Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Teknostres ve İş Performansı İlişkisinde Örgütsel Sinizmin Aracılık Rolü: Öğretmenler Üzerinde Bir Çalışma

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 54, 73 - 99, 25.10.2022

Rukiye Can Yalçın Yunus Gökmen Haluk Erdem Ufuk Türen

https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2022.04.04

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, teknostres ve iş performansı arasındaki ilişkide örgütsel sinizmin aracılık rolünü incelemektir. Veriler Türkiye'de resmi ve özel okullarda görev yapan 234 öğretmenden elde edilmiştir. Çalışmada korelâsyon ve regresyon analizleri ile değişkenler arası ilişkiler ve etkileri belirlenmiş, yapısal eşitlik modeli ile de ölçeklere doğrulayıcı faktör analizi uygulanmıştır. Ayrıca, çalışmada aracılık rolü Process modülünde önyükleme testi ile incelenmiştir. Bulgular, yaygın olarak kullanılan geçerlik ve güvenirlik analiz yöntemlerinin sonuçlarıyla ölçeklerin geçerlilik ve güvenirliğinin sağlandığını göstermektedir. Bulgular, teknostres ve örgütsel sinizmin iş performansını azalttığını ve teknostresin örgütsel sinizmi önemli ölçüde artırdığını göstermektedir. Daha ileri aracılık analizi, teknostres ve iş performansı arasındaki ilişkide örgütsel sinizmin kısmi aracılık rolü olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Teknostres İş Performansı Örgütsel Sinizm

Kaynakça

  • Abraham, R. (2000), “Organizational Cynicism: Bases and Consequences”, Genetic, Social, and General, Psychology Monographs, 126(3), 269- 292.
  • Abugre, J.B. (2017), “Relations at workplace, cynicism and intention to leave: a proposed conceptual framework for organisations”, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(2), 198-216.
  • Alam, M.A. (2015), “Techno-Stress and Productivity: Survey Evidence from The Aviation Industry”, Journal of Air Transport Management, (50), 62-70.
  • Al-Fudail, M. & H. Mellar (2008), “Investigating teacher stress when using technology”, Computers and Education, 51(3), 1103-1110.
  • Alpar, R. (2013), Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Yöntemler, Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Al-Qallaf, C. (2006), “Librarians and technology in academic and research libraries in Kuwait: perceptions and effects”, Libri, 56(3), 168-179.
  • Andersson, L.M. & T.S. Bateman (1997), “Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 449-469.
  • Andersson, L.M. (1996), “Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework”, Human Relations, 49, 1395-1417.
  • Ardiansyah, D. et al. (2019), “Effect of Information Waste and Technostress on Users Satisfaction and Productivity in STMIK El Rahma Yogyakarta”, in: F.W. Wibowo (ed.), International Conference on Electronics Representation and Algorithm, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 29-30 January.
  • Arnetz, B.B. & C. Wiholm (1997), “Technological stress: psychophysiological symptoms in modern offices”, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 43(1), 35-42.
  • Arroba, T. & K. James (1990), “Reducing the cost of stress: An organisational model”, Personnel Review, 19(1), 21-27.
  • Arslan, E.T. (2012), “Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Akademik Personelinin Genel ve Örgütsel Sinizm Düzeyi”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 13(1), 12-27.
  • Arslan, M. (2018), “Organizational cynicism and employee performance: Moderating role of employee engagement”, Journal of Global Responsibility, 9(4), 415-431.
  • Ashforth, B.E. & F. Mael (1989), “Social identity theory and the organization”, Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
  • Avey, J.B. et al. (2008), “Can positive employees help organizational change? Impact of psychological capital and emotions on relevant attitudes and behaviors”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(March), 48-70.
  • Banks, G.C. et al. (2012), “(How) are emotionally exhausted employees harmful?”, International Journal of Stress Management, 19(3), 198-216.
  • Barley, S.R. (1990), “The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 61-103.
  • Baron, R.M. & D.A. Kenny (1986), “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • Barrick, M. et al. (2002), “Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 43-51.
  • Barrick, M.R. et al. (2001) “Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next?”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1-2), 9-30.
  • Bayram, A. et al. (2017), “The role of mediation of the organizational cynicism the relationship between leader-member exchange and job performance: an examination on the elementary teachers of public personnel in Central Anatolia Region”, Journal of Business and Management, 19(1), 39-47.
  • Beehr, T. (1998), “An organizational psychology meta-model of occupational stress”, in: C. Cooper (ed.), Theories of Organizational Stress (6-27), New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Beehr, T.A. & T.M. Franz (1987), “The current debate about the meaning of job stress”, Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 8(2), 5-18.
  • Bernerth, J.B. et al. (2007), “Justice, cynicism, and commitment: A study of important organizational change variables”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(3), 303-326.
  • Blau, P.M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey.
  • Boyer-Davis, S. (2019), “Technostress in Accounting Professionals: A Quantitative Examination of the Differences between Managers and Non-Managers”, Journal of Accounting and Finance, 19(2), 25-41.
  • Boyle, G.J. et al. (1995), “A structural model of the dimensions of teacher stress”, British Journal of Educational Psychology, (65), 49-67.
  • Brandes, P. & D. Das (2006), “Locating behavioral cynicism at work: Construct issues and performance implications”, Research in Occupational Stress and Well-being, 5, 233-266.
  • Brandes, P.M. (1997), “Organizational Cynicism: Its Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences”, PhD. Dissertation, University of Cincinnati, OH.
  • Brod, C. (1982), “Managing technostress: optimizing the use of computer technology”, Personnel Journal, 61(10), 753-757.
  • Brod, C. (1984), Technostress: The human cost of the computer revolution, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Brown, M. et al. (2017), “Understanding the change-cynicism cycle: the role of HR”, Human Resource Management, 56(1), 5-24.
  • Brown, S.P. & T.W. Leigh (1996), “A New Look at Psychological Climate and its Relationship to Job Involvement, Effort and Performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 358-368.
  • Bülbül, H. & Ö. Demirer (2008), “Hizmet Kalitesi Ölçüm Modelleri SERVQUAL ve SERVPERF’in Karşılaştırmalı Analizi”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (20), 181-198.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007), Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı, Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Cahapay, M.B. & N.F. Bangoc II (2021), “Technostress, Work Performance, Job Satisfaction, and Career Commitment of Teachers amid COVID-19 Crisis in the Philippines”, IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (16), 260-275.
  • Cartwright, S. & C. Cooper (1997), Managing Workplace Stress, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Cartwright, S. & N. Holmes (2006), “The meaning of work: The challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism”, Human Resource Management Review, 16(2), 199-208.
  • Çelik, M. & A. Özdemir (2016), “Çalışanların tekno-stres seviyelerinin sinizm üzerine etkisi: Bankacılık sektöründe bir araştırma”, in: A. Yalçın (ed.) Proceedings of IV. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi (256-263), 4-5 November, Adana: Çukurova University.
  • Chandra, S. et al. (2019), “Does Technostress Inhibit Employee Innovation? Examining the Linear and Curvilinear Influence of Technostress Creators”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 44(1), 299-331.
  • Chandra, S. et al. (2019), “Does Technostress Inhibit Employee Innovation? Examining the Linear and Curvilinear Influence of Technostress Creators”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, (44), 299-331.
  • Chen, P.Y. & P.E. Spector (1992), “Relationships of work stressors with aggression, withdrawal, theft and substance use: An exploratory study”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65(3), 177-184.
  • Chiaburu, D.S. et al. (2013), “Antecedents and consequences of employee organizational cynicism: A meta-analysis”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(2), 181-197.
  • Çoklar, A.N. et al. (2016a), “Investigation of Techno-Stress Levels of Teachers Who Were Included in Technology Integration Processes”, TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, (Special Issue: INTE 2016 November), 1331-1339.
  • Çoklar, A.N. et al. (2016b) “Determining the Reasons of Technostress Experienced by Teachers: A Qualitative Study”, Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 7(2), 71-96.
  • Çöl, G. (2008), “Algılanan Güçlendirmenin İşgören Performansı Üzerine Etkileri”, Dogus University Journal, 9(1), 35-46.
  • Cole, M.S. et al. (2006), “Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervisor support and psychological hardiness on employee cynicism”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 463-484.
  • Cooper, C.L. et al. (2001), Organizational Stress: A Review and Critique of Theory, Research, and Applications, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Coovert, M.D. et al. (2005), “Technology”, in: J. Barling et al. (eds.), Handbook of Work Stress (229-234), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cropanzano, R. & M.S. Mitchell (2005), “Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review”, Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
  • Davis, A. & L. Gibson (1994), “Designing employee welfare provision”, Personnel Review, 23(7) 33-45.
  • Davis, W.D. & W.L. Gardner (2004), “Perceptions of politics and organizational cynicism: An attributional and leader-member exchange perspective”, The Leadership Quarterly, 15(4), 439-465.
  • Dean, J.W. et al. (1998), “Organizational Cynicism”, Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 341-352.
  • Devi, K.R. & S.S. Rani (2016), “The impact of organizational role stress and work family conflict: diagnosis sources of difficulty at work place and job satisfaction among women in IT Sector, Chennai, Tamil Nadu”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 214-220.
  • Effiyanti, T. & G.H. Sagala (2018), “Technostress among teachers: a confirmation of its stressors and antecedent”, International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 9(2), 134-148.
  • Efilti, E. & A.N. Çoklar (2019), “Teachers' Technostress Levels as an Indicator of Their Psychological Capital Levels”, Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 413-421.
  • Erdem, H. (2016), “Stresle Başa Çıkmada İç Kontrol Odağının Yordayıcı Gücü ve Psikolojik Sermayenin Aracılık Rolü”, Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 31(78), 1-9.
  • Fornell, C. & D.F. Larcker (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Gaudioso, F. et al. (2017), “The mediating roles of strain facets and coping strategies in translating techno-stressors into adverse job outcomes”, Computers in Human Behaviour, (69), 189-196.
  • Greenglass, E.R. & R.J. Burke (2003), “Teacher stress”, in: M.F. Dollard et al. (eds.), Occupational stress in the service professions (213-236), New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Griffin, M.A. et al. (2007), “A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts”, Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347.
  • Hair, J.F. et al. (2014), Multivariate Data 7th Edition, Pearson Education Limited, USA.
  • Harper, S. (2000), Managing Stress in UK Libraries: A Realistic Guide (Electronic version), <https://www.tecnostress.it/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Managing-Technostress-in-UK-Libraries.pdf>, 10.03.2019.
  • Hunt, S.T. (1996), “Generic work behavior: An investigation into the dimensions of entry-level, hourly job performance”, Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 51-83.
  • Jackson, S. & R. Schuler. (1985), “A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings”, Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes, (36), 16-78.
  • James, M.S.L. (2005), “Antecedents and consequences of cynicism in organization: An examination of the potential positive and negative effects on school systems”, PhD. Dissertation, Tallahassee, Florida: The Florida State University.
  • Jena, R.K. (2015), “Technostress in ICT enabled collaborative learning environment: An empirical study among Indian academician”, Computers in Human Behavior, 51(B), 1116-1123.
  • Jex, S.M. & T.A. Beehr (1991), “Emerging theoretical and methodological issues in the study of work-related stress”, Research in personnel and human resources management, (9), 311-365.
  • Jimmieson, N. & D. Terry (1998), “The role of informational control in the stress strain relationship”, in: 13th Annual Conf. Soc. Indust. Organ. Psych., Dallas Texas.
  • Johari, J. et al. (2018), “Autonomy, workload, work-life balance and job performance among teachers”, International Journal of Educational Management, 32(1), 107-120.
  • Johnson, J.L. & A.M. O'Leary-Kelly (2003), “The effects of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: Not all social exchange violations are created equal”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 627-647.
  • Johnson, R.A. & D.W. Wichern (2002), Applied multivariate statistical analysis 5th Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Joo, Y.J. et al. (2016), “The effects of secondary teachers’ technostress on the intention to use technology in South Korea”, Computers & Education, 95, 114-122.
  • Kahn, R. et al. (1981), Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity, Krieger, Malabar, FL.
  • Kahn, R.L. et al. (1992), “Stress in Organizations”, in: L.M. Hough (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology Vol. 3 (571-650), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Kanter, D.L. & P.H. Mirvis (1989), The Cynical Americans: Living and working in an age of discontent and disillusionment, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Karasek, R. (1979), “Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign”, Admin. Sci. Quart., (24), 285-308.
  • Karatepe, O.M. & R.N. Ngeche (2012), “Does job embeddedness mediate the effect of work engagement on job outcomes? A study of hotel employees in Cameroon”, Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 21(4), 440-461.
  • Klassen, R.M. et al. (2009), “Teaching in the Yukon: Exploring teacher’s efficacy beliefs, stress and job satisfaction in a remote setting”, International Journal of Educational Research, 48(6), 381-394.
  • Kompier, M. (2005), “Dealing with workplace stress”, in: C.L. Cooper (ed.), Handbook of Stress Medicine and Health (349-374), London: CRC Press.
  • Kutanis, R.Ö & E. Çetinel (2010), “Adaletsizlik Algısı Sinisizmi Tetikler mi?: Bir Örnek Olay”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 26(1), 186-195.
  • Kutanis, R.Ö. & A. Dikili (2010), “Değişim Boyutuyla Örgütlerde Sinisizm”, in: D. Ergun-Özler (ed.), Örgütsel Davranışta Güncel Konular (269-285), Bursa: Ekin Yayıncılık.
  • Kyriacou, C. (2001), “Teacher Stress: Directions for future research”, Educational Review, 53(1), 27-35.
  • La Torre, G. et al. (2019), “Definition, symptoms and risk of technostress: a systematic review”, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 92(1), 13-35.
  • Lazarus, R.S. & S. Folkman (1984), Stress, appraisal and coping, New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  • Lemmergaard, J. (2009), “From administrative expert to strategic partner”, Employee Relations, 31(2), 182-196.
  • Li, L. & X. Wang (2021), “Technostress inhibitors and creators and their impacts on university teachers’ work performance in higher education”, Cognition, Technology & Work, 23(2), 315-330.
  • Lim, B. (2012), “Analysis of the elementary school teachers' needs on digital textbooks and its implications on the policy making”, Korean Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1), 317-346.
  • Luthans, F. (1995), Organisational Behaviour (7th Edition), Singapore: McGraw Hill Book Company.
  • Marchiori, D.M. et al. (2018), “Do individual characteristics influence the types of technostress reported by workers?”, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(3), 218-230.
  • Martin, M.J. (2011), “Influence of human resource practices on employee intention to quit”, Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia.
  • McGrath, J.E. (1976), “Stress and behavior in organizations”, in: M.D. Dunnette (ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1351-1395), Rand-McNally, Chicago.
  • Miles, R.H. & W.D. Perreault Jr (1976), “Organizational role conflict: Its antecedents and consequences”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 17(1), 19-44.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2021), National Education Statistics, <http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/ 2020_09/04144812_meb_ista tistikleri_orgun_egitim_2019_2020.pdf>, 01.08.2022.
  • Mirvis, P.H. & D.L. Kanter (1991), “Beyond demography: A psychographic profile of the workforce”, Human Resource Management, 30(1), 45-68.
  • Mishra, A.K. & G.M. Spreitzer (1998), “Explaining how survivors respond to downsizing: The roles of trust, empowerment, justice, and work redesign”, Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 567-588.
  • Mishra, P. & M.J. Kohler (2006), “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge”, Teachers College Record, 8(6), 1017-1054.
  • Motowidlo, S.J. & J.R. Van Scotter (1994), “Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475-480.
  • Motowidlo, S.J. (2003), “Job Performance”, in: W.C. Borman et al. (eds.), Handbook of Psychology, Vol. 12: Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (39-53), New York: Wiley.
  • Motowidlo, S.J. et al. (1997), “A Theory of Individual Difference in Task and Contextual Performance”, Human Performance, 10(2), 71-83.
  • Nafei, W. (2015), “The effects of job embeddedness on organizational cynicism and employee performance: A study on Sadat City University”, International Journal of Business Administration, 6(1), 8-25.
  • Nafei, W.A. (2013), “Examining the Relationship between Organizational Cynicism and Organizational Change: A Study from Egyptian Context”, Journal of Business Administration Research, 2(2), 1-12.
  • Onay, M. (2011), “The Effect of Emotional Intelligence and Emotional Labor on Task Performance and Contextual Performance”, Ege Academic Review, 11(4), 587-600.
  • Penado Abilleira, M. et al. (2021), “Technostress in Spanish university teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic”, Frontiers in Psychology, (12), 617650.
  • Podsakoff, P.M. et al. (2003), “Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
  • Preacher, K.J. & A.F. Hayes (2004), “SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models”, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717-731.
  • Preacher, K.J. & A.F. Hayes (2008), “Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models”, Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
  • Rafter, M. (1998), “Technostress Takes Toll on Internet Users”, Akron Beacon Journal (January), D8.
  • Ragu-Nathan, T.S. et al. (2008), “The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation”, Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417-433.
  • Reichers, A.E. et al. (1997), “Understanding and Managing Cynicism about Organizational Change”, Academy of Management Executive, 11(1), 48-59.
  • Rizzo, J.R. et al. (1970), “Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations”, Admin. Sci. Quart., (15), 150-163.
  • Robbins, S.P. & T.A. Judge (2007), Organizational Behavior (12th Edition), Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
  • Rosen, L.D. & M.M. Weil (1990), “Computers, classroom instruction, and the computerphobic university student”, Collegiate Microcomputer, 8(4), 275-283.
  • Sağır, T. & E. Oğuz (2012), “Öğretmenlere yönelik örgütsel sinizm ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi”, International Journal of Human Sciences, 9(2), 1094-1106.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K. et al. (2003), “Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures”, Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Scott, K.A. & D. Zweig (2021), “We’re in This Together: A Dyadic Approach to Organizational Cynicism, Leader-Member Exchange, and Performance”, Human Performance, 34(4), 257-270.
  • SEGE (2017), Kalkınma Ajansları Genel Müdürlüğü, SEGE Çalışmaları, <https://www.sanayi.gov.tr/merkez-birimi/b94224510b7b/sege”, 28.06.2022.
  • Sert, G. et al. (2012), “Öğretmenlerin teknoloji kullanma durumlarını inceleyen araştırmalara bir bakış: Bir içerik analizi çalışması”, Akademik Bilişim, 1(3), 1-8.
  • Sigler, T.H. & C.M. Pearson (2000), “Creating an Empowering Culture: Examining the Relationship between Organizational Culture and Perceptions of Empowerment”, Journal of Quality Management, 5(1), 27-52.
  • Stich, J.F. et al. (2018), “Electronic communication in the workplace: boon or bane?”, Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 5(1), 98-106.
  • Syvänen, A. et al. (2016), “When does the educational use of ICT become a source of technostress for Finnish teachers?”, Seminar.net - International journal of media, technology and lifelong learning, 12(2), 95-109.
  • Tarafdar M. et al. (2015), “Technostress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations”, Information Systems Journal, 25(2), 103-132.
  • Tarafdar, M. et al. (2007), “The Impact of technostress on role stress and productivity”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328.
  • Tarafdar, M. et al. (2011), “Crossing to the dark side: Examining creators, outcomes and inhibitors of technostress”, Communications of the ACM, 54(9), 113-120.
  • Trist, E.L. & K.W. Bamforth (1951), “Some social and psychological consequences of the Longwall method of coal getting”, Human Relations, 4(1), 3-38.
  • Tuna, R. et al. (2018), “The effects of organizational identification and organizational cynicism on employee performance among nurses”, International Journal of Caring Sciences, 11(3), 1707-1714.
  • Türen, U. et al. (2015), “İş Yerinde Tekno-Stres Ölçeği: Havacılık ve Bankacılık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma”, Çalışma İlişkileri Dergisi, 6(1), 1-19.
  • Wang, K. et al. (2008), “Technostress under different organizational environments: an empirical investigation”, Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 3002-3013.
  • Wanous, J.P. et al. (1994), “Organizational cynicism: An initial study”, Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 1994(1), 269-273.
  • Wanous, J.P. et al. (2000), “Cynicism about organizational change: Measurement, antecedents, and correlates”, Group and Organization Management, 25(2), 132-153.
  • Wayne, S.J. et al. (1997), “Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective”, Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111.
  • Weil, M.M. & L.D. Rosen (1999), “Don’t let technology enslave you: Learn how technostress can affect the habits of your employees and yourself”, Workforce, 78(2) 56-59.
  • Weinert, C. et al. (2019), “How do Users Respond to Technostress? An Empirical Analysis of Proactive and Reactive Coping”, in: T.X. Bui (ed.), Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (5103-5112), January 8-11, Grand Wailea, Hawaii.
  • Westman, M. & D. Eden (1996), “The inverted-U relationship between job stress and performance”, Work and Stress, 10(2), 165-173.
  • Zhao, X. et al. (2010), “Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis”, Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206.

The Mediating Role of Organisational Cynicism on the Relationship Between Technostress and Job Performance: A Research on Teachers

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 54, 73 - 99, 25.10.2022

Rukiye Can Yalçın Yunus Gökmen Haluk Erdem Ufuk Türen

https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2022.04.04

Öz

This study's primary purpose is to examine organisational cynicism's mediating role in the relationship between technostress and job performance. Data are obtained from 234 teachers working in public and private schools in Turkey. In the study, correlation and regression analyses have been performed to determine the relationships and effects between variables, and the structural equation model has been used to verify the scales of the variables. In addition, the mediation role in the study has been examined with the bootstrap test in the Process module. Findings show that the validity and reliability of the scales are ensured by the results of commonly used validity and reliability analysis methods. Additionally, technostress and organisational cynicism decrease job performance and technostress significantly increase organisational cynicism. Further mediation analysis reveals that organisational cynicism partially mediates the relationship between technostress and job performance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Technostress Job Performance Organisational Cynicism

Kaynakça

  • Abraham, R. (2000), “Organizational Cynicism: Bases and Consequences”, Genetic, Social, and General, Psychology Monographs, 126(3), 269- 292.
  • Abugre, J.B. (2017), “Relations at workplace, cynicism and intention to leave: a proposed conceptual framework for organisations”, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(2), 198-216.
  • Alam, M.A. (2015), “Techno-Stress and Productivity: Survey Evidence from The Aviation Industry”, Journal of Air Transport Management, (50), 62-70.
  • Al-Fudail, M. & H. Mellar (2008), “Investigating teacher stress when using technology”, Computers and Education, 51(3), 1103-1110.
  • Alpar, R. (2013), Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Yöntemler, Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Al-Qallaf, C. (2006), “Librarians and technology in academic and research libraries in Kuwait: perceptions and effects”, Libri, 56(3), 168-179.
  • Andersson, L.M. & T.S. Bateman (1997), “Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 449-469.
  • Andersson, L.M. (1996), “Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework”, Human Relations, 49, 1395-1417.
  • Ardiansyah, D. et al. (2019), “Effect of Information Waste and Technostress on Users Satisfaction and Productivity in STMIK El Rahma Yogyakarta”, in: F.W. Wibowo (ed.), International Conference on Electronics Representation and Algorithm, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 29-30 January.
  • Arnetz, B.B. & C. Wiholm (1997), “Technological stress: psychophysiological symptoms in modern offices”, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 43(1), 35-42.
  • Arroba, T. & K. James (1990), “Reducing the cost of stress: An organisational model”, Personnel Review, 19(1), 21-27.
  • Arslan, E.T. (2012), “Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Akademik Personelinin Genel ve Örgütsel Sinizm Düzeyi”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 13(1), 12-27.
  • Arslan, M. (2018), “Organizational cynicism and employee performance: Moderating role of employee engagement”, Journal of Global Responsibility, 9(4), 415-431.
  • Ashforth, B.E. & F. Mael (1989), “Social identity theory and the organization”, Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
  • Avey, J.B. et al. (2008), “Can positive employees help organizational change? Impact of psychological capital and emotions on relevant attitudes and behaviors”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(March), 48-70.
  • Banks, G.C. et al. (2012), “(How) are emotionally exhausted employees harmful?”, International Journal of Stress Management, 19(3), 198-216.
  • Barley, S.R. (1990), “The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 61-103.
  • Baron, R.M. & D.A. Kenny (1986), “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • Barrick, M. et al. (2002), “Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 43-51.
  • Barrick, M.R. et al. (2001) “Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next?”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1-2), 9-30.
  • Bayram, A. et al. (2017), “The role of mediation of the organizational cynicism the relationship between leader-member exchange and job performance: an examination on the elementary teachers of public personnel in Central Anatolia Region”, Journal of Business and Management, 19(1), 39-47.
  • Beehr, T. (1998), “An organizational psychology meta-model of occupational stress”, in: C. Cooper (ed.), Theories of Organizational Stress (6-27), New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Beehr, T.A. & T.M. Franz (1987), “The current debate about the meaning of job stress”, Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 8(2), 5-18.
  • Bernerth, J.B. et al. (2007), “Justice, cynicism, and commitment: A study of important organizational change variables”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(3), 303-326.
  • Blau, P.M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey.
  • Boyer-Davis, S. (2019), “Technostress in Accounting Professionals: A Quantitative Examination of the Differences between Managers and Non-Managers”, Journal of Accounting and Finance, 19(2), 25-41.
  • Boyle, G.J. et al. (1995), “A structural model of the dimensions of teacher stress”, British Journal of Educational Psychology, (65), 49-67.
  • Brandes, P. & D. Das (2006), “Locating behavioral cynicism at work: Construct issues and performance implications”, Research in Occupational Stress and Well-being, 5, 233-266.
  • Brandes, P.M. (1997), “Organizational Cynicism: Its Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences”, PhD. Dissertation, University of Cincinnati, OH.
  • Brod, C. (1982), “Managing technostress: optimizing the use of computer technology”, Personnel Journal, 61(10), 753-757.
  • Brod, C. (1984), Technostress: The human cost of the computer revolution, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Brown, M. et al. (2017), “Understanding the change-cynicism cycle: the role of HR”, Human Resource Management, 56(1), 5-24.
  • Brown, S.P. & T.W. Leigh (1996), “A New Look at Psychological Climate and its Relationship to Job Involvement, Effort and Performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 358-368.
  • Bülbül, H. & Ö. Demirer (2008), “Hizmet Kalitesi Ölçüm Modelleri SERVQUAL ve SERVPERF’in Karşılaştırmalı Analizi”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (20), 181-198.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007), Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı, Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Cahapay, M.B. & N.F. Bangoc II (2021), “Technostress, Work Performance, Job Satisfaction, and Career Commitment of Teachers amid COVID-19 Crisis in the Philippines”, IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (16), 260-275.
  • Cartwright, S. & C. Cooper (1997), Managing Workplace Stress, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Cartwright, S. & N. Holmes (2006), “The meaning of work: The challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism”, Human Resource Management Review, 16(2), 199-208.
  • Çelik, M. & A. Özdemir (2016), “Çalışanların tekno-stres seviyelerinin sinizm üzerine etkisi: Bankacılık sektöründe bir araştırma”, in: A. Yalçın (ed.) Proceedings of IV. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi (256-263), 4-5 November, Adana: Çukurova University.
  • Chandra, S. et al. (2019), “Does Technostress Inhibit Employee Innovation? Examining the Linear and Curvilinear Influence of Technostress Creators”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 44(1), 299-331.
  • Chandra, S. et al. (2019), “Does Technostress Inhibit Employee Innovation? Examining the Linear and Curvilinear Influence of Technostress Creators”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, (44), 299-331.
  • Chen, P.Y. & P.E. Spector (1992), “Relationships of work stressors with aggression, withdrawal, theft and substance use: An exploratory study”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65(3), 177-184.
  • Chiaburu, D.S. et al. (2013), “Antecedents and consequences of employee organizational cynicism: A meta-analysis”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(2), 181-197.
  • Çoklar, A.N. et al. (2016a), “Investigation of Techno-Stress Levels of Teachers Who Were Included in Technology Integration Processes”, TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, (Special Issue: INTE 2016 November), 1331-1339.
  • Çoklar, A.N. et al. (2016b) “Determining the Reasons of Technostress Experienced by Teachers: A Qualitative Study”, Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 7(2), 71-96.
  • Çöl, G. (2008), “Algılanan Güçlendirmenin İşgören Performansı Üzerine Etkileri”, Dogus University Journal, 9(1), 35-46.
  • Cole, M.S. et al. (2006), “Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervisor support and psychological hardiness on employee cynicism”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 463-484.
  • Cooper, C.L. et al. (2001), Organizational Stress: A Review and Critique of Theory, Research, and Applications, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Coovert, M.D. et al. (2005), “Technology”, in: J. Barling et al. (eds.), Handbook of Work Stress (229-234), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cropanzano, R. & M.S. Mitchell (2005), “Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review”, Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
  • Davis, A. & L. Gibson (1994), “Designing employee welfare provision”, Personnel Review, 23(7) 33-45.
  • Davis, W.D. & W.L. Gardner (2004), “Perceptions of politics and organizational cynicism: An attributional and leader-member exchange perspective”, The Leadership Quarterly, 15(4), 439-465.
  • Dean, J.W. et al. (1998), “Organizational Cynicism”, Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 341-352.
  • Devi, K.R. & S.S. Rani (2016), “The impact of organizational role stress and work family conflict: diagnosis sources of difficulty at work place and job satisfaction among women in IT Sector, Chennai, Tamil Nadu”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 214-220.
  • Effiyanti, T. & G.H. Sagala (2018), “Technostress among teachers: a confirmation of its stressors and antecedent”, International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 9(2), 134-148.
  • Efilti, E. & A.N. Çoklar (2019), “Teachers' Technostress Levels as an Indicator of Their Psychological Capital Levels”, Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 413-421.
  • Erdem, H. (2016), “Stresle Başa Çıkmada İç Kontrol Odağının Yordayıcı Gücü ve Psikolojik Sermayenin Aracılık Rolü”, Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 31(78), 1-9.
  • Fornell, C. & D.F. Larcker (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Gaudioso, F. et al. (2017), “The mediating roles of strain facets and coping strategies in translating techno-stressors into adverse job outcomes”, Computers in Human Behaviour, (69), 189-196.
  • Greenglass, E.R. & R.J. Burke (2003), “Teacher stress”, in: M.F. Dollard et al. (eds.), Occupational stress in the service professions (213-236), New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Griffin, M.A. et al. (2007), “A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts”, Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347.
  • Hair, J.F. et al. (2014), Multivariate Data 7th Edition, Pearson Education Limited, USA.
  • Harper, S. (2000), Managing Stress in UK Libraries: A Realistic Guide (Electronic version), <https://www.tecnostress.it/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Managing-Technostress-in-UK-Libraries.pdf>, 10.03.2019.
  • Hunt, S.T. (1996), “Generic work behavior: An investigation into the dimensions of entry-level, hourly job performance”, Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 51-83.
  • Jackson, S. & R. Schuler. (1985), “A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings”, Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes, (36), 16-78.
  • James, M.S.L. (2005), “Antecedents and consequences of cynicism in organization: An examination of the potential positive and negative effects on school systems”, PhD. Dissertation, Tallahassee, Florida: The Florida State University.
  • Jena, R.K. (2015), “Technostress in ICT enabled collaborative learning environment: An empirical study among Indian academician”, Computers in Human Behavior, 51(B), 1116-1123.
  • Jex, S.M. & T.A. Beehr (1991), “Emerging theoretical and methodological issues in the study of work-related stress”, Research in personnel and human resources management, (9), 311-365.
  • Jimmieson, N. & D. Terry (1998), “The role of informational control in the stress strain relationship”, in: 13th Annual Conf. Soc. Indust. Organ. Psych., Dallas Texas.
  • Johari, J. et al. (2018), “Autonomy, workload, work-life balance and job performance among teachers”, International Journal of Educational Management, 32(1), 107-120.
  • Johnson, J.L. & A.M. O'Leary-Kelly (2003), “The effects of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: Not all social exchange violations are created equal”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 627-647.
  • Johnson, R.A. & D.W. Wichern (2002), Applied multivariate statistical analysis 5th Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Joo, Y.J. et al. (2016), “The effects of secondary teachers’ technostress on the intention to use technology in South Korea”, Computers & Education, 95, 114-122.
  • Kahn, R. et al. (1981), Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity, Krieger, Malabar, FL.
  • Kahn, R.L. et al. (1992), “Stress in Organizations”, in: L.M. Hough (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology Vol. 3 (571-650), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Kanter, D.L. & P.H. Mirvis (1989), The Cynical Americans: Living and working in an age of discontent and disillusionment, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Karasek, R. (1979), “Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign”, Admin. Sci. Quart., (24), 285-308.
  • Karatepe, O.M. & R.N. Ngeche (2012), “Does job embeddedness mediate the effect of work engagement on job outcomes? A study of hotel employees in Cameroon”, Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 21(4), 440-461.
  • Klassen, R.M. et al. (2009), “Teaching in the Yukon: Exploring teacher’s efficacy beliefs, stress and job satisfaction in a remote setting”, International Journal of Educational Research, 48(6), 381-394.
  • Kompier, M. (2005), “Dealing with workplace stress”, in: C.L. Cooper (ed.), Handbook of Stress Medicine and Health (349-374), London: CRC Press.
  • Kutanis, R.Ö & E. Çetinel (2010), “Adaletsizlik Algısı Sinisizmi Tetikler mi?: Bir Örnek Olay”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 26(1), 186-195.
  • Kutanis, R.Ö. & A. Dikili (2010), “Değişim Boyutuyla Örgütlerde Sinisizm”, in: D. Ergun-Özler (ed.), Örgütsel Davranışta Güncel Konular (269-285), Bursa: Ekin Yayıncılık.
  • Kyriacou, C. (2001), “Teacher Stress: Directions for future research”, Educational Review, 53(1), 27-35.
  • La Torre, G. et al. (2019), “Definition, symptoms and risk of technostress: a systematic review”, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 92(1), 13-35.
  • Lazarus, R.S. & S. Folkman (1984), Stress, appraisal and coping, New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  • Lemmergaard, J. (2009), “From administrative expert to strategic partner”, Employee Relations, 31(2), 182-196.
  • Li, L. & X. Wang (2021), “Technostress inhibitors and creators and their impacts on university teachers’ work performance in higher education”, Cognition, Technology & Work, 23(2), 315-330.
  • Lim, B. (2012), “Analysis of the elementary school teachers' needs on digital textbooks and its implications on the policy making”, Korean Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1), 317-346.
  • Luthans, F. (1995), Organisational Behaviour (7th Edition), Singapore: McGraw Hill Book Company.
  • Marchiori, D.M. et al. (2018), “Do individual characteristics influence the types of technostress reported by workers?”, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(3), 218-230.
  • Martin, M.J. (2011), “Influence of human resource practices on employee intention to quit”, Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia.
  • McGrath, J.E. (1976), “Stress and behavior in organizations”, in: M.D. Dunnette (ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1351-1395), Rand-McNally, Chicago.
  • Miles, R.H. & W.D. Perreault Jr (1976), “Organizational role conflict: Its antecedents and consequences”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 17(1), 19-44.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2021), National Education Statistics, <http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/ 2020_09/04144812_meb_ista tistikleri_orgun_egitim_2019_2020.pdf>, 01.08.2022.
  • Mirvis, P.H. & D.L. Kanter (1991), “Beyond demography: A psychographic profile of the workforce”, Human Resource Management, 30(1), 45-68.
  • Mishra, A.K. & G.M. Spreitzer (1998), “Explaining how survivors respond to downsizing: The roles of trust, empowerment, justice, and work redesign”, Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 567-588.
  • Mishra, P. & M.J. Kohler (2006), “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge”, Teachers College Record, 8(6), 1017-1054.
  • Motowidlo, S.J. & J.R. Van Scotter (1994), “Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475-480.
  • Motowidlo, S.J. (2003), “Job Performance”, in: W.C. Borman et al. (eds.), Handbook of Psychology, Vol. 12: Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (39-53), New York: Wiley.
  • Motowidlo, S.J. et al. (1997), “A Theory of Individual Difference in Task and Contextual Performance”, Human Performance, 10(2), 71-83.
  • Nafei, W. (2015), “The effects of job embeddedness on organizational cynicism and employee performance: A study on Sadat City University”, International Journal of Business Administration, 6(1), 8-25.
  • Nafei, W.A. (2013), “Examining the Relationship between Organizational Cynicism and Organizational Change: A Study from Egyptian Context”, Journal of Business Administration Research, 2(2), 1-12.
  • Onay, M. (2011), “The Effect of Emotional Intelligence and Emotional Labor on Task Performance and Contextual Performance”, Ege Academic Review, 11(4), 587-600.
  • Penado Abilleira, M. et al. (2021), “Technostress in Spanish university teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic”, Frontiers in Psychology, (12), 617650.
  • Podsakoff, P.M. et al. (2003), “Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
  • Preacher, K.J. & A.F. Hayes (2004), “SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models”, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717-731.
  • Preacher, K.J. & A.F. Hayes (2008), “Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models”, Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
  • Rafter, M. (1998), “Technostress Takes Toll on Internet Users”, Akron Beacon Journal (January), D8.
  • Ragu-Nathan, T.S. et al. (2008), “The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation”, Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417-433.
  • Reichers, A.E. et al. (1997), “Understanding and Managing Cynicism about Organizational Change”, Academy of Management Executive, 11(1), 48-59.
  • Rizzo, J.R. et al. (1970), “Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations”, Admin. Sci. Quart., (15), 150-163.
  • Robbins, S.P. & T.A. Judge (2007), Organizational Behavior (12th Edition), Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
  • Rosen, L.D. & M.M. Weil (1990), “Computers, classroom instruction, and the computerphobic university student”, Collegiate Microcomputer, 8(4), 275-283.
  • Sağır, T. & E. Oğuz (2012), “Öğretmenlere yönelik örgütsel sinizm ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi”, International Journal of Human Sciences, 9(2), 1094-1106.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K. et al. (2003), “Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures”, Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Scott, K.A. & D. Zweig (2021), “We’re in This Together: A Dyadic Approach to Organizational Cynicism, Leader-Member Exchange, and Performance”, Human Performance, 34(4), 257-270.
  • SEGE (2017), Kalkınma Ajansları Genel Müdürlüğü, SEGE Çalışmaları, <https://www.sanayi.gov.tr/merkez-birimi/b94224510b7b/sege”, 28.06.2022.
  • Sert, G. et al. (2012), “Öğretmenlerin teknoloji kullanma durumlarını inceleyen araştırmalara bir bakış: Bir içerik analizi çalışması”, Akademik Bilişim, 1(3), 1-8.
  • Sigler, T.H. & C.M. Pearson (2000), “Creating an Empowering Culture: Examining the Relationship between Organizational Culture and Perceptions of Empowerment”, Journal of Quality Management, 5(1), 27-52.
  • Stich, J.F. et al. (2018), “Electronic communication in the workplace: boon or bane?”, Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 5(1), 98-106.
  • Syvänen, A. et al. (2016), “When does the educational use of ICT become a source of technostress for Finnish teachers?”, Seminar.net - International journal of media, technology and lifelong learning, 12(2), 95-109.
  • Tarafdar M. et al. (2015), “Technostress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations”, Information Systems Journal, 25(2), 103-132.
  • Tarafdar, M. et al. (2007), “The Impact of technostress on role stress and productivity”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328.
  • Tarafdar, M. et al. (2011), “Crossing to the dark side: Examining creators, outcomes and inhibitors of technostress”, Communications of the ACM, 54(9), 113-120.
  • Trist, E.L. & K.W. Bamforth (1951), “Some social and psychological consequences of the Longwall method of coal getting”, Human Relations, 4(1), 3-38.
  • Tuna, R. et al. (2018), “The effects of organizational identification and organizational cynicism on employee performance among nurses”, International Journal of Caring Sciences, 11(3), 1707-1714.
  • Türen, U. et al. (2015), “İş Yerinde Tekno-Stres Ölçeği: Havacılık ve Bankacılık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma”, Çalışma İlişkileri Dergisi, 6(1), 1-19.
  • Wang, K. et al. (2008), “Technostress under different organizational environments: an empirical investigation”, Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 3002-3013.
  • Wanous, J.P. et al. (1994), “Organizational cynicism: An initial study”, Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 1994(1), 269-273.
  • Wanous, J.P. et al. (2000), “Cynicism about organizational change: Measurement, antecedents, and correlates”, Group and Organization Management, 25(2), 132-153.
  • Wayne, S.J. et al. (1997), “Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective”, Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111.
  • Weil, M.M. & L.D. Rosen (1999), “Don’t let technology enslave you: Learn how technostress can affect the habits of your employees and yourself”, Workforce, 78(2) 56-59.
  • Weinert, C. et al. (2019), “How do Users Respond to Technostress? An Empirical Analysis of Proactive and Reactive Coping”, in: T.X. Bui (ed.), Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (5103-5112), January 8-11, Grand Wailea, Hawaii.
  • Westman, M. & D. Eden (1996), “The inverted-U relationship between job stress and performance”, Work and Stress, 10(2), 165-173.
  • Zhao, X. et al. (2010), “Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis”, Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206.
Toplam 135 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Rukiye Can Yalçın 0000-0003-4500-6935

Yunus Gökmen 0000-0002-6107-0577

Haluk Erdem 0000-0002-1980-9075

Ufuk Türen 0000-0002-8729-0690

Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Ekim 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 24 Kasım 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 54

Kaynak Göster

APA Can Yalçın, R., Gökmen, Y., Erdem, H., Türen, U. (2022). The Mediating Role of Organisational Cynicism on the Relationship Between Technostress and Job Performance: A Research on Teachers. Sosyoekonomi, 30(54), 73-99. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2022.04.04
AMA Can Yalçın R, Gökmen Y, Erdem H, Türen U. The Mediating Role of Organisational Cynicism on the Relationship Between Technostress and Job Performance: A Research on Teachers. Sosyoekonomi. Ekim 2022;30(54):73-99. doi:10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2022.04.04
Chicago Can Yalçın, Rukiye, Yunus Gökmen, Haluk Erdem, ve Ufuk Türen. “The Mediating Role of Organisational Cynicism on the Relationship Between Technostress and Job Performance: A Research on Teachers”. Sosyoekonomi 30, sy. 54 (Ekim 2022): 73-99. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2022.04.04.
EndNote Can Yalçın R, Gökmen Y, Erdem H, Türen U (01 Ekim 2022) The Mediating Role of Organisational Cynicism on the Relationship Between Technostress and Job Performance: A Research on Teachers. Sosyoekonomi 30 54 73–99.
IEEE R. Can Yalçın, Y. Gökmen, H. Erdem, ve U. Türen, “The Mediating Role of Organisational Cynicism on the Relationship Between Technostress and Job Performance: A Research on Teachers”, Sosyoekonomi, c. 30, sy. 54, ss. 73–99, 2022, doi: 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2022.04.04.
ISNAD Can Yalçın, Rukiye vd. “The Mediating Role of Organisational Cynicism on the Relationship Between Technostress and Job Performance: A Research on Teachers”. Sosyoekonomi 30/54 (Ekim 2022), 73-99. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2022.04.04.
JAMA Can Yalçın R, Gökmen Y, Erdem H, Türen U. The Mediating Role of Organisational Cynicism on the Relationship Between Technostress and Job Performance: A Research on Teachers. Sosyoekonomi. 2022;30:73–99.
MLA Can Yalçın, Rukiye vd. “The Mediating Role of Organisational Cynicism on the Relationship Between Technostress and Job Performance: A Research on Teachers”. Sosyoekonomi, c. 30, sy. 54, 2022, ss. 73-99, doi:10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2022.04.04.
Vancouver Can Yalçın R, Gökmen Y, Erdem H, Türen U. The Mediating Role of Organisational Cynicism on the Relationship Between Technostress and Job Performance: A Research on Teachers. Sosyoekonomi. 2022;30(54):73-99.
 Kapak Resmi İndir