Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Refah Devletine Yönelik Birey Tutumları: Refah Devleti Politikaları Türkiye'de Sosyal Sermayeyi Etkiler mi?

Year 2020, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 789 - 807, 31.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.46442/intjcss.701352

Abstract

Geçmişte yapılan birçok araştırmada refah devleti ve sosyal sermaye arasındaki ilişki incelenmiş ve birbiriyle çelişen sonuçlar bulunmuştur. Bu araştırmaların bir kısmı, refah devletinin mevcut uygulamaları vasıtasıyla sivil toplumu gereksiz kıldığını ve sosyal sermaye üretimini zorlaştırdığını belirtirken, diğer bir kısmı ise, refah devletinin sosyal sermaye üzerinde olumlu ve canlandırıcı bir etkisinin olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ancak, bu çalışmaların neredeyse tamamı 1970’ler sonrasından başlayarak Avrupa ülkelerine odaklanmıştır ve Türkiye’yi kapsamına alan bir çalışma literatürde bulunmamaktadır. Bu nedenle, mevcut çalışmanın amacı bu eksikliği ortadan kaldırmak, Avrupa refah devletlerine odaklanan örnek çalışmayı model alarak refah devleti ve sosyal sermaye arasındaki ilişkiyi Türkiye odaklı incelemek ve Türkiye'deki refah devleti politikalarının bireyler arasındaki sosyal sermaye (güven) oluşumunu olumlu veya olumsuz ne şekilde etkilediğini ortaya koyabilmektir. Çalışma sonucunda, Türkiye’de refah devleti politikalarına yönelik oluşan birey tutumlarının sosyal sermayeye etkisi üzerine değerlendirmelerde bulunulmuştur.

References

  • Alp, S. (2009). Refah devleti düşüncesinin gelişimi ve bir liberal alternatif olarak üçüncü sektör. Maliye Dergisi, 156, 265-279. https://ms.hmb.gov.tr/uploads/2019/09/16.Salih_.ALP_.pdf.
  • Arts, W., Gelissen, J. (2002). Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state of-the-art report. Journal of European Social Policy, 12(2), 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952872002012002114.
  • Delhey, J., Newton, K. (2003). Who trusts?: The origins of social trust in seven societies. European Societies, 5(2), 93-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000072256.
  • Eagly, A., Chaiken, S. (2005). Attitude research in the 21st century: The current state of knowledge. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson ve M. P. Zanna (Der.), Handbook of attitudes (ss. 743-767). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Elveren, M. A., Elveren, A. Y. (2010). Türkiye’de refah rejiminin dönüşümü ve bireysel emeklilik sistemi. Mülkiye Dergisi, 266, 243-258. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/501.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press.
  • Etzioni, A. (1995). The spirit of community. London: Fontana Books.
  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: The Free Press.
  • Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society, and development. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/713701144.
  • Kaariainen, J., Lehtonen, H. (2006). The variety of social capital in welfare state regimes—A comparative study of 21 countries. European Societies, 8(1), 27-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690500491399.
  • Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2), 163-204. https://doi.org/10.1086/266945.
  • Knack, S., Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1251-1288. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555475.
  • Kumlin, S., Rothstein, B. (2005). Making and breaking social capital: The impact of welfare-state institutions. Comparative Political Studies, 38(4), 339-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004273203.
  • Newton, K. (2001). Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review, 22(2), 201-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512101222004.
  • Özdemir, S. (2005). Sosyal gelişim düzeyleri farklı refah devletlerinin sınıflandırılması üzerine bir inceleme. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 49, 231-266. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/iusskd/issue/897/10024.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
  • Rostila, M. (2013). Social capital and health inequality in European welfare states. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rothstein, B. (1998). Just institutions matter: The moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rothstein, B., Stolle, D. (2003). Social capital, impartiality and the welfare state: An institutional approach. In M. Hooghe ve S. Dietlind (Der.), Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective (ss. 191-211). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Stolle, D. (2003). The sources of social capital. In M. Hooghe ve S. Dietlind (Der.), Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective (ss. 19-43). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Scheepers, P., Te Grotenhuis, M., Gelissen, J. (2002). Welfare states and dimensions of social capital—Cross national comparisons of social contacts in European countries. European Societies, 4, 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690220142781.
  • Stadelmann-Steffen, I. (2011). Social volunteering in welfare states: Where crowding out should occur. Political Studies, 59, 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00838.x.
  • Taşçı, F. (2013). Refah devleti modelleri içinde Türkiye’nin pozisyonu: Yaşlı algısı üzerinden değerlendirmeler. İnsan ve Toplum Dergisi, 3(5), 5-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.12658/human.society.3.5. M0059.
  • Tiyek, R., Yertüm, U. (2016). Güney Avrupa refah rejimi bağlamında Türkiye: Bir değerlendirme. Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), 26-51. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/265289. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038.
  • Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge University Press.
  • Uslaner, E. M. (2003). Trust, democracy, and governance: Can government policies influence generalized trust? In M. Hooghe & S. Dietlind (Der.), Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective (ss. 171-191). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • van Oorschot, W., Arts, W. (2005). The social capital of European welfare states: the Crowding-out hypothesis revisited. The Journal of European Social Policy, 15(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928705049159.
  • van Oorschot, W., Arts, W., Halman, L. (2005). Welfare state effects on social capital and informal solidarity in the European Union: Evidence from the 1999/2000 European values study. Policy & Politics, 33(1), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.1332/0305573052708474.
  • Wolfe, A. (1989). Whose keeper? Social science and moral obligation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Yuksek, D. A., Solakoglu, O. (2019). Individual attitudes toward the welfare state: A test of the ‘crowding out hypothesis’ across European countries. Comparative Sociology, 18(2), 117-147. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341493.
Year 2020, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 789 - 807, 31.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.46442/intjcss.701352

Abstract

References

  • Alp, S. (2009). Refah devleti düşüncesinin gelişimi ve bir liberal alternatif olarak üçüncü sektör. Maliye Dergisi, 156, 265-279. https://ms.hmb.gov.tr/uploads/2019/09/16.Salih_.ALP_.pdf.
  • Arts, W., Gelissen, J. (2002). Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state of-the-art report. Journal of European Social Policy, 12(2), 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952872002012002114.
  • Delhey, J., Newton, K. (2003). Who trusts?: The origins of social trust in seven societies. European Societies, 5(2), 93-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000072256.
  • Eagly, A., Chaiken, S. (2005). Attitude research in the 21st century: The current state of knowledge. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson ve M. P. Zanna (Der.), Handbook of attitudes (ss. 743-767). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Elveren, M. A., Elveren, A. Y. (2010). Türkiye’de refah rejiminin dönüşümü ve bireysel emeklilik sistemi. Mülkiye Dergisi, 266, 243-258. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/501.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press.
  • Etzioni, A. (1995). The spirit of community. London: Fontana Books.
  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: The Free Press.
  • Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society, and development. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/713701144.
  • Kaariainen, J., Lehtonen, H. (2006). The variety of social capital in welfare state regimes—A comparative study of 21 countries. European Societies, 8(1), 27-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690500491399.
  • Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2), 163-204. https://doi.org/10.1086/266945.
  • Knack, S., Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1251-1288. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555475.
  • Kumlin, S., Rothstein, B. (2005). Making and breaking social capital: The impact of welfare-state institutions. Comparative Political Studies, 38(4), 339-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004273203.
  • Newton, K. (2001). Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review, 22(2), 201-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512101222004.
  • Özdemir, S. (2005). Sosyal gelişim düzeyleri farklı refah devletlerinin sınıflandırılması üzerine bir inceleme. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 49, 231-266. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/iusskd/issue/897/10024.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
  • Rostila, M. (2013). Social capital and health inequality in European welfare states. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rothstein, B. (1998). Just institutions matter: The moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rothstein, B., Stolle, D. (2003). Social capital, impartiality and the welfare state: An institutional approach. In M. Hooghe ve S. Dietlind (Der.), Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective (ss. 191-211). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Stolle, D. (2003). The sources of social capital. In M. Hooghe ve S. Dietlind (Der.), Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective (ss. 19-43). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Scheepers, P., Te Grotenhuis, M., Gelissen, J. (2002). Welfare states and dimensions of social capital—Cross national comparisons of social contacts in European countries. European Societies, 4, 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690220142781.
  • Stadelmann-Steffen, I. (2011). Social volunteering in welfare states: Where crowding out should occur. Political Studies, 59, 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00838.x.
  • Taşçı, F. (2013). Refah devleti modelleri içinde Türkiye’nin pozisyonu: Yaşlı algısı üzerinden değerlendirmeler. İnsan ve Toplum Dergisi, 3(5), 5-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.12658/human.society.3.5. M0059.
  • Tiyek, R., Yertüm, U. (2016). Güney Avrupa refah rejimi bağlamında Türkiye: Bir değerlendirme. Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), 26-51. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/265289. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038.
  • Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge University Press.
  • Uslaner, E. M. (2003). Trust, democracy, and governance: Can government policies influence generalized trust? In M. Hooghe & S. Dietlind (Der.), Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective (ss. 171-191). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • van Oorschot, W., Arts, W. (2005). The social capital of European welfare states: the Crowding-out hypothesis revisited. The Journal of European Social Policy, 15(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928705049159.
  • van Oorschot, W., Arts, W., Halman, L. (2005). Welfare state effects on social capital and informal solidarity in the European Union: Evidence from the 1999/2000 European values study. Policy & Politics, 33(1), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.1332/0305573052708474.
  • Wolfe, A. (1989). Whose keeper? Social science and moral obligation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Yuksek, D. A., Solakoglu, O. (2019). Individual attitudes toward the welfare state: A test of the ‘crowding out hypothesis’ across European countries. Comparative Sociology, 18(2), 117-147. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341493.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Sociology
Journal Section Research
Authors

Durmuş A. Yüksek 0000-0002-1153-7853

Publication Date December 31, 2020
Submission Date March 10, 2020
Acceptance Date December 29, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 6 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Yüksek, D. A. (2020). Refah Devletine Yönelik Birey Tutumları: Refah Devleti Politikaları Türkiye’de Sosyal Sermayeyi Etkiler mi?. Uluslararası Kültürel Ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(2), 789-807. https://doi.org/10.46442/intjcss.701352

 International Journal of Cultural and Social Studies