Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

JAPONYA’NIN FİLİPİNLER SİYASETİ (1868-1912)

Yıl 2020, , 67 - 84, 28.04.2020
https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.642757

Öz

Japonya ve Filipinler arasındaki ilişkiler Sengoku Dönemi’ne kadar dayanmaktadır. Ancak Japonya’nın Sakoku Dönemi’ne girmesi ile ikili ilişkiler sekteye uğramış ve ilişkilerin yeniden başlaması için de Meiji Dönemi’ne kadar beklemek gerekmiştir. Bu bakımdan Meiji Dönemi, hem ilişkilerin yeniden düzelmesi hem de resmi anlamda ilişkilerin başlaması açısından önemlidir. Diğer taraftan bize göre bu dönemin bir diğer önemi ise, Japonya’nın 1941 yılında Filipinlere yaptığı çıkartmanın temellerinin bu döneme kadar dayanıyor olmasıdır. Ancak Türkçe literatüre bakıldığında konuyla ilgili yeterince çalışma olmadığı görülmüştür. Bu nedenle Meiji Dönemi’ndeki Japonya’nın Filipinlere yönelik ilgisi ve karşılıklı ilişkiler çalışmanın konusu olarak belirlenmiş, dönem entelektüellerinin yazdıkları üzerinden II. Dünya Savaşı’ndaki Japonya’nın Filipinlere yönelik işgalci siyasetinin temellerinin bu dönemde atılıp atılmadığı tartışılmıştır. 

Kaynakça

  • ADACHI, Hiroaki (2011), Higashi Ajia Kingendaishi (東アジア近現代通史), Cilt 4, Tokyo, Iwanami.ASAO, Naohiro (2008), “The Sixteenth-Century Unification”, Ed. John Whitney Hall ve Marius B. Jansen, The Cambridge History of Japan, Cilt 4, İngiltere, Cambridge University Press, ss. 40-96.ATSUSHIRŌ, Ohata (1991), “Daitōa Sensō Izen Nanshinron no Keifu (大東亜戦争以前南進論の系譜)”, Ed. Yano Tooru, Tōnan Ajia to Nihon (東南アジアと日本), Cilt 10, Tokyo, Kōbunsha, ss. 33-48.CLULOW, Adam (2013), “Like Lambs in Japan and Devils outside Their Land: Diplomacy, Violence and Japanese Merchants in Southeast Asia”, Journal of World History, Cilt 24, Sayı 2, ss. 355-358.DÜNDAR, Ali Merthan (2011), Panislamizm’den Büyük Asyacılığa Osmanlı İmparatorluğu, Japonya ve Orta Asya, Ankara, Ötüken Yayıncılık.ELSBREE, Willard H.(1953), Japan’s Role in Southeast Asian Nationalist Movements, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.GOODMAN, Grant K. (1998), “Filipino Secret Agents, 1896 – 1910”, Philippine Studies, Cilt 46, Sayı 3, ss. 376-387.HAJIME, Shimizu (1990), “Senkanki Nihon. Keizaiteki Nanshin no Shisōteki Haikei (戦間期日本、経済的南進の思想的背景)”, Ed. Ian Brown, Sugiyama Shinya, Senkanki Tōnan Ajia no Keizaimasatsu (戦間期東南アジアの経済摩擦), Tokyo, Dobunkan, ss. 14-44.HASHIYA, Hiroshi (1986), “1930nendai Zenhanki Firipin ni taisuru Nihon no Keizaiteki Shinshutsu (1930年代前半期フィリピンに対する日本の経済的進出)”, Ed. Hajime Shimizu, Ryōtaisenkanki Nihon . Tōnan Ajia Kankei no Shosō (両大戦間期日本・東南アジア関係の諸相), Tokyo, Ajia Keizai Kenkyūjo, ss. 119-154.HAYASE, Shinzō (1985), “American Colonial Policy and the Japanese Abaca Industry in Davao, 1898 – 1941”, Philippine Studies, Cilt 33, Sayı 4, ss. 505-517.HAYASE, Shinzō (1986), “Bengetto Dōrokōjikō (ベンゲット道路工事考)”, Nanpō Bunka, 13, ss. 71-103.HAYASE, Shinzō (1989), “Diplomats of Meiji Japan in the Philippines”, Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society, Cilt 17, Sayı 4, ss. 290-308.HAYASE, Shinzō (1989), Bengetto Imin no Kyozō to Jitsuzō (ベンゲット移民の虚像と実像), Tokyo, Dōbunkan.HAYASE, Shinzō (1996), “Meijiki Nanshinron to Daitōakyōeiken (明治期南進論と大東亜共栄圏)”, Minami Taiheiyō Kaiiki Chōsa Kenkyuū Hōkoku (南太平洋海域調査研究報告), 29, ss. 19-28.HAYASE, Shinzō (1999), “Japan and the Philippines”, Philippine Studies, Cilt 47, Sayı 1, ss. 30-47.HAYASE, Shinzō (2012), Firipin Kingendaishi naka no Nihonjin (フィリピン近現代史なかの日本人), Tokyo, Tokyo Daigaku Shuppan.HAYASE, Shinzō (2014), Japanese in Modern Philippine History, WIAPS Research Series No 5, Waseda University, Waseda.HILDRETH, Richard (1855), Japan As It Was And Is, New York, Philips Samspson and Company.HIROSHI, Shimizu, HITOSHI, Hirakawa (1998), Karayukisan to Keizaishinsutsu (からゆきさんと経済進出), Tokyo, Komonzu.HONJŌ, Eijirō (1942), Senkakusha no Nanpō Keiei (先覚者の南方経営), Tokyo, Nippon Hōsō Shuppan Kyōkai.HUFF, Gregg (2007), “Financial Transition in Pre-World War II Japan and Southeast Asia”, Financial History Review, Cilt 14, Sayı 2, ss. 149-175.JUNZO, Lida (1991), Japan’s Relations with Independent Siam up to 1933: Prelude to Pan-Asian Solidarity, Doktora Tezi, Bristol University, İngiltere.MATSUSHIMA, Yasukatsa (2007), Mikuroneshia ― Chiisana Shimajima no Jiritsu e no Chōsen (ミクロネシア―小さな島々の自立への挑戦), Tokyo, Waseda Daigaku Shuppan.MATTHIESSEN, Sven (2016), Japanese Pan-Asianism and the Philippines from the Late Nineteenth Century to the End of World War II, Boston, Brill.MEYER, Milton W. (2009), Japan A Concise History, İngiltere, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.NISHIOKA, Kaori (1997), Shingapo-ru no Nihonjin Shakaishi (シンガポールの日本人社会史), Tokyo, Kalmia.NORMAN, Herbert E. (1944), “The Genyōsha: A Study in the Origins Of Japanese Imperalism”, Pacific Affairs, Cilt 17, Sayı 3, ss. 261-284.SANIEL, Josefa M. (1963), “Four Japanese: Their Plans for the Expansion of Japan to the Philippines”, Journal of Southeast Asian History, Cilt 4, Sayı 2, ss. 1-12.SANIEL, Josefa M. (2006), “Four Japanese: Their Plans for The Expansion of Japan to The Philippines”, Ed. Mark Caprio, Matsuda Kōichirō, Japan and The Pacific 1540-1920: Threat and Opportunity, İngiltere, Routledge.SEIICHI, Iwao (1962), Shuinsen to Nihonmachi (朱印船と日本町), Tokyo, Shibundō.SETSUHO, Ikehata (2003), “Japan and the Philippines, 1885 – 1905: Mutual Images and Interests”, Ed. Ikehata Setsuho, Lydia Yu-Jose, Philippines – Japan Relations, Manila, Ateneo De Manila University Press.SHŪSAKU, Tanaka (1942), “Hōjin no Nanpōken Ninshiki to Nanshinron no Hatten (邦人の南方圏認識と南進論の発展)”, Chōsa Kenkyū (調査研究), Cilt 79, ss. 1-13.STOCKWIN, Arthur, TAMURA, Keiko (1977), “Karayuki-san: Japanese Prostitutes in Australia, 1887 – 1916”, Historical Studies, Cilt 17, Sayı 69, ss. 323-488.SUGANUMA, Teifū (1943), Shin Nihon no Tonan Yume (新日本の図南の夢), Tokyo, Iwanami.TOKUSHIRŌ, Ohata (1978), “Nanshin no Shisō to Seisaku no Keifu (南進の思想と政策の系譜)”, Kindai Nihon no Tōnan Ajiakan (近代日本の東南アジア観),Tokyo, Ajia Keizai Kenkyūjo, ss. 1-27.TORAJI, Irie (1943), Meiji Nanshinshikō (明治南進史稿), Tokyo, Idashoten.WADA, Motoe Terami (1986), “Karayuki-san of Manila: 1890 – 1920”, Philippine Studies, Cilt 34, Sayı 3YANAIHARA, Tadao (2008), Teikokushugika no Taiwan (帝国主義下の台湾), Tokyo, Iwanami.YANO, Tooru (1980), Tōnan Ajia Sekai no Ronri (東南アジア世界の論理), Tokyo, Chūōkōronsha.YOSHIKAWA, Toshiharu (1992), Kingendaishi no naka no Nihon to Tōnan Ajia (近現代史のなかの日本と東南アジア), Tokyo, Tokyo Shoseki, 1992.YOSHIKAWA, Yoko (1980), “Beiryōge Manira no Shoki Nihonjin Shōgyō, 1898 - 1920: Tagawa Moritarō no Nanpō (米領下マニラの初期日本人商業, 1898-1920:田川森太郎の南方関与)”, Japanese Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Cilt 18, Sayı 3, ss. 387-421.YOSHIKAWA, Yoko (1995), “Jose M. Tagawa and the Japanese Commercial Sector in Manila, 1898-1920”, Philippine Studies, Cilt 43, Sayı 2, ss. 162-194.YU-JOSE, Lydia N. (1998), “Turn of the Century Emigration: Filipinos to Hawaii, Japanese to the Philippines”, Philippine Studies, Cilt 46, Sayı 1, ss. 89-103.YU-JOSE, Lydia N. (1999), Japan Views the Phillippines 1900 - 1944, Manila, Ateneo de Manila University Press.

JAPAN’S POLICY TOWARD PHILIPPINES (1868-1912)

Yıl 2020, , 67 - 84, 28.04.2020
https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.642757

Öz

The relations between Japan and Philippines date back to the Sengoku Period. However, because of the Sakoku Period, bilateral relations were interrupted and it was necessary to wait until the Meiji Period for restarting relations. In this respect, the Meiji Period is important both in terms of the recovery of relations and the beginning of formal relations between Japan and Philippines. On the other hand, another important point of this period for Turkey is that in 1941 Japan’s occupation of the Philippines was based on this period. However, it has been seen that this issue has not been adequately addressed in the Turkish literature. So Japan’s interest in the Philippines during the Meiji Period and mutual relations have been identified as the subject of this study. In this study, it has been discussed that whether it had been laid the basis of the occupation policy of Japan towards the Philippines in the Meiji Period by the writings of the Meiji intellectuals. 

Kaynakça

  • ADACHI, Hiroaki (2011), Higashi Ajia Kingendaishi (東アジア近現代通史), Cilt 4, Tokyo, Iwanami.ASAO, Naohiro (2008), “The Sixteenth-Century Unification”, Ed. John Whitney Hall ve Marius B. Jansen, The Cambridge History of Japan, Cilt 4, İngiltere, Cambridge University Press, ss. 40-96.ATSUSHIRŌ, Ohata (1991), “Daitōa Sensō Izen Nanshinron no Keifu (大東亜戦争以前南進論の系譜)”, Ed. Yano Tooru, Tōnan Ajia to Nihon (東南アジアと日本), Cilt 10, Tokyo, Kōbunsha, ss. 33-48.CLULOW, Adam (2013), “Like Lambs in Japan and Devils outside Their Land: Diplomacy, Violence and Japanese Merchants in Southeast Asia”, Journal of World History, Cilt 24, Sayı 2, ss. 355-358.DÜNDAR, Ali Merthan (2011), Panislamizm’den Büyük Asyacılığa Osmanlı İmparatorluğu, Japonya ve Orta Asya, Ankara, Ötüken Yayıncılık.ELSBREE, Willard H.(1953), Japan’s Role in Southeast Asian Nationalist Movements, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.GOODMAN, Grant K. (1998), “Filipino Secret Agents, 1896 – 1910”, Philippine Studies, Cilt 46, Sayı 3, ss. 376-387.HAJIME, Shimizu (1990), “Senkanki Nihon. Keizaiteki Nanshin no Shisōteki Haikei (戦間期日本、経済的南進の思想的背景)”, Ed. Ian Brown, Sugiyama Shinya, Senkanki Tōnan Ajia no Keizaimasatsu (戦間期東南アジアの経済摩擦), Tokyo, Dobunkan, ss. 14-44.HASHIYA, Hiroshi (1986), “1930nendai Zenhanki Firipin ni taisuru Nihon no Keizaiteki Shinshutsu (1930年代前半期フィリピンに対する日本の経済的進出)”, Ed. Hajime Shimizu, Ryōtaisenkanki Nihon . Tōnan Ajia Kankei no Shosō (両大戦間期日本・東南アジア関係の諸相), Tokyo, Ajia Keizai Kenkyūjo, ss. 119-154.HAYASE, Shinzō (1985), “American Colonial Policy and the Japanese Abaca Industry in Davao, 1898 – 1941”, Philippine Studies, Cilt 33, Sayı 4, ss. 505-517.HAYASE, Shinzō (1986), “Bengetto Dōrokōjikō (ベンゲット道路工事考)”, Nanpō Bunka, 13, ss. 71-103.HAYASE, Shinzō (1989), “Diplomats of Meiji Japan in the Philippines”, Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society, Cilt 17, Sayı 4, ss. 290-308.HAYASE, Shinzō (1989), Bengetto Imin no Kyozō to Jitsuzō (ベンゲット移民の虚像と実像), Tokyo, Dōbunkan.HAYASE, Shinzō (1996), “Meijiki Nanshinron to Daitōakyōeiken (明治期南進論と大東亜共栄圏)”, Minami Taiheiyō Kaiiki Chōsa Kenkyuū Hōkoku (南太平洋海域調査研究報告), 29, ss. 19-28.HAYASE, Shinzō (1999), “Japan and the Philippines”, Philippine Studies, Cilt 47, Sayı 1, ss. 30-47.HAYASE, Shinzō (2012), Firipin Kingendaishi naka no Nihonjin (フィリピン近現代史なかの日本人), Tokyo, Tokyo Daigaku Shuppan.HAYASE, Shinzō (2014), Japanese in Modern Philippine History, WIAPS Research Series No 5, Waseda University, Waseda.HILDRETH, Richard (1855), Japan As It Was And Is, New York, Philips Samspson and Company.HIROSHI, Shimizu, HITOSHI, Hirakawa (1998), Karayukisan to Keizaishinsutsu (からゆきさんと経済進出), Tokyo, Komonzu.HONJŌ, Eijirō (1942), Senkakusha no Nanpō Keiei (先覚者の南方経営), Tokyo, Nippon Hōsō Shuppan Kyōkai.HUFF, Gregg (2007), “Financial Transition in Pre-World War II Japan and Southeast Asia”, Financial History Review, Cilt 14, Sayı 2, ss. 149-175.JUNZO, Lida (1991), Japan’s Relations with Independent Siam up to 1933: Prelude to Pan-Asian Solidarity, Doktora Tezi, Bristol University, İngiltere.MATSUSHIMA, Yasukatsa (2007), Mikuroneshia ― Chiisana Shimajima no Jiritsu e no Chōsen (ミクロネシア―小さな島々の自立への挑戦), Tokyo, Waseda Daigaku Shuppan.MATTHIESSEN, Sven (2016), Japanese Pan-Asianism and the Philippines from the Late Nineteenth Century to the End of World War II, Boston, Brill.MEYER, Milton W. (2009), Japan A Concise History, İngiltere, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.NISHIOKA, Kaori (1997), Shingapo-ru no Nihonjin Shakaishi (シンガポールの日本人社会史), Tokyo, Kalmia.NORMAN, Herbert E. (1944), “The Genyōsha: A Study in the Origins Of Japanese Imperalism”, Pacific Affairs, Cilt 17, Sayı 3, ss. 261-284.SANIEL, Josefa M. (1963), “Four Japanese: Their Plans for the Expansion of Japan to the Philippines”, Journal of Southeast Asian History, Cilt 4, Sayı 2, ss. 1-12.SANIEL, Josefa M. (2006), “Four Japanese: Their Plans for The Expansion of Japan to The Philippines”, Ed. Mark Caprio, Matsuda Kōichirō, Japan and The Pacific 1540-1920: Threat and Opportunity, İngiltere, Routledge.SEIICHI, Iwao (1962), Shuinsen to Nihonmachi (朱印船と日本町), Tokyo, Shibundō.SETSUHO, Ikehata (2003), “Japan and the Philippines, 1885 – 1905: Mutual Images and Interests”, Ed. Ikehata Setsuho, Lydia Yu-Jose, Philippines – Japan Relations, Manila, Ateneo De Manila University Press.SHŪSAKU, Tanaka (1942), “Hōjin no Nanpōken Ninshiki to Nanshinron no Hatten (邦人の南方圏認識と南進論の発展)”, Chōsa Kenkyū (調査研究), Cilt 79, ss. 1-13.STOCKWIN, Arthur, TAMURA, Keiko (1977), “Karayuki-san: Japanese Prostitutes in Australia, 1887 – 1916”, Historical Studies, Cilt 17, Sayı 69, ss. 323-488.SUGANUMA, Teifū (1943), Shin Nihon no Tonan Yume (新日本の図南の夢), Tokyo, Iwanami.TOKUSHIRŌ, Ohata (1978), “Nanshin no Shisō to Seisaku no Keifu (南進の思想と政策の系譜)”, Kindai Nihon no Tōnan Ajiakan (近代日本の東南アジア観),Tokyo, Ajia Keizai Kenkyūjo, ss. 1-27.TORAJI, Irie (1943), Meiji Nanshinshikō (明治南進史稿), Tokyo, Idashoten.WADA, Motoe Terami (1986), “Karayuki-san of Manila: 1890 – 1920”, Philippine Studies, Cilt 34, Sayı 3YANAIHARA, Tadao (2008), Teikokushugika no Taiwan (帝国主義下の台湾), Tokyo, Iwanami.YANO, Tooru (1980), Tōnan Ajia Sekai no Ronri (東南アジア世界の論理), Tokyo, Chūōkōronsha.YOSHIKAWA, Toshiharu (1992), Kingendaishi no naka no Nihon to Tōnan Ajia (近現代史のなかの日本と東南アジア), Tokyo, Tokyo Shoseki, 1992.YOSHIKAWA, Yoko (1980), “Beiryōge Manira no Shoki Nihonjin Shōgyō, 1898 - 1920: Tagawa Moritarō no Nanpō (米領下マニラの初期日本人商業, 1898-1920:田川森太郎の南方関与)”, Japanese Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Cilt 18, Sayı 3, ss. 387-421.YOSHIKAWA, Yoko (1995), “Jose M. Tagawa and the Japanese Commercial Sector in Manila, 1898-1920”, Philippine Studies, Cilt 43, Sayı 2, ss. 162-194.YU-JOSE, Lydia N. (1998), “Turn of the Century Emigration: Filipinos to Hawaii, Japanese to the Philippines”, Philippine Studies, Cilt 46, Sayı 1, ss. 89-103.YU-JOSE, Lydia N. (1999), Japan Views the Phillippines 1900 - 1944, Manila, Ateneo de Manila University Press.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Emine Sicim Kaplan 0000-0002-9328-1192

Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Nisan 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020

Kaynak Göster

APA Sicim Kaplan, E. (2020). JAPONYA’NIN FİLİPİNLER SİYASETİ (1868-1912). Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(19), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.642757