Please organize your manuscript prior to application in accordance with the UASBD Manuscript Template. UASBD uses the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th edition as a citation and referencing guide. Please see APA 6th edition for more information.
Submission Preparation Checklist:
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
• The submission has not been previously published in any other journal, nor submitted to another journal for publication consideration.
• The submission is original and written by the stated author(s).
• The submission is written either in Turkish or English. Manuscript written in English has to have  max. 300 words abstract followed by 3-5 keywords. The article should be written with 1.5 line spacing.
• The submission should not exceed 20.000 words (including abstract and bibliography).

• The submission file is in MS Word (.doc or .docx) format.

• Proofreading has been performed.
• Authors' names, orcid, institutions and address information should not be excluded in the first submission text.
Documents to be uploaded to the system:
During the first submission, the following files must be uploaded to the system:
1. Maximum 20.000 words, Turkish or English full-text article formatted according to the UASBD Manuscript Template. 
2. Ethical Declaration Form: If the study requires ethics committee approval, the relevant document (s) should be attached to the back of this form (as the 2nd and 3rd page) and uploaded to the system as a single PDF file. If a personal data collection tool or a copyrighted image is used, the required usage permission documents must be attached to this form as well.
3. Similarity report should not be more than %20 (The similarity report of the article should be obtained using İntihal.net or IThenticate services and this report should be uploaded to the system during the first application)
4. For the articles accepted for publication after the peer-review process, the following files must be uploaded to the system:
Guidelines for publication reviews:

Review works should also be formatted in accordance with the UASBD Manuscript Template in terms of layout and format, but sections and sub-titles can be edited by the authors in accordance with the content.

Bibliography Writing Examples
Ahbab, Y. (2017). “Kalkandelen Para Vakıfları.“ Journal of Ottoman Civilization Studies, 3(5),49-71.
URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/osmed/issue/28672/309239 10.03.2021.
Akgündüz, A. (2009). “Shari’ah Courts and Shari’ah Records: The Application of Islamic Law in the
Ottoman State.” Islamic Law and Society, 16 (2), 202–230.
Arendt, H. (1992). Vita activa oder Vom tätigen Leben. München: Piper.
Baldwin, D.A. (1971). “Money and Power.” The Journal of Polities (33): 578-614.
Barkey, K. (1996b). “In different times: Scheduling and social control in the Ottoman Empire, 1550 to
1650.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 38(3),460–483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500020028 10.03.2021.
Cengiz A. (2019). “Yeni Vakıfların İşlevselliği: Seçilmiş Vakıflar İçin bir İnceleme,” Akademi Sosyal
Bilimler Dergisi, 7(20),58-81. URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/asbider/issue/54336/737844 10.03.2021.
Durkheim, E. (1981). Die elementaren Formen des religiösen Lebens. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Faroqhi, S. (1981). Der Bektaschi–Orden in Anatolien: vom späten fünfzehnten Jahrhundert bis
1826. Wien: Verlag des Institutes für Orientalistik der Universität Wien.
Habermas, J. (1981a). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Band I: Handlungsrationalität und
gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (1981b). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Band II: Zur Kritik der
funktionalistischen Vernunft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (1991c). Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (1998d). Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des
demokratischen Rechtsstaates. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (1999e). Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie. Frankfurt am
Main.
Habermas, J. (2013f). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der
bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Heper, M. (1980). “Center and periphery in the Ottoman Empire: with special reference to the
nineteenth century.” International political science review, 1(1),81–105. URL: www.jstor.org/stable/1600742 10.03.2021.
Karpat, K. H. (2006b). Osmanlı’da Degisim, Modernlesme ve Uluslaşma. Ankara: İmge.
Karpat, K. H. (2009c). Osmanlı’dan Günümüze Elitler ve Din. İstanbul: Timaş.
Kayaoğlu, İ. (1978). “Vakfın Menşei Hakkındaki Görüşler.” Vakıflar Dergisi, (11),49-55. URL:
http://hdl.handle.net/11352/1146 10.03.2021.
Köprülü, M. F. (1938). “Vakıf Müessesesi ve Vakıf vesikalarının tarihi ehemiyeti.” Vakıflar Dergisi,
(1),1–6.
Lewis, B. (1937). “The Islamic Guilds.” The Economic History Review, 8(1),20–37. URL:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–0289.1937.tb01703.x 10.03.2021.
Matuz, J. (2010). Das Osmanische Reich: Grundlinien seiner Geschichte. Darmstadt: Primus Verlag.
Mead, G. H. (1913). “The Social Self.” Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods,
(10), 374-380.
Morgan, C. (2001): “Islam and Civil Society: The Waqf.” The Good Society, 10(1),21–24.URL:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20710998 10.03.2021.
Mundy, M. and Smith, R. S. (2007). Governing property, making the modern state: law, administration
, and production in Ottoman Syria. London: Tauris.
Nizri, M. (2015). “Defining Village Boundaries at the Time of the Introduction of the Malikane System:
The Struggle of the Ottoman State for Reaffirming Ownership of the Land.” Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association, 2(1),37-57. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/jottturstuass.2.1.37 10.03.2021.
Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. London: Routledge.
Rohe, M. (2013). Das islamische Recht: eine Einführung. München: Beck.
Rumpf, C. (1996). Das türkische Verfassungssystem: Einführung mit vollständigem Verfassungstext.
Harrassowitz Verlag: Wiesbaden.
Sadat, D. R. (1972). “Rumeli Ayanları: The eighteenth century.” The journal of modern history, 44(3),346–363.
Saraçoğlu, M. S. (2015). “Economic Interventionism, Islamic Law and Provincial Government in the
Ottoman Empire.” Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association, 2(1),59-84. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/jottturstuass.2.1.59 10.03.2021.
Uzunçarşılı, İ. H. (1941). “Gazi Orhan Bey Vakfiyesi.” Belleten, 5(19):227-288. URL:
https://belleten.gov.tr/tam-metin-pdf/665/tur 10.03.2021.
Van Leeuwen, R. (1999). Waqfs and Urban Structures: The Case of Ottoman Damascus. Leiden: Brill.
Weber, M. (1980a). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen:
Mohr.
Weber, M. (1985b). „Die ‚Objektivität’ sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis.“ In:
Winckelmann, Johannes (Hrsg./Ed.): Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre (p. 146-214). Tübingen: Mohr.
Weber, M. (1986c). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie. Tübingen: Mohr.
Weber, M. (1988d). Gesammelte politische Schriften. Tübingen: Mohr.