Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Mediator Role of Self Concept Clarity on the Relationship Between the Need for Absolute Truth, Problem Solving and Symptoms of Stress in Gay Men

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 10, 11 - 26, 30.06.2020

Öz

The self concept is a basic reference point for all people and it is closely related to need for absolute truth. During the formation of awareness of sexual orientation, gay individuals want to capture absolute information about their self concept; therefore, they have high level of need for absolute truth. It has been observed that gay men with low level of self-concept clarity use non-functional problem-solving methods and they show symptoms of intense stress because of their sexual orientation. The main aim of this study is to investigate the mediator role of self-concept clarity on the relationship between the need for absolute truth, problem solving and symptoms of stress in gay men. The participants of the present study consisted of 200 gay men aged between 20 and 50 years old. Demographic Information Form, Self- Concept Clarity Scale, Need for Absolute Truth Scale, Stress Self-Assessment Checklist and Problem- Solving Inventory were applied to the participants. According to the findings of this study, the relationship between need for absolute truth, problem solving, and symptoms of stress was mediated by self-concept clarity in gay men.

Kaynakça

  • American Psychological Association (APA). (2015a). “Guidelines for psychological practice with transgender and gender nonconforming people”. American Psychologist 70 (2015a) 832-864 doi.org/10.1037/a0039906.
  • American Psychological Association (APA). (2012). “Guidelines for psychological practice with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients”. American Psychologist 67(2012) 10–42. doi: 10.1037/a0024659
  • American Psychological Association & National Association of School Psychologists. (2015). Resolution on gender and sexual orientation diversity in children and adolescents in schools. Retrieved from: http://www.apa.org/about/policy/orie ntation-diversity.aspx.
  • Akcan G. (2013). Mutlak Gerçek İhtiyacı Ölçeği Geliştirme Çalışması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi SBE. İstanbul 2013.
  • Bar-Anan Y., Wilson T. D. & Gilbert D. T. (2009). “The feeling of uncertainty intensifies affective reactions”. Emotion 9 (2009) 123–127.
  • Bechtoldt M. N., De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A. & Zapf, D. (2010). Self-concept clarity and the management of social confict. Journal of Personality 78 (2010) 539–574.
  • Berman S. L., Montgomery M. J. & Kurtines W. M. (2004). “The development and validation of a measure of identity distress”. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research 4 (2004) 1-8.
  • Buhr K. & Dugas M. J. (2002). “The intolerance of uncertainty scale: Psychometric properties of the English version”. Behaviour Research and Therapy 40 (2002) 931-945.
  • Butzer B. & Kuiper N. A. (2006). “Relationships between the frequency of social comparisons and self- concept clarity, intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety, and depression”. Personality and Individual Differences 41 (2006) 167–176.
  • Campbell J. D., Assanand S. & Di Paula A. (2003). “The structure of the self concept and its relation to psychological adjustment”. Journal of Personality 71 (2003) 115–140.
  • Campbell J. D., Trapnell P. D., Heine S. J. & Katz, I. M. (1996). “Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (1996) 141–156.
  • Cass V. C. (1979). “Homosexuality identity formation: a theoretical model”. Journal of Homosexuality 4 (1979) 219-235.
  • Coleman E. (1982). “Developmental stages of the coming out process”. Journal of Homosexuality 7 (1982) 31-43.
  • Ed D., Suh E. M., Lucas R. E. & Smith H. L. (1999). “Subjective being: Three decades of progress”. Psychological Bulletin 125 (1999) 276-302.
  • DasGupta B. (1992). “Perceived control and examination stress”. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior 29 (1992) 31-34.
  • De Cremer D. & Sedikides C. (2005). “Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41 (2005) 157-173.
  • Ertan C. (2009). Türkiye’de Erkeklik İmgesi ve Eşcinsel Kimliği. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi SBE. Antalya 2009.
  • Feinstein B. A., Meuwly N., Davila J., Eaton N. R. & Yoneda A. (2014). “Sexual orientation prototypicality and well-being among heterosexual and sexual minority adults’”. Archives of Sexual
  • Behavior 44 (2014) 1415–1422. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0401-4
  • George D. & Mallery P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step. A simple study guide and reference, (10. Baskı). GEN, Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Herek G. M., Gillis J. R. & Cogan J. C. (2009). “Internalized stigma among sexual minority adults: Insights from a social psychological perspective”. Journal of Counseling Psychology 56 (2009) 32.
  • Heppner P. P. & Petersen C. H. (1982). “The development and implications of a personal problem solving inventory”. Journal of Counseling Psychology 29 (1982) 66.

Gay Erkeklerde Mutlak Gerçek İhtiyacı ile Problem Çözme ve Stres Belirtileri Arasındaki İlişkide Benlik Kavramının Netliğinin Aracılık Rolünün İncelenmesi

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 10, 11 - 26, 30.06.2020

Öz

Benlik kavramı bütün insanlar için temel bir referans merkezidir ve mutlak gerçek ihtiyacı ile yakından ilişkilidir. Cinsel yönelim farkındalığı oluşumu sırasında eşcinsel bireyler, benlik kavramları hakkında mutlak bilgi edinmek isterler ve bu nedenle mutlak gerçek ihtiyaçları yüksektir. Benlik kavramının netliği düşük olan gey erkeklerin fonksiyonel olmayan problem çözme yöntemleri kullan- dıkları ve cinsel yönelimleri nedeniyle yoğun stres belirtileri gösterdikleri gözlenmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, gey erkeklerde mutlak gerçek ihtiyacı, problem çözme ve stres belirtileri arasındaki ilişkide benlik kavramı netliğinin aracılık rolünü araştırmaktır. Bu araştırmanın katılımcıları, 20-50 yaş arası 200 gey erkekten oluşmaktadır. Katılımcılara Demografik Bilgi Formu, Benlik Kavramının Netliği Ölçeği, Mutlak Gerçek İhtiyacı Ölçeği, Stres Belirtileri Ölçeği ve Problem Çözme Envanteri uygulanmıştır. Bu çalış- manın bulgularına göre, gey erkeklerde mutlak gerçek ihtiyacı, problem çözme ve stres belirtileri arasındaki ilişkiye benlik kavramının netliği aracılık etmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • American Psychological Association (APA). (2015a). “Guidelines for psychological practice with transgender and gender nonconforming people”. American Psychologist 70 (2015a) 832-864 doi.org/10.1037/a0039906.
  • American Psychological Association (APA). (2012). “Guidelines for psychological practice with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients”. American Psychologist 67(2012) 10–42. doi: 10.1037/a0024659
  • American Psychological Association & National Association of School Psychologists. (2015). Resolution on gender and sexual orientation diversity in children and adolescents in schools. Retrieved from: http://www.apa.org/about/policy/orie ntation-diversity.aspx.
  • Akcan G. (2013). Mutlak Gerçek İhtiyacı Ölçeği Geliştirme Çalışması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi SBE. İstanbul 2013.
  • Bar-Anan Y., Wilson T. D. & Gilbert D. T. (2009). “The feeling of uncertainty intensifies affective reactions”. Emotion 9 (2009) 123–127.
  • Bechtoldt M. N., De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A. & Zapf, D. (2010). Self-concept clarity and the management of social confict. Journal of Personality 78 (2010) 539–574.
  • Berman S. L., Montgomery M. J. & Kurtines W. M. (2004). “The development and validation of a measure of identity distress”. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research 4 (2004) 1-8.
  • Buhr K. & Dugas M. J. (2002). “The intolerance of uncertainty scale: Psychometric properties of the English version”. Behaviour Research and Therapy 40 (2002) 931-945.
  • Butzer B. & Kuiper N. A. (2006). “Relationships between the frequency of social comparisons and self- concept clarity, intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety, and depression”. Personality and Individual Differences 41 (2006) 167–176.
  • Campbell J. D., Assanand S. & Di Paula A. (2003). “The structure of the self concept and its relation to psychological adjustment”. Journal of Personality 71 (2003) 115–140.
  • Campbell J. D., Trapnell P. D., Heine S. J. & Katz, I. M. (1996). “Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (1996) 141–156.
  • Cass V. C. (1979). “Homosexuality identity formation: a theoretical model”. Journal of Homosexuality 4 (1979) 219-235.
  • Coleman E. (1982). “Developmental stages of the coming out process”. Journal of Homosexuality 7 (1982) 31-43.
  • Ed D., Suh E. M., Lucas R. E. & Smith H. L. (1999). “Subjective being: Three decades of progress”. Psychological Bulletin 125 (1999) 276-302.
  • DasGupta B. (1992). “Perceived control and examination stress”. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior 29 (1992) 31-34.
  • De Cremer D. & Sedikides C. (2005). “Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41 (2005) 157-173.
  • Ertan C. (2009). Türkiye’de Erkeklik İmgesi ve Eşcinsel Kimliği. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi SBE. Antalya 2009.
  • Feinstein B. A., Meuwly N., Davila J., Eaton N. R. & Yoneda A. (2014). “Sexual orientation prototypicality and well-being among heterosexual and sexual minority adults’”. Archives of Sexual
  • Behavior 44 (2014) 1415–1422. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0401-4
  • George D. & Mallery P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step. A simple study guide and reference, (10. Baskı). GEN, Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Herek G. M., Gillis J. R. & Cogan J. C. (2009). “Internalized stigma among sexual minority adults: Insights from a social psychological perspective”. Journal of Counseling Psychology 56 (2009) 32.
  • Heppner P. P. & Petersen C. H. (1982). “The development and implications of a personal problem solving inventory”. Journal of Counseling Psychology 29 (1982) 66.
Toplam 22 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Cinsiyet Psikolojisi, Kişilik ve Bireysel Farklılıklar, Sosyal Psikoloji
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Gizem Akcan 0000-0003-1997-9178

Erdinç Öztürk 0000-0003-1553-2619

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 10

Kaynak Göster

APA Akcan, G., & Öztürk, E. (2020). Gay Erkeklerde Mutlak Gerçek İhtiyacı ile Problem Çözme ve Stres Belirtileri Arasındaki İlişkide Benlik Kavramının Netliğinin Aracılık Rolünün İncelenmesi. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, 10, 11-26.
Adres:
Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi
Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi
07058 Kampüs, Antalya / TÜRKİYE
E-Posta:
mjh@akdeniz.edu.tr