BibTex RIS Cite

TÜRKİYE’NİN BIRIC ÜLKELERİYLE TİCARİ POTANSİYELİ:PANEL ÇEKİM MODELİ YAKLAŞIMI

Year 2012, Volume: 7 Issue: 25, 4164 - 4175, 01.06.2012

Abstract

References

  • AĞAYEV, Seymur. (2010), Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları Ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Geçiş Ekonomileri Örneğinde Panel Eştümleşme Ve Panel Nedensellik Analizleri, Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi 12/1, s:159-184.
  • ATICI, Cemal ve Bülent Güloğlu. (2006), Gravity Model of Turkey’s Fresh and Processed Fruit and Vegetable Export to the EU: A Panel Data Analysis, Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing, 18(3/4), p:7–21.
  • BATRA, Amita. (2006), India’s Global Trade Potential: The Gravity Model Approach, Global EconomicReview, Vol:35, No:3, p:327-361.
  • BRÜLHART, Marius, Mary J. Kelly. (1999), Ireland’s Trading Potential with Central and Eastern European Countries: A Gravity Study, The Economic and Social Review, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 159-174.
  • CONWAY-SMITH, Erin. (2011), South Africa to be a BRIC, Global Post, January 08, 2011, (http://www.globalpost.com, E.T:28.04.2011)
  • FRANK, William P., Emily C.Frank. (2010), International Business Challenge: Can The BRIC Countries Take World Economic Leadership Away From The Traditional Leadership in The Near Future?, International Journal of Arts and Sciences, Vol:3, No:13, p:46-54.
  • GOLDMAN SACHS. (2007), BRICs and Beyond, (www2.goldmansachs.com, E.T:25.04.2011).
  • HELMERS, Christian, Jean-Michel Pasteels. (20059, TradeSim, A Gravity Model For The Calculation Of Trade Potentials For Developing Countries And Economies in Transition, ITC Working Paper.
  • IMF. (2010), World Economic Outlook Database, (www.imf.org, E.T:15.04.2011)
  • ITC. (2011), Trade Map, (www.trademap.org, E.T:21.04.2011)
  • JENSEN, Thomas H., Jens Anton K. Larsen. (2004), The BRIC Countries, Monetary Review, Denmark Nationalbank, 4th Quarter.
  • KALBASI, Hassan. (2001), The Gravity Model and Global Trade Flows, Iranian Economic Review, Vol:5, No:5, pp.13-17.
  • KARAGÖZ, Kadir, Murat Karagöz. (2009, Türkiye’nin Küresel Ticaret Potansiyeli: Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı, C.Ü. İktisadı ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt:10, Sayı:2, s:127-144.
  • MARTINEZ-ZARZOSO, Inmaculada, Felicitas Nowak-Lehmann. (2003), Augmented Gravity Model: An Empirical Application to MERCOSUR-European Union Trade Flows, Journal of Applied Economics, VI(2), p:291– 316.
  • O’NEILL, Jim. (2001), Building Better Global Economic BRICs, Goldman Sachs, Global Economics, Paper No: 66, p:1-16.
  • ÖZDEŞER, Hüseyin, Dizem Ertaç. (2010), Turkey’s Trade Potential with Euro Zone Countries: A Gravity Study, European Journal of Scientific Researcher, Vol:43, No:1, p:15-23.
  • PÖYHÖNEN, P. (1963), A Tentative Model For The Flows Of Trade Between Countries, Weltwirtschatftliches Archiv.
  • RAHMAN, Mohammad Mafizur. (2009), Australia’s Global Trade Potential: Evidence from the Gravity Model Analysis, Oxford Business & Economics Conference Program.
  • RUIZ, Juan M., Josep M. Vilarrubia. (2007), The Wise Use Of Dummies in Gravity Models: Export Potentials in The Euromed Regions, Working Paper, Banco De España, No: 0720, Madrid.
  • SMITH, Jack A. (2011), BRIC Becomes BRICS: Changes on the Geopolitical Chessboard, Foreign Policy Journal, January 21, 2011, (http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com, E.T:28.04.2011)
  • TINBERGEN, J. (1962), Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy, The Twentieth Century Fund, New York.
  • TIMEANDDATE.COM (2011), www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/distance.html, (E.T:21.04.2011).
  • WILSON, Dominic, Roopa Purushothaman. (2003), Dreaming With BRICs: The Path to 2050, Goldman Sachs, Global Economics, Paper No: 99, p:1-24.

TÜRKİYE’NİN BIRIC ÜLKELERİYLE TİCARİ POTANSİYELİ:PANEL ÇEKİM MODELİ YAKLAŞIMI

Year 2012, Volume: 7 Issue: 25, 4164 - 4175, 01.06.2012

Abstract

Kısaca BRIC olarak adlandırılan Brezilya, Rusya, Hindistan ve Çin dünya ekonomisinde en hızlı gelişen “yükselen piyasaları” olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu ülkelerin geniş yüzölçüm, büyük nüfus, hızlı ekonomik büyüme gibi çok sayıda ortak özellikleri bulunmaktadır. Ekonomik göstergeler baz alınarak yapılan analizlerde global ekonomik gücün yakın gelecekte geleneksel ekonomik lider olarak gösterilen G7 grubundan, BRIC grubuna geçebileceği ve dünyanın ekonomik liderliğine BRIC ülkelerinin oturacağı tartışmaları yapılmaktadır. Yükselen piyasalar arasında gösterilen ve BRIC grubuna dâhil edilebileceği tartışılan bir diğer ülkede Türkiye’dir. Bu bağlamda Türkiye’nin BRIC ülkeleriyle olan dış ticareti önemini arttırmaktadır. Çalışmada Türkiye’nin BRIC ülkeleriyle olan ticareti analiz edilerek ticaretin belirleyicileri tahmin edilmiştir. Ayrıca Türkiye’nin bu ülkelerle olan ticari potansiyeli hesaplanmıştır

References

  • AĞAYEV, Seymur. (2010), Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları Ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Geçiş Ekonomileri Örneğinde Panel Eştümleşme Ve Panel Nedensellik Analizleri, Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi 12/1, s:159-184.
  • ATICI, Cemal ve Bülent Güloğlu. (2006), Gravity Model of Turkey’s Fresh and Processed Fruit and Vegetable Export to the EU: A Panel Data Analysis, Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing, 18(3/4), p:7–21.
  • BATRA, Amita. (2006), India’s Global Trade Potential: The Gravity Model Approach, Global EconomicReview, Vol:35, No:3, p:327-361.
  • BRÜLHART, Marius, Mary J. Kelly. (1999), Ireland’s Trading Potential with Central and Eastern European Countries: A Gravity Study, The Economic and Social Review, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 159-174.
  • CONWAY-SMITH, Erin. (2011), South Africa to be a BRIC, Global Post, January 08, 2011, (http://www.globalpost.com, E.T:28.04.2011)
  • FRANK, William P., Emily C.Frank. (2010), International Business Challenge: Can The BRIC Countries Take World Economic Leadership Away From The Traditional Leadership in The Near Future?, International Journal of Arts and Sciences, Vol:3, No:13, p:46-54.
  • GOLDMAN SACHS. (2007), BRICs and Beyond, (www2.goldmansachs.com, E.T:25.04.2011).
  • HELMERS, Christian, Jean-Michel Pasteels. (20059, TradeSim, A Gravity Model For The Calculation Of Trade Potentials For Developing Countries And Economies in Transition, ITC Working Paper.
  • IMF. (2010), World Economic Outlook Database, (www.imf.org, E.T:15.04.2011)
  • ITC. (2011), Trade Map, (www.trademap.org, E.T:21.04.2011)
  • JENSEN, Thomas H., Jens Anton K. Larsen. (2004), The BRIC Countries, Monetary Review, Denmark Nationalbank, 4th Quarter.
  • KALBASI, Hassan. (2001), The Gravity Model and Global Trade Flows, Iranian Economic Review, Vol:5, No:5, pp.13-17.
  • KARAGÖZ, Kadir, Murat Karagöz. (2009, Türkiye’nin Küresel Ticaret Potansiyeli: Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı, C.Ü. İktisadı ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt:10, Sayı:2, s:127-144.
  • MARTINEZ-ZARZOSO, Inmaculada, Felicitas Nowak-Lehmann. (2003), Augmented Gravity Model: An Empirical Application to MERCOSUR-European Union Trade Flows, Journal of Applied Economics, VI(2), p:291– 316.
  • O’NEILL, Jim. (2001), Building Better Global Economic BRICs, Goldman Sachs, Global Economics, Paper No: 66, p:1-16.
  • ÖZDEŞER, Hüseyin, Dizem Ertaç. (2010), Turkey’s Trade Potential with Euro Zone Countries: A Gravity Study, European Journal of Scientific Researcher, Vol:43, No:1, p:15-23.
  • PÖYHÖNEN, P. (1963), A Tentative Model For The Flows Of Trade Between Countries, Weltwirtschatftliches Archiv.
  • RAHMAN, Mohammad Mafizur. (2009), Australia’s Global Trade Potential: Evidence from the Gravity Model Analysis, Oxford Business & Economics Conference Program.
  • RUIZ, Juan M., Josep M. Vilarrubia. (2007), The Wise Use Of Dummies in Gravity Models: Export Potentials in The Euromed Regions, Working Paper, Banco De España, No: 0720, Madrid.
  • SMITH, Jack A. (2011), BRIC Becomes BRICS: Changes on the Geopolitical Chessboard, Foreign Policy Journal, January 21, 2011, (http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com, E.T:28.04.2011)
  • TINBERGEN, J. (1962), Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy, The Twentieth Century Fund, New York.
  • TIMEANDDATE.COM (2011), www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/distance.html, (E.T:21.04.2011).
  • WILSON, Dominic, Roopa Purushothaman. (2003), Dreaming With BRICs: The Path to 2050, Goldman Sachs, Global Economics, Paper No: 99, p:1-24.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ali Rıza Sandalcılar

Publication Date June 1, 2012
Published in Issue Year 2012 Volume: 7 Issue: 25

Cite

APA Sandalcılar, A. R. (2012). TÜRKİYE’NİN BIRIC ÜLKELERİYLE TİCARİ POTANSİYELİ:PANEL ÇEKİM MODELİ YAKLAŞIMI. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 7(25), 4164-4175. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.49453
AMA Sandalcılar AR. TÜRKİYE’NİN BIRIC ÜLKELERİYLE TİCARİ POTANSİYELİ:PANEL ÇEKİM MODELİ YAKLAŞIMI. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. June 2012;7(25):4164-4175. doi:10.19168/jyu.49453
Chicago Sandalcılar, Ali Rıza. “TÜRKİYE’NİN BIRIC ÜLKELERİYLE TİCARİ POTANSİYELİ:PANEL ÇEKİM MODELİ YAKLAŞIMI”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 7, no. 25 (June 2012): 4164-75. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.49453.
EndNote Sandalcılar AR (June 1, 2012) TÜRKİYE’NİN BIRIC ÜLKELERİYLE TİCARİ POTANSİYELİ:PANEL ÇEKİM MODELİ YAKLAŞIMI. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 7 25 4164–4175.
IEEE A. R. Sandalcılar, “TÜRKİYE’NİN BIRIC ÜLKELERİYLE TİCARİ POTANSİYELİ:PANEL ÇEKİM MODELİ YAKLAŞIMI”, Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, vol. 7, no. 25, pp. 4164–4175, 2012, doi: 10.19168/jyu.49453.
ISNAD Sandalcılar, Ali Rıza. “TÜRKİYE’NİN BIRIC ÜLKELERİYLE TİCARİ POTANSİYELİ:PANEL ÇEKİM MODELİ YAKLAŞIMI”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 7/25 (June 2012), 4164-4175. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.49453.
JAMA Sandalcılar AR. TÜRKİYE’NİN BIRIC ÜLKELERİYLE TİCARİ POTANSİYELİ:PANEL ÇEKİM MODELİ YAKLAŞIMI. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. 2012;7:4164–4175.
MLA Sandalcılar, Ali Rıza. “TÜRKİYE’NİN BIRIC ÜLKELERİYLE TİCARİ POTANSİYELİ:PANEL ÇEKİM MODELİ YAKLAŞIMI”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, vol. 7, no. 25, 2012, pp. 4164-75, doi:10.19168/jyu.49453.
Vancouver Sandalcılar AR. TÜRKİYE’NİN BIRIC ÜLKELERİYLE TİCARİ POTANSİYELİ:PANEL ÇEKİM MODELİ YAKLAŞIMI. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. 2012;7(25):4164-75.