BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Linking Organizational Identification with Individual Creativity: Organizational Citizenship Behavior as a Mediator

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 41, 56 - 66, 08.01.2016
https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.47683

Öz

This empirical study seeks to add depth and clarity to the research of individual creativity and combines it with reflections about organizational identification and organizational citizenship behaviors. The study results were based on the questionnaire data gathered from 177 employees working in 25 different textile companies in İstanbul, a major city of Turkey. Results from the current study showed that organizational identification positively affects individual creativity. Besides, organizational identification affects all dimensions of organizational citizenship behaviors which are conscientiousness, sportsmanship, helping and civic virtue. Furthermore, helping and civic virtue dimensions of organizational citizenship behaviors were found as mediator variables in the relationship between organizational identification and employees’ creativeness.

Kaynakça

  • Amabile, Teresa M. 1996. Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Amabile, Teresa M. 1988. “A model of creativity and innovation in organizations”, In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.). Research in organizational behavior 10: 123-167. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Amabile, Teresa M., Hill, Karl., Hennessey, Beth. A., and Tighe, Elizabeth. 1994. “The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66:950-967.
  • Baron, Reuben M., and David A. Kenny. 1986. “The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.” Journal of personality and social psychology 51(6): 1173.
  • Blakely, Gerald L., Martha C. Andrews, and Robert H. Moorman. 2005. “The moderating effects of equity sensitivity on the relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors.” Journal of Business and Psychology 20: 259–273.
  • Brown, Michael E. 1969. “Identification and some conditions of organizational involvement.” Administrative Science Quarterly 14:346- 355.
  • Byrne, Barbara M. 2010. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Carmeli, Abraham, Ravit Cohen-Meitar, and Dov Elizur. 2007. “The role of job challenge and organizational identification in enhancing creative behavior among employees in the workplace.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 41(2): 75-90.
  • Cheney, George. (1983). “On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification.” Communication Monographs 50:342–362.
  • Christ, Oliver., Dick, Rolf., Wagner, Ulrich.., and Stellmacher, Jost. 2003. “When teachers go the extra mile: Foci of organisational identification as determinants of different forms of organisational citizenship behaviour among school teachers.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 73(3): 329-341.
  • Coleman, Venetta I., and Walter C. Borman. 2000. “Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain.” Human Resource Management Review 10: 25–44.
  • Dick, Rolf. V., Wagner, Ulrich., Stellmacher, Jost., and Christ, Oliver. 2004. “The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter?.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 77: 171–191.
  • Dollinger, Stephen J., Klaus K. Urban, and Troy A. James.2004. “Creativity and Openness: Further Validation of Two Creative Product Measures.” Creativity Research Journal 16: 35-48.
  • Dutton, Jane E., Janet M. Dukerich, and Celia V. Harquail. 1994. “Organizational images and member identification.” Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 239–263.
  • Farmer, Steven M., Pamela Tierney, and Kate Kung-Mcintyre. 2003. “Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory.” Academy of Management Journal 46(5): 618-630.
  • Feather, Norman T., and Katrin A. Rauter. 2004. “Organizational citizenship behaviours in relation to job status, job insecurity, organizational commitment and identification, job satisfaction and work values.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 77(1): 81-94.
  • Flynn, Francis J. 2005. “Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations.” Academy of Management Review 30: 737–750.
  • George, Jennifer M., and Arthur P. Brief. 1992. “Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work organizational spontaneity relationship.” Psychological Bulletin 112(2): 310-329.
  • George, Jennifer M., and Jing Zhou. 2001. “When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach.” Journal of Applied Psychology 86: 513-524.
  • Gilmore, Philip. L., Hu, Xiaoxiao., Wei, Feng., Tetrick, Lois. E., and Zaccaro, Stephen J. 2013. “Positive affectivity neutralizes transformational leadership's influence on creative performance and organizational citizenship behaviors.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 34(8): 1061-1075.
  • Gouldner, Alvin W. 1957. “Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles.” Administrative Science Quarterly 2: 281-306.
  • Graham, Jill W. 1991. “An essay on organizational citizenship behavior.” Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journals 4 (4): 249-270.
  • Gumusluoğlu, Lale., and Arzu, Ilsev. A. 2009. “Transformational Leadership and Organizational Innovation: The Roles of Internal and External Support for Innovation.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 26(3): 264-277.
  • Hogg, Michael A., and Deborah I. Terry. 2000. “Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts.” Academy of Management Review 25: 121–140.
  • Jha, Shweta, and Srirang Jha. (2009). “Determinants of organizational citizenship behaviour: A review of literature.” Journal of Management & Public Policy 1(1): 33-42.
  • Katz, Daniel. 1964. “The motivational basis of organizational behavior.” Behavioral Science 9: 131–133.
  • Katz, Daniel, and Robert Louis Kahn. 1978 [1966]. The Social Psychology of Organizations. Wiley: New York.
  • Kidwell, Roland E., Kevin W. Mossholder, and Nathan Bennett. 1997. “Cohesiveness and organizational citizenship behavior: A multilevel analysis using work groups and individuals.” Journal of Management 23(6): 775–793.
  • Koys, Daniel J. 2006. “The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: A unit-level, longitudinal study.” Personnel Psychology 54: 101-114.
  • Kramer, Roderick M. 1993. Cooperation and organizational identification. In J. K. Murnighan (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and practice (pp. 244–268). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Krogh, Georg. 1998. “Care in Knowledge Creation.” California Management Review 40 (3): 133–53.
  • Lu, Chia-Ju., Shih, Yi-Yu, and Chen, Yi-Len. 2013. “Effects of Emotional Labor and Job Satisfaction on Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Case Study on Business Hotel Chains.” The International Journal of Organizational Innovation 5(4): 165-176.
  • Meydan, Cem Harun., and Şeşen, Harun. 2011. Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık:Ankara.
  • Mael, Fred, and Blake E. Ashforth. 1992. “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test Of The Reformulated Model Of Organizational Identification.” Journal of Organizational Behaviour 13(2): 103-123.
  • Organ, Dennis W. 1988. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington MA: Lexington Books.
  • Organ, Dennis W. 1990a. “The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior.” Research in organizational behavior 12(1): 43-72.
  • Organ, Dennis W. 1990b. “The subtle significance of job satisfaction.” Clinical Laboratory Management Review 4(1): 94-98.
  • Pallant, Julie. 2010. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. McGraw-Hill International.
  • Parjanen, Satu. 2012. “Experiencing Creativity in the Organization: From Individual Creativity to Collective Creativity.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge & Management 7: 109-128
  • Patchen, Martin. 1970. Participation, achievement and involvement on the job. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Podsakoff, Philip M., and MacKenzie, Scott B. 1994. “Organizational citizenship behaviors and sales unit effectiveness.” Journal of Marketing Research 31: 351-363.
  • Podsakoff, Philip M., MacKenzie, Scott B., Moorman, Robert. H., and Fetter, Richard. 1990. “Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors.” The Leadership Quarterly1(2): 107-142.
  • Podsakoff, Philip M., Mackenzie, Scott B., Paine, Julie Beth., and Bachrach, Daniel G. 2000. “Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research.” Journal of Management 26(3): 513–563.
  • Piçakçi, Kemal. 2013. Örgüt İkliminin Bireylerin Yaratıcılık Performansı Üzerindeki Etkileri: Moda Sektöründe Bir Uygulama. Unpublished Master Thesis, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
  • Scott, Susanne G., and Reginald A. Bruce. 1994. “Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace.” Academy of Management Journal 37: 580-607.
  • Shalley, Christina E., Jing Zhou, and Greg R. Oldham. 2004. “The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?.” Journal of Management 30: 933-958.
  • Shalley, Christina E., and Lucy L. Gilson. 2004. “What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity.” Leadership Quarterly 15(1): 33-53.
  • Shen, Yimo., Jackson, Todd., Ding, Coddy., Yuan, Denghua., Zhao, Lei., Dou, Yunlai., and Zhang, Qinling. 2013. “Linking perceived organizational support with employee work outcomes in a Chinese context: Organizational identification as a mediator.” European Management Journal 32(3): 406-412.
  • Shirazi, Farid. 2008. “The contribution of ICT to freedom and democracy: an empirical analysis of archival data on Middle East.” The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 35(6): 1–24.
  • Smith, C. A., Dennis W. Organ, and Janet P. Near. 1983. “Organizational citizenship behavior: its nature and antecedents.” Journal of Applied Psychology 68: 653–663.
  • Somech, Anit, and Anat Drach‐Zahavy. 2004. “Exploring organizational citizenship behavior from an organizational perspective: the relationship between organizational learning and organizational citizenship behavior.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 77: 281–298.
  • Textiles Human Resource Council, 2011. Canadian textile industry labour market information and HR needs assessment: A report on the changing face of Canada’s textile industry, Ottawa.
  • Tierney, Pamela, Steven M. Farmer, and George B. Graen. 1999. “An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships.” Personnel Psychology 52(3): 591-620.
  • Turner, James C. 1982. Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Turnipseed, David L.2002. “Are good soldiers good?: Exploring the link between organization citizenship behavior and personal ethics.” Journal of Business Research 55(1): 1-15.
  • Turnipseed, Patricia H., and David L. Turnipseed. 2013. “Testing the Proposed Linkage between Organizational Citizenship Behaviours and an Innovative Organizational Climate.” Creativity and Innovation Management 22(2): 209-216.
  • Van Dick, Rolf., Grojean, Micheal. W., Christ, Oliver., and Wieseke, Jan. 2006. “Identity and the extra mile: Relationships between organizational identification and organizational citizenship behavior.” British Journal of Management 17(4): 283-301.
  • Vandyne, Linn, Larry L. Cummings, and J. McLean Parks.1995. “Extra-role behaviors-in pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters).” Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews 17(17): 215-285.
  • Van Dyne, Linn, and Jeffrey A. LePine. 1998. “Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity.” Academy of Management Journal 41: 108–119.
  • Vandenberg, Robert J., and Charles E. Lance. 1992. “Examining the causal order of job satisfaction and organizational commitment.” Journal of Management 18(1): 153-167.
  • Williams, Larry J., and Stella E. Anderson. 1991. “Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in role behaviors.” Journal of Management 17: 601–617.
  • Yan, Li, and Jun Yan. 2013. “Leadership, organizational citizenship behavior, and innovation in small business: an empirical study.” Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship 26(2): 183-199.
  • Zhao, Hao., Wu, Jihong., Sun, Jian Min., and Chen, Charles Weizheng. 2012. “Organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society: a reexamination.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 23(19): 4145-4165.
Toplam 63 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Mustafa Kesen

Yayımlanma Tarihi 8 Ocak 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 41

Kaynak Göster

APA Kesen, M. (2016). Linking Organizational Identification with Individual Creativity: Organizational Citizenship Behavior as a Mediator. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 11(41), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.47683
AMA Kesen M. Linking Organizational Identification with Individual Creativity: Organizational Citizenship Behavior as a Mediator. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. Ocak 2016;11(41):56-66. doi:10.19168/jyu.47683
Chicago Kesen, Mustafa. “Linking Organizational Identification With Individual Creativity: Organizational Citizenship Behavior As a Mediator”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 11, sy. 41 (Ocak 2016): 56-66. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.47683.
EndNote Kesen M (01 Ocak 2016) Linking Organizational Identification with Individual Creativity: Organizational Citizenship Behavior as a Mediator. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 11 41 56–66.
IEEE M. Kesen, “Linking Organizational Identification with Individual Creativity: Organizational Citizenship Behavior as a Mediator”, Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, c. 11, sy. 41, ss. 56–66, 2016, doi: 10.19168/jyu.47683.
ISNAD Kesen, Mustafa. “Linking Organizational Identification With Individual Creativity: Organizational Citizenship Behavior As a Mediator”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 11/41 (Ocak 2016), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.47683.
JAMA Kesen M. Linking Organizational Identification with Individual Creativity: Organizational Citizenship Behavior as a Mediator. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. 2016;11:56–66.
MLA Kesen, Mustafa. “Linking Organizational Identification With Individual Creativity: Organizational Citizenship Behavior As a Mediator”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, c. 11, sy. 41, 2016, ss. 56-66, doi:10.19168/jyu.47683.
Vancouver Kesen M. Linking Organizational Identification with Individual Creativity: Organizational Citizenship Behavior as a Mediator. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. 2016;11(41):56-6.

Cited By