Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Examination of Risk Factors Predicting Cyber Dating Violence Categories in Youths

Year 2023, Issue: 57, 151 - 176, 01.01.2023

Seda Donat Bacıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.1090649

Abstract

Cyber dating violence is a kind of dating violence resulting in both perpetration and victimization of partners with the use of technological tools. The present study aims to examine the risk factors predicting cyber dating violence categories of youths. The study included a total of 470 undergraduate students (311 females and 159 males) from Turkey, aged between 18- 25 years. Data were collected from the participants of the study through self-report scales. Multinominal logistic regression analysis was used to analyze collected data. The findings suggest that the frequency of text messaging (SMS) with date, the frequency of posting a video/photo on social media, the frequency of and competence in using social media, and online social interaction preferences and emotion regulation in problematic internet usage are the risk factors increasing or decreasing probability of perpetration and/or victimization of partners. Based on these findings, understanding the power dynamics in dating relationships may enlighten individuals to have digital dating interactions isolated from violent activities or abusive patterns. The present study suggests developing preventive and intervention strategies in future studies.

Keywords

youth cyber dating violence perpetration victimization

References

  • Kaynakça Akbari, M. (2017). Metacognitions or distress intolerance: The mediating role in the relationship between emotional dysregulation and problematic internet use. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 6, 128-133.
  • Alber, J. M., Bernhardt, J. M., Stellefson, M., Weiler, R. M., Anderson-Lewis, C., Miller, M. D., ve MacInnes, J. (2014). Designing and testing an inventory for measuring social media competency of certified health education specialists. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(9), 221–221.
  • Atak, H. ve Çok, F. (2010). A new period in human life: Emerging adulthood. Journal of Childhood and Adolescence Mental Health, 17(1), 39-50.
  • Baker, C. K., ve Carreño, P. K. (2016). Understanding the role of technology in adolescent dating and dating violence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 308–320.
  • Bakır, A. ve Kalkan, B. (2019). Siber flört istismarı, beden imgesi ve benlik saygısı arasındaki ilişki. Aile Psikolojik Danışmanlığı Dergisi, 2 (2), 21-25.
  • Bargh , J. A. ve Mckenna , K. Y. A. ( 2004 ). The internet and social life . Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573 – 590.
  • Bennet, D.C., Guran, E.L., Ramos, M.C., ve MargolinCollege, G (2011). Students’ electronic victimization in friendships and dating relationships: Anticipated distress and associations with risky behaviors. Violence and Victims, 4, 410-429.
  • Borrajo, E., Gámez-Guadix, M., Pereda, N., ve Calvete, E. (2015). The development and validation of the cyber dating abuse questionnaire among young couples. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 358–365.
  • Burke, S. C., Wallen, M., Vail-Smith, K., ve Knox, D. (2011). Using technology to control intimate partners: An exploratory study of college undergraduates. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1162–1167.
  • Canoğulları, Ö. ve Cenkseven-Önder, F. (2019). Genelleştirilmiş Problemli İnternet Kullanımı Ölçeğİ 2 (GPİKÖ2)’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması Çalışması. Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(18), 1540-1565.
  • Caplan, S.E. (2010). Theory and measurement of generalized problematic internet use: A two-step approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1089-1097.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2016). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Deans, H., ve Bhogal, M.S. (2019). Perpetrating cyber dating abuse: A brief report on the role of aggression, romantic jealousy and gender. Current Psychologhy, 38, 1077–1082.
  • Deniz, L.& Tutgun-Ünal, A. (2019). Sosyal medya çağında kuşakların sosyal medya kullanımı ve değerlerine yönelik bir dizi ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(18), 1025-1057.
  • Dim, E. E., & Elabor-Idemudia, P. (2018). Prevalence and predictors of psychological violence against male victims in ıntimate relationships in Canada. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 27(8), 846-866.
  • Draucker, C. B., Martsolf, D. S. (2010). The role of electronic communication technology in adolescent dating violence. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 23, 133–142.
  • Erdem, A., Tunç, E., & Erdem, Ş. (Ekim, 2018). Siber Flört Şiddeti Ölçeği geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. 20. Uluslararası Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Kongresi’de bildiri olarak sunulmuştur. Samsun, Türkiye.
  • Hallam, C., ve Zanella, G. (2017). Online self-disclosure: The privacy paradox explained as a temporally discounted balance between concerns and rewards. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 217–227.
  • Henry, N., ve Powell, A. (2016). Sexual violence in the digital age: The scope and limits of criminal law. Social & Legal Studies, 25(4), 397–418. Hormes, J.H., Kearns, B., Timko, C.A. (2014). Craving Facebook? Behavioral addiction to online social networking and its association with emotion regulation deficits. Addiction, 109, 2079-2088.
  • Işığıçok, E. (2003). Bebeklerin doğum ağırlıklarını ve boylarını etkileyen faktörlerin lojistik regresyon analizi ile araştırılması. VI. Ulusal Ekonometri ve İstatistik Sempozyumu’nda bildiri olarak sunulmuştur. Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Kelly, L. ve Miller-Ott, A.E. (2018). Perceived miscommunication in friends’ and romantic partners’ texted conversations. Southern Communication Journal, 83(4), 267-280.
  • Kingston, D.A. ve Malamuth, N.M. (2011). Problems with aggregate data and the ımportance of individual differences in the study of pornography and sexual aggression: Comment on Diamond, Jozifkova, and Weiss (2010). Archieves of Sex Behavior, 40, 1045–1048.
  • Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J., Mellor, D. J. (2014). Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 44–53.
  • Kohut, A., Wike, R., Horowitz, J. M., Simmons, K., Poushter, J., Barker, C., . . . Gross, E. M. (2011). Global digital communication: Texting, social networking popular worldwide. Washington, DC: Pew Global Attitudes Project, Pew Research Center.
  • Kwon, M., Kim, D.J., Cho, H., ve Yang, S. (2013). The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS One, 8(12). Lee, K. D. M., Rodriguez, L. M., Edwards, K. M., ve Neal, A. M. (2020). Emotional dysregulation and intimate partner violence: A dyadic perspective. Psychology of Violence, 10(2), 162–171.
  • Leisring, P. A., ve Giumetti, G. W. (2014). Sticks and stones may break my bones, but abusive text messages also hurt. Partner Abuse, 5(3), 323-341.
  • Lyndon, A., Bonds-Raacke, J. ve Cratty, A.D. (2011). College students’ Facebook stalking of ex-partners. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 711-716.
  • Machimbarrena, J. M., González-Cabrera, J., Montiel, I., ve Ortega-Barón, J. (2021). An exploratory analysis of different problematic internet use profiles in cybervictims, cyberbullies, and cyberbully victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking.
  • Marshall, T.C., Lefringhausen, K., ve Ferenczi, N. (2015).The big five, self-esteem, and narcissism as predictors of the topics people write about in Facebook status updates. Personality And Individual Differences, 85, 35-40.
  • Marganski, A., ve Fauth, K. (2013). Socially interactive technology and contemporary dating: A cross-cultural exploration of deviant behaviors among young adults in the modern, evolving technological world. International Criminal Justice Review, 23(4), 357-377.
  • Marganski, A., ve Melander, L. (2018). Intimate Partner violence victimization in the cyber and real world: Examining the extent of cyber aggression experiences and its association with in-person dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(7), 1071–1095.
  • Martinez-Pecino, R., ve Durán, M. (2019). I love you but I cyberbully you: The role of hostile sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(4), 812-825.
  • Matsangidou, M., ve Otterbacher, J. (2018). Can Posting Be a Catalyst for Dating Violence? Social media behaviors and physical interactions. Violence and Gender, 5(3), 182-190.
  • Mayoyo, N. , Ogeno, J. ve Likoye, F. (2020). The impact of contemporary communication technology on undergraduate students’ dating violence episodes: An exploration of routine activity theory. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 161-175.
  • McEwan, B., ve Horn, D. (2016). ILY & Can U pick up some milk: Effects of relational maintenance via text messaging on relational satisfaction and closeness in dating partners. Southern Communication Journal, 81(3), 168-181.
  • McKenna, K.Y.A. ve Bargh, J.A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 57-75.
  • Mittal, V. A., Tessner, K. D., ve Walker, E. F. (2007). Elevated social Internet use and schizotypal personality disorder in adolescents. Schizophrenia Research, 94(1-3), 50-57.
  • Morelli, M., Bianchi, D., Chirumbolo, A., ve Baiocco, R. (2017). The cyber dating violence inventory. Validation of a new scale for online perpetration and victimization among dating partners. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(4), 464–471.
  • Muñiz-Rivas, M., Vera, M., ve Povedano-Díaz, A. (2019). Parental style, dating violence and gender. International Journal Of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), 2722.
  • Noyan, C. O., Enez-Darçın, A., Nurmedov, S., Yılmaz, O. ve Dilbaz, N. (2015). Akıllı Telefon Bağımlılığı Ölçeğinin kısa formunun üniversite öğrencilerinde Türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 16, 73-81.
  • Picard, P. (2007). Tech Abuse in Teen Relationships Study. NY: Liz Claiborne Inc.
  • Postmus, J. (2013). Sexual violence and abuse. Santa Barbara: Abc-Clio.
  • Reed, L.A., Tolman, R.M. ve Ward, L.M. (2016). Snooping and sexting: Digital media as a context for dating aggression and abuse among college students. Violence Against Women, 22(13):1-21.
  • Smith-Darden, J.P., Kernsmith, P.D., Victor, B. ve Lathrop, R.A. (2017). Electronic displays of aggression in teen dating relationships: Does the social ecology matter?, Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 33-40.
  • Smoker, M., ve March, E. (2017). Predicting perpetration of intimate partner cyberstalking: Gender and the Dark Tetrad. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 390-396.
  • Stonard, K.E., Bowen, E., Walker, K. ve Price, S.A. (2017). They’ll always find a way to get to you: Technology use in adolescent romantic relationships and its role in dating violence and abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 2083-2117.
  • Stonard, K. E. (2021). The prevalence and overlap of technology-assisted and offline adolescent dating violence. Current Psychology: Advance online publication, 40(3), 1056-1070.
  • Taylor, B.G., Stein, N.D., Mumford, E.A. ve Woods, D. (2013). Shifting boundaries: An experimental evaluation of a dating violence prevention program in middle schools. Previous Science, 14, 64–76.
  • Temple, J.R., Choi, H.J., Brem, M., Wolford-Clevenger, C., Stuart, G.L. and Peskin, M.F. ve Elmquist, J. (2016). The temporal association between traditional and cyber dating abuse among adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 340-349.
  • Tjaden, P., ve Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
  • Valkenburg, P. M., ve Peter, J. (2011). Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48, 121–127.
  • Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K..ve Temple, J.R. (2016). Digital forms of dating violence: what school nurses need to know. NASN School Nurse, 31(6), 348-353.
  • Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., Willems, A., & Van Dam, M. (2019). Adolescents’ perceptions of digital media’s potential to elicit jealousy, conflict and monitoring behaviors within romantic relationships. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 13(3), 3-21.
  • Walker, K., Sleath, E., Hatcher, R. M., Hine, B., ve Crookes, R. L. (2019). Nonconsensual sharing of private sexually explicit media among university students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 36(17-18), NP9078 –NP9108.
  • Watts, L. K., Wagner, J., Velasquez, B., ve Behrens, P. I. (2017). Cyberbullying in higher education: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 268–274.
  • Wolfe, D. A., Scott, K., Reitzel-Jaffe, D., Wekerle, C., Grasley, C., ve Straatman, A. L. (2001). Development and validation of the conflict in adolescent dating relationships inventory. Psychological Assessment, 13, 277–293.
  • Woodlock, D. (2017). The abuse of technology in domestic violence and stalking. Violence Against Women, 23(5), 584–602.
  • Yıldırım, S., Ergüzer, T.T., ve Sayar, H.G. (2019). Akıllı telefon bağımlılığı. Current Addiction Research, 3(1), 25-30.
  • Zhu, S., Yang, H. H., Xu, S., ve MacLeod, J. (2019). Social media competence and digital citizenship among college students. Convergence, 25(4), 735–752.
  • Zweig, J. M., Dank, M., Yahner, J., Lachman, P. (2013). The rate of cyber dating abuse among teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1063–1077.

Genç Yetişkinlerde Siber Flört Şiddeti Kategorilerini Yordayan Risk Faktörlerinin İncelenmesi

Year 2023, Issue: 57, 151 - 176, 01.01.2023

Seda Donat Bacıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.1090649

Abstract

Siber flört şiddeti, teknolojik araçların kullanımıyla birlikte partnerlerin kötüye kullanımı ve/veya mağduriyeti ile sonuçlanan bir flört şiddeti türüdür. Bu çalışmada, üniversite öğrencilerinin siber flört şiddeti kategorilerini yordayan risk faktörlerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmaya, yaşları 18-25 yaş arasında değişen, 311 kadın 159 erkek olmak üzere toplamda 470 genç yetişkin katılmıştır. Araştırmada kullanılan ölçeklerden elde edilen verilerin analizinde, çok kategorili isimsel lojistik regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, flörtle kısa mesajlaşma (sms) sıklığının, flörtle sosyal ağlar aracılığıyla mesajlaşma sıklığının, sosyal medyada herkese açık video, resim paylaşma sıklığının, sosyal medya kullanımında süreklilik ve yetkinliğin, problemli internet kullanımında online sosyal etkileşim tercihi ve duygu düzenlemenin siber flört şiddetinde partneri kötüye kullanma/mağduriyet olasılığını artıran veya azaltan risk faktörleri olduğu göstermiştir. Araştırma sonuçları alanyazın ışığında tartışılıp yorumlanmış, siber flört şiddetiyle ilgili önleyici ve müdahale edici stratejilerin geliştirilmesi önerilmiştir.

Keywords

genç yetişkinler siber flört kötüye kullanım siber mağduriyet

References

  • Kaynakça Akbari, M. (2017). Metacognitions or distress intolerance: The mediating role in the relationship between emotional dysregulation and problematic internet use. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 6, 128-133.
  • Alber, J. M., Bernhardt, J. M., Stellefson, M., Weiler, R. M., Anderson-Lewis, C., Miller, M. D., ve MacInnes, J. (2014). Designing and testing an inventory for measuring social media competency of certified health education specialists. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(9), 221–221.
  • Atak, H. ve Çok, F. (2010). A new period in human life: Emerging adulthood. Journal of Childhood and Adolescence Mental Health, 17(1), 39-50.
  • Baker, C. K., ve Carreño, P. K. (2016). Understanding the role of technology in adolescent dating and dating violence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 308–320.
  • Bakır, A. ve Kalkan, B. (2019). Siber flört istismarı, beden imgesi ve benlik saygısı arasındaki ilişki. Aile Psikolojik Danışmanlığı Dergisi, 2 (2), 21-25.
  • Bargh , J. A. ve Mckenna , K. Y. A. ( 2004 ). The internet and social life . Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573 – 590.
  • Bennet, D.C., Guran, E.L., Ramos, M.C., ve MargolinCollege, G (2011). Students’ electronic victimization in friendships and dating relationships: Anticipated distress and associations with risky behaviors. Violence and Victims, 4, 410-429.
  • Borrajo, E., Gámez-Guadix, M., Pereda, N., ve Calvete, E. (2015). The development and validation of the cyber dating abuse questionnaire among young couples. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 358–365.
  • Burke, S. C., Wallen, M., Vail-Smith, K., ve Knox, D. (2011). Using technology to control intimate partners: An exploratory study of college undergraduates. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1162–1167.
  • Canoğulları, Ö. ve Cenkseven-Önder, F. (2019). Genelleştirilmiş Problemli İnternet Kullanımı Ölçeğİ 2 (GPİKÖ2)’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması Çalışması. Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(18), 1540-1565.
  • Caplan, S.E. (2010). Theory and measurement of generalized problematic internet use: A two-step approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1089-1097.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2016). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Deans, H., ve Bhogal, M.S. (2019). Perpetrating cyber dating abuse: A brief report on the role of aggression, romantic jealousy and gender. Current Psychologhy, 38, 1077–1082.
  • Deniz, L.& Tutgun-Ünal, A. (2019). Sosyal medya çağında kuşakların sosyal medya kullanımı ve değerlerine yönelik bir dizi ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(18), 1025-1057.
  • Dim, E. E., & Elabor-Idemudia, P. (2018). Prevalence and predictors of psychological violence against male victims in ıntimate relationships in Canada. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 27(8), 846-866.
  • Draucker, C. B., Martsolf, D. S. (2010). The role of electronic communication technology in adolescent dating violence. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 23, 133–142.
  • Erdem, A., Tunç, E., & Erdem, Ş. (Ekim, 2018). Siber Flört Şiddeti Ölçeği geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. 20. Uluslararası Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Kongresi’de bildiri olarak sunulmuştur. Samsun, Türkiye.
  • Hallam, C., ve Zanella, G. (2017). Online self-disclosure: The privacy paradox explained as a temporally discounted balance between concerns and rewards. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 217–227.
  • Henry, N., ve Powell, A. (2016). Sexual violence in the digital age: The scope and limits of criminal law. Social & Legal Studies, 25(4), 397–418. Hormes, J.H., Kearns, B., Timko, C.A. (2014). Craving Facebook? Behavioral addiction to online social networking and its association with emotion regulation deficits. Addiction, 109, 2079-2088.
  • Işığıçok, E. (2003). Bebeklerin doğum ağırlıklarını ve boylarını etkileyen faktörlerin lojistik regresyon analizi ile araştırılması. VI. Ulusal Ekonometri ve İstatistik Sempozyumu’nda bildiri olarak sunulmuştur. Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Kelly, L. ve Miller-Ott, A.E. (2018). Perceived miscommunication in friends’ and romantic partners’ texted conversations. Southern Communication Journal, 83(4), 267-280.
  • Kingston, D.A. ve Malamuth, N.M. (2011). Problems with aggregate data and the ımportance of individual differences in the study of pornography and sexual aggression: Comment on Diamond, Jozifkova, and Weiss (2010). Archieves of Sex Behavior, 40, 1045–1048.
  • Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J., Mellor, D. J. (2014). Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 44–53.
  • Kohut, A., Wike, R., Horowitz, J. M., Simmons, K., Poushter, J., Barker, C., . . . Gross, E. M. (2011). Global digital communication: Texting, social networking popular worldwide. Washington, DC: Pew Global Attitudes Project, Pew Research Center.
  • Kwon, M., Kim, D.J., Cho, H., ve Yang, S. (2013). The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS One, 8(12). Lee, K. D. M., Rodriguez, L. M., Edwards, K. M., ve Neal, A. M. (2020). Emotional dysregulation and intimate partner violence: A dyadic perspective. Psychology of Violence, 10(2), 162–171.
  • Leisring, P. A., ve Giumetti, G. W. (2014). Sticks and stones may break my bones, but abusive text messages also hurt. Partner Abuse, 5(3), 323-341.
  • Lyndon, A., Bonds-Raacke, J. ve Cratty, A.D. (2011). College students’ Facebook stalking of ex-partners. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 711-716.
  • Machimbarrena, J. M., González-Cabrera, J., Montiel, I., ve Ortega-Barón, J. (2021). An exploratory analysis of different problematic internet use profiles in cybervictims, cyberbullies, and cyberbully victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking.
  • Marshall, T.C., Lefringhausen, K., ve Ferenczi, N. (2015).The big five, self-esteem, and narcissism as predictors of the topics people write about in Facebook status updates. Personality And Individual Differences, 85, 35-40.
  • Marganski, A., ve Fauth, K. (2013). Socially interactive technology and contemporary dating: A cross-cultural exploration of deviant behaviors among young adults in the modern, evolving technological world. International Criminal Justice Review, 23(4), 357-377.
  • Marganski, A., ve Melander, L. (2018). Intimate Partner violence victimization in the cyber and real world: Examining the extent of cyber aggression experiences and its association with in-person dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(7), 1071–1095.
  • Martinez-Pecino, R., ve Durán, M. (2019). I love you but I cyberbully you: The role of hostile sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(4), 812-825.
  • Matsangidou, M., ve Otterbacher, J. (2018). Can Posting Be a Catalyst for Dating Violence? Social media behaviors and physical interactions. Violence and Gender, 5(3), 182-190.
  • Mayoyo, N. , Ogeno, J. ve Likoye, F. (2020). The impact of contemporary communication technology on undergraduate students’ dating violence episodes: An exploration of routine activity theory. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 161-175.
  • McEwan, B., ve Horn, D. (2016). ILY & Can U pick up some milk: Effects of relational maintenance via text messaging on relational satisfaction and closeness in dating partners. Southern Communication Journal, 81(3), 168-181.
  • McKenna, K.Y.A. ve Bargh, J.A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 57-75.
  • Mittal, V. A., Tessner, K. D., ve Walker, E. F. (2007). Elevated social Internet use and schizotypal personality disorder in adolescents. Schizophrenia Research, 94(1-3), 50-57.
  • Morelli, M., Bianchi, D., Chirumbolo, A., ve Baiocco, R. (2017). The cyber dating violence inventory. Validation of a new scale for online perpetration and victimization among dating partners. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(4), 464–471.
  • Muñiz-Rivas, M., Vera, M., ve Povedano-Díaz, A. (2019). Parental style, dating violence and gender. International Journal Of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), 2722.
  • Noyan, C. O., Enez-Darçın, A., Nurmedov, S., Yılmaz, O. ve Dilbaz, N. (2015). Akıllı Telefon Bağımlılığı Ölçeğinin kısa formunun üniversite öğrencilerinde Türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 16, 73-81.
  • Picard, P. (2007). Tech Abuse in Teen Relationships Study. NY: Liz Claiborne Inc.
  • Postmus, J. (2013). Sexual violence and abuse. Santa Barbara: Abc-Clio.
  • Reed, L.A., Tolman, R.M. ve Ward, L.M. (2016). Snooping and sexting: Digital media as a context for dating aggression and abuse among college students. Violence Against Women, 22(13):1-21.
  • Smith-Darden, J.P., Kernsmith, P.D., Victor, B. ve Lathrop, R.A. (2017). Electronic displays of aggression in teen dating relationships: Does the social ecology matter?, Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 33-40.
  • Smoker, M., ve March, E. (2017). Predicting perpetration of intimate partner cyberstalking: Gender and the Dark Tetrad. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 390-396.
  • Stonard, K.E., Bowen, E., Walker, K. ve Price, S.A. (2017). They’ll always find a way to get to you: Technology use in adolescent romantic relationships and its role in dating violence and abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 2083-2117.
  • Stonard, K. E. (2021). The prevalence and overlap of technology-assisted and offline adolescent dating violence. Current Psychology: Advance online publication, 40(3), 1056-1070.
  • Taylor, B.G., Stein, N.D., Mumford, E.A. ve Woods, D. (2013). Shifting boundaries: An experimental evaluation of a dating violence prevention program in middle schools. Previous Science, 14, 64–76.
  • Temple, J.R., Choi, H.J., Brem, M., Wolford-Clevenger, C., Stuart, G.L. and Peskin, M.F. ve Elmquist, J. (2016). The temporal association between traditional and cyber dating abuse among adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 340-349.
  • Tjaden, P., ve Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
  • Valkenburg, P. M., ve Peter, J. (2011). Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48, 121–127.
  • Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K..ve Temple, J.R. (2016). Digital forms of dating violence: what school nurses need to know. NASN School Nurse, 31(6), 348-353.
  • Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., Willems, A., & Van Dam, M. (2019). Adolescents’ perceptions of digital media’s potential to elicit jealousy, conflict and monitoring behaviors within romantic relationships. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 13(3), 3-21.
  • Walker, K., Sleath, E., Hatcher, R. M., Hine, B., ve Crookes, R. L. (2019). Nonconsensual sharing of private sexually explicit media among university students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 36(17-18), NP9078 –NP9108.
  • Watts, L. K., Wagner, J., Velasquez, B., ve Behrens, P. I. (2017). Cyberbullying in higher education: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 268–274.
  • Wolfe, D. A., Scott, K., Reitzel-Jaffe, D., Wekerle, C., Grasley, C., ve Straatman, A. L. (2001). Development and validation of the conflict in adolescent dating relationships inventory. Psychological Assessment, 13, 277–293.
  • Woodlock, D. (2017). The abuse of technology in domestic violence and stalking. Violence Against Women, 23(5), 584–602.
  • Yıldırım, S., Ergüzer, T.T., ve Sayar, H.G. (2019). Akıllı telefon bağımlılığı. Current Addiction Research, 3(1), 25-30.
  • Zhu, S., Yang, H. H., Xu, S., ve MacLeod, J. (2019). Social media competence and digital citizenship among college students. Convergence, 25(4), 735–752.
  • Zweig, J. M., Dank, M., Yahner, J., Lachman, P. (2013). The rate of cyber dating abuse among teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1063–1077.
There are 60 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Seda Donat Bacıoğlu 0000-0001-9901-0601

Publication Date January 1, 2023
Submission Date March 20, 2022
Acceptance Date June 26, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2023 Issue: 57

Cite

APA Donat Bacıoğlu, S. (2023). Genç Yetişkinlerde Siber Flört Şiddeti Kategorilerini Yordayan Risk Faktörlerinin İncelenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi(57), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.1090649
 Download Cover Image

27767 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/