THE ROLE OF ETHICAL WORK CLIMATE PERCEPTION IN THE EFFECT OF SOCIOTROPIC-AUTONOMOUS PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS ON WHISTLEBLOWING
Abstract
Bu araştırmanın temel amacı sağlık çalışanlarının sosyotropik-otonom kişilik özelliklerinin bilgi ifşası üzerine etkisinde etik iş iklimi algısının aracı rolünün incelenmesidir. Araştırmanın örneklemi 320 sağlık çalışanından oluşmaktadır. Yapılan analizlerden elde edilen sonuçlara göre sosyotropik-otonom kişilik özellikleri ile bilgi ifşası arasındaki ilişkinin anlamlı olmadığı ancak sosyotropik kişilik özelliklerinin alt boyutu olan onaylanmama kaygısı ile bilgi ifşası arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca etik iş iklimi algısının, sosyotropik-otonom kişilik özelliklerinin bilgi ifşası üzerindeki etkisinde aracılık rolünün olmadığı tespit edilmiştir.
References
- Hersh, M. A. (2002). Whistleblowers -heroes or traitors?: Indivıdual and collectıve responsibility for ethical behavıour. Annual Reviews in Control, 26, 243-262.
- Cullen, J. B., Victor, B. ve Stephens, C. (1989). An ethical weather report: Assessing the organization’s ethical climate. Organizational Dynamics, 18(2), 50-62.
- Kolts, R. L., Robinson, A. M. ve Tracy, J. J. (2004). The relationship of sociotropy and autonomyto posttraumatic cognitions and PTSD symptomatology in trauma survivors. Journal Of Clinical Psychology, 60(1), 53–63.
- King III, G. (1999). The implications of an organization's structure on whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(4), 315-326.
- Park, H., Blenkinsopp, J., Öktem, M. K. ve Ömürgönülşen, U. (2008). Cultural orientation and attitudes toward different forms of whistleblowing: A comparison of South Korea, Turkey and the U.K. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 929–939.
- Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Harrison R.P. ve Emery, J. (1983). Development of the sociotropyautonomy scale: A measure of personality factors in psychopathology. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania.
- Bartuli, J., Djawadi, B. M. ve Fahr, R. (2016). Business ethics in organizations: An experimental examination of whistleblowing and personality. IZA Discussion Paper, 10190, 1-42.
Abstract
References
- Hersh, M. A. (2002). Whistleblowers -heroes or traitors?: Indivıdual and collectıve responsibility for ethical behavıour. Annual Reviews in Control, 26, 243-262.
- Cullen, J. B., Victor, B. ve Stephens, C. (1989). An ethical weather report: Assessing the organization’s ethical climate. Organizational Dynamics, 18(2), 50-62.
- Kolts, R. L., Robinson, A. M. ve Tracy, J. J. (2004). The relationship of sociotropy and autonomyto posttraumatic cognitions and PTSD symptomatology in trauma survivors. Journal Of Clinical Psychology, 60(1), 53–63.
- King III, G. (1999). The implications of an organization's structure on whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(4), 315-326.
- Park, H., Blenkinsopp, J., Öktem, M. K. ve Ömürgönülşen, U. (2008). Cultural orientation and attitudes toward different forms of whistleblowing: A comparison of South Korea, Turkey and the U.K. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 929–939.
- Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Harrison R.P. ve Emery, J. (1983). Development of the sociotropyautonomy scale: A measure of personality factors in psychopathology. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania.
- Bartuli, J., Djawadi, B. M. ve Fahr, R. (2016). Business ethics in organizations: An experimental examination of whistleblowing and personality. IZA Discussion Paper, 10190, 1-42.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 16, 2022 |
| Acceptance Date | February 7, 2022 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2022 Volume: 13 Issue: Kongre Özel Sayısı |
Cite
KAUJEASF is the corporate journal of Kafkas University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal Publishing.
2024 June issue article acceptance and evaluations are ongoing.