Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 358 - 380, 17.10.2019

Binnur Ergen Tugba Yanpar Yelken Sedat Kanadli

https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.634182

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Acikgul, K. & Aslaner, R. (2015). Ilkogretim matematik ogretmen adaylarinin TPAB guven algilarinin incelenmesi. Erzincan Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 17(1), 118-152. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17556/jef.04990
  • Akgoz, S., Ercan, I. Kan, I., (2004). Meta analiz. Uludag Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Dergisi, 30(2), 107-112.
  • Akkoc, H., Ozmantar, M.F., Bingolbali, E., Demir,S., Basturk, S., & Yavuz, I. (2011). Matematik ogretmen adaylarina teknolojiye yonelik pedagojik alan bilgisi kazandirma amacli program gelistirme. TUBITAK Proje No: 107K531. Istanbul.
  • *Aksin, A. (2014). Sosyal bilgiler ogretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPACK) yeterlilikleri: Amasya ili ornegi) (Yayınlanmamis doktora tezi). Ataturk Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Erzurum, Turkiye.
  • Akyildiz, S. Altun, T. (2018). Sinif ogretmeni adayteknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerinin (TPAB) bazi degiskenlere gore incelenmesi. Trakya Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 8(2), 318-333. DOI: 10.24315/trkefd.322749
  • *Alazcioglu, H. (2016). Ogretmen adaylarinin TPAB yeterlik duzeyleri ile Web 2.0 aracarini kullanim durumlari arasindaki iliskinin incelenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Mevlana Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu. Konya, Turkiye.
  • Alshehri, K. A. (2012). The influence of mathematics teachers’ knowledge in technology, pedagogy and content (TPACK) on their teaching effectiveness in Saudi public schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
  • *Altun, T. (2013). Examination of classroom teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge on the basis of their demographic profiles. Croatian Journal of Education, 15(2), 365-397.
  • Anderson, B. (2012). Testing the effectiveness of professional development for integrating technology in an Urban Iowa Middle School (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northcentral University. Scottsdale, AZ.
  • *Avci, T. (2014). Fen bilimleri ogretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi ve oz-guven duzeylerinin belirlenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Celal Bayar Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu. Manisa, Turkiye.
  • *Bagriyanik, K. E. (2015). Fen bilgisi ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerine yonelik oz-yeterlik inanislari, tutumlari ve algilari (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Cumhuriyet Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Sivas, Turkiye.
  • Bakioglu, A. & Ozcan, S. (2016). Meta analiz. Ankara: Nobel.
  • Balcin, M. D., Ergun, A. (2016). Fen bilgisi ogretmen adaylarinin materyal gelistirme konusundaki teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi oz-yeterlik olcegi: Gelistirme, guvenirlik ve gecerlik calısmasi. Turkish Journal of Education, 5(3), 109-120.
  • Baran, E. Canbazoglu Bilici, S. (2015). Teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) uzerine alanyazin incelemesi: Turkiye Ornegi. Hacettepe Unıversity Journal of Education, 30(1), 15-32.
  • *Baturay, M.H., Gokcearslan, S., Sahin, S. (2017). Associations among teachers’ attitudes towards computer-assisted education and TPACK competencies. Informatics in Education, 16(1), 1-23. DOI: 10.15388/infedu.2017.01
  • Bavonese, J. (2014). Determining the impact of a multiliteracies workshop on TPACK knowledge of elemantary preservice teachers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Alabama University. Tuscaloosa, AL.
  • *Bilici, S. (2015). Ortaogretim ogretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi duzeylerinin etkilesimli tahta ve diger ogretim teknolojilerinin kullanma durumlarina gore incelenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu Van, Turkiye.
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.T. & Rothstein, H.R. (2013). Meta-analize giris. (Trans. Ed: S. Dincer). Ankara: Ani.
  • Bostancioglu, A. (2014). EFL-TPACK: The development of a questionnaire to measure the technology pedagogy and content knowledge of English as foreign language (EFL) teachers. The EUROCALL Teacher Ed SIG. Retrieved on 14 November 2018 from https://sites.google.com/site/teacheredsignice/programme/abstracts/efl-tpackquestionnaireforteachers.
  • *Cam, E. (2017). Ilkogretim ogretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) duzeylerinin yasam boyu ogrenme, oz-yeterlik duzeyleri ve hizmet ici egitim gereksinimleri acisindan incelenmesi: Mus/Bulanik ornegi) (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Amasya Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu. Amasya, Turkiye.
  • *Can, S., Dogru, S., Bayir, G. (2017). Determination of pre-service classroom teachers technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(2). Retrieved on 14 November 2018 from http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i2.2083
  • Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Yamak, H., Kavak, N. S., Guzey, S. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacy scale (TPACK-SeS) for pre-service science teachers: construction, validation and reliability. Eurasian Journal of Education Research, 52, 37-60.
  • *Canbolat, N.(2011). Matematik ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgileri ile dusunme stilleri arasındaki iliskinin incelenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Selcuk Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Konya, Turkiye.
  • Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York, London: Guilford.
  • Cetin, I. (2017). Matematik ogretmeni adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) duzeylerinin incelenmesi (Yayinlanmais doktora tezi). Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Konya, Turkiye.
  • *Cetin-Berber, D. Erdem, A. R. (2015). An investigation of Turkish pre-service teachers’ technological, pedagogical and content knowledge. Computers, 4, 234-250. doi: 10.3390/computers4030234.
  • Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31-51.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cooper, H. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step by step approach (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cuhadar, C., Bulbul, T., Ilgaz, G.(2013). Exploring of the relationship between individual innovativeness and techno-pedagogical education competencies of pre-service teachers. Elementary Education Online, 12(3), 797‐807.
  • *Delen, K. (2016). The investigation of technological pedagogical and content knowledge level by Turkish teachers of English (Unpublished master’s thesis). Cag University. Graduate School of Social Sciences. Mersin, Turkey.
  • *Demir Atalay, T. (2016). Turkce ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi durumlarinin cesitli degiskenlerle iliskisi. Turkish Studies, 11(9), 247-266. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.
  • Demir, T. & Firat Durdukoca, S. (2018). Pedagojik formasyon egitimi sertifika programina devam eden ogrencilerin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerinin cesitli degiskenlere gore incelenmesi. International Journal of Turkish Literature and Culture Education, 7(2), 1253-1275.
  • *Depew, R. (2015). Investigating the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and technology leadership capacities of k-12 public school principals (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Brandman University. Irvine, CA.
  • Dikkartin Ovez, F. T. & Akyuz, G. (2013). Ilkogretim matematik ogretmeni adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi yapilarinin modellenmesi. Education and Science, 38(170), 321-334.
  • Dikmen, C.H. & Demirer, V. (2016). Trends in studies on technological pedagogical content knowledge in Turkey between 2009 and 2013 years. Turkish Journal of Education, 5(1), 33-46.
  • Dincer, S. (2014). Egitim bilimlerinde uygulamali meta-analiz. Ankara. Pegem.
  • Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect size. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • *Erdogan, A., Sahin, İ. (2010). Relationship between math teacher candidates’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) and achievement levels. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2707-2711.
  • Glass, G.V. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
  • Gomleksiz M. N. & Fidan E .K. (2013). Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik icerik bilgisi oz-yeterliklerine iliskin algi duzeyleri. Inonu University Journal of Education Faculty, 14(1), 87-113.
  • Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St. Clair, L., Harris, R. (2009). TPACK development in science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends, 53(5), 70-79.
  • Gravel, R. J. (2014). The effects of pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade in-service teachers’ participation in a professional development course aligned with the TPACK framework (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Illinois University. DeKalb, IL.
  • Gliner A. J., Morgan A. G., Leech L. N. (2015). Uygulamada araştirma yontemleri desen ve analizi butunlestiren yaklasim (Trans. Ed: S. Turan). Ankara: Nobel.
  • *Gundogmus, N. (2013). Ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgileri ile ogrenme stratejileri arasındaki iliskinin incelenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Konya, Turkiye.
  • Gur, H. & Karamete, A. (2015). A short review of TPACK for teacher education. Academic Journals, 10(7), 777-789.
  • Haciomeroglu, G., Sahin, C., Arcagok, S. (2014). Turkish adaptation of preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge assessment scale. Theory and Practice in Education (Egitimde Kuram ve Uygulama), 10(2), 297-315.
  • Higgins, J. P. T, Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 6(327), 557–560.
  • Holland, D. D. (2014). Technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) competencies of preservice teachers at a small rural university (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona Northcentral University. Scottsdale, AZ, United States.
  • Isiguzel, B. (2014). Almanca ogretmen adaylarinin teknopedagojik egitime yonelik yeterlik duzeylerinin incelenmesi. The Journal of International Social Research, 7(34), 768-778.
  • Jang S.-J., Tsai M. F. (2013). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese secondary school science teachers using a new contextualized TPACK Model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 566-580.
  • Kabakci Yurdakul I. (2011). Ogretmen adaylarinin teknopedagojik egitim yeterliklerinin bilgi ve iletisim teknolojileri kullanimlari acisindan incelenmesi. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 40, 397-408.
  • Kabakci Yurdakul I., Odabasi, F. H., Kılıcer, K., Coklar, A.N., Birinci, G., Kurt, A. A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Computer and Education, 58(3), 964-977.
  • Kabakci Yurdakul, I. (Ed.), Odabasi, F. (2013). Teknopedagojik egitime dayali ogretim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarimi. Ankara: Ani.
  • *Kabaran, H. (2016). Ogretim elemanlarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgileri (TPAB) İle ogretme stilleri arasındaki iliskinin incelenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Mugla Sitki Kocman Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Mugla, Turkiye.
  • Kaleli Y.G. (2015). Turkiye’deki teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi calismalarinin analizi: Bir meta-sentez calismasi. Egitim ve Bilim, 40(178), 103-122.
  • *Karaca, F. (2015). An investigation of pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge based on a variety characteristics. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(4), 128-136.
  • Karademir, E. (2015). Egitsel internet kullanimi ile teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi ve egitim teknolojilerine yonelik tutum arasındaki iliski: ogretmen adayları ornegi. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 10(15), 519-534.
  • Karadeniz, S., Vatanartiran, S. (2015). Primary school teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Elementary Education Online, 14(3), 1017-1028.
  • *Karatas, A. (2014). Lise ogretmenlerinin FATIH Projesi’ni Uygulamaya yonelik teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi yeterliklerinin incelenmesi: Adiyaman ornegi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Sakarya Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Sakarya, Turkiye.
  • Karatas, I., Piskin-Tunc, M., Demiray, E. ve Yilmaz, N. (2016). Ogretmen adaylarinin matematik ogretiminde teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerinin gelistirilmesi. Abant Izzet Baysal Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 16(2), 512-533.
  • *Kartal, T., Afacan, O. (2017). Examining Turkish pre-service science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) based on demographic variables. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(1), 1-22.
  • Kaya, Z., Ozdemir, T. Y., Emre, I. & Kaya, O. N. (2011). Exploring preservice information technology teachers’ perception of self-efficacy in web-technological pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the 6th International Advanced Technologies Symposium (IATS’11). Elazig, Turkey.
  • Kaya, S. & Dag, F. (2013). Sinif ogretmenlerine yonelik teknolojik pedagojik icerik bilgisi olcegi’nin Turkce’ye uyarlanmasi. Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice, 13(1), 291-306.
  • Kaya, Z., Kaya, O. N. & Emre, G. (2013). Teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) olçegi’nin Turkçe’ye uyarlanmasi. Educational Sciences: in Theory and Practice, 13(4). 2355-2377.
  • Kaya, Z. (2014). Harmanlanmis ogrenmenin fen bilgisi ogretmen adaylarinin kuresel isinma konusundaki teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi ve sinif ici ogretim becerilerinin gelistirilmesi uzerine etkisi (Yayinlanmamis doktora tezi). Firat Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Elazig, Turkiye.
  • Kazu, I. Y., Erten, P. (2014). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacies. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(2), 126-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v2i2.261
  • Kiray, A. S. (2016). Development of a TPACK self-efficacy scale for preservice science teachers. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(2), 527-541.
  • *Kiylik, D. (2016). Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) seviyelerinin cesitli degiskenlere gore incelenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Van, Turkiye.
  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical knowledge. In AACTE (Eds.). The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators (p.14). New York: Routledge.
  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
  • Koh, J.H.L and Sing, C.C. (2011). Modeling pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (tpack) perceptions: the influence of demographic factors and TPACK constructs. Paper presented at ASCILITE Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference. Australia.
  • Kula, A. (2015). Ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (Tpab) yeterliliklerinin incelenmesi: Bartin Universitesi Ornegi. Akademik Sosyal Arastirmalar Dergisi, 3(12), 395-412.
  • Kurt, A. A. & Kabakci Yurdakul, I. (Ed.) (2013). Teknopedagojik egitime dayali ogretim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarimi. 1. Ed. Ankara: Anı Press.
  • Leech, N. L., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2002, November). Nonparametric statistics. Annual meeting of the mid-south educational research association. Chattanooga, TN.
  • Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D.B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Miles, M.B. & Huberman, AM. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Millen, R. (2015). Closing the gap between technological and best practice innovations: teachers’ perceived technological pedagogical content knowledge and self-efficacy towards differentiated instruction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Johnson & Wales University. Providence, RI.
  • *Mutluoglu, A. (2012). Ilkogretim matematik ogretmenlerinin ogretim stil tercihlerine gore teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerinin incelenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Konya, Turkiye.
  • North, A. S. & Noyes, J. M. (2002). Gender influences on children's computer attitudes and cognitions. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(2), 135-150.
  • *Oz, H. (2015). Assessing pre-service English as a foreign language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. International Education Studies, 8(5), 119-130.
  • Ozaydinlik, K. (2014). Toplumsal cinsiyet temelinde Turkiye’de kadin ve egitim. Sosyal Politika Calismalari Dergisi, 33, 93-112. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21560/spcd.03093.
  • *Ozturk, E. (2013). Sinif ogretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerinin bazi degiskenler acisindan degerlendirilmesi. Usak Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2), 223-228.
  • Pamuk, S., Ulken, A. & Dilek, N. S. (2012). Ogretmen adaylarinin ogretimde teknoloji kullanim yeterliliklerinin teknolojik pedagojik içerik bilgisi kuramsal perspektifinden incelenmesi. Mustafa Kemal Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 9(17), 415-438.
  • Pamuk, S., Ergun, M., Cakir, R., Yilmaz, H.B., Ayas C. (2015). Exploring relationships among TPACK components and development of the TPACK instrument. Educ. Inf. Technol., 20(2015), 241–263. DOI 10.1007/s10639-013-9278-4.
  • Price G. F., Wright V. H., Rice M. L. (2014). Determining the impact of an integrated triadic model on TPACK development in preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30(4), 139-149. DOI: 10.1080/21532974.2014.927250.
  • *Roig-Vila R., Mengual-Andrés S., Quinto-Medrano P. (2015). Primary teachers’ technological, pedagogical and content knowledge. Media Education Research Journal, 45(23), 151-159. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C45-2015-16.
  • *Sad S. N., Acikgul, K., Delican, K. (2015). Senior pre-service teachers’ senses of efficacy on their technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 8(2), 204-235. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5578/keg.9480.
  • Sahin, İ. (2011). Development of survey of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 97-105.
  • Sainz, M. & Saez, M. L. (2010). Gender differences in computer attitude and the choice of technology related occupations in a sample of secondary students in Spain. Computers & Education, 54(2), 578-587.
  • *Saka Ozturk, H. (2017). Ogretmenlerin tekno-pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) duzeyleri, ogrencilerin oz-yeterlikleri ve akademik basarilari arasindaki iliskilerin incelenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Konya, Turkiye.
  • Sancar Tokmak H., Yavuz Konokman G., Yanpar Yelken T. (2013). Mersin Universitesi okul oncesi ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (tpab) ozguven algilarinin incelenmesi. Ahi Evran Universitesi Kirsehir Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 14(1), 35-51.
  • Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J., & Shin, T. (2009a). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
  • Tuncer, M., Dikmen, M. (2018). Cinsiyetin tekno-pedagojik alan bilgisi uzerindeki etkisinin meta-analiz yontemiyle arastirilmasi. Firat Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 28(1), 85-92.
  • *Turgut, T. (2017). Sosyal bilgiler ogretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi yeterlilikleri: Karabuk ili ornegi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Karabuk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu. Karabuk, Turkiye.
  • *Unlu, I., Kaskaya, A., Coskun, M. K. (2017). Sosyal bilgiler ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi yeterliklerinin cesitli degiskenlere gore incelenmesi. Erzincan Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 19(1), 1-24. DOI: 10.17556/erziefd.295611.
  • Viechtbauer, W. (2017). Metafor: Meta-analysis package for R. R package version 2.0-0 [Data files].https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/metafor/index.
  • Wright, B. & Akgunduz, D. (2018). The relationship between technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) self-efficacy belief levels and the usage of Web 2.0 applications of pre-service science teachers. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues. 10(1), 70-87.
  • Yanpar Yelken T. (2012). Ogretim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarimi (11.Ed.). Ankara: Ani.
  • Yanpar Yelken T., Sancar Tokmak H., Ozgelen, S & Incikapi, L. (2013). Teknolojik- pedagojik- alan bilgisi (tpab) cercevesi ve bu cercevenin Milli Egitim Bakanligi fen ve matematik egitimi programindaki yeri. T. Y.Yelken, H. S. Tokmak, S. Ozgelen and L. Incikapi (Eds.) Fen ve matematik egitiminde teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi temelli ogretim tasarimlari (pp.2-10). Ankara: Ani.
  • Yavuz Konokman, G., Yanpar Yelken, T., Sancar Tokmak, H. (2013). Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin TPAB’lerine iliskin algilarinin cesitli degiskenlere gore incelenmesi: Mersin Universitesi ornegi. Kastamonu Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 21(2), 666-684.

A Meta-Analysis of Research on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge by Gender

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 358 - 380, 17.10.2019

Binnur Ergen Tugba Yanpar Yelken Sedat Kanadli

https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.634182

Öz

The
purpose of this study is, by using meta-analysis method, to examine whether
there is a significant difference in the effect size of the Technological
Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) according to gender. For this purpose, it
was examined whether both Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and the
knowledge types related to TPACK shows a statistically significant difference
by gender. A total of 29 studies conducted both in Turkey and abroad between
2007 and 2017 and meet the inclusion criteria were synthesized by the
meta-analysis method. “Cohen’s d” was chosen as the effect size index in order
to examine the knowledge types related to TPACK by gender. Since the studies
were obtained from the literature, primary studies were combined according to
the Random Effects Model. It was concluded as a result of the analysis that
there is a significant difference between the knowledge types about TPACK by
gender, and in the sub-group analysis, technology knowledge, technological
pedagogical knowledge and technological pedagogical content knowledge have a significant
effect size in favor of male; on the other hand, content knowledge, pedagogical
content knowledge, and technological content knowledge have an insignificant
effect size in favor of male and pedagogical knowledge has an insignificant effect
size in favor of female.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Technological pedagogical content knowledge Meta analysis Gender Sub-group analysis

Kaynakça

  • Acikgul, K. & Aslaner, R. (2015). Ilkogretim matematik ogretmen adaylarinin TPAB guven algilarinin incelenmesi. Erzincan Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 17(1), 118-152. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17556/jef.04990
  • Akgoz, S., Ercan, I. Kan, I., (2004). Meta analiz. Uludag Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Dergisi, 30(2), 107-112.
  • Akkoc, H., Ozmantar, M.F., Bingolbali, E., Demir,S., Basturk, S., & Yavuz, I. (2011). Matematik ogretmen adaylarina teknolojiye yonelik pedagojik alan bilgisi kazandirma amacli program gelistirme. TUBITAK Proje No: 107K531. Istanbul.
  • *Aksin, A. (2014). Sosyal bilgiler ogretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPACK) yeterlilikleri: Amasya ili ornegi) (Yayınlanmamis doktora tezi). Ataturk Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Erzurum, Turkiye.
  • Akyildiz, S. Altun, T. (2018). Sinif ogretmeni adayteknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerinin (TPAB) bazi degiskenlere gore incelenmesi. Trakya Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 8(2), 318-333. DOI: 10.24315/trkefd.322749
  • *Alazcioglu, H. (2016). Ogretmen adaylarinin TPAB yeterlik duzeyleri ile Web 2.0 aracarini kullanim durumlari arasindaki iliskinin incelenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Mevlana Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu. Konya, Turkiye.
  • Alshehri, K. A. (2012). The influence of mathematics teachers’ knowledge in technology, pedagogy and content (TPACK) on their teaching effectiveness in Saudi public schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
  • *Altun, T. (2013). Examination of classroom teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge on the basis of their demographic profiles. Croatian Journal of Education, 15(2), 365-397.
  • Anderson, B. (2012). Testing the effectiveness of professional development for integrating technology in an Urban Iowa Middle School (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northcentral University. Scottsdale, AZ.
  • *Avci, T. (2014). Fen bilimleri ogretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi ve oz-guven duzeylerinin belirlenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Celal Bayar Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu. Manisa, Turkiye.
  • *Bagriyanik, K. E. (2015). Fen bilgisi ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerine yonelik oz-yeterlik inanislari, tutumlari ve algilari (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Cumhuriyet Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Sivas, Turkiye.
  • Bakioglu, A. & Ozcan, S. (2016). Meta analiz. Ankara: Nobel.
  • Balcin, M. D., Ergun, A. (2016). Fen bilgisi ogretmen adaylarinin materyal gelistirme konusundaki teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi oz-yeterlik olcegi: Gelistirme, guvenirlik ve gecerlik calısmasi. Turkish Journal of Education, 5(3), 109-120.
  • Baran, E. Canbazoglu Bilici, S. (2015). Teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) uzerine alanyazin incelemesi: Turkiye Ornegi. Hacettepe Unıversity Journal of Education, 30(1), 15-32.
  • *Baturay, M.H., Gokcearslan, S., Sahin, S. (2017). Associations among teachers’ attitudes towards computer-assisted education and TPACK competencies. Informatics in Education, 16(1), 1-23. DOI: 10.15388/infedu.2017.01
  • Bavonese, J. (2014). Determining the impact of a multiliteracies workshop on TPACK knowledge of elemantary preservice teachers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Alabama University. Tuscaloosa, AL.
  • *Bilici, S. (2015). Ortaogretim ogretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi duzeylerinin etkilesimli tahta ve diger ogretim teknolojilerinin kullanma durumlarina gore incelenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu Van, Turkiye.
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.T. & Rothstein, H.R. (2013). Meta-analize giris. (Trans. Ed: S. Dincer). Ankara: Ani.
  • Bostancioglu, A. (2014). EFL-TPACK: The development of a questionnaire to measure the technology pedagogy and content knowledge of English as foreign language (EFL) teachers. The EUROCALL Teacher Ed SIG. Retrieved on 14 November 2018 from https://sites.google.com/site/teacheredsignice/programme/abstracts/efl-tpackquestionnaireforteachers.
  • *Cam, E. (2017). Ilkogretim ogretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) duzeylerinin yasam boyu ogrenme, oz-yeterlik duzeyleri ve hizmet ici egitim gereksinimleri acisindan incelenmesi: Mus/Bulanik ornegi) (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Amasya Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu. Amasya, Turkiye.
  • *Can, S., Dogru, S., Bayir, G. (2017). Determination of pre-service classroom teachers technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(2). Retrieved on 14 November 2018 from http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i2.2083
  • Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Yamak, H., Kavak, N. S., Guzey, S. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacy scale (TPACK-SeS) for pre-service science teachers: construction, validation and reliability. Eurasian Journal of Education Research, 52, 37-60.
  • *Canbolat, N.(2011). Matematik ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgileri ile dusunme stilleri arasındaki iliskinin incelenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Selcuk Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Konya, Turkiye.
  • Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York, London: Guilford.
  • Cetin, I. (2017). Matematik ogretmeni adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) duzeylerinin incelenmesi (Yayinlanmais doktora tezi). Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Konya, Turkiye.
  • *Cetin-Berber, D. Erdem, A. R. (2015). An investigation of Turkish pre-service teachers’ technological, pedagogical and content knowledge. Computers, 4, 234-250. doi: 10.3390/computers4030234.
  • Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31-51.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cooper, H. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step by step approach (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cuhadar, C., Bulbul, T., Ilgaz, G.(2013). Exploring of the relationship between individual innovativeness and techno-pedagogical education competencies of pre-service teachers. Elementary Education Online, 12(3), 797‐807.
  • *Delen, K. (2016). The investigation of technological pedagogical and content knowledge level by Turkish teachers of English (Unpublished master’s thesis). Cag University. Graduate School of Social Sciences. Mersin, Turkey.
  • *Demir Atalay, T. (2016). Turkce ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi durumlarinin cesitli degiskenlerle iliskisi. Turkish Studies, 11(9), 247-266. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.
  • Demir, T. & Firat Durdukoca, S. (2018). Pedagojik formasyon egitimi sertifika programina devam eden ogrencilerin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerinin cesitli degiskenlere gore incelenmesi. International Journal of Turkish Literature and Culture Education, 7(2), 1253-1275.
  • *Depew, R. (2015). Investigating the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and technology leadership capacities of k-12 public school principals (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Brandman University. Irvine, CA.
  • Dikkartin Ovez, F. T. & Akyuz, G. (2013). Ilkogretim matematik ogretmeni adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi yapilarinin modellenmesi. Education and Science, 38(170), 321-334.
  • Dikmen, C.H. & Demirer, V. (2016). Trends in studies on technological pedagogical content knowledge in Turkey between 2009 and 2013 years. Turkish Journal of Education, 5(1), 33-46.
  • Dincer, S. (2014). Egitim bilimlerinde uygulamali meta-analiz. Ankara. Pegem.
  • Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect size. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • *Erdogan, A., Sahin, İ. (2010). Relationship between math teacher candidates’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) and achievement levels. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2707-2711.
  • Glass, G.V. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
  • Gomleksiz M. N. & Fidan E .K. (2013). Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik icerik bilgisi oz-yeterliklerine iliskin algi duzeyleri. Inonu University Journal of Education Faculty, 14(1), 87-113.
  • Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St. Clair, L., Harris, R. (2009). TPACK development in science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends, 53(5), 70-79.
  • Gravel, R. J. (2014). The effects of pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade in-service teachers’ participation in a professional development course aligned with the TPACK framework (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Illinois University. DeKalb, IL.
  • Gliner A. J., Morgan A. G., Leech L. N. (2015). Uygulamada araştirma yontemleri desen ve analizi butunlestiren yaklasim (Trans. Ed: S. Turan). Ankara: Nobel.
  • *Gundogmus, N. (2013). Ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgileri ile ogrenme stratejileri arasındaki iliskinin incelenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Konya, Turkiye.
  • Gur, H. & Karamete, A. (2015). A short review of TPACK for teacher education. Academic Journals, 10(7), 777-789.
  • Haciomeroglu, G., Sahin, C., Arcagok, S. (2014). Turkish adaptation of preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge assessment scale. Theory and Practice in Education (Egitimde Kuram ve Uygulama), 10(2), 297-315.
  • Higgins, J. P. T, Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 6(327), 557–560.
  • Holland, D. D. (2014). Technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) competencies of preservice teachers at a small rural university (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona Northcentral University. Scottsdale, AZ, United States.
  • Isiguzel, B. (2014). Almanca ogretmen adaylarinin teknopedagojik egitime yonelik yeterlik duzeylerinin incelenmesi. The Journal of International Social Research, 7(34), 768-778.
  • Jang S.-J., Tsai M. F. (2013). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese secondary school science teachers using a new contextualized TPACK Model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 566-580.
  • Kabakci Yurdakul I. (2011). Ogretmen adaylarinin teknopedagojik egitim yeterliklerinin bilgi ve iletisim teknolojileri kullanimlari acisindan incelenmesi. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 40, 397-408.
  • Kabakci Yurdakul I., Odabasi, F. H., Kılıcer, K., Coklar, A.N., Birinci, G., Kurt, A. A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Computer and Education, 58(3), 964-977.
  • Kabakci Yurdakul, I. (Ed.), Odabasi, F. (2013). Teknopedagojik egitime dayali ogretim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarimi. Ankara: Ani.
  • *Kabaran, H. (2016). Ogretim elemanlarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgileri (TPAB) İle ogretme stilleri arasındaki iliskinin incelenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Mugla Sitki Kocman Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Mugla, Turkiye.
  • Kaleli Y.G. (2015). Turkiye’deki teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi calismalarinin analizi: Bir meta-sentez calismasi. Egitim ve Bilim, 40(178), 103-122.
  • *Karaca, F. (2015). An investigation of pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge based on a variety characteristics. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(4), 128-136.
  • Karademir, E. (2015). Egitsel internet kullanimi ile teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi ve egitim teknolojilerine yonelik tutum arasındaki iliski: ogretmen adayları ornegi. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 10(15), 519-534.
  • Karadeniz, S., Vatanartiran, S. (2015). Primary school teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Elementary Education Online, 14(3), 1017-1028.
  • *Karatas, A. (2014). Lise ogretmenlerinin FATIH Projesi’ni Uygulamaya yonelik teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi yeterliklerinin incelenmesi: Adiyaman ornegi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Sakarya Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Sakarya, Turkiye.
  • Karatas, I., Piskin-Tunc, M., Demiray, E. ve Yilmaz, N. (2016). Ogretmen adaylarinin matematik ogretiminde teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerinin gelistirilmesi. Abant Izzet Baysal Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 16(2), 512-533.
  • *Kartal, T., Afacan, O. (2017). Examining Turkish pre-service science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) based on demographic variables. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(1), 1-22.
  • Kaya, Z., Ozdemir, T. Y., Emre, I. & Kaya, O. N. (2011). Exploring preservice information technology teachers’ perception of self-efficacy in web-technological pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the 6th International Advanced Technologies Symposium (IATS’11). Elazig, Turkey.
  • Kaya, S. & Dag, F. (2013). Sinif ogretmenlerine yonelik teknolojik pedagojik icerik bilgisi olcegi’nin Turkce’ye uyarlanmasi. Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice, 13(1), 291-306.
  • Kaya, Z., Kaya, O. N. & Emre, G. (2013). Teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) olçegi’nin Turkçe’ye uyarlanmasi. Educational Sciences: in Theory and Practice, 13(4). 2355-2377.
  • Kaya, Z. (2014). Harmanlanmis ogrenmenin fen bilgisi ogretmen adaylarinin kuresel isinma konusundaki teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi ve sinif ici ogretim becerilerinin gelistirilmesi uzerine etkisi (Yayinlanmamis doktora tezi). Firat Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Elazig, Turkiye.
  • Kazu, I. Y., Erten, P. (2014). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacies. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(2), 126-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v2i2.261
  • Kiray, A. S. (2016). Development of a TPACK self-efficacy scale for preservice science teachers. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(2), 527-541.
  • *Kiylik, D. (2016). Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) seviyelerinin cesitli degiskenlere gore incelenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Van, Turkiye.
  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical knowledge. In AACTE (Eds.). The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators (p.14). New York: Routledge.
  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
  • Koh, J.H.L and Sing, C.C. (2011). Modeling pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (tpack) perceptions: the influence of demographic factors and TPACK constructs. Paper presented at ASCILITE Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference. Australia.
  • Kula, A. (2015). Ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (Tpab) yeterliliklerinin incelenmesi: Bartin Universitesi Ornegi. Akademik Sosyal Arastirmalar Dergisi, 3(12), 395-412.
  • Kurt, A. A. & Kabakci Yurdakul, I. (Ed.) (2013). Teknopedagojik egitime dayali ogretim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarimi. 1. Ed. Ankara: Anı Press.
  • Leech, N. L., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2002, November). Nonparametric statistics. Annual meeting of the mid-south educational research association. Chattanooga, TN.
  • Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D.B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Miles, M.B. & Huberman, AM. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Millen, R. (2015). Closing the gap between technological and best practice innovations: teachers’ perceived technological pedagogical content knowledge and self-efficacy towards differentiated instruction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Johnson & Wales University. Providence, RI.
  • *Mutluoglu, A. (2012). Ilkogretim matematik ogretmenlerinin ogretim stil tercihlerine gore teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerinin incelenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Konya, Turkiye.
  • North, A. S. & Noyes, J. M. (2002). Gender influences on children's computer attitudes and cognitions. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(2), 135-150.
  • *Oz, H. (2015). Assessing pre-service English as a foreign language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. International Education Studies, 8(5), 119-130.
  • Ozaydinlik, K. (2014). Toplumsal cinsiyet temelinde Turkiye’de kadin ve egitim. Sosyal Politika Calismalari Dergisi, 33, 93-112. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21560/spcd.03093.
  • *Ozturk, E. (2013). Sinif ogretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerinin bazi degiskenler acisindan degerlendirilmesi. Usak Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2), 223-228.
  • Pamuk, S., Ulken, A. & Dilek, N. S. (2012). Ogretmen adaylarinin ogretimde teknoloji kullanim yeterliliklerinin teknolojik pedagojik içerik bilgisi kuramsal perspektifinden incelenmesi. Mustafa Kemal Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 9(17), 415-438.
  • Pamuk, S., Ergun, M., Cakir, R., Yilmaz, H.B., Ayas C. (2015). Exploring relationships among TPACK components and development of the TPACK instrument. Educ. Inf. Technol., 20(2015), 241–263. DOI 10.1007/s10639-013-9278-4.
  • Price G. F., Wright V. H., Rice M. L. (2014). Determining the impact of an integrated triadic model on TPACK development in preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30(4), 139-149. DOI: 10.1080/21532974.2014.927250.
  • *Roig-Vila R., Mengual-Andrés S., Quinto-Medrano P. (2015). Primary teachers’ technological, pedagogical and content knowledge. Media Education Research Journal, 45(23), 151-159. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C45-2015-16.
  • *Sad S. N., Acikgul, K., Delican, K. (2015). Senior pre-service teachers’ senses of efficacy on their technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 8(2), 204-235. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5578/keg.9480.
  • Sahin, İ. (2011). Development of survey of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 97-105.
  • Sainz, M. & Saez, M. L. (2010). Gender differences in computer attitude and the choice of technology related occupations in a sample of secondary students in Spain. Computers & Education, 54(2), 578-587.
  • *Saka Ozturk, H. (2017). Ogretmenlerin tekno-pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) duzeyleri, ogrencilerin oz-yeterlikleri ve akademik basarilari arasindaki iliskilerin incelenmesi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu. Konya, Turkiye.
  • Sancar Tokmak H., Yavuz Konokman G., Yanpar Yelken T. (2013). Mersin Universitesi okul oncesi ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (tpab) ozguven algilarinin incelenmesi. Ahi Evran Universitesi Kirsehir Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 14(1), 35-51.
  • Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J., & Shin, T. (2009a). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
  • Tuncer, M., Dikmen, M. (2018). Cinsiyetin tekno-pedagojik alan bilgisi uzerindeki etkisinin meta-analiz yontemiyle arastirilmasi. Firat Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 28(1), 85-92.
  • *Turgut, T. (2017). Sosyal bilgiler ogretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi yeterlilikleri: Karabuk ili ornegi (Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi). Karabuk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu. Karabuk, Turkiye.
  • *Unlu, I., Kaskaya, A., Coskun, M. K. (2017). Sosyal bilgiler ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi yeterliklerinin cesitli degiskenlere gore incelenmesi. Erzincan Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 19(1), 1-24. DOI: 10.17556/erziefd.295611.
  • Viechtbauer, W. (2017). Metafor: Meta-analysis package for R. R package version 2.0-0 [Data files].https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/metafor/index.
  • Wright, B. & Akgunduz, D. (2018). The relationship between technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) self-efficacy belief levels and the usage of Web 2.0 applications of pre-service science teachers. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues. 10(1), 70-87.
  • Yanpar Yelken T. (2012). Ogretim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarimi (11.Ed.). Ankara: Ani.
  • Yanpar Yelken T., Sancar Tokmak H., Ozgelen, S & Incikapi, L. (2013). Teknolojik- pedagojik- alan bilgisi (tpab) cercevesi ve bu cercevenin Milli Egitim Bakanligi fen ve matematik egitimi programindaki yeri. T. Y.Yelken, H. S. Tokmak, S. Ozgelen and L. Incikapi (Eds.) Fen ve matematik egitiminde teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi temelli ogretim tasarimlari (pp.2-10). Ankara: Ani.
  • Yavuz Konokman, G., Yanpar Yelken, T., Sancar Tokmak, H. (2013). Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin TPAB’lerine iliskin algilarinin cesitli degiskenlere gore incelenmesi: Mersin Universitesi ornegi. Kastamonu Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 21(2), 666-684.
Toplam 102 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Binnur Ergen Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-9772-5758

Tugba Yanpar Yelken 0000-0002-0800-4802

Sedat Kanadli Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-0905-8677

Yayımlanma Tarihi 17 Ekim 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Ergen, B., Yanpar Yelken, T., & Kanadli, S. (2019). A Meta-Analysis of Research on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge by Gender. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(4), 358-380. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.634182
AMA Ergen B, Yanpar Yelken T, Kanadli S. A Meta-Analysis of Research on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge by Gender. Contemporary Educational Technology. Ekim 2019;10(4):358-380. doi:10.30935/cet.634182
Chicago Ergen, Binnur, Tugba Yanpar Yelken, ve Sedat Kanadli. “A Meta-Analysis of Research on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge by Gender”. Contemporary Educational Technology 10, sy. 4 (Ekim 2019): 358-80. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.634182.
EndNote Ergen B, Yanpar Yelken T, Kanadli S (01 Ekim 2019) A Meta-Analysis of Research on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge by Gender. Contemporary Educational Technology 10 4 358–380.
IEEE B. Ergen, T. Yanpar Yelken, ve S. Kanadli, “A Meta-Analysis of Research on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge by Gender”, Contemporary Educational Technology, c. 10, sy. 4, ss. 358–380, 2019, doi: 10.30935/cet.634182.
ISNAD Ergen, Binnur vd. “A Meta-Analysis of Research on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge by Gender”. Contemporary Educational Technology 10/4 (Ekim 2019), 358-380. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.634182.
JAMA Ergen B, Yanpar Yelken T, Kanadli S. A Meta-Analysis of Research on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge by Gender. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2019;10:358–380.
MLA Ergen, Binnur vd. “A Meta-Analysis of Research on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge by Gender”. Contemporary Educational Technology, c. 10, sy. 4, 2019, ss. 358-80, doi:10.30935/cet.634182.
Vancouver Ergen B, Yanpar Yelken T, Kanadli S. A Meta-Analysis of Research on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge by Gender. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2019;10(4):358-80.