Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Karesel atama problemleri için tavlama benzetimi paralelleştirme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması

Year 2018, Volume: 24 Issue: 5, 898 - 905, 12.10.2018

Abstract

Karesel
atama problemi (KAP), NP-hard sınıfındaki en zor kombinatoryal optimizasyon
problemlerinden birisidir. Problemin zorluğundan dolayı birçok araştırmacı bu
tip atama problemini çalışılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada tavlama benzetimi yöntemi
MATLAB platformunda paralelleştirilerek iyi bilinen bir KAP Kütüphanesi olan
QAPLIB’den alınan 36 örnek problemi çözmek için kullanılmıştır. Değişik
paralelleştirme yöntemlerinin performansları kullanılan problemler için
karşılaştırılmıştır. Sonuç olarak seri tavlama benzetimi yöntemiyle
karşılaştırıldığında, paralel yöntemlerin uygun parametreler kullanıldığında
daha hızlı sonuç verdiği görülmüştür.

References

  • Koopmans TC, Beckmann M. “Assignment problems and the location of economic activities”. Econometrica, 25(1), 53-76, 1957.
  • Loiola EM, de Abreu NMM, Boaventura-Netto PO, Hahn P, Querido T. “A survey for the quadratic assignment problem”. Europian Journal of Operational Research, 176(2), 657-690, 2007.
  • Paul G. “Comparative performance of tabu search and simulated annealing heuristics for the quadratic assignment problem”. Operations Research Letters, 38(6), 577-581, 2010.
  • Onbaşoǧlu E, Özdamar L. “Parallel simulated annealing algorithms in global optimization”. Journal of Global Optimization, 19(1), 27-50, 2001.
  • Ferreiro AM, García JA, López-Salas JG, Vázquez C. “An efficient implementation of parallel simulated annealing algorithm in GPUs”. Journal of Global Optimization, 57(3), 863-890, 2013.
  • Laursen PS. “Parallel heuristic search-introductions and a new approach”. Solving Combinatorial Optimization Problems in Parallel. Editors: Ferreira A, Pardalos P. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1054, 248-274, 1996.
  • Holmqvist K, Migdalas A, Pardalos PM. Parallelized Heuristics for Combinatorial Search. Editors: Migdalas A, Pardalos PM, Storøy S. Parallel Computing in Optimization, 269-294, Boston, MA, USA, Springer, 1997.
  • Hussin MS, Stützle T. “Tabu search vs. simulated annealing as a function of the size of quadratic assignment problem instances”. Computers & Operation Research, 43, 286-291, 2014.
  • Said GAENA, Mahmoud AM, El-Horbaty ESM. “A comparative study of meta-heuristic algorithms for solving quadratic assignment problem”. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 1-6, 2014.
  • Karami M, Niroomand S, Mirzaei N, Vizvari B. “Analysis and performance measurement of existing solution methods of quadratic assignment problem”. International Journal of Electronics, Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, 3(2), 557-570, 2014.
  • Ghandeshtani KS, Mollai N, Seyedkashi SMH, Neshati MM. “New simulated annealing algorithm for quadratic assignment problem”. ADVCOMP 2010: The Fouth International Conference on Advanced Engineering Computing and Applications in Sciences, Florence, Italy, 25-30 October 2010.
  • Wang JC. “A multistart simulated annealing algorithm for the quadratic assignment problem”. 3rd International Conference on Innovations in Bio-Inspired Computing and Applications, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 26-28 September 2012.
  • Kovac M. “Solving quadratic assignment problem in parallel using local search with simulated annealing elements”. The International Conference on Digital Technologies 2013, Zilina, Slovakia 29-31 May 2013.
  • Kaviani MA, Abbasi M, Rahpeyma B, Yusefi MM. “A hybrid tabu search-simulated annealing method to solve quadratic assignment problem”. Decision Science Letters, 3(3), 391-396, 2014.
  • Paul G. “A GPU implementation of the simulated annealing heuristic for the quadratic assignment problem”. Computing Research Repository, arXiv: 1208.2675, 2012.
  • Rao SS. Engineering Optimization Theory and Practice. 4th ed. New Jersey, USA, Wiley, 2009.
  • Chen H, Flann NS, Watson DW. “Parallel genetic simulated annealing: a massively parallel SIMD algorithm”. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 9(2), 126-136, 1998.
  • Burkard RE, Çela E, Karisch SE, Rendl F. "QAPLIB”. http://anjos.mgi.polymtl.ca/qaplib/ (09.05.2017).
  • Nugent CE, Vollmann TE, Ruml J. “An experimental comparison of techniques for the assignment of facilities to locations”. Operations Research, 16(1), 150-173, 1968.
  • Skorin-Kapov J. “Tabu search applied to the quadratic assignment problem”. ORSA Journal of Computing, 2(1), 33-45, 1990.
  • Burkard RE, Karisch SE, Rendl F. “QAPLIB A quadratic assignment problem library”. Journal of Global Optimization, 10(4), 391-403, 1997.
  • Li Y, Pardalos PM. “Generating quadratic assignment test problems with known optimal permutations”. Computational Optimization and Applications, 1(2), 163-184, 1992.

Comparison of simulated annealing parallelization methods for quadratic assignment problems

Year 2018, Volume: 24 Issue: 5, 898 - 905, 12.10.2018

Abstract

Quadratic
assignment problem (QAP) is one of the most difficult combinatorial
optimization problems in the NP-hard class. Due to the difficulty of the
problem, many researchers have been studying this type of assignment problem.
In this work, simulated annealing method is parallelized on MATLAB platform and
is used to solve 36 problems from QAPLIB which is a well-known QAP library. The
performance of different parallelization methods is compared for the problems
used. As a result, when compared with the serial simulated annealing method, it
is seen that the parallel methods give faster results when the appropriate
parameters are used.

References

  • Koopmans TC, Beckmann M. “Assignment problems and the location of economic activities”. Econometrica, 25(1), 53-76, 1957.
  • Loiola EM, de Abreu NMM, Boaventura-Netto PO, Hahn P, Querido T. “A survey for the quadratic assignment problem”. Europian Journal of Operational Research, 176(2), 657-690, 2007.
  • Paul G. “Comparative performance of tabu search and simulated annealing heuristics for the quadratic assignment problem”. Operations Research Letters, 38(6), 577-581, 2010.
  • Onbaşoǧlu E, Özdamar L. “Parallel simulated annealing algorithms in global optimization”. Journal of Global Optimization, 19(1), 27-50, 2001.
  • Ferreiro AM, García JA, López-Salas JG, Vázquez C. “An efficient implementation of parallel simulated annealing algorithm in GPUs”. Journal of Global Optimization, 57(3), 863-890, 2013.
  • Laursen PS. “Parallel heuristic search-introductions and a new approach”. Solving Combinatorial Optimization Problems in Parallel. Editors: Ferreira A, Pardalos P. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1054, 248-274, 1996.
  • Holmqvist K, Migdalas A, Pardalos PM. Parallelized Heuristics for Combinatorial Search. Editors: Migdalas A, Pardalos PM, Storøy S. Parallel Computing in Optimization, 269-294, Boston, MA, USA, Springer, 1997.
  • Hussin MS, Stützle T. “Tabu search vs. simulated annealing as a function of the size of quadratic assignment problem instances”. Computers & Operation Research, 43, 286-291, 2014.
  • Said GAENA, Mahmoud AM, El-Horbaty ESM. “A comparative study of meta-heuristic algorithms for solving quadratic assignment problem”. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 1-6, 2014.
  • Karami M, Niroomand S, Mirzaei N, Vizvari B. “Analysis and performance measurement of existing solution methods of quadratic assignment problem”. International Journal of Electronics, Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, 3(2), 557-570, 2014.
  • Ghandeshtani KS, Mollai N, Seyedkashi SMH, Neshati MM. “New simulated annealing algorithm for quadratic assignment problem”. ADVCOMP 2010: The Fouth International Conference on Advanced Engineering Computing and Applications in Sciences, Florence, Italy, 25-30 October 2010.
  • Wang JC. “A multistart simulated annealing algorithm for the quadratic assignment problem”. 3rd International Conference on Innovations in Bio-Inspired Computing and Applications, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 26-28 September 2012.
  • Kovac M. “Solving quadratic assignment problem in parallel using local search with simulated annealing elements”. The International Conference on Digital Technologies 2013, Zilina, Slovakia 29-31 May 2013.
  • Kaviani MA, Abbasi M, Rahpeyma B, Yusefi MM. “A hybrid tabu search-simulated annealing method to solve quadratic assignment problem”. Decision Science Letters, 3(3), 391-396, 2014.
  • Paul G. “A GPU implementation of the simulated annealing heuristic for the quadratic assignment problem”. Computing Research Repository, arXiv: 1208.2675, 2012.
  • Rao SS. Engineering Optimization Theory and Practice. 4th ed. New Jersey, USA, Wiley, 2009.
  • Chen H, Flann NS, Watson DW. “Parallel genetic simulated annealing: a massively parallel SIMD algorithm”. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 9(2), 126-136, 1998.
  • Burkard RE, Çela E, Karisch SE, Rendl F. "QAPLIB”. http://anjos.mgi.polymtl.ca/qaplib/ (09.05.2017).
  • Nugent CE, Vollmann TE, Ruml J. “An experimental comparison of techniques for the assignment of facilities to locations”. Operations Research, 16(1), 150-173, 1968.
  • Skorin-Kapov J. “Tabu search applied to the quadratic assignment problem”. ORSA Journal of Computing, 2(1), 33-45, 1990.
  • Burkard RE, Karisch SE, Rendl F. “QAPLIB A quadratic assignment problem library”. Journal of Global Optimization, 10(4), 391-403, 1997.
  • Li Y, Pardalos PM. “Generating quadratic assignment test problems with known optimal permutations”. Computational Optimization and Applications, 1(2), 163-184, 1992.
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Selahattin Akkaş This is me 0000-0001-8121-9300

Kadir Kavaklıoğlu 0000-0002-9050-9219

Publication Date October 12, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 24 Issue: 5

Cite

APA Akkaş, S., & Kavaklıoğlu, K. (2018). Karesel atama problemleri için tavlama benzetimi paralelleştirme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 24(5), 898-905.
AMA Akkaş S, Kavaklıoğlu K. Karesel atama problemleri için tavlama benzetimi paralelleştirme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. October 2018;24(5):898-905.
Chicago Akkaş, Selahattin, and Kadir Kavaklıoğlu. “Karesel Atama Problemleri için Tavlama Benzetimi paralelleştirme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 24, no. 5 (October 2018): 898-905.
EndNote Akkaş S, Kavaklıoğlu K (October 1, 2018) Karesel atama problemleri için tavlama benzetimi paralelleştirme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 24 5 898–905.
IEEE S. Akkaş and K. Kavaklıoğlu, “Karesel atama problemleri için tavlama benzetimi paralelleştirme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması”, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 898–905, 2018.
ISNAD Akkaş, Selahattin - Kavaklıoğlu, Kadir. “Karesel Atama Problemleri için Tavlama Benzetimi paralelleştirme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 24/5 (October 2018), 898-905.
JAMA Akkaş S, Kavaklıoğlu K. Karesel atama problemleri için tavlama benzetimi paralelleştirme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018;24:898–905.
MLA Akkaş, Selahattin and Kadir Kavaklıoğlu. “Karesel Atama Problemleri için Tavlama Benzetimi paralelleştirme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 24, no. 5, 2018, pp. 898-05.
Vancouver Akkaş S, Kavaklıoğlu K. Karesel atama problemleri için tavlama benzetimi paralelleştirme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018;24(5):898-905.

ESCI_LOGO.png    image001.gif    image002.gif        image003.gif     image004.gif