Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

COMPARISON OF UNIVERSITIES’ TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY WITH HICKS-MOORSTEEN AND FÄRE-PRIMONT INDEXES

Year 2022, Issue: 1, 1 - 15, 31.01.2022

Erdinc Koc Halim Tatlı

https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.866005

Abstract

Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of the state universities, which was established in Turkey in 2007, with the Färe-Primont and Hicks-Moorsteen indexes.

Methodology: In the study, the Total Factor Productivity Efficiency (TFPE) was found by using İnput-Oriented Technical Efficiency (ITE), Mixed Efficiency (IME) and Residual İnput-Oriented Scale Efficiency (RISE). The data set consisting of input and output variables related to universities was analyzed in Färe-Primont and Hicks-Moorsteen indexes.

Findings: As a result of the analysis, it was determined that mixed efficiency in the Färe-Primont index plays a determining role in TFPE. In the Hicks-Moosteen index, it was determined that the TFPE was most affected by the RISE. When the universities in general were evaluated, it was seen that the downward trend of the RISE between 2018-2019 turned into an upward trend in 2019-2020. It has been determined that the results of the analysis performed with the Färe-Primont and Hicks-Moorsteen TFP indices did not overlap each other. When the results obtained are examined, it is seen that only the ITE has the same values in the Färe-Primont and Hicks-Moorsteen indexes.

Originality: There are many studies conducted to compare the efficiency of universities. This study differs from existing studies in terms of the data set and analysis methods it uses and has a unique value.

References

  • Abed, R. ve Acosta, A. (2018). “Assessing Livestock Total Factor Productivity: A Malmquist Index Approach”, African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 13(4), 297-306.
  • Abramo, G., Cicero, T. ve D’angelo, C.C. (2011). “A Field-Standardized Application of DEA to National Scale Research Assessment of Universities”, Journal of Infometrics, 5, 618-628.
  • Agasisti, T. ve Johnes, G. (2009). “Beyond Frontiers: Comparing the Efficiency of Higher Education Decision‐Making Units Across more than One Country”, Education Economics, 17(1), 59-79.
  • Aleskerov, F. ve Petruschenko, V. (2013). “DEA by Sequential Exclusion of Alternatives”, Higher School of Economics Working Paper Series, WP7/2013/02.
  • Arjomandi, A., Salleh, M.I. ve Mohammadzadeh, A. (2015). “Measuring Productivity Change in Higher Education: An Application of Hicks–Moorsteen Total Factor Productivity Index to Malaysian Public Universities”, Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 20(4), 630-643.
  • Arslan, H. (2014). “Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesinin Kente Ekonomik Katkısı ve Öğrenci Harcamalarının Farklı Değişkenler Açısından Analizi”, Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(2), 114-127.
  • Asante, B.O. ve Villano, R.A. (2019). “Components of Farm-Level Productivity in Integrated Crop-Livestock Farming Systems in Ghana: The Role of Mix Efficiency”, International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics, 7(1), 63-76.
  • Atik, H. (1999). “Üniversitelerin Yerel Ekonomiye Katkıları: Teori ve Erciyes Üniversitesi Üzerine Bir Uygulama”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 15, 99-109.
  • Babacan, M., Kartal, M. ve Bircan, M.H. (2007). “Cumhuriyet Üniversitesinin Etkinliğinin Kamu Üniversiteleri ile Karşılaştırılması: Bir VZA Tekniği Uygulaması”, C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 97-114.
  • Bal, V. (2013). “Vakıf Üniversitelerinde Veri Zarflama Analizi ile Etkinlik Belirlenmesi”, Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(1), 1-14.
  • Baležentis, T. (2015). “The Sources of the Total Factor Productivity Growth in Lithuanian Family Farms: A Färe-Primont Index Approach”, Prague Economic Papers, 24(2), 225-241.
  • Baysal, M.E., Alçılar, B., Çerçioğlu, H. ve Toklu, B. (2005). “Türkiye'deki Devlet Üniversitelerinin 2004 Yılı Performanslarının, Veri Zarflama Analizi Yöntemiyle Belirlenip Buna Göre 2005 Yılı Bütçe Tahsislerinin Yapılması”, Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 67-73.
  • Beasley, J. (1995). “Determining Teaching and Research Efficiencies”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46, 441-452.
  • Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Lafuente, E. ve Solé, F. (2013). “The Pursuit of Knowledge Transfer Activities: An Efficiency Analysis of Spanish Universities”, Journal of Business Research, 66, 2051-2059.
  • Birlik, M., Aydın, Ü. ve Kahyaoğlu, H. (2016). “Türkiye Gıda Sanayinde Kısa ve Uzun Dönemli Etkinlik: Stokastik Sınır Analizi”, Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 6(2), 67-84.
  • Bjurek, H. (1996). “The Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index”, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 98(2), 303-313.
  • Bougnol, M.L. ve Dulá, J.V. (2006). “Validating DEA as a Ranking Tool: An Application of DEA to Assess Performance in Higher Education”, Annals of Operations Research, 145, 339-365.
  • Briec, W. ve Kerstens, K. (2004). “A Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen Productivity Indicator: Its Relation to the Hicks-Moorsteen Productivity Index and the Luenberger Productivity Indicator”, Economic Theory, 23(4), 925-939.
  • Chen, Y. (2011). “Productivity of Automobile Industries Using the Malmquist Index: Evidence from the Last Economic Recession”, Journal of Centrum Cathedra, 4(2), 165-181.
  • Cillero, M.M. ve Thorne, F. (2019). “Sources of Pdroductivity Growth Using the Färe-Primont Decomposition: An Empirical Application to the Irish Beef Sector”, Applied Economics, 51(36), 3982-3994.
  • Coelli, T.J., Rao, D.S.P., O'Donnell, C.J. ve Battese, G.E. (2005). “An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis”, 2nd Edition, Springer, New York.
  • Cook, W.D., Tone, K. ve Zhu, J. (2014). “Data Envelopment Analysis: Prior to Choosing a Model Wade”, Omega, 44, 1-4.
  • Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı (2021). “Orta Vadeli Mali Plan 2021-2023”, https://www.sbb.gov.tr/butce-orta-vadeli-mali-planlar, (Erişim Tarihi:20.01.2021).
  • Cunha, M. ve Rocha, V. (2012). “On the Efficiency of Public Higher Education Institutions in Portugal: An Exploratory Study”, FEP Working Papers, 1-31.
  • Çalışkan, Ş. (2010). “Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Harcamalarının Kent Ekonomisine Katkısı (Uşak Üniversitesi Örneği)”, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(31), 169-179.
  • Çetin, T. (2010). “İktisadi Etkinlik Üzerine Bir Deneme: X Etkinlik Yaklaşımı”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 11(2), 183-198.
  • Çınar, Y. (2013). “Türkiye’de Kamu Üniversitelerinin Eğitim-Araştırma Etkinlikleri ve Etkinlik Artışında Stratejik Önceliklerin Rolü: Çok-Aktiviteli VZA Uygulaması”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 68(2), 27-62.
  • Dakpo, K.H., Desjeux, Y., Jeanneaux, P. ve Latruffe, L. (2019). “Productivity, Technical Efficiency and Technological Change in French Agriculture During 2002-2015: A Färe-Primont Index Decomposition Using Group Frontiers and Meta-Frontier”, Applied Economics, 51(11), 1166-1182.
  • Deliktaş, E. (2002). “Efficiency and Total factor Productivity Analysis in Private Manufacturing Industry in Turkey”, The Journal of METU Development, 29(3-4), 247-284.
  • Epure, M., Kernstens, K. ve Diego, D. (2011). “Technology-Based Total Factor Productivity and Benchmarking: New Proposals and an Application”, Omega International Journal of Management Science, 39(6), 608-619.
  • Fandel, G. (2007), “On the Performance of Universities in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany: Government's Redistribution of Funds Judged Using DEA Efficiency Measures”, European Journal of Operational Research, 176, 521-533.
  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. ve Roos, P. (1996). “On Two Definitions of Productivity”, Economics Letters, 53(3), 269-274.
  • Farrel, M.J. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 120(3), 253-290.
  • Ferreira, D.C. ve Marques, R.C. (2016). “Malmquist and Hicks-Moorsteen Productivity Indexes for Clusters Performance Evaluation”, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15(5), 1015- 1053.
  • Georganta, Z. (1997). “The Effect of a Free Market Price Mechanism on Total Factor Productivity: The Case of the Agricultural Crop Industry in Greece”, International Journal of Production Economics, 52, 55-71.
  • Görkemli, H.N. (2009). “Selçuk Üniversitesinin Konya Kent Ekonomisine Etkileri”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22, 169-186.
  • Guironnet, J.P. ve Peypoch, N. (2017). “The Geographical Efficiency of Education and Research: The Ranking of U.S. Universities”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1-12
  • Günay, A., Dulupçu, M.A. ve Oruç, K.O. (2017). “Türkiye’de Devlet Üniversitelerinin Etkinlik ve Verimlilik Analizi: Veri Zarflama Analizi ve Malmquist Toplam Faktör Verimlilik Endeksi Uygulamaları”, AİBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(3), 85-113.
  • Hicks, J.R. (1961). “Measurement of Capital in Relation to the Measurement of Other Economic Aggregates”, In Theory of Capital, Macmillan, London.
  • Ilyas, A.M. ve Rajasekaran, S. (2020). “Productivity of the Indian Non-Life Insurance Sector New Evidence Employing Fare-Primont Inde Approach”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Measurement, 69(4), 633-650.
  • Johnes, J. (2006). “Measuring Teaching Efficiency in Higher Education: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Economics Graduates from UK Universities 1993”, European Journal of Operational Research, 174, 443-456.
  • Johnes, J. ve Yu, L. (2008). “Measuring the Research Performance of Chinese Higher Education Institutions Using Data Envelopment Analysis”, China Economic Review, 19, 679-696.
  • Joumady, O. ve Ris, C. (2005). “Performance in European Higher Education: A Non-Parametric Production Frontier Approach”, Education Economics, 13(2), 189-205.
  • Kalirajan, K.P. ve Shand, R.T. (1999). “Frontier Production Functions and Technical Efficiency Measures”, Journal of Economic Surveys, DOI: 10. 1111/1467-6419.00080.
  • Kao, C. ve Hung, H.T. (2008). “Efficiency Analysis of University Departments: An Empirical Study”, Omega, 36, 653-664.
  • Katharaki, M. ve Katharakis, G. (2010). “A Comparative Assessment of Greek Universities” Efficiency Using Quantitative Analysis”, International Journal of Educational Research, 49, 115-128.
  • Kevork, I., Pange, J., Tzeremes, P. ve Tzeremes, N.G. (2017). “Estimating Malmquist Productivity Indexes Using Probabilistic Directional Distances: An Application to the European Banking Sector”, European Journal of Operational Research, 26, 1125-1140.
  • Köksal, G. ve Nalçacı, B. (2006). “The Relative Efficiency of Departments at a Turkish Engineering College: A Data Envelopment Analysis”, Higher Education, 51, 173-189.
  • Kuah, C.T. ve Wong, K.W. (2011). “Efficiency Assessment of Universities through Data Envelopment Analysis”, Procedia Computer Science, 3, 499-506.
  • Kuosmanen, T. ve Sipiläinen, T. (2009). “Exact Decomposition of the Fisher Ideal Total Factor Productivity Index”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 31, 137-150.
  • Kutlar, A. ve Kartal, M. (2004). “Cumhuriyet Üniversitesinin Verimlilik Analizi: Fakülteler Düzeyinde Veri Zarflama Yöntemiyle Bir Uygulama”, Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(2), 49-79.
  • Kutlar, A., Yüksel F. ve Bakırcı, F. (2011). “Türkiye’de Belediyelerin Ekonomik Etkinliği ve Etkinliğe Etki Eden Faktörler Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Korza Yayımcılık, Ankara.
  • Laurenceson, J. ve O’Donnell, C. (2014). “New Estimates and a Decomposition of Provincial Productivity Change in China”, China Economic Review, 30, 86-97.
  • Laureti, T., Secondi, L. ve Biggeri, L. (2014). “Measuring the Efficiency of Teaching Activities in Italian Universities: An Information Theoretic Approach”, Economics of Education Review, 42, 147-164.
  • Lebas, M. (1995). “Performance Measurement and Performance Management”, International Journal of Production Economics, 41(1-3), 23-35.
  • Madden, G. ve Savage, S.J. (1999). “Telecommunications Productivity, Catch-Up and Innovation”, Telecommunications Policy, 23(1), 65-81.
  • Maredza, A., Kapingura, F. ve Mishi, S. (2013). “Exploring the Nexus between Bank Competition and Productivity in the South African Banking Sector”, https://www.econrsa.org/system/files/workshops/papers/2013/kapingura.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 27.02.2021).
  • Molinos-Senante, M. ve Sala-Garrido, R. (2015). “The Impact of Privatization Approaches on the Productivity Growth of the Water Industry: A Case Study of Chile”, Environmental Science & Policy, 50, 166-179.
  • Molinos-Senante, M., Maziotis, A. ve Sala-Garrido, R. (2017). “Assessment of the Total Factor Productivity Change in the English and Welsh Water Industry: A Färe-Primont Productivity Index Approach”, Water Resour Management, 31, 2389-2405.
  • Moorsteen, R.H. (1961). “On Measuring Productive Potential and Relative Efficiency”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 451-467.
  • O’Donnell, C.J, (2012). “An Aggregate Quantity Framework for Measuring and Decomposing Productivity Change”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 38, 255-272.
  • O’Donnell, C.J. (2010). “DPIN Version 1.0 A Program for Decomposing Productivity Index Numbers”, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 1-11.
  • O’Donnell, C.J. (2011a). “DPIN 3.0 a Program for Decomposing Productivity Index Numbers”, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 1-28.
  • O’Donnell, C.J. (2011b). “The Sources of Productivity Change in the Manufacturing Sectors of the US Economy”, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA), Working Paper No. WP07/2011, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 1-56.
  • Oruç, K.O., Güngör, İ. ve Demiral, M.F. (2009). “Üniversitelerin Etkinlik-Ölçümünde Bulanık Veri Zarflama Analizi Uygulaması”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22, 279-294.
  • Özden, H.Ü. (2008). “Veri Zarflama Analizi ile Türkiye’deki Vakıf Üniversitelerinin Etkinliğinin Ölçülmesi”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(2), 167-185.
  • Özel Kadilar, G. (2015). “Efficiency Analysis of Foundation Universities in Turkey”, Education and Science, 40(177), 31-41.
  • Özel, G. (2014). “Devlet Üniversitelerinin Etkinlik Analizi: Türkiye Örneği”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(3), 124-136.
  • Özyakışır, D. ve Şayan, S. (2016). “Üniversite Öğrenci Harcamalarının Kent Ekonomisine Katkısı: Kafkas Üniversitesi Üzerine Bir Saha Çalışması”, Kafkas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Ek Sayı 1; 197-219.
  • Rao, D.S.P., O’Donnell, C.J. ve Ball, V.E. (2002). “Transitive Multilateral Comparisons of Agricultural Output, Input, and Productivity: A Nonparametric Approach”, Agricultural Productivity: Measurement and Sources of Growth, Editor: Ball, V. E. ve Norton, G. W., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell.
  • Reziti, I. (2020). “Total Factor Productivity Change in Greek Crop Production Using a Färe-Primont Index Analyses”, Research in Agricultural & Applied Economics, 8(2), 167-178.
  • Sagarra, M., Mar-Molinero, C. ve Agasisti, T. (2017). “Exploring the Efficiency of Mexican Universities: Integrating Data Envelopment Analysisand Multidimensional Scaling”, Omega, 67, 23-133.
  • See, K.F. ve Li, F. (2015). “Total Factor Productivity Analysis of the UK Airport Industry: A Hicks-Moorsteen Index Method”, Journal of Air Transport Management, 43, 1-10.
  • Selçuk N.G. ve Başar, S. (2012). “Kafkas Üniversitesi Öğrencilerinin Harcamalarının Kars İli Ekonomisine Katkısı”, Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(4), 89-106.
  • Sheng, Y., Wu, Y., Shi, X. ve Zhang, D. (2015). “Energy Trade Efficiency and Its Determinants: A Malmquist Index Approach”, Energy Economics, 50, 306-314.
  • Sudit, E.F. (1984). “The Productivity Concept: Definition, Measurement and Managerial Importance”, Productivity Based Management Studies in Productivity Analysis, Vol 5, Springer, Dordrecht.
  • Tan, W. (2000). “Total Factor Productivity in Singapore Construction”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 7(2), 154-158.
  • Tatlı, H. (2014). “Bingöl Üniversitesi Öğrencilerinin Bingöl Ekonomisine Katkıları”, Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(7), 79-94.
  • Tatlı, H. ve Bayrak, R. (2014). “Total Factor Productivity Analysis in Food Sector”, International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, 6(4), 25-34.
  • Ulucan, A. (2011). “Measuring the Efficiency of Turkish Universities Using Measure-specific Data Envelopment Analysis”, Sosyoekonomi, 1, 181-196.
  • Yayar, R. ve Demir, D. (2013). “Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesinin Tokat İli Ekonomisine Etkisi”, Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 5(8), 106-122.
  • Yaylalı, M. (2013). “Mikroiktisat”, 3. Baskı, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Ying Chu N.G. ve Sung-Ko, L.I. (2009). “Efficiency and Productivity Growth in Chinese Universities during the Post-Reform Period”, China Economic Review, 20, 183-192.
  • Yükçü, S. ve Atağan, G. (2009). “Etkinlik, Etkililik ve Verimlilik Kavramlarının Yarattığı Karışıklık”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 23(4), 1-13.
  • Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu, (2021). “Yüksek Öğrenim Bilgi Yönetim Sitemi”, https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr, (Erişim Tarihi: 20.01.2021).
  • Zoghbi, A.C., Rocha, F. ve Mattos, E. (2013). “Education Production Efficiency: Evidence from Brazilian Universities”, Economic Modelling, 31, 94-103.

ÜNİVERSİTELERİN TOPLAM FAKTÖR VERİMLİLİĞİNİN HICKS-MOORSTEEN VE FÄRE-PRIMONT ENDEKSLERİ İLE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Year 2022, Issue: 1, 1 - 15, 31.01.2022

Erdinc Koc Halim Tatlı

https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.866005

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye'de 2007 yılında kurulan devlet üniversitelerinin etkinliğini Färe-Primont ve Hicks-Moorsteen Endeksleri ile değerlendirmektir.

Yöntem: Çalışmada, Girdi Odaklı Teknik Etkinlik (ITE), Karma Etkinlik (IME) ve Kalan Girdi Odaklı Ölçek Etkinliğinden (RISE) faydalanılarak Toplam Faktör Verimliliğinin Etkinliği (TFPE) bulunmuştur. Üniversitelere ilişkin girdi ve çıktı değişkenlerinden oluşan veri seti Färe-Primont ve Hicks-Moorsteen endekslerinde analiz edilmiştir.

Bulgular: Yapılan analizler sonucunda Färe-Primont endeksi içerisinde IME’nin TFPE içerisinde belirleyici rol üstlendiği tespit edilmiştir. Hicks-Moorsteen endeksinde ise TFPE’nin en fazla RISE’den etkilendiği belirlenmiştir. Üniversitelerin geneli değerlendirildiğinde kalan girdi odaklı ölçek etkinliğinin 2018-2019 yılları arasındaki düşüşü 2019-2020 yıllarında yükselişe dönüşmüş olduğu görülmüştür. Färe-Primont ve Hicks-Moorsteen TFP endeksleri ile gerçekleştirilen analiz sonuçlarının birbirleriyle örtüşmediği tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar incelendiğinde yalnızca ITE’nin Färe-Primont ve Hicks-Moorsteen endeksinde aynı değerlere sahip olduğu görülmektedir.

Özgünlük: Üniversitelerin etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılması amacıyla gerçekleştirilen birçok çalışma mevcuttur. Bu çalışma kullandığı veri seti ve analiz yöntemleri itibarıyla mevcut çalışmalardan ayrışmakta olup özgün değere sahiptir.

Keywords

Etkinlik Toplam Faktör Verimliliği Fare-Primont Endeksi Hicks-Moorsteen Endeksi

References

  • Abed, R. ve Acosta, A. (2018). “Assessing Livestock Total Factor Productivity: A Malmquist Index Approach”, African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 13(4), 297-306.
  • Abramo, G., Cicero, T. ve D’angelo, C.C. (2011). “A Field-Standardized Application of DEA to National Scale Research Assessment of Universities”, Journal of Infometrics, 5, 618-628.
  • Agasisti, T. ve Johnes, G. (2009). “Beyond Frontiers: Comparing the Efficiency of Higher Education Decision‐Making Units Across more than One Country”, Education Economics, 17(1), 59-79.
  • Aleskerov, F. ve Petruschenko, V. (2013). “DEA by Sequential Exclusion of Alternatives”, Higher School of Economics Working Paper Series, WP7/2013/02.
  • Arjomandi, A., Salleh, M.I. ve Mohammadzadeh, A. (2015). “Measuring Productivity Change in Higher Education: An Application of Hicks–Moorsteen Total Factor Productivity Index to Malaysian Public Universities”, Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 20(4), 630-643.
  • Arslan, H. (2014). “Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesinin Kente Ekonomik Katkısı ve Öğrenci Harcamalarının Farklı Değişkenler Açısından Analizi”, Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(2), 114-127.
  • Asante, B.O. ve Villano, R.A. (2019). “Components of Farm-Level Productivity in Integrated Crop-Livestock Farming Systems in Ghana: The Role of Mix Efficiency”, International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics, 7(1), 63-76.
  • Atik, H. (1999). “Üniversitelerin Yerel Ekonomiye Katkıları: Teori ve Erciyes Üniversitesi Üzerine Bir Uygulama”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 15, 99-109.
  • Babacan, M., Kartal, M. ve Bircan, M.H. (2007). “Cumhuriyet Üniversitesinin Etkinliğinin Kamu Üniversiteleri ile Karşılaştırılması: Bir VZA Tekniği Uygulaması”, C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 97-114.
  • Bal, V. (2013). “Vakıf Üniversitelerinde Veri Zarflama Analizi ile Etkinlik Belirlenmesi”, Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(1), 1-14.
  • Baležentis, T. (2015). “The Sources of the Total Factor Productivity Growth in Lithuanian Family Farms: A Färe-Primont Index Approach”, Prague Economic Papers, 24(2), 225-241.
  • Baysal, M.E., Alçılar, B., Çerçioğlu, H. ve Toklu, B. (2005). “Türkiye'deki Devlet Üniversitelerinin 2004 Yılı Performanslarının, Veri Zarflama Analizi Yöntemiyle Belirlenip Buna Göre 2005 Yılı Bütçe Tahsislerinin Yapılması”, Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 67-73.
  • Beasley, J. (1995). “Determining Teaching and Research Efficiencies”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46, 441-452.
  • Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Lafuente, E. ve Solé, F. (2013). “The Pursuit of Knowledge Transfer Activities: An Efficiency Analysis of Spanish Universities”, Journal of Business Research, 66, 2051-2059.
  • Birlik, M., Aydın, Ü. ve Kahyaoğlu, H. (2016). “Türkiye Gıda Sanayinde Kısa ve Uzun Dönemli Etkinlik: Stokastik Sınır Analizi”, Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 6(2), 67-84.
  • Bjurek, H. (1996). “The Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index”, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 98(2), 303-313.
  • Bougnol, M.L. ve Dulá, J.V. (2006). “Validating DEA as a Ranking Tool: An Application of DEA to Assess Performance in Higher Education”, Annals of Operations Research, 145, 339-365.
  • Briec, W. ve Kerstens, K. (2004). “A Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen Productivity Indicator: Its Relation to the Hicks-Moorsteen Productivity Index and the Luenberger Productivity Indicator”, Economic Theory, 23(4), 925-939.
  • Chen, Y. (2011). “Productivity of Automobile Industries Using the Malmquist Index: Evidence from the Last Economic Recession”, Journal of Centrum Cathedra, 4(2), 165-181.
  • Cillero, M.M. ve Thorne, F. (2019). “Sources of Pdroductivity Growth Using the Färe-Primont Decomposition: An Empirical Application to the Irish Beef Sector”, Applied Economics, 51(36), 3982-3994.
  • Coelli, T.J., Rao, D.S.P., O'Donnell, C.J. ve Battese, G.E. (2005). “An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis”, 2nd Edition, Springer, New York.
  • Cook, W.D., Tone, K. ve Zhu, J. (2014). “Data Envelopment Analysis: Prior to Choosing a Model Wade”, Omega, 44, 1-4.
  • Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı (2021). “Orta Vadeli Mali Plan 2021-2023”, https://www.sbb.gov.tr/butce-orta-vadeli-mali-planlar, (Erişim Tarihi:20.01.2021).
  • Cunha, M. ve Rocha, V. (2012). “On the Efficiency of Public Higher Education Institutions in Portugal: An Exploratory Study”, FEP Working Papers, 1-31.
  • Çalışkan, Ş. (2010). “Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Harcamalarının Kent Ekonomisine Katkısı (Uşak Üniversitesi Örneği)”, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(31), 169-179.
  • Çetin, T. (2010). “İktisadi Etkinlik Üzerine Bir Deneme: X Etkinlik Yaklaşımı”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 11(2), 183-198.
  • Çınar, Y. (2013). “Türkiye’de Kamu Üniversitelerinin Eğitim-Araştırma Etkinlikleri ve Etkinlik Artışında Stratejik Önceliklerin Rolü: Çok-Aktiviteli VZA Uygulaması”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 68(2), 27-62.
  • Dakpo, K.H., Desjeux, Y., Jeanneaux, P. ve Latruffe, L. (2019). “Productivity, Technical Efficiency and Technological Change in French Agriculture During 2002-2015: A Färe-Primont Index Decomposition Using Group Frontiers and Meta-Frontier”, Applied Economics, 51(11), 1166-1182.
  • Deliktaş, E. (2002). “Efficiency and Total factor Productivity Analysis in Private Manufacturing Industry in Turkey”, The Journal of METU Development, 29(3-4), 247-284.
  • Epure, M., Kernstens, K. ve Diego, D. (2011). “Technology-Based Total Factor Productivity and Benchmarking: New Proposals and an Application”, Omega International Journal of Management Science, 39(6), 608-619.
  • Fandel, G. (2007), “On the Performance of Universities in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany: Government's Redistribution of Funds Judged Using DEA Efficiency Measures”, European Journal of Operational Research, 176, 521-533.
  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. ve Roos, P. (1996). “On Two Definitions of Productivity”, Economics Letters, 53(3), 269-274.
  • Farrel, M.J. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 120(3), 253-290.
  • Ferreira, D.C. ve Marques, R.C. (2016). “Malmquist and Hicks-Moorsteen Productivity Indexes for Clusters Performance Evaluation”, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15(5), 1015- 1053.
  • Georganta, Z. (1997). “The Effect of a Free Market Price Mechanism on Total Factor Productivity: The Case of the Agricultural Crop Industry in Greece”, International Journal of Production Economics, 52, 55-71.
  • Görkemli, H.N. (2009). “Selçuk Üniversitesinin Konya Kent Ekonomisine Etkileri”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22, 169-186.
  • Guironnet, J.P. ve Peypoch, N. (2017). “The Geographical Efficiency of Education and Research: The Ranking of U.S. Universities”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1-12
  • Günay, A., Dulupçu, M.A. ve Oruç, K.O. (2017). “Türkiye’de Devlet Üniversitelerinin Etkinlik ve Verimlilik Analizi: Veri Zarflama Analizi ve Malmquist Toplam Faktör Verimlilik Endeksi Uygulamaları”, AİBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(3), 85-113.
  • Hicks, J.R. (1961). “Measurement of Capital in Relation to the Measurement of Other Economic Aggregates”, In Theory of Capital, Macmillan, London.
  • Ilyas, A.M. ve Rajasekaran, S. (2020). “Productivity of the Indian Non-Life Insurance Sector New Evidence Employing Fare-Primont Inde Approach”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Measurement, 69(4), 633-650.
  • Johnes, J. (2006). “Measuring Teaching Efficiency in Higher Education: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Economics Graduates from UK Universities 1993”, European Journal of Operational Research, 174, 443-456.
  • Johnes, J. ve Yu, L. (2008). “Measuring the Research Performance of Chinese Higher Education Institutions Using Data Envelopment Analysis”, China Economic Review, 19, 679-696.
  • Joumady, O. ve Ris, C. (2005). “Performance in European Higher Education: A Non-Parametric Production Frontier Approach”, Education Economics, 13(2), 189-205.
  • Kalirajan, K.P. ve Shand, R.T. (1999). “Frontier Production Functions and Technical Efficiency Measures”, Journal of Economic Surveys, DOI: 10. 1111/1467-6419.00080.
  • Kao, C. ve Hung, H.T. (2008). “Efficiency Analysis of University Departments: An Empirical Study”, Omega, 36, 653-664.
  • Katharaki, M. ve Katharakis, G. (2010). “A Comparative Assessment of Greek Universities” Efficiency Using Quantitative Analysis”, International Journal of Educational Research, 49, 115-128.
  • Kevork, I., Pange, J., Tzeremes, P. ve Tzeremes, N.G. (2017). “Estimating Malmquist Productivity Indexes Using Probabilistic Directional Distances: An Application to the European Banking Sector”, European Journal of Operational Research, 26, 1125-1140.
  • Köksal, G. ve Nalçacı, B. (2006). “The Relative Efficiency of Departments at a Turkish Engineering College: A Data Envelopment Analysis”, Higher Education, 51, 173-189.
  • Kuah, C.T. ve Wong, K.W. (2011). “Efficiency Assessment of Universities through Data Envelopment Analysis”, Procedia Computer Science, 3, 499-506.
  • Kuosmanen, T. ve Sipiläinen, T. (2009). “Exact Decomposition of the Fisher Ideal Total Factor Productivity Index”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 31, 137-150.
  • Kutlar, A. ve Kartal, M. (2004). “Cumhuriyet Üniversitesinin Verimlilik Analizi: Fakülteler Düzeyinde Veri Zarflama Yöntemiyle Bir Uygulama”, Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(2), 49-79.
  • Kutlar, A., Yüksel F. ve Bakırcı, F. (2011). “Türkiye’de Belediyelerin Ekonomik Etkinliği ve Etkinliğe Etki Eden Faktörler Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Korza Yayımcılık, Ankara.
  • Laurenceson, J. ve O’Donnell, C. (2014). “New Estimates and a Decomposition of Provincial Productivity Change in China”, China Economic Review, 30, 86-97.
  • Laureti, T., Secondi, L. ve Biggeri, L. (2014). “Measuring the Efficiency of Teaching Activities in Italian Universities: An Information Theoretic Approach”, Economics of Education Review, 42, 147-164.
  • Lebas, M. (1995). “Performance Measurement and Performance Management”, International Journal of Production Economics, 41(1-3), 23-35.
  • Madden, G. ve Savage, S.J. (1999). “Telecommunications Productivity, Catch-Up and Innovation”, Telecommunications Policy, 23(1), 65-81.
  • Maredza, A., Kapingura, F. ve Mishi, S. (2013). “Exploring the Nexus between Bank Competition and Productivity in the South African Banking Sector”, https://www.econrsa.org/system/files/workshops/papers/2013/kapingura.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 27.02.2021).
  • Molinos-Senante, M. ve Sala-Garrido, R. (2015). “The Impact of Privatization Approaches on the Productivity Growth of the Water Industry: A Case Study of Chile”, Environmental Science & Policy, 50, 166-179.
  • Molinos-Senante, M., Maziotis, A. ve Sala-Garrido, R. (2017). “Assessment of the Total Factor Productivity Change in the English and Welsh Water Industry: A Färe-Primont Productivity Index Approach”, Water Resour Management, 31, 2389-2405.
  • Moorsteen, R.H. (1961). “On Measuring Productive Potential and Relative Efficiency”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 451-467.
  • O’Donnell, C.J, (2012). “An Aggregate Quantity Framework for Measuring and Decomposing Productivity Change”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 38, 255-272.
  • O’Donnell, C.J. (2010). “DPIN Version 1.0 A Program for Decomposing Productivity Index Numbers”, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 1-11.
  • O’Donnell, C.J. (2011a). “DPIN 3.0 a Program for Decomposing Productivity Index Numbers”, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 1-28.
  • O’Donnell, C.J. (2011b). “The Sources of Productivity Change in the Manufacturing Sectors of the US Economy”, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA), Working Paper No. WP07/2011, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 1-56.
  • Oruç, K.O., Güngör, İ. ve Demiral, M.F. (2009). “Üniversitelerin Etkinlik-Ölçümünde Bulanık Veri Zarflama Analizi Uygulaması”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22, 279-294.
  • Özden, H.Ü. (2008). “Veri Zarflama Analizi ile Türkiye’deki Vakıf Üniversitelerinin Etkinliğinin Ölçülmesi”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(2), 167-185.
  • Özel Kadilar, G. (2015). “Efficiency Analysis of Foundation Universities in Turkey”, Education and Science, 40(177), 31-41.
  • Özel, G. (2014). “Devlet Üniversitelerinin Etkinlik Analizi: Türkiye Örneği”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(3), 124-136.
  • Özyakışır, D. ve Şayan, S. (2016). “Üniversite Öğrenci Harcamalarının Kent Ekonomisine Katkısı: Kafkas Üniversitesi Üzerine Bir Saha Çalışması”, Kafkas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Ek Sayı 1; 197-219.
  • Rao, D.S.P., O’Donnell, C.J. ve Ball, V.E. (2002). “Transitive Multilateral Comparisons of Agricultural Output, Input, and Productivity: A Nonparametric Approach”, Agricultural Productivity: Measurement and Sources of Growth, Editor: Ball, V. E. ve Norton, G. W., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell.
  • Reziti, I. (2020). “Total Factor Productivity Change in Greek Crop Production Using a Färe-Primont Index Analyses”, Research in Agricultural & Applied Economics, 8(2), 167-178.
  • Sagarra, M., Mar-Molinero, C. ve Agasisti, T. (2017). “Exploring the Efficiency of Mexican Universities: Integrating Data Envelopment Analysisand Multidimensional Scaling”, Omega, 67, 23-133.
  • See, K.F. ve Li, F. (2015). “Total Factor Productivity Analysis of the UK Airport Industry: A Hicks-Moorsteen Index Method”, Journal of Air Transport Management, 43, 1-10.
  • Selçuk N.G. ve Başar, S. (2012). “Kafkas Üniversitesi Öğrencilerinin Harcamalarının Kars İli Ekonomisine Katkısı”, Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(4), 89-106.
  • Sheng, Y., Wu, Y., Shi, X. ve Zhang, D. (2015). “Energy Trade Efficiency and Its Determinants: A Malmquist Index Approach”, Energy Economics, 50, 306-314.
  • Sudit, E.F. (1984). “The Productivity Concept: Definition, Measurement and Managerial Importance”, Productivity Based Management Studies in Productivity Analysis, Vol 5, Springer, Dordrecht.
  • Tan, W. (2000). “Total Factor Productivity in Singapore Construction”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 7(2), 154-158.
  • Tatlı, H. (2014). “Bingöl Üniversitesi Öğrencilerinin Bingöl Ekonomisine Katkıları”, Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(7), 79-94.
  • Tatlı, H. ve Bayrak, R. (2014). “Total Factor Productivity Analysis in Food Sector”, International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, 6(4), 25-34.
  • Ulucan, A. (2011). “Measuring the Efficiency of Turkish Universities Using Measure-specific Data Envelopment Analysis”, Sosyoekonomi, 1, 181-196.
  • Yayar, R. ve Demir, D. (2013). “Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesinin Tokat İli Ekonomisine Etkisi”, Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 5(8), 106-122.
  • Yaylalı, M. (2013). “Mikroiktisat”, 3. Baskı, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Ying Chu N.G. ve Sung-Ko, L.I. (2009). “Efficiency and Productivity Growth in Chinese Universities during the Post-Reform Period”, China Economic Review, 20, 183-192.
  • Yükçü, S. ve Atağan, G. (2009). “Etkinlik, Etkililik ve Verimlilik Kavramlarının Yarattığı Karışıklık”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 23(4), 1-13.
  • Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu, (2021). “Yüksek Öğrenim Bilgi Yönetim Sitemi”, https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr, (Erişim Tarihi: 20.01.2021).
  • Zoghbi, A.C., Rocha, F. ve Mattos, E. (2013). “Education Production Efficiency: Evidence from Brazilian Universities”, Economic Modelling, 31, 94-103.
There are 86 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Erdinc Koc 0000-0002-8209-5714

Halim Tatlı 0000-0002-7940-0087

Publication Date January 31, 2022
Submission Date January 21, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2022 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Koc, E., & Tatlı, H. (2022). ÜNİVERSİTELERİN TOPLAM FAKTÖR VERİMLİLİĞİNİN HICKS-MOORSTEEN VE FÄRE-PRIMONT ENDEKSLERİ İLE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Verimlilik Dergisi(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.866005
 Download Cover Image

23139       23140          29293

22408 Journal of Productivity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0)