Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Lisans Öğrencilerinin Uzaktan Eğitim ve Yüz Yüze Eğitim Kapsamında Tutum ve Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması

Year 2023, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 81 - 96, 25.12.2023

Tuncer Gövdeli Rafet Beyaz Abdullah Yiğit Güngör Mehmet Gözel

https://doi.org/10.47479/ihead.1374499
Cited By: 1

Abstract

2019 yılının sonlarında ortaya çıkan COVID-19 Yeni Koronavirüs Hastalığı bütün sektörleri etkilediği gibi eğitim sektörünü de etkilemiştir. Zorunlu olarak gerçekleştirilen uzaktan eğitimin öğrenci başarısı üzerindeki etkisi literatürde yeterince araştırılmamıştır. Bu amaçla çalışmada uzaktan eğitim ile yüz yüze eğitimin öğrenci başarıları üzerindeki etkisi araştırılmıştır. Oltu Beşerî ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi’nde yüz yüze eğitim verilen 2019-2020 güz dönemi ile uzaktan eğitim verilen 2020-2021 güz döneminin karşılaştırması yapılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, öğrencilerin yüz yüze eğitime göre uzaktan eğitimde daha başarılı oldukları tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca öğrencilere anket uygulanmış olup, uzaktan eğitim ile elde ettikleri akademik tatmin araştırması yapılmıştır. Verilerin ampirik analiz sonuçlarında, öğrencilerin uzaktan eğitimde daha başarılı olmalarına rağmen yüz yüze eğitimden daha memnun kaldıkları belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar neticesinde, ileride yaşanabilecek COVID-19 tarzı salgınlarda, uzaktan eğitim ile yüz yüze eğitim arasındaki fark ortaya konulmuştur. Böylece karar vericiler, bu farkı gözlemleyerek uzaktan eğitim ile yüz yüze eğitim arasındaki seçimi daha sağlıklı olarak gerçekleştirebilecektir. Çalışmanın sonuçları neticesinde eğitim sisteminde hem yüz yüze eğitim hem de uzaktan eğitimi içeren harmanlanmış eğitim modelinin yürütülmesi gerektiği önerilmektedir.

Keywords

Akademik başarı uzaktan eğitim yüz yüze eğitim

Supporting Institution

Atatürk Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi

Project Number

Proje ID: 8824, Proje kodu: SBA-2021-8824

Thanks

Atatürk Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi'ne çalışmamıza vermiş oldukları katkılardan dolayı teşekkür ederiz.

References

  • Akyürek, M. İ. (2020). Uzaktan eğitim: Bir alanyazın taraması. Medeniyet Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 1-9.
  • Allen, M., Mabry, E., Mattrey, M., Bourhis, J., Titsworth, S., & Burrell, N. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: A comparison using meta‐analysis. Journal of Communication, 54(3), 402-420.
  • Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32-54.
  • Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Manon, F., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439.
  • Beyaz, R. (2022). Tüketicilerin Uzaktan Alınan Hizmetlere Bakışı: Eğitim Sektörüne Yönelik Değerlendirme, C. Tor Kadıoğlu (Ed.). Pandemi Sonrası Tüketim Araştırmaları içinde (s.35-62). Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi.
  • Bozkurt, A. (2017). Türkiye’de uzaktan eğitimin dünü, bugünü ve yarını. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 85-124.
  • Brown, J. L. (2012). Online learning: A comparison of web-based and land-based courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 39-42.
  • Cambridge Dictionary. Distance education. In www.dictionary.cambridge.org. Date accessed: 03.12.2023
  • Cavanaugh, J. K., & Jacquemin, S. J. (2015). A large sample comparison of grade based student learning outcomes in online vs. face-to-face courses. Online Learning, 19(2), 25-32.
  • CDC COVID-19 Response Team, CDC COVID-19 Response Team, CDC COVID-19 Response Team, Bialek, S., Boundy, E., Bowen, V., ... & Sauber-Schatz, E. (2020). Severe outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)—United States, February 12–March 16, 2020. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 69(12),343-346.
  • Çelik, F. (2016). Comparing distance education versus traditional education in Engineering Management Masters Program: Sakarya University Sample. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(29), 305-309.
  • Cheng, H. C., Lehman, J., & Armstrong, P. (1991). Comparison of performance and attitude in traditional and computer conferencing classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 5(3), 51-64.
  • De Oliveira, Mayra Martins Santana, Antonio Sergio Torres Penedo, and Vinícius Silva Pereira (2018). Distance education: Advantages and disadvantages of the point of view of education and society. Dialogia, [S. l.], 29, 139-152.
  • Duru, E., & Balkis, M. (2017). Procrastination, self-esteem, academic performance, and well-being: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Educational Psychology: IJEP, 6(2), 97-119.
  • Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students' perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235.
  • Gagne, M., & Shepherd, M. (2001). Distance learning in accounting: A comparison between a distance and a traditional graduate accounting class. The Journal, 28(9), 58-60.
  • Gossenheimer, A. N., Bem, T., Carneiro, M. L. F., & de Castro, M. S. (2017). Impact of distance education on academic performance in a pharmaceutical care course. PloS One, 12(4), 1-11.
  • Grunschel, C., Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Fries, S. (2016). Effects of using motivational regulation strategies on students' academic procrastination, academic performance, and well-being. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 162-170.
  • Güngör, A. Y. (2020). The relationship between academic procrastination academic self-efficacy and academic achievement among undergraduates. Oltu Beşeri ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 57-68.
  • Hannay, M., & Newvine, T. (2006). Perceptions of distance learning: A comparison of online and traditional learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 1-11.
  • Harrington, D. (1999). Teaching statistics: A comparison of traditional classroom and programmed instruction/distance learning approaches. Journal of Social Work Education, 35(3), 343-352.
  • Hemmati, N., Omrani, S., & Hemmati, N. (2013). A comparison of internet-based learning and traditional classroom lecture to learn CPR for continuing medical education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 256-265.
  • Hijazi, S. T., & Naqvi, S. M. M. (2006). Factors affecting students' performance. Bangladesh E-Journal of Sociology, 3(1), 1-10.
  • Hobbs, G. D., Moshinskie, J. F., Roden, S. K., & Jarvis, J. L. (1998). A comparison of classroom and distance learning techniques for rural EMT-I instruction. Prehospital Emergency Care, 2(3), 189-191.
  • Holmberg, B. (2005). Theory and practice of distance education. UK: Routledge.
  • Hurlbut, A. R. (2018). Online vs. traditional learning in teacher education: a comparison of student progress. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(4), 248-266.
  • İşman, A. (2011). Uzaktan eğitim. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Karcıoğlu, R., Kılıçarslan, Ş., & Çelik, K. (2022). COVID-19 pandemi döneminde lisans öğrencilerinin uzaktan eğitim kapsamında muhasebe derslerine yönelik bakış açıları üzerine bir araştırma. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(1), 1-22.
  • Keržič D, Alex JK, Pamela Balbontín Alvarado R, Bezerra DdS, Cheraghi M, Dobrowolska B, vd. (2021) Academic student satisfaction and perceived performance in the e-learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence across ten countries. Plos One 16(10): e0258807. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258807
  • Kırık, A. (2014). Uzaktan eğitimin tarihsel gelişimi ve Türkiye’deki durumu. Marmara İletişim Dergisi, 21, 73-94.
  • Kim, S., Fernandez, S., & Terrier, L. (2017). Procrastination, personality traits, and academic performance: When active and passive procrastination tell a different story. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 154-157.
  • Kleinman, J., & Entin, E. B. (2002). Comparison of in-class and distance-learning students' performance and attitudes in an introductory computer science course. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 17(6), 206-219.
  • Kör, H., Çataloğlu, E., & Erbay, H. (2013). Uzaktan ve örgün eğitimin öğrenci başarısı üzerine etkisinin araştırılması. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(2), 267-279.
  • Machtmes, K., & Asher, J. W. (2000). A meta‐analysis of the effectiveness of telecourses in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 27-46.
  • Marks, R. B., Sibley, S. D., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 531-563.
  • Merriam-Webster. Distance education. In www.merriam-webster.com. Date accessed: 03.12.2023
  • Özgöl, M., Sarıkaya, İ., & Özürk, M. (2017). Örgün eğitimde uzaktan eğitim uygulamalarına ilişkin öğrenci ve öğretim elemanı değerlendirmeleri. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 7(2), 294-304.
  • Schuchat, A., Covid, C. D. C., & Team, R. (2020). Public health response to the initiation and spread of pandemic COVID19 in the United States, February 24–April 21, 2020. Morbidity and mortality weekly Report, 69(18), 551.
  • Shachar, M., & Neumann, Y. (2003). Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: A meta-analytic approach. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(2), 1-20.
  • Steinweg, S. B., Davis, M. L., & Thomson, W. S. (2005). A comparison of traditional and online instruction in an introduction to special education course. Teacher Education and Special Education, 28(1), 62-73.
  • Tok, H., Özgan, H., & Döş, B. (2010). Assessing metacognitive awareness and learning strategies as positive predictors for success in a distance learning class. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(14), 123-134.
  • Türk Dil Kurumu. Uzaktan eğitim. www.sozluk.gov.tr içinde. Erişim tarihi: 03.12.2023
  • Verduin, J. R., & Clark, T. A. (1994). Distance education: The foundation of effective practice. The University of Michigan: Wiley.
  • Yıldız, R. (2004). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme. Ankara: Nobel.
  • Yorgancı, S. (2015). Web tabanlı uzaktan eğitim yönteminin öğrencilerin matematik başarılarına etkileri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 23(3), 1401-1420.
  • Yüner, B., Eriçok, B., & Ertaş, B. (2023). Examination of variables affecting the perceptions of academic performance of higher education students during the distance education process. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 8(1), 161-168.
  • Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, H. S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1836-1884.

Year 2023, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 81 - 96, 25.12.2023

Tuncer Gövdeli Rafet Beyaz Abdullah Yiğit Güngör Mehmet Gözel

https://doi.org/10.47479/ihead.1374499
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Project Number

Proje ID: 8824, Proje kodu: SBA-2021-8824

References

  • Akyürek, M. İ. (2020). Uzaktan eğitim: Bir alanyazın taraması. Medeniyet Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 1-9.
  • Allen, M., Mabry, E., Mattrey, M., Bourhis, J., Titsworth, S., & Burrell, N. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: A comparison using meta‐analysis. Journal of Communication, 54(3), 402-420.
  • Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32-54.
  • Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Manon, F., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439.
  • Beyaz, R. (2022). Tüketicilerin Uzaktan Alınan Hizmetlere Bakışı: Eğitim Sektörüne Yönelik Değerlendirme, C. Tor Kadıoğlu (Ed.). Pandemi Sonrası Tüketim Araştırmaları içinde (s.35-62). Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi.
  • Bozkurt, A. (2017). Türkiye’de uzaktan eğitimin dünü, bugünü ve yarını. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 85-124.
  • Brown, J. L. (2012). Online learning: A comparison of web-based and land-based courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 39-42.
  • Cambridge Dictionary. Distance education. In www.dictionary.cambridge.org. Date accessed: 03.12.2023
  • Cavanaugh, J. K., & Jacquemin, S. J. (2015). A large sample comparison of grade based student learning outcomes in online vs. face-to-face courses. Online Learning, 19(2), 25-32.
  • CDC COVID-19 Response Team, CDC COVID-19 Response Team, CDC COVID-19 Response Team, Bialek, S., Boundy, E., Bowen, V., ... & Sauber-Schatz, E. (2020). Severe outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)—United States, February 12–March 16, 2020. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 69(12),343-346.
  • Çelik, F. (2016). Comparing distance education versus traditional education in Engineering Management Masters Program: Sakarya University Sample. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(29), 305-309.
  • Cheng, H. C., Lehman, J., & Armstrong, P. (1991). Comparison of performance and attitude in traditional and computer conferencing classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 5(3), 51-64.
  • De Oliveira, Mayra Martins Santana, Antonio Sergio Torres Penedo, and Vinícius Silva Pereira (2018). Distance education: Advantages and disadvantages of the point of view of education and society. Dialogia, [S. l.], 29, 139-152.
  • Duru, E., & Balkis, M. (2017). Procrastination, self-esteem, academic performance, and well-being: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Educational Psychology: IJEP, 6(2), 97-119.
  • Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students' perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235.
  • Gagne, M., & Shepherd, M. (2001). Distance learning in accounting: A comparison between a distance and a traditional graduate accounting class. The Journal, 28(9), 58-60.
  • Gossenheimer, A. N., Bem, T., Carneiro, M. L. F., & de Castro, M. S. (2017). Impact of distance education on academic performance in a pharmaceutical care course. PloS One, 12(4), 1-11.
  • Grunschel, C., Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Fries, S. (2016). Effects of using motivational regulation strategies on students' academic procrastination, academic performance, and well-being. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 162-170.
  • Güngör, A. Y. (2020). The relationship between academic procrastination academic self-efficacy and academic achievement among undergraduates. Oltu Beşeri ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 57-68.
  • Hannay, M., & Newvine, T. (2006). Perceptions of distance learning: A comparison of online and traditional learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 1-11.
  • Harrington, D. (1999). Teaching statistics: A comparison of traditional classroom and programmed instruction/distance learning approaches. Journal of Social Work Education, 35(3), 343-352.
  • Hemmati, N., Omrani, S., & Hemmati, N. (2013). A comparison of internet-based learning and traditional classroom lecture to learn CPR for continuing medical education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 256-265.
  • Hijazi, S. T., & Naqvi, S. M. M. (2006). Factors affecting students' performance. Bangladesh E-Journal of Sociology, 3(1), 1-10.
  • Hobbs, G. D., Moshinskie, J. F., Roden, S. K., & Jarvis, J. L. (1998). A comparison of classroom and distance learning techniques for rural EMT-I instruction. Prehospital Emergency Care, 2(3), 189-191.
  • Holmberg, B. (2005). Theory and practice of distance education. UK: Routledge.
  • Hurlbut, A. R. (2018). Online vs. traditional learning in teacher education: a comparison of student progress. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(4), 248-266.
  • İşman, A. (2011). Uzaktan eğitim. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Karcıoğlu, R., Kılıçarslan, Ş., & Çelik, K. (2022). COVID-19 pandemi döneminde lisans öğrencilerinin uzaktan eğitim kapsamında muhasebe derslerine yönelik bakış açıları üzerine bir araştırma. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(1), 1-22.
  • Keržič D, Alex JK, Pamela Balbontín Alvarado R, Bezerra DdS, Cheraghi M, Dobrowolska B, vd. (2021) Academic student satisfaction and perceived performance in the e-learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence across ten countries. Plos One 16(10): e0258807. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258807
  • Kırık, A. (2014). Uzaktan eğitimin tarihsel gelişimi ve Türkiye’deki durumu. Marmara İletişim Dergisi, 21, 73-94.
  • Kim, S., Fernandez, S., & Terrier, L. (2017). Procrastination, personality traits, and academic performance: When active and passive procrastination tell a different story. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 154-157.
  • Kleinman, J., & Entin, E. B. (2002). Comparison of in-class and distance-learning students' performance and attitudes in an introductory computer science course. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 17(6), 206-219.
  • Kör, H., Çataloğlu, E., & Erbay, H. (2013). Uzaktan ve örgün eğitimin öğrenci başarısı üzerine etkisinin araştırılması. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(2), 267-279.
  • Machtmes, K., & Asher, J. W. (2000). A meta‐analysis of the effectiveness of telecourses in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 27-46.
  • Marks, R. B., Sibley, S. D., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 531-563.
  • Merriam-Webster. Distance education. In www.merriam-webster.com. Date accessed: 03.12.2023
  • Özgöl, M., Sarıkaya, İ., & Özürk, M. (2017). Örgün eğitimde uzaktan eğitim uygulamalarına ilişkin öğrenci ve öğretim elemanı değerlendirmeleri. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 7(2), 294-304.
  • Schuchat, A., Covid, C. D. C., & Team, R. (2020). Public health response to the initiation and spread of pandemic COVID19 in the United States, February 24–April 21, 2020. Morbidity and mortality weekly Report, 69(18), 551.
  • Shachar, M., & Neumann, Y. (2003). Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: A meta-analytic approach. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(2), 1-20.
  • Steinweg, S. B., Davis, M. L., & Thomson, W. S. (2005). A comparison of traditional and online instruction in an introduction to special education course. Teacher Education and Special Education, 28(1), 62-73.
  • Tok, H., Özgan, H., & Döş, B. (2010). Assessing metacognitive awareness and learning strategies as positive predictors for success in a distance learning class. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(14), 123-134.
  • Türk Dil Kurumu. Uzaktan eğitim. www.sozluk.gov.tr içinde. Erişim tarihi: 03.12.2023
  • Verduin, J. R., & Clark, T. A. (1994). Distance education: The foundation of effective practice. The University of Michigan: Wiley.
  • Yıldız, R. (2004). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme. Ankara: Nobel.
  • Yorgancı, S. (2015). Web tabanlı uzaktan eğitim yönteminin öğrencilerin matematik başarılarına etkileri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 23(3), 1401-1420.
  • Yüner, B., Eriçok, B., & Ertaş, B. (2023). Examination of variables affecting the perceptions of academic performance of higher education students during the distance education process. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 8(1), 161-168.
  • Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, H. S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1836-1884.
There are 47 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Social and Humanities Education (Excluding Economics, Business and Management), Curriculum and Teaching in Economics, Business and Management
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Tuncer Gövdeli 0000-0002-6600-8684

Rafet Beyaz 0000-0002-0026-5346

Abdullah Yiğit Güngör 0000-0001-8135-7180

Mehmet Gözel 0000-0002-0955-3344

Project Number Proje ID: 8824, Proje kodu: SBA-2021-8824
Publication Date December 25, 2023
Submission Date October 11, 2023
Acceptance Date December 8, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Gövdeli, T., Beyaz, R., Güngör, A. Y., Gözel, M. (2023). Lisans Öğrencilerinin Uzaktan Eğitim ve Yüz Yüze Eğitim Kapsamında Tutum ve Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması. Ihlara Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(2), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.47479/ihead.1374499

Cited By

Uzaktan Eğitim Sisteminin Başarısını Etkileyen Faktörlerin Belirlenmesi
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1358870
 Download Cover Image

Dear Colleagues,
We are very pleased to announce that the latest issue of IHEAD (Vol. 8- Iss. 2) has been released. We kindly want to express our speacial thanks to the editorial board members, reviewers, and authors for their invaluable contribution to this issue. Also, we are delighted to announce that the next issue (Vol. 9- Iss. 1) of the IHEAD will be available online in June, 2024. As of January, 2024, IHEAD will accept submission in English along with Turkish. Handling your papers within the scope education for the next issue will be a great pleasure for us. Many thanks in advance for your contributions.
Editorial Board

Ihlara Journal of Educational Research (IHEAD) by Education Faculty of Aksaray University is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. To view a copy of this license,visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/  

by-nc-sa.svg

Ihlara Journal Educational Research (IHEAD) uses iThenticate, one the most trusted plagiarism checkers by the world’s top researchers, publishers, and scholars.

ithenticate-badge-rec-reverse.jpg

Ihlara Journal Educational Research (IHEAD) is an open-access journal.

Open-Access-logo.png