Baker, N. (2019b). The moderating effect of leader anger on the relationship between leader-member exchange and follower job outcomes. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(2), 781-794.
  • [4] Baker, N. (2019c). Lider-üye etkileşimi ve takipçi iş performansı: Lider duygu dışavurumunun modere edici etkisi. In Tuğsal, T. (Ed.), Liderlik ve Kurumsal Yönetim: Teori ve Güncel Araştırmalar (pp. 65-75). Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
  • [5] Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89-136.
  • [6] Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278-321.
  • [7] Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
  • [8] Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42–51.
  • [9] Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844.
  • [10] Graen, G., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30(1), 109-131.
  • [11] Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
  • [12] Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta‐analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281-342.
  • [13] Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
  • [14] Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698.
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Leadership
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Nevra Baker 0000-0002-5557-8235

Early Pub Date October 11, 2023
Publication Date October 15, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 9 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Baker, N. (2023). 40 YEARS OF LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE RESEARCH: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS BETWEEN 1982 AND 2022. Florya Chronicles of Political Economy, 9(2), 107-120.


All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Common Attribution Licence. (CC-BY-NC 4.0)

by-nc.png