Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Aile İşletmelerinde Aile Üyelerinin Çatışma Yönetim Tarzlarının Aile Mantığı Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi: Kuramsal Önerme Çalışması

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 1678 - 1699, 30.06.2021

F. Nazlı Sayğan Yağız Reşit Şadi Can Saruhan

https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.888671

Öz

Bu çalışmada, aile işletmelerindeki aile üyelerinin çatışma yönetim tarzları, kurumsal mantıklardan biri olan aile mantığı çerçevesinde ele alınmakta, yazındaki ipuçlarından yola çıkarak tartışılmakta ve ileride bu konu üzerinde çalışacak araştırmacılar için sınanmak üzere kuramsal önermeler geliştirilmektedir. Aile mantığı, aile çıkarlarını korumayı amaçlayan, aile norm, değer ve amaçlarını kapsayan ve aile işletmeleri üyelerinin davranışlarını etkileyen bir kurumsal mantıktır. Çalışmada, aile mantığının, aile işletmelerindeki aile üyelerinin çatışmaları sonlandırmak için kullandıkları çatışma yönetim tarzlarını etkileyebileceği ileri sürülmektedir. Makalede çatışmalar iş ile ilgili çatışmalar ve kişisel çatışmalar olmak üzere iki grup altında ele alınmakta ve aile üyelerinin bu çatışmalar karşısında hangi çatışma yönetim tarzlarını kullanabilecekleri aile mantığı yazınından yola çıkılarak açıklanmaktadır. Aile mantığı yazını incelendiğinde, aile mantığının aile işletmelerini etkileme düzeyinin değişiklik gösterebildiği ve bazı aile işletmelerinin, aile mantığından güçlü düzeyde; bazılarının ise zayıf düzeyde etkilendiği gözlemlenmektedir. Çalışma kapsamında, aile mantığının, örgütleri etkileme düzeyinin aile üyelerinin iş ile ilgili çatışmaları sonlandırmak için kullandıkları “uyma ve uzlaşma” davranışları ve kişisel çatışmaları sonlandırmak için kullandıkları “kaçınma” davranışı üzerinde anlamlı etkisi olduğu ileri sürülmekte ve bu kuramsal önermelere yönelik tartışmalar yapılmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda yazında daha önce rastlanmayan önermelerle, gelecekte aile işletmelerindeki aile üyelerini örneklem olarak alacak araştırmacılara, çatışma yönetim tarzları ve kurumsal mantıklar çerçevesinde değerlendirilebilecek kuramsal bir önerme çalışması sunulmaktadır. Ayrıca bu çalışmanın, aile mantığı ve çatışma yönetim tarzlarını birlikte ele alması, hem aile mantığı ve çatışma yönetimi yazınlarına katkı sağlayabilmede, hem de aile mantığının aile işletmelerine etkisinin mevcut çalışmalarda tespit edilenden daha fazla olabileceğine dair bir anlayışın kazanılmasında etkili olacağı tahmin edilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kurumsal Mantık Aile Mantığı Aile İşletmeleri Çatışma Yönetimi Çatışma Yönetim Tarzları

Kaynakça

  • Alderson, K. (2015). Conflict Management and Resolution in Family-Owned Businesses: A Practitioner Focused Review. Journal of Family Business Management, 5, 140–156.
  • Alford, R. R. ve Friedland, R. (1985). Powers of Theory: Capitalism, The State, and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
  • Alvarado- Alverez, C., Armadans I. ve Parada M. J. (2020). Tracing the Roots of Constructive Conflict Management in Family Firms, Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 13(2), 105–126.
  • Amason, A. C. ve David M. Schweiger (1994). Resolving the Paradox of Conflict, Strategic Decision Making, and Organizational Performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 239-253.
  • Aycan Z., Kanungo R. N., Mendonça, M., (2014). Kültürler Arası Bağlamda Örgütler ve Yönetim, 1. Baskı, Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Bertrand, M. ve Schoar, A. (2006). The Role of Family in Family Firms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 73–96.
  • Bhappu, A. D. (2000). The Japanese family: An institutional logic for Japanese corporate network and Japanese management, Academy of Management Review, 25, 409-415.
  • Chrisman, J. J., Kellermanns, F. W., Chan, K. C. ve Liano, K. (2010). Intellectual Foundations of Current Research in Family Business: An İdentification and Review of 25 Influential Articles. Family Business Review, 23, 9-26.
  • Cosier, R. A. ve Harvey, M. (1998). The Hidden Strengths in Family Business: Functional Conflict. Family Business Review, 11(1), 75–79.
  • Danes S.M., Zuiker V., Kean R. , Arbuthnot J. ve Kaye K. (1999). Predictors of Family Business Tension And Goal Achievement, Family Business Review, 12(3), 241-252.
  • De Kok, J.M.P., L.M. Uhlaner ve R. Thurik. (2006). Professional HRM Practices in Family Owned-Managed Enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(3) 441-460.
  • DeChurch, L.A. ve Marks, M.A. (2001). Maximizing the Benefits of Task Conflict: The role of Conflict Management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 4 –22.
  • Drozd L. (2019). Aile İşletmelerinde Duygusal Sahiplik: Türk ve Ukraynalı Aile İşletmeleri Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı.
  • Fairclough, S. ve Micelotta, E. (2013). Beyond the Family Firm: Reasserting the Influence of the Family İnstitutional Logic across Organizations, içinde M. Lounsbury ve E. Boxenbaum (editörler), Institutional Logics in Action, Part B (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 39 Part B). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 63 – 98.
  • Farh, J. L., Lee, C. ve Farh, C.I.C. (2010). Task Conflict and Team Creativity: A Question of How Much and When. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1173–1180.
  • Fiss, P.C. ve Zajac, E.J. (2004) The Diffusion of Ideas over Contested Terrain: The (Non)Adoption of a Share Holder Value Orientation Among German Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 501-53.
  • Friedland, R., ve Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing Society Back in Symbols, Practices, and İnstitutional Contradictions, içinde Powell, W. W. ve DiMaggio P. J. (Editörler.), The New İnstitutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Giebels, E., De Reuver, R. S., Rispens, S. ve Ufkes, E. G. (2016). The Critical Roles of Task Conflict and Job Autonomy in The Relationship Between Proactive Personalities and Innovative Employee Behavior. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 52, 320-341.
  • Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S.X. ve Lorente, J. C. (2010). The Multiplicity of İnstitutional Logics and The Heterogeneity of Organizational Responses. Organization Science, 21: 521–539.
  • Greer, L. L. ve Jehn, K. A. (2007). The Pivotal Role of Emotion in Intragroup Process Conflict: An Examination of The Nature, Causes, And Effects of Process Conflict. Research on Managing Groups And Teams, 10, 23- 45.
  • Großmann, S. ve Von Schlippe, A. (2015). Family Businesses: Fertile Environments For Conflict. Journal of Family Business Management, 5(2), 294-314.
  • Hofstede, G. (1983). National Cultures in Four Dimensions: A Research Based Theory of Cultural Differences Among Nations, International Studies of Management and Organization, 13(1/2), 46-74.
  • Hofstede G. (1984). Cultural Dimensions in Management and Planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1(2), 81- 99.
  • Jaskiewicz P., Heinrichs K., Rau, S. B. ve Reay T. (2015). To Be or Not to Be: How Family Firms Manage Family and Commercial Logics in Succession, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(4), 781- 813.
  • Jehn, K. (1994). Enhancing Effectiveness: An Investigation of Advantages and Disadvantages of Value-Based İntragroup Conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 223-238
  • Jehn, K.A. (1995). A Multimethod Examination of The Benefits And Detriments of İntragroup Conflict. Adminstrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
  • Jehn, K. A. (1997). A Quantitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530-558.
  • Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, G.B. ve Neale, M.A. (1999). Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict, And Performance in Workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741-763.
  • Jehn, K. ve Mannix, E. (2001). The Dynamic Nature Of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-251.
  • Jehn, K. ve Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup Conflict in Organizations: A Contingency Perspective on The Conflict Outcome Relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25: 187-242.
  • Kabasakal, H. ve Bodur, M., (2007). Leadership and Culture in Turkey: A Multifaceted Phenomenon. Culture and Leadership Across the World: The GLOBE Book of In-Depth Studies of 25 Societies (p. 835-874), Editorler: Jagdeep S. Chhokar, Felix C. Brodbeck and Robert J. House, Taylor & Francis Group, Londra.
  • Kammerlander, N., Dessi, C., Bird, M. ve Floris, M., (2015). The Impact of Shared Stories on Family Firm Innovation: A Multicase Study. Family Business Review, 28 (4), 332-354.
  • Kaye, K. (1991). Penetrating the Cycle of Sustained Conflict. Family Business Review, 4(1), 21-41.
  • Kellermanns F.W. ve Eddleston K. (2004), Feuding Families: When Conflict Does A Family Firm Good, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28 (3), 209-228.
  • Keser, N. S. (2018). Türk Aile İşletmelerinde Kurumsallaşma Çabalarında Kuşaklar Arası Çatışmanın Rolü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi, İşletme Anabilim Dalı.
  • Kets De Vries, M.F.R. (1993). The Dynamics of Family Controlled Firms: The Good and The Bad News. Organizational Dynamics, 21 (3), 59–71.
  • Koçel, T. (2014). İşletme Yöneticiliği, Beta Yayınevi, 17. Baskı, İstanbul.
  • Lansberg, I. (1983). Managing Human Resources in Family Firms: The Problem of Institutional Overlap. Organizational Dynamics, 39 – 46.
  • Lê J.K. ve Jarzabkowski P. (2015). The Role of Task and Process Conflict in Strategizing. British Journal of Management, 26 (3), 439- 462.
  • Miller, D. ve Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005b). Management İnsights From Great and Struggling Family Businesses. Long Range Planning, 38, 517–30.
  • Nosé, L., Korunka, C., Frank, H. ve Danes, S. M. (2017). Decreasing the Effects of Relationship Conflict on Family Businesses. Journal of Family Issues, 38(1), 25–51.
  • Önder, Ç., ve Üsdiken, B. (2016). Kurumsal mantıklar, örgüt altyapısı ve örgütsel alanlarda değişim: Türkiye'de isçi sendikalarının tarihsel gelişimi, 1947-1980. METU Studies in Development, 43(2), 573.
  • Pieper, T., Astrachan, J. ve Manners, G. (2013). Conflict in Family Business: Common Metaphors and Suggestions for İntervention. Family Relations, 62, 490 -500.
  • Reay, T. ve Hinings, C. R. (2005). The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Health Care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26, 351–384.
  • Reay, T., Jaskiewicz, P. ve Hinings, C. R. (2015). How Family, Business, and Community Logics Shape Family Firm Behavior and “Rules of the Game” in an Organizational Field. Family Business Review, 28(4), 1-20.
  • Rao, H., Monin, P. ve Durand, R. (2005). Border Crossing: Bricolage and the Erosion of Categorical Boundaries in French Gastronomy. American Sociological Review, 70: 968 –991.
  • Simons T.L. ve Peterson R.S. (2000). Task Conflict and Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams: The Pivotal Role of İntragroup Trust, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102-111.
  • Smink, M., Negro, S.O., Niesten E. ve Hekkert, M.P. (2015). How Mismatching Institutional Logics Hinder Niche-Regime Interaction and How Boundary Spanners Intervene. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 100, 225– 237.
  • Sorenson R.L. (1999). Conflict Management Strategies Used in Successful Family Businesses, Family Business Review, 12(4), 325-339.
  • Steinhauser, M. (2014). Family Influences on Strategic Decision-Making Processes in Family Firms, Doktora Tezi, University of Brighton, İşletme Bilim Dalı.
  • Tagiuri, R. ve Davis, J.A. (1992). On the Goals of Successful Family Companies. Family Business Review, 5(1), 43-62
  • Thornton, P. H. (2002). The Rise of the Corporation in a Craft Industry: Conflict and Conformity in Institutional Logics. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 81–101.
  • Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets From Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
  • Thornton, P. H. ve Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional Logics. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 840, 99-128.
  • Yan, J. ve Sorenson, R.L. (2004). The İnfluence of Confucian İdeology on Conflict in Chinese Family Business. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, CCM, 4(1), 5-17.
  • Yaşbay Kobal, H. (2020). Türkiye'de Sosyal Girişimcilik Alanında Çoklu Kurumsal Mantıklar. Igdir University Journal of Social Sciences, 24, 559- 589.
  • Yeniçeri, Ö. (2009). Örgütlerde Çatışma ve Yabancılaşma Yönetimi, 1. Baskı, IQ Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık.
  • Yılmaz, O. (2018). Aile İşletmelerinde Kurumsallaşma ve Bir Vaka Analizi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yaşar Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı.
  • Ward, J. L. (1997). Growing The Family Business: Special Challenges and Best Practices. Family Business Review, 10(4), 323–337.

Evaluation of Conflict Management Styles of Family Members in Family Businesses in the Framework of Family Logic from Institutional Logic: Theoretical Proposition Study

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 1678 - 1699, 30.06.2021

F. Nazlı Sayğan Yağız Reşit Şadi Can Saruhan

https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.888671

Öz

In this study, the conflict management styles of family members in family businesses are discussed within the framework of family logic, which is one of the institutional logics, and discussed on the basis of relevant studies in literature. Theoretical propositions are developed to be tested for researchers who will work on this research topic in the future. Family logic is an institutional logic which protects family interests, encompasses family norms, values and goals and affects the behavior of family businesses and their members. In this study, it is assumed that family logic may affect the conflict management styles of family members in family businesses. Also, conflicts are discussed under two groups as task and relationship conflicts and the family members’ conflict management styles against these conflicts are explained based on family logic literature. According to family logic literature, the effect of family logic on family businesses varies. Within the scope of this study, it is suggested that the level of family logic affecting organizations has a significant impact on compromising and accommodating behaviors of family members to end task conflicts and has a significant effect on avoiding behavior to end relationship conflicts. Discussions are made for these theoretical propositions. It is assumed that this study, with propositions that have not been made before in the literature, is important in terms of being a theoretical source that can be evaluated within the framework of conflict management styles and institutional logics for researchers who take family members as a sample. Furthermore, it is predicted that this study's handling of family logic and conflict management styles together will be useful both in contributing to family logic and conflict management literature, and also gaining an understanding that the impact of family logic on family businesses may be greater than it’s declared in current studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Institutional Logic Family Logic Family Businesses Conflict Management Conflict Management Styles

Kaynakça

  • Alderson, K. (2015). Conflict Management and Resolution in Family-Owned Businesses: A Practitioner Focused Review. Journal of Family Business Management, 5, 140–156.
  • Alford, R. R. ve Friedland, R. (1985). Powers of Theory: Capitalism, The State, and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
  • Alvarado- Alverez, C., Armadans I. ve Parada M. J. (2020). Tracing the Roots of Constructive Conflict Management in Family Firms, Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 13(2), 105–126.
  • Amason, A. C. ve David M. Schweiger (1994). Resolving the Paradox of Conflict, Strategic Decision Making, and Organizational Performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 239-253.
  • Aycan Z., Kanungo R. N., Mendonça, M., (2014). Kültürler Arası Bağlamda Örgütler ve Yönetim, 1. Baskı, Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Bertrand, M. ve Schoar, A. (2006). The Role of Family in Family Firms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 73–96.
  • Bhappu, A. D. (2000). The Japanese family: An institutional logic for Japanese corporate network and Japanese management, Academy of Management Review, 25, 409-415.
  • Chrisman, J. J., Kellermanns, F. W., Chan, K. C. ve Liano, K. (2010). Intellectual Foundations of Current Research in Family Business: An İdentification and Review of 25 Influential Articles. Family Business Review, 23, 9-26.
  • Cosier, R. A. ve Harvey, M. (1998). The Hidden Strengths in Family Business: Functional Conflict. Family Business Review, 11(1), 75–79.
  • Danes S.M., Zuiker V., Kean R. , Arbuthnot J. ve Kaye K. (1999). Predictors of Family Business Tension And Goal Achievement, Family Business Review, 12(3), 241-252.
  • De Kok, J.M.P., L.M. Uhlaner ve R. Thurik. (2006). Professional HRM Practices in Family Owned-Managed Enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(3) 441-460.
  • DeChurch, L.A. ve Marks, M.A. (2001). Maximizing the Benefits of Task Conflict: The role of Conflict Management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 4 –22.
  • Drozd L. (2019). Aile İşletmelerinde Duygusal Sahiplik: Türk ve Ukraynalı Aile İşletmeleri Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı.
  • Fairclough, S. ve Micelotta, E. (2013). Beyond the Family Firm: Reasserting the Influence of the Family İnstitutional Logic across Organizations, içinde M. Lounsbury ve E. Boxenbaum (editörler), Institutional Logics in Action, Part B (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 39 Part B). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 63 – 98.
  • Farh, J. L., Lee, C. ve Farh, C.I.C. (2010). Task Conflict and Team Creativity: A Question of How Much and When. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1173–1180.
  • Fiss, P.C. ve Zajac, E.J. (2004) The Diffusion of Ideas over Contested Terrain: The (Non)Adoption of a Share Holder Value Orientation Among German Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 501-53.
  • Friedland, R., ve Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing Society Back in Symbols, Practices, and İnstitutional Contradictions, içinde Powell, W. W. ve DiMaggio P. J. (Editörler.), The New İnstitutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Giebels, E., De Reuver, R. S., Rispens, S. ve Ufkes, E. G. (2016). The Critical Roles of Task Conflict and Job Autonomy in The Relationship Between Proactive Personalities and Innovative Employee Behavior. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 52, 320-341.
  • Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S.X. ve Lorente, J. C. (2010). The Multiplicity of İnstitutional Logics and The Heterogeneity of Organizational Responses. Organization Science, 21: 521–539.
  • Greer, L. L. ve Jehn, K. A. (2007). The Pivotal Role of Emotion in Intragroup Process Conflict: An Examination of The Nature, Causes, And Effects of Process Conflict. Research on Managing Groups And Teams, 10, 23- 45.
  • Großmann, S. ve Von Schlippe, A. (2015). Family Businesses: Fertile Environments For Conflict. Journal of Family Business Management, 5(2), 294-314.
  • Hofstede, G. (1983). National Cultures in Four Dimensions: A Research Based Theory of Cultural Differences Among Nations, International Studies of Management and Organization, 13(1/2), 46-74.
  • Hofstede G. (1984). Cultural Dimensions in Management and Planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1(2), 81- 99.
  • Jaskiewicz P., Heinrichs K., Rau, S. B. ve Reay T. (2015). To Be or Not to Be: How Family Firms Manage Family and Commercial Logics in Succession, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(4), 781- 813.
  • Jehn, K. (1994). Enhancing Effectiveness: An Investigation of Advantages and Disadvantages of Value-Based İntragroup Conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 223-238
  • Jehn, K.A. (1995). A Multimethod Examination of The Benefits And Detriments of İntragroup Conflict. Adminstrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
  • Jehn, K. A. (1997). A Quantitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530-558.
  • Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, G.B. ve Neale, M.A. (1999). Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict, And Performance in Workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741-763.
  • Jehn, K. ve Mannix, E. (2001). The Dynamic Nature Of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-251.
  • Jehn, K. ve Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup Conflict in Organizations: A Contingency Perspective on The Conflict Outcome Relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25: 187-242.
  • Kabasakal, H. ve Bodur, M., (2007). Leadership and Culture in Turkey: A Multifaceted Phenomenon. Culture and Leadership Across the World: The GLOBE Book of In-Depth Studies of 25 Societies (p. 835-874), Editorler: Jagdeep S. Chhokar, Felix C. Brodbeck and Robert J. House, Taylor & Francis Group, Londra.
  • Kammerlander, N., Dessi, C., Bird, M. ve Floris, M., (2015). The Impact of Shared Stories on Family Firm Innovation: A Multicase Study. Family Business Review, 28 (4), 332-354.
  • Kaye, K. (1991). Penetrating the Cycle of Sustained Conflict. Family Business Review, 4(1), 21-41.
  • Kellermanns F.W. ve Eddleston K. (2004), Feuding Families: When Conflict Does A Family Firm Good, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28 (3), 209-228.
  • Keser, N. S. (2018). Türk Aile İşletmelerinde Kurumsallaşma Çabalarında Kuşaklar Arası Çatışmanın Rolü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi, İşletme Anabilim Dalı.
  • Kets De Vries, M.F.R. (1993). The Dynamics of Family Controlled Firms: The Good and The Bad News. Organizational Dynamics, 21 (3), 59–71.
  • Koçel, T. (2014). İşletme Yöneticiliği, Beta Yayınevi, 17. Baskı, İstanbul.
  • Lansberg, I. (1983). Managing Human Resources in Family Firms: The Problem of Institutional Overlap. Organizational Dynamics, 39 – 46.
  • Lê J.K. ve Jarzabkowski P. (2015). The Role of Task and Process Conflict in Strategizing. British Journal of Management, 26 (3), 439- 462.
  • Miller, D. ve Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005b). Management İnsights From Great and Struggling Family Businesses. Long Range Planning, 38, 517–30.
  • Nosé, L., Korunka, C., Frank, H. ve Danes, S. M. (2017). Decreasing the Effects of Relationship Conflict on Family Businesses. Journal of Family Issues, 38(1), 25–51.
  • Önder, Ç., ve Üsdiken, B. (2016). Kurumsal mantıklar, örgüt altyapısı ve örgütsel alanlarda değişim: Türkiye'de isçi sendikalarının tarihsel gelişimi, 1947-1980. METU Studies in Development, 43(2), 573.
  • Pieper, T., Astrachan, J. ve Manners, G. (2013). Conflict in Family Business: Common Metaphors and Suggestions for İntervention. Family Relations, 62, 490 -500.
  • Reay, T. ve Hinings, C. R. (2005). The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Health Care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26, 351–384.
  • Reay, T., Jaskiewicz, P. ve Hinings, C. R. (2015). How Family, Business, and Community Logics Shape Family Firm Behavior and “Rules of the Game” in an Organizational Field. Family Business Review, 28(4), 1-20.
  • Rao, H., Monin, P. ve Durand, R. (2005). Border Crossing: Bricolage and the Erosion of Categorical Boundaries in French Gastronomy. American Sociological Review, 70: 968 –991.
  • Simons T.L. ve Peterson R.S. (2000). Task Conflict and Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams: The Pivotal Role of İntragroup Trust, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102-111.
  • Smink, M., Negro, S.O., Niesten E. ve Hekkert, M.P. (2015). How Mismatching Institutional Logics Hinder Niche-Regime Interaction and How Boundary Spanners Intervene. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 100, 225– 237.
  • Sorenson R.L. (1999). Conflict Management Strategies Used in Successful Family Businesses, Family Business Review, 12(4), 325-339.
  • Steinhauser, M. (2014). Family Influences on Strategic Decision-Making Processes in Family Firms, Doktora Tezi, University of Brighton, İşletme Bilim Dalı.
  • Tagiuri, R. ve Davis, J.A. (1992). On the Goals of Successful Family Companies. Family Business Review, 5(1), 43-62
  • Thornton, P. H. (2002). The Rise of the Corporation in a Craft Industry: Conflict and Conformity in Institutional Logics. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 81–101.
  • Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets From Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
  • Thornton, P. H. ve Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional Logics. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 840, 99-128.
  • Yan, J. ve Sorenson, R.L. (2004). The İnfluence of Confucian İdeology on Conflict in Chinese Family Business. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, CCM, 4(1), 5-17.
  • Yaşbay Kobal, H. (2020). Türkiye'de Sosyal Girişimcilik Alanında Çoklu Kurumsal Mantıklar. Igdir University Journal of Social Sciences, 24, 559- 589.
  • Yeniçeri, Ö. (2009). Örgütlerde Çatışma ve Yabancılaşma Yönetimi, 1. Baskı, IQ Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık.
  • Yılmaz, O. (2018). Aile İşletmelerinde Kurumsallaşma ve Bir Vaka Analizi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yaşar Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı.
  • Ward, J. L. (1997). Growing The Family Business: Special Challenges and Best Practices. Family Business Review, 10(4), 323–337.
Toplam 59 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular İşletme
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

F. Nazlı Sayğan Yağız 0000-0001-6780-8061

Reşit Şadi Can Saruhan 0000-0002-8418-7217

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Sayğan Yağız, F. N., & Saruhan, R. Ş. C. (2021). Aile İşletmelerinde Aile Üyelerinin Çatışma Yönetim Tarzlarının Aile Mantığı Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi: Kuramsal Önerme Çalışması. İnsan Ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(2), 1678-1699. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.888671
 Kapak Resmi İndir
İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi  Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.