Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Perception of Technology in Secondary School Students’ Drawings and Expressions

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 244 - 259, 02.05.2024
https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.44.11.3

Abstract

With today’s developing technology, students’ ways of living, learning, and working have been changing rapidly, leading them to acquire new approaches related to technology. The main objective of this study is to identify the views of secondary school students regarding technology. The participants of the study, which was designed as a qualitative study, consisted of 5th grade students studying at a state secondary school in the district of Yalova, Turkey in the fall semester of the 2023-2024 academic year. The data of the study, which consisted of students’ pictures and written expressions, were analyzed with the content analysis technique. As far as the emerging results are concerned, while the students emphasized the more useful and entertaining aspects of technology as its positive features, they expressed their opinions on the lack of social communication, energy insufficiency and environmental damage as technology’s negative features. In the students’ perceptions, it can be seen that technology makes their lives easier, but that the harms to personal health, social communication and the environment are taken into account. Since the study was carried out with 5th grade students, perception of technology at different age and grade levels is a matter of interest for future research. In this sense, it is possible to recommend identifying the direction of the trends with studies to be conducted with different age levels.

References

  • Aktay, S., & Aktay. E. G. (2015). Technology education in primary schools. Journal of Adıyaman University Institute of Social Sciences, 8(19), Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.55299
  • Ardies, J., De Maeyer, S., Gijbels, D., & Van Keulen, H. (2015). Students’ attitudes towards technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25, 43-65. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-014-9268-x
  • Avsec, S., & Jamšek, J. (2018). A path model of factors affecting secondary school students’ technological literacy. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28, 145-168. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-016-9382-z
  • Başer, V. G., Mutlu, N., Şendurur, P., & Şendurur, E. (2012). Perceptions of students about technology integration. Education Sciences, 7(2), 591-598. https://www.firatakademi.com/upload/articleTmpFiles/NWSA-5889-2724-8.pdf
  • Baytak, A., Tarman, B., & Ayas, C. (2011). Experiencing technology integration in education: Children's perceptions. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 3(2), 139-151. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1052441
  • Becker, K. H., & Maunsaiyat, S. (2002). Thai students' attitudes and concepts of Technology. Journal of Technology Education, 13(2), 6-20. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ646589.pdf
  • Black, P. (1998). An international overview of curricular approaches and models in technology education, Journal of Technology Studies, Winter-Spring, http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTS/Winter-Spring-1998/PDF/black.pdf
  • Boser, R. A., & Daugherty, M. K. (1998). Students' attitudes toward technology in selected technology education programs. Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), 4-19. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/8203/boser.pdf?sequence=1
  • Çakmak, B. (2020). Investigation of self-efficıency perception of course study in secondary school students with self-learning by technology. (Master's thesis) Maltepe University, İstanbul, Turkey. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  • Calvert, S. L., & Wilson, B. J. (2008). The handbook of children, media and development. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Cambridge Dictionary (2023). Technology. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english
  • Carswell, L., Petre, M., & Thomas, P. (2000). Distance education via the Internet: The student experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00133
  • Chauhan, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students. Computers & Education, 105, 14-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.005
  • Cilesiz, S. (2011). A phenomenological approach to experiences with technology: current state, promise, and future directions for research. Education Tech Research Dev 59, 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9173-2
  • Çolak, E. A., Şeren, N., Tut, E., & Kıroğlu, M. K. (2023). A comparison of some primary school curricula in Turkey and Germany in the context of technology education. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 66, 600-630. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.1159348
  • DiGironimo, N. (2011). What is technology? Investigating student conceptions about the nature of technology. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1337-1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.495400
  • Ersoy, A., & Türkkan, B. (2009). Perceptions about Internet in elementary school children’s drawings. Elementary Education Online, 8(1), 57-73. http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr
  • European Space Agency, [ESA], (2023). What is the technology? https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Engineering_Technology/What_is_technology
  • Fleer, M. (2023). Technologies for children. Cambridge University Press.
  • Funk, K. (1999). Technology and Christian values. https://web. engr. oregonstate. edu/~funkk/Technology/index.html#technology.
  • Gökçe, H., Gökçe, Z., Bektas, O., & Saylan Kırmızıgül, A. (2024). Robotic coding perceptions of middle school students. Journal of Education and Future (25), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.1274671
  • Herdem, K., Aygün, H., & Çinici, A. (2014). Investigation of eighth grade students' perceptions of technology through cartoons they drew. Journal of the Faculty of Education of Amasya University, 3(2), 232-258. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/amauefd/issue/1731
  • Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 223–252. DOI:10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
  • Hilton, J. K. (2006). The effect of technology on student science achievement. In Cognitively informed systems: Utilizing practical approaches to enrich information presentation and transfer (pp. 312-333). IGI Global.
  • Hsieh, W. M., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). Exploring students’ conceptions of science learning via drawing: A cross-sectional analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 274-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1280640
  • Ihde, D. (2004). Philosophy of technology (pp. 91-108). Netherlands: Springer.
  • Karaçam, S., & Aydın, F. (2014). Metaphor analysis of secondary school students’ perceptions related to technology concept. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 13(2), 545-572. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.256829
  • Karaman, H., & Ayhan, H. (2021). Technological neglect and abuse against children. Online Journal of Technology Addiction and Cyberbullying, 8(1), 43-59. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ojtac/issue/63473/942837
  • Khunyakari, R., Mehrotra, S., Chunawala, S., & Natarajan, C. (2009). Studying Indian middle school students’ attitudes towards technology. In K. Subramaniam & A. Mazumdar (Eds.), Proceedings epiSTEME-3: An International Conference to Review Research in Science, Technology and Mathematics Education (pp. 81-87). Macmillan Publishers
  • Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2003.10782399
  • Küçükaydin, Z., Bozdoğan, A. E., & Öztürk, P. (2014). Secondary school students’ views in a village school about the use of tablet computers in science course. Mevlâna International Journal of Education (MIJE), 4(2), 52-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.44.4.2
  • Levin, B. B., & Barry, S. A. (1997). Children's views of technology: The role of age, gender, and school setting. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 8(4), 267-290. https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/B_Levin_Children%27s_1997.pdf
  • Li, Q. (2007). Student and teacher views about technology: A tale of two cities? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 377-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782488
  • Lind, K. (1998). Science process skills: Preparing for the future. Monroe 2-Orleans Board of Cooperative Education Services. http:/Avww.monroe2boces.org/shared/instruct/ sciencekö/process.htm
  • Lowerison, G., Sclater, J., Schmid, R. F.& Abrami P. C (2006). Student perceived effectiveness of computer technology use in post-secondary classrooms. Computers & Education 47, 465–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.014
  • Mehrotra, S., Khunyakari, R., Chunawala, S., & Natarajan, C. (2007). Using pictures and interviews to elicit Indian students’ understanding of technology. In Proceedings of PATT 18–International conference on design and technology education research: teaching and learning technological literacy in the classroom (pp. 152-161).
  • Merriam, S. B. (2018). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (Trans. Ed. Selahattin Turan), Nobel Publications.
  • Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  • Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2023). Social studies curriculum (4, 5, 6 and 7). Ministry of National Education Publishing. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=1264
  • Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2003). Primary pupils and teachers use of computers at home and school. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 79-83. https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-8535.d01-9
  • Odabaşı, H. F., Kabakçı, I. & Çoklar, A. N. (2007). Internet, child and family. Nobel Publications.
  • Özek, M. B. (2019). Analysis of technology perceptions of secondary school students through pictures. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(3), 1327-1336. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/553434
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative social work, 1(3), 261-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325002001003636
  • Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
  • Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: a systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
  • Rennie, L. J., & Jarvis, T. (1995). Children's choice of drawings to communicate their ideas about technology. Research in Science Education, 25, 239-252. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02357399
  • Sadikovna, R. K., & Mukhtorjonova, I. Y. (2023). Chıldren wıth hearıng problems new attıtudes to educatıon. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 11(11), 904-907. https://internationaljournals.co.in/index.php/girj/article/view/4715
  • Şahin, A. (2014). Training Programs for children and adolescents. https://www.dbe.com.tr/tr/
  • Saldana, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
  • Sarıkaya, M. (2019). Technology acceptance of primary and secondary school teachers. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 20(2), 578-590. DOI: 10.17679/inuefd.495886
  • Seligmann, E.R. (2007). Reaching students through synectics: A creative solution. (Unpublishing doctoral thesis). University of Northern. Colorado, USA
  • Şenel, A., & Gençoğlu, S. (2003). Technology education in a globalizing world. Gazi University Journal of Industrial Arts Education Faculty, 11(2), 45-65 https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/296526
  • Shaw, G. & Marlow, N., (1999). The role of student learning styles, gender, attitudes and perceptions on information and communication technology assisted learning. Computers & Education, 33, 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00020-2
  • Solomonidou, C., & Tassios, A. (2007). A phenomenographic study of Greek primary school students’ representations concerning technology in daily life. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17, 113-133. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-006-0007-9
  • Soykan, E. (2015). Views of students', teachers' and parents' on the tablet computer usage in education. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(3), 228-244. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1140949
  • Tekinarslan, E., Kennedy, E., & Nicolle, P. S. (2015). A cross-cultural comparative study of uses and perceptions of technology in education among Turkish and us undergraduates. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(6). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1078254
  • Topal, A. D & Geçer, A. K (2014). Determination of secondary school students' perceptions of internet proficiency level. Elementary Education Online, 13(1), 180-190. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/230034109.pdf
  • Turkish Language Institution, [TLI], (2023). Technology. https://sozluk.gov.tr/
  • Ünal, Y., & Yeşilyurt M. (2023). The effect of technology supported instruction on understanding the subject of division. Journal of Science, Mathematics, Entrepreneurship and Technology Education, 6(2), 160-171. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/fmgted
  • Visvizi, A., Lytras, M. D., & Daniela, L. (Eds.). (2018). The future of innovation and technology in education: Policies and practices for teaching and learning excellence. Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Volk, K. S., & Dugger J. W. E. (2005). East meets west: What Americans and Hong Kong people think about technology. Journal of Technology Education, 17(1), 53-68. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1064404
  • Yeh, H. Y., Tsai, Y. H., Tsai, C. C., & Chang, H. Y. (2019). Investigating students’ conceptions of technology-assisted science learning: A drawing analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(4), 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-9769-1
  • Yörükoğulları, E. (2013). The history of science and technology. Anadolu University Publications.
Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 244 - 259, 02.05.2024
https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.44.11.3

Abstract

References

  • Aktay, S., & Aktay. E. G. (2015). Technology education in primary schools. Journal of Adıyaman University Institute of Social Sciences, 8(19), Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.55299
  • Ardies, J., De Maeyer, S., Gijbels, D., & Van Keulen, H. (2015). Students’ attitudes towards technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25, 43-65. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-014-9268-x
  • Avsec, S., & Jamšek, J. (2018). A path model of factors affecting secondary school students’ technological literacy. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28, 145-168. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-016-9382-z
  • Başer, V. G., Mutlu, N., Şendurur, P., & Şendurur, E. (2012). Perceptions of students about technology integration. Education Sciences, 7(2), 591-598. https://www.firatakademi.com/upload/articleTmpFiles/NWSA-5889-2724-8.pdf
  • Baytak, A., Tarman, B., & Ayas, C. (2011). Experiencing technology integration in education: Children's perceptions. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 3(2), 139-151. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1052441
  • Becker, K. H., & Maunsaiyat, S. (2002). Thai students' attitudes and concepts of Technology. Journal of Technology Education, 13(2), 6-20. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ646589.pdf
  • Black, P. (1998). An international overview of curricular approaches and models in technology education, Journal of Technology Studies, Winter-Spring, http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTS/Winter-Spring-1998/PDF/black.pdf
  • Boser, R. A., & Daugherty, M. K. (1998). Students' attitudes toward technology in selected technology education programs. Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), 4-19. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/8203/boser.pdf?sequence=1
  • Çakmak, B. (2020). Investigation of self-efficıency perception of course study in secondary school students with self-learning by technology. (Master's thesis) Maltepe University, İstanbul, Turkey. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  • Calvert, S. L., & Wilson, B. J. (2008). The handbook of children, media and development. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Cambridge Dictionary (2023). Technology. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english
  • Carswell, L., Petre, M., & Thomas, P. (2000). Distance education via the Internet: The student experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00133
  • Chauhan, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students. Computers & Education, 105, 14-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.005
  • Cilesiz, S. (2011). A phenomenological approach to experiences with technology: current state, promise, and future directions for research. Education Tech Research Dev 59, 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9173-2
  • Çolak, E. A., Şeren, N., Tut, E., & Kıroğlu, M. K. (2023). A comparison of some primary school curricula in Turkey and Germany in the context of technology education. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 66, 600-630. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.1159348
  • DiGironimo, N. (2011). What is technology? Investigating student conceptions about the nature of technology. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1337-1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.495400
  • Ersoy, A., & Türkkan, B. (2009). Perceptions about Internet in elementary school children’s drawings. Elementary Education Online, 8(1), 57-73. http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr
  • European Space Agency, [ESA], (2023). What is the technology? https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Engineering_Technology/What_is_technology
  • Fleer, M. (2023). Technologies for children. Cambridge University Press.
  • Funk, K. (1999). Technology and Christian values. https://web. engr. oregonstate. edu/~funkk/Technology/index.html#technology.
  • Gökçe, H., Gökçe, Z., Bektas, O., & Saylan Kırmızıgül, A. (2024). Robotic coding perceptions of middle school students. Journal of Education and Future (25), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.1274671
  • Herdem, K., Aygün, H., & Çinici, A. (2014). Investigation of eighth grade students' perceptions of technology through cartoons they drew. Journal of the Faculty of Education of Amasya University, 3(2), 232-258. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/amauefd/issue/1731
  • Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 223–252. DOI:10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
  • Hilton, J. K. (2006). The effect of technology on student science achievement. In Cognitively informed systems: Utilizing practical approaches to enrich information presentation and transfer (pp. 312-333). IGI Global.
  • Hsieh, W. M., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). Exploring students’ conceptions of science learning via drawing: A cross-sectional analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 274-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1280640
  • Ihde, D. (2004). Philosophy of technology (pp. 91-108). Netherlands: Springer.
  • Karaçam, S., & Aydın, F. (2014). Metaphor analysis of secondary school students’ perceptions related to technology concept. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 13(2), 545-572. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.256829
  • Karaman, H., & Ayhan, H. (2021). Technological neglect and abuse against children. Online Journal of Technology Addiction and Cyberbullying, 8(1), 43-59. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ojtac/issue/63473/942837
  • Khunyakari, R., Mehrotra, S., Chunawala, S., & Natarajan, C. (2009). Studying Indian middle school students’ attitudes towards technology. In K. Subramaniam & A. Mazumdar (Eds.), Proceedings epiSTEME-3: An International Conference to Review Research in Science, Technology and Mathematics Education (pp. 81-87). Macmillan Publishers
  • Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2003.10782399
  • Küçükaydin, Z., Bozdoğan, A. E., & Öztürk, P. (2014). Secondary school students’ views in a village school about the use of tablet computers in science course. Mevlâna International Journal of Education (MIJE), 4(2), 52-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.44.4.2
  • Levin, B. B., & Barry, S. A. (1997). Children's views of technology: The role of age, gender, and school setting. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 8(4), 267-290. https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/B_Levin_Children%27s_1997.pdf
  • Li, Q. (2007). Student and teacher views about technology: A tale of two cities? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 377-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782488
  • Lind, K. (1998). Science process skills: Preparing for the future. Monroe 2-Orleans Board of Cooperative Education Services. http:/Avww.monroe2boces.org/shared/instruct/ sciencekö/process.htm
  • Lowerison, G., Sclater, J., Schmid, R. F.& Abrami P. C (2006). Student perceived effectiveness of computer technology use in post-secondary classrooms. Computers & Education 47, 465–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.014
  • Mehrotra, S., Khunyakari, R., Chunawala, S., & Natarajan, C. (2007). Using pictures and interviews to elicit Indian students’ understanding of technology. In Proceedings of PATT 18–International conference on design and technology education research: teaching and learning technological literacy in the classroom (pp. 152-161).
  • Merriam, S. B. (2018). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (Trans. Ed. Selahattin Turan), Nobel Publications.
  • Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  • Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2023). Social studies curriculum (4, 5, 6 and 7). Ministry of National Education Publishing. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=1264
  • Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2003). Primary pupils and teachers use of computers at home and school. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 79-83. https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-8535.d01-9
  • Odabaşı, H. F., Kabakçı, I. & Çoklar, A. N. (2007). Internet, child and family. Nobel Publications.
  • Özek, M. B. (2019). Analysis of technology perceptions of secondary school students through pictures. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(3), 1327-1336. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/553434
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative social work, 1(3), 261-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325002001003636
  • Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
  • Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: a systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
  • Rennie, L. J., & Jarvis, T. (1995). Children's choice of drawings to communicate their ideas about technology. Research in Science Education, 25, 239-252. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02357399
  • Sadikovna, R. K., & Mukhtorjonova, I. Y. (2023). Chıldren wıth hearıng problems new attıtudes to educatıon. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 11(11), 904-907. https://internationaljournals.co.in/index.php/girj/article/view/4715
  • Şahin, A. (2014). Training Programs for children and adolescents. https://www.dbe.com.tr/tr/
  • Saldana, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
  • Sarıkaya, M. (2019). Technology acceptance of primary and secondary school teachers. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 20(2), 578-590. DOI: 10.17679/inuefd.495886
  • Seligmann, E.R. (2007). Reaching students through synectics: A creative solution. (Unpublishing doctoral thesis). University of Northern. Colorado, USA
  • Şenel, A., & Gençoğlu, S. (2003). Technology education in a globalizing world. Gazi University Journal of Industrial Arts Education Faculty, 11(2), 45-65 https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/296526
  • Shaw, G. & Marlow, N., (1999). The role of student learning styles, gender, attitudes and perceptions on information and communication technology assisted learning. Computers & Education, 33, 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00020-2
  • Solomonidou, C., & Tassios, A. (2007). A phenomenographic study of Greek primary school students’ representations concerning technology in daily life. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17, 113-133. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-006-0007-9
  • Soykan, E. (2015). Views of students', teachers' and parents' on the tablet computer usage in education. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(3), 228-244. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1140949
  • Tekinarslan, E., Kennedy, E., & Nicolle, P. S. (2015). A cross-cultural comparative study of uses and perceptions of technology in education among Turkish and us undergraduates. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(6). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1078254
  • Topal, A. D & Geçer, A. K (2014). Determination of secondary school students' perceptions of internet proficiency level. Elementary Education Online, 13(1), 180-190. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/230034109.pdf
  • Turkish Language Institution, [TLI], (2023). Technology. https://sozluk.gov.tr/
  • Ünal, Y., & Yeşilyurt M. (2023). The effect of technology supported instruction on understanding the subject of division. Journal of Science, Mathematics, Entrepreneurship and Technology Education, 6(2), 160-171. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/fmgted
  • Visvizi, A., Lytras, M. D., & Daniela, L. (Eds.). (2018). The future of innovation and technology in education: Policies and practices for teaching and learning excellence. Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Volk, K. S., & Dugger J. W. E. (2005). East meets west: What Americans and Hong Kong people think about technology. Journal of Technology Education, 17(1), 53-68. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1064404
  • Yeh, H. Y., Tsai, Y. H., Tsai, C. C., & Chang, H. Y. (2019). Investigating students’ conceptions of technology-assisted science learning: A drawing analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(4), 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-9769-1
  • Yörükoğulları, E. (2013). The history of science and technology. Anadolu University Publications.
There are 63 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Specialist Studies in Education (Other)
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Ali Yalçın 0000-0001-8421-3924

Elif Alkar 0000-0002-5048-6470

Early Pub Date May 13, 2024
Publication Date May 2, 2024
Submission Date February 4, 2024
Acceptance Date April 30, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 11 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Yalçın, A., & Alkar, E. (2024). The Perception of Technology in Secondary School Students’ Drawings and Expressions. Participatory Educational Research, 11(3), 244-259. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.44.11.3