Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

GÜÇLENDİRİCİ LİDERLİĞİN YENİLİKÇİ İŞ DAVRANIŞINA ETKİSİNDE BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMININ ARACILIK ROLÜ: BİLİŞİM SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 1, 119 - 131, 30.04.2021
https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.824655

Öz

Güçlendirici liderlik, örgütün verimliliği kapsamında ele alınan ve yöneticinin olumlu yönlerine ilişkin davranış durumlarıdır. Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, olumlu liderlik davranışı olan güçlendirici liderliğin yenilikçi iş davranışına etkisinde “bilgi paylaşımı” nın aracı bir işlev görüp görmediğini belirlemektir. Araştırmada “güçlendirici liderliğin yenilikçi iş davranışına etkisinde bilgi paylaşımı aracı bir değişken olarak rol oynamakta mıdır?” sorusu cevaplandırılmaya çalışılmıştır. Araştırma nicel araştırma yöntemine göre tasarlanarak desenlenmiştir. Araştırma verileri basit tesadüfi örnekleme tekniğine göre Ankara’daki bir bilişim işletmesinden (n=412) toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde SPSS ve AMOS programları kullanılarak fark ve ilişki testleri ile betimsel analizler yapılmıştır. Araştırma verilerinin analizinde elde edilen bulgulara göre güçlendirici liderlik davranışı, bilgi paylaşımı ve yenilikçi iş davranışları arasında pozitif yönlü etkiler bulunmuştur ve güçlendirici liderliğin yenilikçi iş davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde bilgi paylaşımının kısmi aracı etkisinin olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak güçlendirici liderlik davranışı örgütte çalışanlara yönelik olumlu davranışları etkilemektedir. Pozitif yönetim davranışı da çalışanlarda bilgi paylaşımı ve yenilikçi iş davranışı algılarının artmasını sağlamaktadır.

Teşekkür

Değerli Editör, Yayın Kurulu Üyeleri ve Hakemler, Katkılarınız ve emekleriniz için sonsuz teşekkür ederim. Saygılarımla

Kaynakça

  • Abubakar, A. M., & Ilkan, M. (2016). Impact of online WOM on destination trust and intention to travel: A medical tourism perspective. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 5(3), 192-201.
  • Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., & Hussain, S. T. (2018). Exploring the impact of knowledge sharing on the innovative work behavior of employees: A study in China. International Business Research, 11(3), 186-194.
  • Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., & Hussain, S. T. (2020). The impact of organizational justice on employee innovative work behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(2), 117-129.
  • Alotaibi, S. M., Amin, M., & Winterton, J. (2020). Does emotional intelligence and empowering leadership affect psychological empowerment and work engagement? Leadership & Organization Development Journal.
  • Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge‐sharing communities of practice. Journal of knowledge management.
  • Arslantaş, C. C. (2007). Güçlendirici lider davranışının psikolojik güçlendirme üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeye yönelik görgül bir araştırma. Ayhan, A. (1999). Yenilik (İnovasyon), Kocaeli, Gebze İleri Teknoloji Enstitüsü Basımevi.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
  • Bartol, K. M., & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of leadership & organizational studies, 9(1), 64-76.
  • Baş, T. (2013). Anket: anket nasıl hazırlanır?: anket nasıl uygulanır?: anket nasıl uygulanır? : Seçkin yayıncılık.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588.
  • Bhatti, S. H., Vorobyev, D., Zakariya, R., & Christofi, M. (2020). Social capital, knowledge sharing, work meaningfulness and creativity: evidence from the Pakistani pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital.
  • Bolat, O. İ., Bolat, T., & Seymen, O. A. (2009). Güçlendirici Lider Davranişlari Ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlik Davranişi Arasindakİ İlİşkİnİn Sosyal Mübadele Kuramindan Hareketle İncelenmesİ. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(21), 215-239.
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing structural equation models, 154, 136.
  • Bucher, J., Burmeister, A., Osland, J. S., & Deller, J. (2020). The influence of empowering leadership on repatriate knowledge transfer: understanding mechanisms and boundary conditions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-26.
  • Ceylan, C. (2013). Algılanan Bağlılık Tabanlı İnsan Kaynakları Sisteminin Algılanan Gelişim Kültürü ve Yenilikçi İş Davranışına Etkisi. Is, Guc: The Journal of Industrial Relations & Human Resources, 15(1).
  • Chen, L.-Y. (2006). Effect of knowledge sharing to organizational marketing effectiveness in large accounting firms that are strategically aligned. Journal of American academy of business, 9(1), 176-182.
  • Churchill Jr, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of marketing research, 16(1), 64-73.
  • Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of management review, 13(3), 471-482.
  • Çapraz, B., Ünnü, N. A. A., İlic, D. K., Kocamaz, M., Çiçekli, U. G., Aracıoğlu, B., . . . Soyuer, H. (2014). Çalışanlar perspektifinden inovatif iş davranışının belirleyicileri: İzmir ilindeki öncelikli sektörlere ilişkin bir araştırma. Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi, 3(1), 49-72.
  • Çimen, İ., & Yücel, C. (2017). Yenilikçi davranış ölçeği (YDÖ): Türk kültürüne uyarlama çalışması. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 6(3), 365-381.
  • Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (2001). İş Dünyasında Bilgi Yönetimi,(Çev. Günhan Günay). Baskı, Rota Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and innovation management, 19(1), 23-36.
  • De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management.
  • Demirel, Y., & Seçkin, Z. (2008). Bilgi ve bilgi paylaşımının yenilikçilik üzerine etkileri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(1), 189-202.
  • Dyer, J., Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C. (2011). The innovator's DNA: Mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators Harvard Business Press Boston MA USA.
  • Ellonen, R., Blomqvist, K., & Puumalainen, K. (2008). The role of trust in organisational innovativeness. European Journal of Innovation Management.
  • Erdem, A. T. (2019). X ve Y kuşakları açısından kurumsallaşma, kurumsal girişimcilik ve örgütsel yenilikçilik arasındaki ilişkilerin analizi: Küresel doğan aile işletmelerinde bir araştırma. Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
  • Ford, R. C., & Fottler, M. D. (1995). Empowerment: A matter of degree. Academy of Management Perspectives, 9(3), 21-29.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Gkorezis, P. (2016). Principal empowering leadership and teacher innovative behavior: a moderated mediation model. International journal of educational management.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis . Uppersaddle River. In: NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Hassan, H. A., Asif, J., Waqar, N., & Abbas, S. K. (2018). The impact of knowledge sharing on innovative work behavior. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 6(5).
  • Hassi, A. (2019). Empowering leadership and management innovation in the hospitality industry context. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
  • Honold, L. (1997). A review of the literature on employee empowerment. Empowerment in organizations.
  • Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • İmamoğlu, E. B. (2019). Güçlendirici Liderlik İle Yenilikçi İş Davranişi Arasindaki İlişkide Algilanan Örgütsel Destek Ve Bilgi Paylaşimi Davranişinin Araci Rolü: Bilişim Sektöründe Bir Çalişma. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Işletme Ana Bilim Dali Işletme Yönetimi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • İmamoğlu, E. B., & Turan, A. D. (2019). Güçlendirici Liderlik ile Bilgi Paylaşımı Davranışı Arasındaki İlişkide Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin Aracı Rolü: Bilişim Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Institute of Business Administration-Management Journal/Isletme Iktisadi Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi(87).
  • Ipe, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework. Human resource development review, 2(4), 337-359.
  • Karaaslan, A., Özler, D. E., & KULAKLIOĞLU, A. S. (2009). Örgütsel Vatandaşlik Davranişi Ve Bİlgİ Paylaşimi Arasindakİ İlİşkİye Yönelİk Bİr Araştirma. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 135-160.
  • Kasemsap, K. (2013). Strategic business management: A practical framework and causal model of empowering leadership, team cohesion, knowledge-sharing behavior, and team performance. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 4(3), 100-106.
  • Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2020). Empowering leadership: leading people to be present through affective organizational commitment? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(16), 2017-2044.
  • Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2006). The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge‐sharing capabilities. Public administration review, 66(3), 370-385.
  • Kim, W., & Park, J. (2017). Examining structural relationships between work engagement, organizational procedural justice, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior for sustainable organizations. Sustainability, 9(2), 205.
  • Kline, P. (2014). An easy guide to factor analysis: Routledge.
  • Koçak, S. (2016). Ortaöğretİm Kurumlarindakİ Psİkolojİk Sözleşme Üzerİnde Güçlendİrİcİ Lİderlİk Davranişlarinin Rolü. (Doktora Tezi), Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
  • Konan, N., & Çelik, O. T. (2018). Güçlendirici Liderlik Ölçeğinin Eğitim Örgütleri İçin Türkçe’ye Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması.
  • Konczak, L. J., Stelly, D. J., & Trusty, M. L. (2000). Defining and measuring empowering leader behaviors: Development of an upward feedback instrument. Educational and Psychological measurement, 60(2), 301-313.
  • Lee, J.-N. (2001). The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success. Information & management, 38(5), 323-335.
  • Lee, J., Lee, H., & Park, J.-G. (2014). Exploring the impact of empowering leadership on knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity and team performance in IT service. Information Technology & People.
  • Lee, M., & Koh, J. (2001). Is empowerment really a new concept? International journal of human resource management, 12(4), 684-695.
  • MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of retailing, 88(4), 542-555.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 58, 593-614.
  • Manojlovich, M. (2007). Power and empowerment in nursing: Looking backward to inform the future. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 12(1).
  • Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological bulletin, 97(3), 562.
  • McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological bulletin, 107(2), 247.
  • Minai, M. H., Jauhari, H., Kumar, M., & Singh, S. (2020). Unpacking transformational leadership: dimensional analysis with psychological empowerment. Personnel review.
  • Mutonyi, B. R., Slåtten, T., & Lien, G. (2020). Empowering leadership, work group cohesiveness, individual learning orientation and individual innovative behaviour in the public sector: empirical evidence from Norway. International Journal of Public Leadership.
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation: Oxford university press.
  • Sagnak, M. (2012). The empowering leadership and teachers innovative behavior: The mediating role of innovation climate. African Journal of Business Management, 6(4), 1635-1641.
  • Slåtten, T., Svensson, G., & Sværi, S. (2011). Empowering leadership and the influence of a humorous work climate on service employees' creativity and innovative behaviour in frontline service jobs. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences.
  • Sönmez Çakir, F., & Adigüzel, Z. (2020). Evaluation of Empowering Leadership and Knowledge Sharing on Organization and Organization Employees. Optimum: Journal of Economics & Management Sciences/Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2).
  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
  • Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of management Journal, 49(6), 1239-1251.
  • Stanescu, D. F., Zbuchea, A., & Pinzaru, F. (2020). Transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Kybernetes.
  • Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1985). A fit index for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 38(2), 197-201.
  • Tian, G., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Linking empowering leadership to employee innovation: The mediating role of work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 48(10), 1-8.
  • Töre, E. (2017). Entelektüel Sermayenin Yenilikçi İş Davranışına Etkisinin Bilgi Paylaşımı, Öz-yeterlilik ve İç Denetim Odağı Perspektifinden İncelenmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Yönetimi ve Organizasyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul.
  • Turgut, E., & Beğenirbaş, M. (2013). Çalışanların yenilikçi davranışları üzerinde sosyal sermaye ve yenilikçi iklimin rolü: Sağlık sektöründe bir araştırma. Kara Harp Okulu Bilim Dergisi, 23(2), 101-124.
  • Tutar, H., & Erdem, A. T. (2020). Örnekleriyle BİLİMSEL ARAŞTIRMA YÖNTEMLERİ ve - SPSS Uygulamaları. In: Seçkin Yayncılık.
  • van Assen, M. F. (2020). Empowering leadership and contextual ambidexterity–The mediating role of committed leadership for continuous improvement. European Management Journal, 38(3), 435-449.
  • Vu, H. M. (2020). Employee empowerment and empowering leadership: A literature review. Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 2(7), 20-28.
  • Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert systems with applications, 39(10), 8899-8908.
  • Wu, C.-M., & Chen, T.-J. (2015). Psychological contract fulfillment in the hotel workplace: Empowering leadership, knowledge exchange, and service performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 48, 27-38.
  • Wu, W.L., & Lee, Y.C. (2017). Empowering group leaders encourages knowledge sharing: integrating the social exchange theory and positive organizational behavior perspective. Journal of knowledge management.
  • Xue, Y., Bradley, J., & Liang, H. (2011). Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing. Journal of knowledge management.
  • Yang, J. t. (2007). The impact of knowledge sharing on organizational learning and effectiveness. Journal of knowledge management, 11(2), 83-90. Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations. Paramus, NJ: Prentice Hall.

THE MEDIATING ROLE OF KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN THE EFFECT OF EMPOWERING LEADERSHIP ON INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR: A RESEARCH IN THE INFORMATION SECTOR

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 1, 119 - 131, 30.04.2021
https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.824655

Öz

Empowering leadership is the behavioral states that are considered within the scope of the efficiency of the organization and regarding the positive aspects of the manager. The main purpose of this study is to determine whether “information sharing” functions as a mediator in the effect of empowering leadership, which is a positive leadership behavior, on innovative work behavior. In the study, "Does knowledge sharing play a role as a mediating variable in the effect of empowering leadership on innovative business behavior?" the question has been tried to be answered. The research has been designed according to the quantitative research method. Research data have been collected from an informatics firm (n = 412) in Ankara according to the simple random sampling technique. In the analysis of the data, descriptive analyzes were made with difference and relationship tests using SPSS and AMOS programs. According to the findings obtained in the analysis of the research data, positive effects have been found between empowering leadership behavior, information sharing and innovative work behaviors, and it has been determined that information sharing had a partial mediating effect on the effect of empowering leadership on innovative work behavior. As a result, empowering leadership behavior affects positive behaviors towards employees in the organization. Positive management behavior also increases the perception of information sharing and innovative work behavior among employees.

Kaynakça

  • Abubakar, A. M., & Ilkan, M. (2016). Impact of online WOM on destination trust and intention to travel: A medical tourism perspective. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 5(3), 192-201.
  • Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., & Hussain, S. T. (2018). Exploring the impact of knowledge sharing on the innovative work behavior of employees: A study in China. International Business Research, 11(3), 186-194.
  • Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., & Hussain, S. T. (2020). The impact of organizational justice on employee innovative work behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(2), 117-129.
  • Alotaibi, S. M., Amin, M., & Winterton, J. (2020). Does emotional intelligence and empowering leadership affect psychological empowerment and work engagement? Leadership & Organization Development Journal.
  • Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge‐sharing communities of practice. Journal of knowledge management.
  • Arslantaş, C. C. (2007). Güçlendirici lider davranışının psikolojik güçlendirme üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeye yönelik görgül bir araştırma. Ayhan, A. (1999). Yenilik (İnovasyon), Kocaeli, Gebze İleri Teknoloji Enstitüsü Basımevi.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
  • Bartol, K. M., & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of leadership & organizational studies, 9(1), 64-76.
  • Baş, T. (2013). Anket: anket nasıl hazırlanır?: anket nasıl uygulanır?: anket nasıl uygulanır? : Seçkin yayıncılık.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588.
  • Bhatti, S. H., Vorobyev, D., Zakariya, R., & Christofi, M. (2020). Social capital, knowledge sharing, work meaningfulness and creativity: evidence from the Pakistani pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital.
  • Bolat, O. İ., Bolat, T., & Seymen, O. A. (2009). Güçlendirici Lider Davranişlari Ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlik Davranişi Arasindakİ İlİşkİnİn Sosyal Mübadele Kuramindan Hareketle İncelenmesİ. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(21), 215-239.
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing structural equation models, 154, 136.
  • Bucher, J., Burmeister, A., Osland, J. S., & Deller, J. (2020). The influence of empowering leadership on repatriate knowledge transfer: understanding mechanisms and boundary conditions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-26.
  • Ceylan, C. (2013). Algılanan Bağlılık Tabanlı İnsan Kaynakları Sisteminin Algılanan Gelişim Kültürü ve Yenilikçi İş Davranışına Etkisi. Is, Guc: The Journal of Industrial Relations & Human Resources, 15(1).
  • Chen, L.-Y. (2006). Effect of knowledge sharing to organizational marketing effectiveness in large accounting firms that are strategically aligned. Journal of American academy of business, 9(1), 176-182.
  • Churchill Jr, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of marketing research, 16(1), 64-73.
  • Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of management review, 13(3), 471-482.
  • Çapraz, B., Ünnü, N. A. A., İlic, D. K., Kocamaz, M., Çiçekli, U. G., Aracıoğlu, B., . . . Soyuer, H. (2014). Çalışanlar perspektifinden inovatif iş davranışının belirleyicileri: İzmir ilindeki öncelikli sektörlere ilişkin bir araştırma. Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi, 3(1), 49-72.
  • Çimen, İ., & Yücel, C. (2017). Yenilikçi davranış ölçeği (YDÖ): Türk kültürüne uyarlama çalışması. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 6(3), 365-381.
  • Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (2001). İş Dünyasında Bilgi Yönetimi,(Çev. Günhan Günay). Baskı, Rota Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and innovation management, 19(1), 23-36.
  • De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management.
  • Demirel, Y., & Seçkin, Z. (2008). Bilgi ve bilgi paylaşımının yenilikçilik üzerine etkileri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(1), 189-202.
  • Dyer, J., Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C. (2011). The innovator's DNA: Mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators Harvard Business Press Boston MA USA.
  • Ellonen, R., Blomqvist, K., & Puumalainen, K. (2008). The role of trust in organisational innovativeness. European Journal of Innovation Management.
  • Erdem, A. T. (2019). X ve Y kuşakları açısından kurumsallaşma, kurumsal girişimcilik ve örgütsel yenilikçilik arasındaki ilişkilerin analizi: Küresel doğan aile işletmelerinde bir araştırma. Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
  • Ford, R. C., & Fottler, M. D. (1995). Empowerment: A matter of degree. Academy of Management Perspectives, 9(3), 21-29.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Gkorezis, P. (2016). Principal empowering leadership and teacher innovative behavior: a moderated mediation model. International journal of educational management.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis . Uppersaddle River. In: NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Hassan, H. A., Asif, J., Waqar, N., & Abbas, S. K. (2018). The impact of knowledge sharing on innovative work behavior. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 6(5).
  • Hassi, A. (2019). Empowering leadership and management innovation in the hospitality industry context. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
  • Honold, L. (1997). A review of the literature on employee empowerment. Empowerment in organizations.
  • Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • İmamoğlu, E. B. (2019). Güçlendirici Liderlik İle Yenilikçi İş Davranişi Arasindaki İlişkide Algilanan Örgütsel Destek Ve Bilgi Paylaşimi Davranişinin Araci Rolü: Bilişim Sektöründe Bir Çalişma. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Işletme Ana Bilim Dali Işletme Yönetimi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • İmamoğlu, E. B., & Turan, A. D. (2019). Güçlendirici Liderlik ile Bilgi Paylaşımı Davranışı Arasındaki İlişkide Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin Aracı Rolü: Bilişim Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Institute of Business Administration-Management Journal/Isletme Iktisadi Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi(87).
  • Ipe, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework. Human resource development review, 2(4), 337-359.
  • Karaaslan, A., Özler, D. E., & KULAKLIOĞLU, A. S. (2009). Örgütsel Vatandaşlik Davranişi Ve Bİlgİ Paylaşimi Arasindakİ İlİşkİye Yönelİk Bİr Araştirma. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 135-160.
  • Kasemsap, K. (2013). Strategic business management: A practical framework and causal model of empowering leadership, team cohesion, knowledge-sharing behavior, and team performance. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 4(3), 100-106.
  • Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2020). Empowering leadership: leading people to be present through affective organizational commitment? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(16), 2017-2044.
  • Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2006). The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge‐sharing capabilities. Public administration review, 66(3), 370-385.
  • Kim, W., & Park, J. (2017). Examining structural relationships between work engagement, organizational procedural justice, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior for sustainable organizations. Sustainability, 9(2), 205.
  • Kline, P. (2014). An easy guide to factor analysis: Routledge.
  • Koçak, S. (2016). Ortaöğretİm Kurumlarindakİ Psİkolojİk Sözleşme Üzerİnde Güçlendİrİcİ Lİderlİk Davranişlarinin Rolü. (Doktora Tezi), Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
  • Konan, N., & Çelik, O. T. (2018). Güçlendirici Liderlik Ölçeğinin Eğitim Örgütleri İçin Türkçe’ye Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması.
  • Konczak, L. J., Stelly, D. J., & Trusty, M. L. (2000). Defining and measuring empowering leader behaviors: Development of an upward feedback instrument. Educational and Psychological measurement, 60(2), 301-313.
  • Lee, J.-N. (2001). The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success. Information & management, 38(5), 323-335.
  • Lee, J., Lee, H., & Park, J.-G. (2014). Exploring the impact of empowering leadership on knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity and team performance in IT service. Information Technology & People.
  • Lee, M., & Koh, J. (2001). Is empowerment really a new concept? International journal of human resource management, 12(4), 684-695.
  • MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of retailing, 88(4), 542-555.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 58, 593-614.
  • Manojlovich, M. (2007). Power and empowerment in nursing: Looking backward to inform the future. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 12(1).
  • Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological bulletin, 97(3), 562.
  • McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological bulletin, 107(2), 247.
  • Minai, M. H., Jauhari, H., Kumar, M., & Singh, S. (2020). Unpacking transformational leadership: dimensional analysis with psychological empowerment. Personnel review.
  • Mutonyi, B. R., Slåtten, T., & Lien, G. (2020). Empowering leadership, work group cohesiveness, individual learning orientation and individual innovative behaviour in the public sector: empirical evidence from Norway. International Journal of Public Leadership.
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation: Oxford university press.
  • Sagnak, M. (2012). The empowering leadership and teachers innovative behavior: The mediating role of innovation climate. African Journal of Business Management, 6(4), 1635-1641.
  • Slåtten, T., Svensson, G., & Sværi, S. (2011). Empowering leadership and the influence of a humorous work climate on service employees' creativity and innovative behaviour in frontline service jobs. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences.
  • Sönmez Çakir, F., & Adigüzel, Z. (2020). Evaluation of Empowering Leadership and Knowledge Sharing on Organization and Organization Employees. Optimum: Journal of Economics & Management Sciences/Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2).
  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
  • Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of management Journal, 49(6), 1239-1251.
  • Stanescu, D. F., Zbuchea, A., & Pinzaru, F. (2020). Transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Kybernetes.
  • Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1985). A fit index for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 38(2), 197-201.
  • Tian, G., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Linking empowering leadership to employee innovation: The mediating role of work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 48(10), 1-8.
  • Töre, E. (2017). Entelektüel Sermayenin Yenilikçi İş Davranışına Etkisinin Bilgi Paylaşımı, Öz-yeterlilik ve İç Denetim Odağı Perspektifinden İncelenmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Yönetimi ve Organizasyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul.
  • Turgut, E., & Beğenirbaş, M. (2013). Çalışanların yenilikçi davranışları üzerinde sosyal sermaye ve yenilikçi iklimin rolü: Sağlık sektöründe bir araştırma. Kara Harp Okulu Bilim Dergisi, 23(2), 101-124.
  • Tutar, H., & Erdem, A. T. (2020). Örnekleriyle BİLİMSEL ARAŞTIRMA YÖNTEMLERİ ve - SPSS Uygulamaları. In: Seçkin Yayncılık.
  • van Assen, M. F. (2020). Empowering leadership and contextual ambidexterity–The mediating role of committed leadership for continuous improvement. European Management Journal, 38(3), 435-449.
  • Vu, H. M. (2020). Employee empowerment and empowering leadership: A literature review. Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 2(7), 20-28.
  • Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert systems with applications, 39(10), 8899-8908.
  • Wu, C.-M., & Chen, T.-J. (2015). Psychological contract fulfillment in the hotel workplace: Empowering leadership, knowledge exchange, and service performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 48, 27-38.
  • Wu, W.L., & Lee, Y.C. (2017). Empowering group leaders encourages knowledge sharing: integrating the social exchange theory and positive organizational behavior perspective. Journal of knowledge management.
  • Xue, Y., Bradley, J., & Liang, H. (2011). Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing. Journal of knowledge management.
  • Yang, J. t. (2007). The impact of knowledge sharing on organizational learning and effectiveness. Journal of knowledge management, 11(2), 83-90. Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations. Paramus, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Toplam 76 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Ahmet Tuncay Erdem 0000-0003-4573-8415

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Nisan 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi 11 Kasım 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Erdem, A. T. (2021). GÜÇLENDİRİCİ LİDERLİĞİN YENİLİKÇİ İŞ DAVRANIŞINA ETKİSİNDE BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMININ ARACILIK ROLÜ: BİLİŞİM SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 30(1), 119-131. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.824655